throbber
Case 1:14-cv-02396-PGG-SN Document 249-9 Filed 04/07/21 Page 1 of 3
`
`Exhibit I
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-02396-PGG-SN Document 249-9 Filed 04/07/21 Page 2 of 3

`

`
`
`

`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
`SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 


`

`
`Plaintiff, 
`
`NETWORK‐1 TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 



`vs. 

`GOOGLE LLC AND YOUTUBE, LLC, 


`
`Defendants. 
`








`

`

`
`Case No. 1:14‐CV‐02396‐PGG‐SN 
`Case No. 1:14‐CV‐09558‐PGG‐SN 




`




`Expert Rebuttal Report of Dr. Gregory K. Leonard 
`
`Confidential Outside Counsel Only 
`Prosecution/Acquisition Bar Materials 


`



`

`

`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-02396-PGG-SN Document 249-9 Filed 04/07/21 Page 3 of 3
`Confidential Outside Counsel Only 
`Prosecution/Acquisition Bar Materials 
`
`
`Table 1.   Summary of Costs Google Would Have Incurred to Move Match System Outside of the US 

`
`  
`

`
`d. Additional Considerations 
`

`
`88.
`The above calculations provide a conservative estimate on the total cost to 
`YouTube of a design‐around that it would have been able to implement at the time of each 
`hypothetical negotiation, and which therefore acts as an upper bound on what it would have 
`been willing to pay during the hypothetical negotiation.   
`
`89.
`I understand that Network‐1’s experts (Mr. Kinrich and Dr. Mitzenmacher) have 
`claimed that implementing the non‐infringing alternative of moving Content ID components 
`outside of the United States would not have been considered a viable alternative.  Mr. Kinrich 
`appears to assume that, in order to avoid infringement of the Patents‐in‐Suit, YouTube would 
`have to move the entire Content ID process abroad.  Mr. Kinrich asserts that moving servers 
`abroad would result in a reduction in quality (e.g., latency, reliability, and other adverse 
`issues)—though he does not evaluate the economic value of the claimed quality reduction.197  
`He then defers to Dr. Mitzenmacher’s opinion that there “are likely significant resource and 
`performance costs to this alternative,” and that therefore this is not a viable alternative.198  As I 
`discuss in the rebuttal section, Mr. Kinrich fails to consider, as an economic matter, the next‐
`
`                                                       
`197   Kinrich Report, ¶ 33. 
`198   Kinrich Report, ¶ 33. 
`
`
`
`46 
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket