`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`14 Civ. 2396 (PGG-SN)
`
`14 Civ. 9558 (PGG-SN)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`NETWORK-1 TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`GOOGLE LLC and YOUTUBE, LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DECLARATION OF AMY E. HAYDEN IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF NETWORK-1
`TECHNOLOGIES, INC.’S OBJECTIONS TO THE MAGISTRATE’S ORDER
`STRIKING PORTIONS OF ITS EXPERT’S SUPPLEMENTAL EXPERT REPORT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:14-cv-02396-PGG-SN Document 287-1 Filed 11/01/22 Page 2 of 2
`
`I, Amy E. Hayden, declare as follows:
`
`
`
`1.
`
`I am an attorney with Russ, August & Kabat, and counsel for Network-1
`
`Technologies, Inc. in the above-captioned cases. I have personal knowledge of the facts stated
`
`herein, and I could and would competently testify to them if asked to as a witness.
`
`2.
`
`Attached as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of the document produced in these
`
`cases with beginning Bates number LEONARD_0000439, entitled Form 10-K Network-1
`
`Technologies, Inc.
`
`3.
`
`Attached as Exhibit B is a true and correct copy of the transcript of the hearing before
`
`the Magistrate Judge concerning Defendants’ motion to strike portions of Network-1’s
`
`supplemental expert report, dated October 6, 2022.
`
`4.
`
`Attached as Exhibit C is a true and correct copy of a redacted excerpt from the Expert
`
`Rebuttal Report of Dr. Gregory K. Leonard, served on February 14, 2020 in the above-captioned cases.
`
`The redactions were applied pursuant to the Court’s Individual Practice II.A to remove sensitive
`
`third-party information that is not necessary or relevant to Network-1’s objections to the Magistrate’s
`
`Order.
`
`
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury that the forgoing is true and correct. Executed this 28th
`
`day of October 2022 at Rancho Mirage, California.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`s/ Amy E. Hayden
`Amy E. Hayden
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`