`
`Exhibit J
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:14-cv-02396-PGG-SN Document 249-10 Filed 04/07/21 Page 2 of 4
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
`
`NETWORK-I TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`- against-
`
`14 Civ. 2396 (PGG)
`
`GOOGLE, INC., and YOUTUBE, LLC,
`
`Defendants.
`
`;PLAINTIFF NETWORK-l TECIINOLOGIES, INC.'S FIRST SE'IQF REQUESTS FOR
`PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS AND THINGS FROM DEFENDANTS
`
`Pursuant to Rules 26 and 34 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Network-l
`
`Technologies, Inc. ("Network-l ") serves its First Set of Requests for Production of Documents
`
`and Things on Defendants Google, Inc. and YouTube, LLC (collectively "Defendants" or
`
`"Google"), as follows:
`
`I.
`
`INSTRUCTIONS AND DEFINITIONS
`
`A.
`
`INSTRUCTIONS
`
`1.
`
`Whenever an objection is asserted to a particular request or portion thereof, please
`
`produce all responsive documents or parts thereof that are not subject to the objection. Similarly,
`
`wherever a document is not produced in full, please state with particularity the reason or reasons
`
`it is not being produced in full, and describe, to the best of your knowledge, information and
`
`belief and with as much particularity as possible, those portions of the document which are not
`
`produced.
`
`
`
`Case 1:14-cv-02396-PGG-SN Document 249-10 Filed 04/07/21 Page 3 of 4
`
`II.
`
`REQUESTS FOR DOCUMENTS AND THINGS
`
`Documents and things relating or referring to any of the patents-in-suit.
`
`Documents and things relating or referring to Ingemar 1. Cox.
`
`Documents and things relating or referring to Network-I.
`
`Documents and things relating to any contention that you do not directly infringe
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`the patents-in-suit.
`
`5.
`
`Documents and things relating to any of your affirmative defenses and
`
`counterclaims.
`
`6.
`
`Documents and things relating to any contention that any claim of the patents-in-
`
`suit is invalid and/or unenforceable due to double-patenting and/or failure to meet one or more of
`
`the conditions of patentability and/or patent eligibility specified in Title 35 of the United States
`
`Code, including, without limitation, sections 101, 102, 103, and/or 112.
`
`7.
`
`Documents and things relating to any contention that Network -1 's claims for relief
`
`are barred any equitable doctrines.
`
`8.
`
`9.
`
`Documents relating to the level of ordinary skill in the art of the patents-in-suit.
`
`Documents relating to alleged prior art to the patents-in-suit.
`
`10.
`
`Documents relating to any searches performed by you or on your behalf of patents
`
`or other prior art relating to the patents-in-suit, including, but not limited to, enforceability
`
`searches, infringement searches, validity searches, and prior art searches.
`
`11.
`
`Documents relating to any opinion, request for opinion, evaluation, analysis,
`
`investigation, or search relating to the validity, scope, interpretation, construction, enforceability,
`
`unenforceability, or the infringement or potential infringement of any of the claims of the
`
`patents-in-suit.
`
`12.
`
`Documents relating to when you first became aware of the patents-in-suit or any
`
`application from which the patents-in-suit issued.
`
`6
`
`
`
`Case 1:14-cv-02396-PGG-SN Document 249-10 Filed 04/07/21 Page 4 of 4
`
`13.
`
`Documents relating to any planned, potential, or implemented design-around of
`
`any claim of the patents-in-suit, including any documents evidencing the cost and/or effects of
`
`any such design-around.
`
`14.
`
`Documents relating to your policies or practices, if any, to avoid infringing
`
`patents owned by third parties.
`
`15.
`
`16.
`
`Documents sufficient to identify all versions of each Accused Instrumentality.
`
`Documents sufficient
`
`to evidence
`
`the conception, design, development,
`
`implementation, testing, production or operation of each Accused Instrumentality, including
`
`documents relating to research, functional specifications, design specifications, operational
`
`specifications, other specifications, or similar documents.
`
`17.
`
`Documents related to the conception, design, development, implementation,
`
`testing, and operation of each Accused Instrumentality's algorithm or process related to
`
`extracting features from media content, including without limitation, any digital "fingerprints,"
`
`vectors, ID files, or other features used by any Accused Instrumentality in used to match
`
`reference files to uploaded content.
`
`18.
`
`Documents related to the conception, design, development, implementation,
`
`testing, and operation of each Accused Instrumentality's algorithm or process related to
`
`comparing reference files to uploaded files using features extracted from media content,
`
`including without limitation any algorithm or process used to compare ID files to uploaded
`
`content.
`
`19.
`
`Source code (e.g., C++, Flash, Java, etc.) for each of the Accused
`
`Instrumentalities, including the source code for the functionalities responsible for extracting
`
`features from uploaded media content and searching for corresponding reference works in each
`
`of the Accused Instrumentalities.
`
`20.
`
`Documents sufficient to evidence the manuals, guides, instructions, and product
`
`documentation for each Accused Instrumentality.
`
`7
`
`