throbber
Case 1:14-cv-02396-PGG-SN Document 241-3 Filed 11/12/20 Page 1 of 428
`
`Exhibit 28
`(Partially Redacted)
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-02396-PGG-SN Document 241-3 Filed 11/12/20 Page 2 of 428
`
` 1
`
` 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
` 3 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
`
` 4 ---------------------------------x
`
` 5 NETWORK-1 TECHNOLOGIES,INC.
`
` 6 Plaintiff,
`
` 7 Civil Action No.
`
` 8 -against- 1:14-cv-02396-PGG
`
` 9
`
`10 GOOGLE, INC, and YOUTUBE, LLC,
`
`11 Defendants.
`
`12 ---------------------------------x
`
`13 May 28, 2015, 2014
`
`14 9:10 a.m.
`
`15 ** OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS EYES ONLY **
`
`16 VOLUME I
`
`17 Confidential Videotaped Deposition of
`
`18 DAVID ERB, taken by the Plaintiffs, pursuant
`
`19 to Notice and Rule 30(b)(6) Notice, at the
`
`20 offices of SKADDEN ARPS SLATE MEAGHER & FLOM
`
`21 LLP, Four Times Square, New York, New York,
`
`22 before David Levy, CSR, RPR, CLR, a Notary
`
`23 Public of the State of New York.
`
`24
`
`25
`
`1
`
`DAVID ERB, 30(b)(6) - VOLUME I
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-02396-PGG-SN Document 241-3 Filed 11/12/20 Page 3 of 428
`
` 1
`
` 2 A P P E A R A N C E S:
`
` 3
`
` 4 RUSS AUGUST & KABAT
`
` 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff
`
` 6 12424 Wilshire Boulevard, 12th Floor
`
` 7 Los Angeles, California 90025
`
` 8 (310) 826-7474
`
` 9 BY: BRIAN D. LEDAHL, ESQ.
`
`10 bledahl@raklaw.com
`
`11 MARC FENSTER, ESQ.
`
`12 mfenster@raklaw.com
`
`13
`
`14 SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP
`
`15 Attorneys for Defendants
`
`16 Four Times Square
`
`17 New York, New York 10036
`
`18 (212) 735-2419
`
`19 BY: DOUGLAS R. NEMEC, ESQ.
`
`20 douglas.memec@skadden.com
`
`21
`
`22 ALSO PRESENT:
`
`23 RICH SONNENTAG ESQ.
`
`24 Litigation Counsel, Google, Inc.
`
`25 SHA-LA HOLLIS, Videographer
`
`2
`
`DAVID ERB, 30(b)(6) - VOLUME I
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-02396-PGG-SN Document 241-3 Filed 11/12/20 Page 4 of 428
`
` 1 Erb - Confidential - Outside Counsel Only
`
` 2 VIDEOGRAPHER: Good morning. Here
`
` 3 begins tape number one of the videotaped
`
` 4 deposition of Mr. David Erb in the matter
`
` 5 Network-1 Technologies, Inc., plaintiff,
`
` 6 versus Google, Inc., and YouTube LLC,
`
` 7 defendants, in the United States District
`
` 8 Court, Southern District of New York, civil
`
` 9 action number 14-CV-2396. This deposition
`
`10 is being held at the Law Offices of Skadden
`
`11 Arps Slate Meagher & Flom LLP, located at
`
`12 Four Times Square, New York, New York, on
`
`13 May 28th, 2015, at approximately 9:10 a.m.
`
`14 My name is Sha-La Hollis and I'm the legal
`
`15 video specialist. The court reporter is
`
`16 David Levy and we are both in association
`
`17 with Barkley Reporting Services.
`
`18 Will all counsel present please
`
`19 introduce themselves for the record.
`
`20 MR. LEDAHL: Brian Ledahl, Russ August
`
`21 on behalf of the plaintiff Network-1.
`
`22 MR. FENSTER: Marc Fenster for the
`
`23 plaintiff.
`
`24 MR. NEMEC: Good morning, Doug Nemec
`
`25 from Skadden, Arps for the defendants Google
`
`3
`
`DAVID ERB, 30(b)(6) - VOLUME I
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-02396-PGG-SN Document 241-3 Filed 11/12/20 Page 5 of 428
`
` 1 Erb - Confidential - Outside Counsel Only
`
` 2 and YouTube, and with me is Rich Sonnentag,
`
` 3 in-house counsel for Google.
`
` 4 VIDEOGRAPHER: Will the court reporter
`
` 5 please swear in the witness.
`
` 6 D A V I D E R B , having been duly sworn
`
` 7 by the Notary Public, was examined and
`
` 8 testified as follows:
`
` 9 EXAMINATION BY
`
`10 MR. LEDAHL:
`
`11 Q. Good morning, Dr. Erb. It is Dr. Erb,
`
`12 correct?
`
`13 A. No --
`
`14 Q. I'm sorry.
`
`15 A. Mr. Erb.
`
`16 Q. Mr. Erb. Mr. Erb, before we get into
`
`17 the substance of your deposition, I to want to
`
`18 cover a few preliminaries and things, hopefully to
`
`19 make the process a little simpler and smoother.
`
`20 The first question I have is, have you ever had
`
`21 your deposition taken before today?
`
`22 A. Yes, I have.
`
`23 Q. And when was the last time you had
`
`24 your deposition taken?
`
`25 A. I don't recall the date.
`
`4
`
`DAVID ERB, 30(b)(6) - VOLUME I
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-02396-PGG-SN Document 241-3 Filed 11/12/20 Page 6 of 428
`
` 1 Erb - Confidential - Outside Counsel Only
`
` 2 Q. Do you recall approximately when?
`
` 3 A. It would have been in approximately
`
` 4 18 months or two years ago.
`
` 5 Q. And what was the context of that prior
`
` 6 deposition?
`
` 7 A. It was a -- in the context of a
`
` 8 lawsuit over a patent from a plaintiff called
`
` 9 Personal Web in my professional capacity working
`
`10 for YouTube.
`
`11 Q. And were you in that deposition
`
`12 testifying -- if you don't understand these terms,
`
`13 I'll clarify -- but were you testifying in your
`
`14 personal capacity or as a corporate representative
`
`15 of Google or both?
`
`16 A. In my personal capacity.
`
`17 Q. Had you had your deposition taken any
`
`18 other times than the one in the Personal Web case
`
`19 you mentioned?
`
`20 A. Yes.
`
`21 Q. How many other occasions?
`
`22 A. Two that I recall.
`
`23 Q. What were the contexts of those two
`
`24 other depositions?
`
`25 A. One was in the context of a lawsuit
`
`5
`
`DAVID ERB, 30(b)(6) - VOLUME I
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-02396-PGG-SN Document 241-3 Filed 11/12/20 Page 7 of 428
`
` 1 Erb - Confidential - Outside Counsel Only
`
` 2 that I filed against a driver for a personal
`
` 3 injury and the other was in the case of a lawsuit
`
` 4 involving a company that I owned, my wife and I
`
` 5 owned, for a breach of contract with another
`
` 6 company.
`
` 7 Q. So I'm going to cover a couple of
`
` 8 preliminaries. It sounds like you're somewhat
`
` 9 familiar with the process at least; but just so
`
`10 we're all on the same page for these purposes,
`
`11 first of all, you understand that the oath you
`
`12 took a few moments ago when we began is the same
`
`13 oath you would take if you were testifying live in
`
`14 court in front of a judge and jury?
`
`15 A. Yes.
`
`16 Q. And you understand that that oath
`
`17 carries the same penalties of perjury as if you
`
`18 were testifying live in court?
`
`19 A. Yes.
`
`20 Q. During the course of the deposition
`
`21 today, I'll obviously be asking you a number of
`
`22 questions. If at any time you don't understand
`
`23 one of my questions, please let me know and I'll
`
`24 do my best to clarify. Otherwise, I'll assume you
`
`25 understood the question. Do you understand?
`
`6
`
`DAVID ERB, 30(b)(6) - VOLUME I
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-02396-PGG-SN Document 241-3 Filed 11/12/20 Page 8 of 428
`
` 1 Erb - Confidential - Outside Counsel Only
`
` 2 A. Yes.
`
` 3 Q. Because, as you may note, we have a
`
` 4 court reporter who takes down a transcript of the
`
` 5 proceedings, it's important that we follow a
`
` 6 couple of somewhat simple rules to try to make his
`
` 7 job a little easier, mostly to avoid talking over
`
` 8 one another, since it's only really possible to
`
` 9 record one person at a time.
`
`10 To that end, I'm going to do my best
`
`11 to wait until you finish your answers to begin my
`
`12 next question. Likewise, if you could wait until
`
`13 I finish my question to start your answer, that
`
`14 will make everything a little easier for the court
`
`15 reporter; do you understand?
`
`16 A. Yes.
`
`17 Q. In the same vein, because the court
`
`18 reporter has a very difficult time taking down
`
`19 things like shakes of the head or phrases like
`
`20 "uh-huh" and "uh-uh," which can be very ambiguous,
`
`21 I'm going to ask that you do your best to respond
`
`22 verbally and use words like yes or no so that the
`
`23 transcript is clear, do you understand that?
`
`24 A. Yes.
`
`25 Q. And additionally, as you may know from
`
`7
`
`DAVID ERB, 30(b)(6) - VOLUME I
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-02396-PGG-SN Document 241-3 Filed 11/12/20 Page 9 of 428
`
` 1 Erb - Confidential - Outside Counsel Only
`
` 2 past experience, after the deposition is
`
` 3 completed, the court reporter will prepare a
`
` 4 written transcript and you will have an
`
` 5 opportunity to review that and, to the extent you
`
` 6 believe necessary, make corrections to that
`
` 7 transcript. However, I do want to caution you
`
` 8 that, to the extent that you make such
`
` 9 corrections, I or my colleagues will be able to
`
`10 comment on those and suggest that it may call into
`
`11 question the truthfulness or accuracy of your
`
`12 testimony; do you understand?
`
`13 A. Yes.
`
`14 Q. And because of that, I would ask that
`
`15 you do your best to provide us with your best and
`
`16 most accurate recollections today. And in light
`
`17 of that, is there any reason, such as a health
`
`18 issue or medication, that would prevent you from
`
`19 giving your best and most accurate recollections
`
`20 and testimony today?
`
`21 A. No.
`
`22 Q. Okay. Where are you currently
`
`23 employed, Mr. Erb?
`
`24 A. I'm an employee of Google.
`
`25 Q. How long have you been employed by
`
`8
`
`DAVID ERB, 30(b)(6) - VOLUME I
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-02396-PGG-SN Document 241-3 Filed 11/12/20 Page 10 of 428
`
` 1 Erb - Confidential - Outside Counsel Only
`
` 2 Google?
`
` 3 A. Since December 12th, 2005.
`
` 4 Q. Where are you currently based
`
` 5 geographically?
`
` 6 A. Zurich, Switzerland.
`
` 7 Q. How long have you been based in
`
` 8 Zurich?
`
` 9 A. Since August 2011.
`
`10 Q. When you began your employment at
`
`11 Google in 2005, what was your position or job
`
`12 function?
`
`13 A. My title was member of the technical
`
`14 staff, and I was the technical lead on a project
`
`15 called Sputnik.
`
`16 Q. In very general terms, what was
`
`17 Sputnik?
`
`18 A. Sputnik was a mobile application to
`
`19 bring the equivalent of the Google Widget, the
`
`20 home page, I don't remember what it was called, by
`
`21 a mobile Widget application.
`
`22 Q. How long were you working on the
`
`23 Sputnik project?
`
`24 A. About 14 months.
`
`25 Q. So into early 2007?
`
`9
`
`DAVID ERB, 30(b)(6) - VOLUME I
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-02396-PGG-SN Document 241-3 Filed 11/12/20 Page 11 of 428
`
` 1 Erb - Confidential - Outside Counsel Only
`
` 2 A. Yes.
`
` 3 Q. Did you work on just that one project
`
` 4 during that time or were there others as well?
`
` 5 A. I worked briefly on a project to build
`
` 6 a tool called an SMS Reflector. Other than that,
`
` 7 only Sputnik.
`
` 8 Q. And after the time that you mentioned
`
` 9 that you were working on the Sputnik project, what
`
`10 was the next project or area that you worked on at
`
`11 Google?
`
`12 A. I worked an a telephony project called
`
`13 Piston.
`
`14 Q. And that began in early 2007?
`
`15 A. Yes.
`
`16 Q. What was the nature of that Piston
`
`17 project?
`
`18 A. The Piston project provided telephony
`
`19 services that ran on Google servers so that
`
`20 telephone calls could be initiated from the
`
`21 external public switched telephone network to
`
`22 Google, or from Google to the public switched
`
`23 telephone network.
`
`24 Q. And approximately how long did you
`
`25 work on the Piston project?
`
`10
`
`DAVID ERB, 30(b)(6) - VOLUME I
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-02396-PGG-SN Document 241-3 Filed 11/12/20 Page 12 of 428
`
` 1 Erb - Confidential - Outside Counsel Only
`
` 2 A. Approximately two-and-a-half years.
`
` 3 Q. So into sometime around the middle of
`
` 4 2009?
`
` 5 A. That's my recollection, yes. It's
`
` 6 approximate, but yes.
`
` 7 Q. Was that your primary focus, the
`
` 8 Piston project, during that two-and-a-half years?
`
` 9 A. Yes, that was -- I would say really my
`
`10 sole focus at work.
`
`11 Q. After the time you mentioned working
`
`12 on the Piston project, what was your next area of
`
`13 focus or activity at Google?
`
`14 A. Cloud computing.
`
`15 Q. And what in particular with regard to
`
`16 cloud computing did you work on?
`
`17 A. I was the tech lead and manager of
`
`18 what's publicly known as the Google Cloud Storage
`
`19 project, and I contributed to the Big Query
`
`20 project and to the Compute Engine project.
`
`21 Q. In general terms, what is the, or what
`
`22 was the Big Query project?
`
`23 A. Big Query is a publicly-available
`
`24 service under that name for querying -- rapidly
`
`25 querying very large datasets in the range of up to
`
`11
`
`DAVID ERB, 30(b)(6) - VOLUME I
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-02396-PGG-SN Document 241-3 Filed 11/12/20 Page 13 of 428
`
` 1 Erb - Confidential - Outside Counsel Only
`
` 2 many trillions of rows of data with a SQL-like
`
` 3 query language.
`
` 4 Q. You mentioned essentially three areas
`
` 5 within this -- were these all with the cloud
`
` 6 computing area that you mentioned?
`
` 7 A. Yes.
`
` 8 Q. And during what time frame,
`
` 9 approximately, did you work on the cloud computing
`
`10 projects that you've listed?
`
`11 A. From mid 2009 until August of 2011.
`
`12 Q. You also mentioned, I think, a Compute
`
`13 Engine, in those projects.
`
`14 A. Yes.
`
`15 Q. What was the Compute Engine?
`
`16 A. Compute Engine is a publicly-available
`
`17 service from Google that allows users to configure
`
`18 virtual machines in a network to run distributed
`
`19 computing jobs.
`
`20 Q. And after you transitioned out of --
`
`21 it sounded like the cloud computing projects in
`
`22 August of 2011, what was the next project or area
`
`23 of focus that you had?
`
`24 A. I moved to the YouTube product area to
`
`25 work as an individual contributor on the ContentID
`
`12
`
`DAVID ERB, 30(b)(6) - VOLUME I
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-02396-PGG-SN Document 241-3 Filed 11/12/20 Page 14 of 428
`
` 1 Erb - Confidential - Outside Counsel Only
`
` 2 claiming team.
`
` 3 Q. And how long did you work in the
`
` 4 YouTube area on the ContentID claiming team?
`
` 5 A. As an individual contributor until
`
` 6 December 2011. I continued to work on ContentID,
`
` 7 including the claiming team, beyond that time,
`
` 8 though.
`
` 9 Q. What was the change in your status or
`
`10 position in December 2011?
`
`11 A. I became the tech lead and manager of
`
`12 ContentID.
`
`13 Q. And do you still hold that position?
`
`14 A. Yes, among others.
`
`15 Q. What are the others?
`
`16 A. I am also the -- now I'm called a
`
`17 director, but I'm the engineering lead for YouTube
`
`18 Creator Analytics in addition to ContentID. And I
`
`19 also am the overall YouTube engineering lead for
`
`20 the Zurich office.
`
`21 Q. Any other positions that you've had or
`
`22 functions that you've had within Google in the
`
`23 time that you've worked there?
`
`24 A. I think we've covered every job role
`
`25 I've filled.
`
`13
`
`DAVID ERB, 30(b)(6) - VOLUME I
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-02396-PGG-SN Document 241-3 Filed 11/12/20 Page 15 of 428
`
` 1 Erb - Confidential - Outside Counsel Only
`
` 2 Q. Okay. I'd like to step back for a
`
` 3 moment and cover a little bit about your
`
` 4 background. So starting with after secondary
`
` 5 school, any university education, did you attend
`
` 6 college?
`
` 7 A. Yes.
`
` 8 Q. And where was that?
`
` 9 A. Harvard.
`
`10 Q. And what, if any, degrees did you
`
`11 obtain?
`
`12 A. I obtained -- I obtained an AB degree.
`
`13 Q. And what was your major or the subject
`
`14 of study?
`
`15 A. Astrophysics.
`
`16 Q. What year did you graduate from
`
`17 Harvard?
`
`18 A. I was in the class of 1977 but my
`
`19 graduation was in January 1978.
`
`20 Q. Okay. After attending Harvard, did
`
`21 you pursue any further postgraduate, new
`
`22 additional education?
`
`23 A. Yes.
`
`24 Q. What other education did you pursue?
`
`25 A. I attended graduate school in
`
`14
`
`DAVID ERB, 30(b)(6) - VOLUME I
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-02396-PGG-SN Document 241-3 Filed 11/12/20 Page 16 of 428
`
` 1 Erb - Confidential - Outside Counsel Only
`
` 2 geophysics at the University of Alaska in
`
` 3 Fairbanks but did not receive a degree. And I
`
` 4 received a Master's science degree in applied
`
` 5 mathematics from the University of Colorado in
`
` 6 1985.
`
` 7 Q. After you finished your Master's
`
` 8 degree at the University of Colorado, any further
`
` 9 postgraduate education?
`
`10 A. No.
`
`11 Q. I'm assuming you had various work
`
`12 positions between that time, 1985, and the time
`
`13 you joined Google 20 years later.
`
`14 A. Yes.
`
`15 Q. How many of those were in the, or were
`
`16 they all in the computer science, computer field
`
`17 generally?
`
`18 A. I would describe them all as being
`
`19 within the computer science or software
`
`20 engineering field except that one of them was in
`
`21 professional -- building professional audio
`
`22 systems. But my role was really focused on
`
`23 software.
`
`24 Q. Okay. Can you briefly run me through
`
`25 sort of the various employers you had or companies
`
`15
`
`DAVID ERB, 30(b)(6) - VOLUME I
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-02396-PGG-SN Document 241-3 Filed 11/12/20 Page 17 of 428
`
` 1 Erb - Confidential - Outside Counsel Only
`
` 2 you worked for during that span, starting with the
`
` 3 time when you graduated from the University of
`
` 4 Colorado.
`
` 5 A. I'll do that to the best of my
`
` 6 ability.
`
` 7 Q. Of course.
`
` 8 A. The first company after graduate
`
` 9 school that I worked for was called Alden Research
`
`10 Corporation. I worked there for approximately one
`
`11 year, from 1985 to 1986. I then moved to
`
`12 Cadnetics Corporation, where I worked for
`
`13 approximately two years, from 1986 until 1988.
`
`14 Then I moved to WaveFrame Corporation, where I
`
`15 worked for approximately two years, from 1988 to
`
`16 1990. Then I -- my wife and I had started a
`
`17 company called At Last Software, and I worked
`
`18 there from approximately 1990 until 1992.
`
`19 Between 1992 and 1995, I worked for a
`
`20 wide variety of companies. I was -- essentially I
`
`21 was a consultant for some venture capitalists and
`
`22 they would ask me to go work at a particular
`
`23 startup or particular company that they had
`
`24 invested in for a short period of time, and so I
`
`25 cannot recall most of the companies I worked for
`
`16
`
`DAVID ERB, 30(b)(6) - VOLUME I
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-02396-PGG-SN Document 241-3 Filed 11/12/20 Page 18 of 428
`
` 1 Erb - Confidential - Outside Counsel Only
`
` 2 during that time period, although I did work for
`
` 3 about a six-month period, somewhere in that time
`
` 4 frame for Borland, which was separate from the
`
` 5 venture capital issues.
`
` 6 From 1995, approximately January of
`
` 7 1995 until December of 2005, I worked for
`
` 8 Microsoft, and that covers the time up until I
`
` 9 went to Google.
`
`10 Q. You mentioned a company called
`
`11 WaveFrame along the way. What was the business or
`
`12 the general nature of WaveFrame's activities?
`
`13 A. Professional audio workstations.
`
`14 That's the professional audio that I alluded to
`
`15 earlier.
`
`16 Q. When you say professional audio
`
`17 workstations, can you give me an example or a
`
`18 description of what you're referring to?
`
`19 A. Sure. The product that we built was
`
`20 called the AudioFrame, and it was a
`
`21 general-purpose digital signaling -- digital
`
`22 signal processing platform that allowed us to plug
`
`23 in boards that performed functions like sampling
`
`24 synthesizer for performance of music, or a -- a
`
`25 digital audio recording system to record and edit
`
`17
`
`DAVID ERB, 30(b)(6) - VOLUME I
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-02396-PGG-SN Document 241-3 Filed 11/12/20 Page 19 of 428
`
` 1 Erb - Confidential - Outside Counsel Only
`
` 2 digital audio.
`
` 3 These systems were typically for sale
`
` 4 either to professional musicians or to recording
`
` 5 studios or post-production facilities for fields
`
` 6 like music, television, and film.
`
` 7 Q. You also mentioned, I think, about a
`
` 8 ten-year span at Microsoft, is that correct?
`
` 9 A. Nearly 11 years, yes.
`
`10 Q. What was your primary function during
`
`11 that time at Microsoft?
`
`12 A. I had several -- I was initially a
`
`13 tech lead and then a development manager on a
`
`14 project called DaVinci, which built graphical
`
`15 systems for visually designing and constructing
`
`16 software. From that, I moved to be the
`
`17 development manager of Microsoft's internal tools.
`
`18 From that, I moved to Microsoft Research and was a
`
`19 group manager for Advanced Internal Tools.
`
`20 After that I became an architect for
`
`21 Advanced Internal Tools and after that, I became
`
`22 the architect for performance issues and Visual
`
`23 Studio, which was the last job I held.
`
`24 Q. Sir, do you understand that in
`
`25 connection with your deposition here today, at
`
`18
`
`DAVID ERB, 30(b)(6) - VOLUME I
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-02396-PGG-SN Document 241-3 Filed 11/12/20 Page 20 of 428
`
` 1 Erb - Confidential - Outside Counsel Only
`
` 2 least in part, you have also been identified or
`
` 3 designated by Google as a witness offering
`
` 4 testimony on behalf of the company?
`
` 5 A. Yes, I am -- I understand that I'm a
`
` 6 30(b)(6) witness.
`
` 7 Q. That's right. I didn't want to bore
`
` 8 you with the legal jargon of the numbers or the
`
` 9 section but that's right.
`
`10 MR. LEDAHL: I'm going to ask the
`
`11 reporter to mark this, as I think I
`
`12 mentioned, let's start at 20.
`
`13 EXH (Exhibit 20, Rule 30(b)(6) notice of
`
`14 deposition, marked for identification, as of
`
`15 this date.)
`
`16 Q. Mr. Erb, I'll first ask you if you've
`
`17 seen this document that we've marked as Exhibit 20
`
`18 before.
`
`19 A. I believe I have.
`
`20 Q. Okay. And if you turn to, starting on
`
`21 page five of this document, do you see there's a
`
`22 list of topics and subjects on which examination
`
`23 is requested?
`
`24 A. Yes, I see that list.
`
`25 MR. LEDAHL: And for the record, just
`
`19
`
`DAVID ERB, 30(b)(6) - VOLUME I
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-02396-PGG-SN Document 241-3 Filed 11/12/20 Page 21 of 428
`
` 1 Erb - Confidential - Outside Counsel Only
`
` 2 for clarity, the document we've marked as
`
` 3 Exhibit 20 is Plaintiff's notice of Rule
`
` 4 30(b)(6) deposition of defendants.
`
` 5 Q. Mr. Erb, what I'd like to do is go
`
` 6 through what I understand to be the topics for
`
` 7 which you've been designated as the witness, make
`
` 8 sure we have a common understanding about which
`
` 9 ones those are so that we can go forward.
`
`10 The first is topic number one, "The
`
`11 website and/or system architecture for all accused
`
`12 instrumentalities, including hardware and
`
`13 software," do you see that?
`
`14 A. Yes.
`
`15 Q. And is it your understanding that you
`
`16 are the designated witness for that topic?
`
`17 A. Yes.
`
`18 Q. Okay. The next one is topic number
`
`19 two, and that's "The conception, development,
`
`20 design, testing and implementation of the accused
`
`21 instrumentalities, including the reasons why you
`
`22 developed and implemented the accused
`
`23 instrumentalities, any alternatives considered,
`
`24 the cost of such alternatives, and reasons why the
`
`25 alternatives were not used."
`
`20
`
`DAVID ERB, 30(b)(6) - VOLUME I
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-02396-PGG-SN Document 241-3 Filed 11/12/20 Page 22 of 428
`
` 1 Erb - Confidential - Outside Counsel Only
`
` 2 Is it your understanding that you are
`
` 3 also the designee on topic number two?
`
` 4 A. Yes.
`
` 5 Q. Okay. And if I could ask you to turn
`
` 6 to topic number four on the following page, that
`
` 7 topic is, "The past and present design,
`
` 8 development and operation of the accused
`
` 9 instrumentalities."
`
`10 Is it your understanding that you are
`
`11 also the designee for that topic?
`
`12 A. Yes.
`
`13 Q. Okay. And the next one, number five,
`
`14 "The identity, location, custodians, and general
`
`15 description of the contents of documents that
`
`16 relate to the past and present design, development
`
`17 and operation of the accused instrumentalities."
`
`18 Is it also your understanding that you
`
`19 are designated to testify on that topic?
`
`20 A. Yes.
`
`21 Q. Okay. And the next one is number six,
`
`22 "The people most knowledgeable about the past and
`
`23 present design, development and operation of the
`
`24 accused instrumentalities."
`
`25 Is it your understanding that you're
`
`21
`
`DAVID ERB, 30(b)(6) - VOLUME I
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-02396-PGG-SN Document 241-3 Filed 11/12/20 Page 23 of 428
`
` 1 Erb - Confidential - Outside Counsel Only
`
` 2 the designated witness on that topic as well?
`
` 3 A. Yes.
`
` 4 Q. And next topic number nine, "Any
`
` 5 material or significant changes to the
`
` 6 functionality of the accused instrumentalities
`
` 7 from the time of their introduction to the
`
` 8 present."
`
` 9 Is it your understanding that you're
`
`10 the designee on that topic as well?
`
`11 A. Yes.
`
`12 Q. And next, number ten, "Any planned
`
`13 changes to the design, development and operation
`
`14 of the accused instrumentalities, including the
`
`15 reasons therefor and the identity of all documents
`
`16 related to and persons knowledgeable about the
`
`17 same."
`
`18 Is it your understanding you're the
`
`19 designated witness on that topic?
`
`20 A. Yes.
`
`21 Q. Okay. Next topic 11, "The methods,
`
`22 manner and means by which you memorialize or
`
`23 document actual, planned or proposed changes to
`
`24 the accused instrumentalities, including the
`
`25 documents created for or during the process and
`
`22
`
`DAVID ERB, 30(b)(6) - VOLUME I
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-02396-PGG-SN Document 241-3 Filed 11/12/20 Page 24 of 428
`
` 1 Erb - Confidential - Outside Counsel Only
`
` 2 the identity of the persons knowledgeable about
`
` 3 the process."
`
` 4 Is it your understanding you're the
`
` 5 designee also on topic 11?
`
` 6 A. Yes.
`
` 7 Q. And next, I have topic 13 on the next
`
` 8 page, "The method, manner and/or means by which
`
` 9 the accused instrumentalities extract features
`
`10 from media works including, without limitation,
`
`11 any digital fingerprints, vectors, wavelets or ID
`
`12 fields."
`
`13 Is it your understanding that you are
`
`14 the designee on that topic as well?
`
`15 A. Yes.
`
`16 Q. Next the topic 14, "Any algorithm or
`
`17 process relating to the accused instrumentalities,
`
`18 extraction of features from media files or works,
`
`19 including without limitation any digital
`
`20 fingerprints, vectors, wavelets or ID files."
`
`21 Is it your understanding that you're
`
`22 also the designee for that topic?
`
`23 A. Yes.
`
`24 Q. The next one I have is number 15, "The
`
`25 method, manner and/or means by which the accused
`
`23
`
`DAVID ERB, 30(b)(6) - VOLUME I
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-02396-PGG-SN Document 241-3 Filed 11/12/20 Page 25 of 428
`
` 1 Erb - Confidential - Outside Counsel Only
`
` 2 instrumentalities identify or recognize uploaded
`
` 3 media files or works, including, but not limited
`
` 4 to, the method, manner and/or means by which the
`
` 5 accused instrumentalities compare referenced files
`
` 6 to uploaded media files or works."
`
` 7 Is it your understanding that you are
`
` 8 the designated witness on that topic?
`
` 9 A. Yes.
`
`10 Q. Next I have topic number --
`
`11 apologize -- 16, "Any algorithm or process
`
`12 relating to the accused instrumentalities'
`
`13 identification or recognition of uploaded media
`
`14 files or works, including but not limited to any
`
`15 algorithm or process relating to the accused
`
`16 instrumentalities' comparison or matching of
`
`17 reference files or works for uploaded files or
`
`18 works."
`
`19 Is it your understanding that you're
`
`20 the designated witness on that topic?
`
`21 A. Yes.
`
`22 Q. Next one I have is number 19, "The
`
`23 transcoding, fingerprint or ID file generation,
`
`24 content recognition/identification, claiming,
`
`25 usage policy application, blocking, tracking,
`
`24
`
`DAVID ERB, 30(b)(6) - VOLUME I
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-02396-PGG-SN Document 241-3 Filed 11/12/20 Page 26 of 428
`
` 1 Erb - Confidential - Outside Counsel Only
`
` 2 monetizing, click-to-buy, promoting and
`
` 3 advertising functionalities of the accused
`
` 4 instrumentalities, including the design,
`
` 5 development and operation of such
`
` 6 functionalities."
`
` 7 Is it your understanding that you're
`
` 8 the designated witness on that topic?
`
` 9 A. Yes.
`
`10 MR. NEMEC: Sorry to interrupt, Brian,
`
`11 I just want to clarify that the portion of
`
`12 19 implicating "claiming, usage policy
`
`13 application, blocking, tracking, monetizing,
`
`14 click-to-buy, promoting and advertising," it
`
`15 was our intention to designate David
`
`16 Rosenstein.
`
`17 MR. LEDAHL: Okay.
`
`18 MR. NEMEC: Mr. Erb may have knowledge
`
`19 about those issues but the corporate
`
`20 designee on that aspect of topic 19 would be
`
`21 Mr. David Rosenstein.
`
`22 MR. LEDAHL: Okay, thank you for that
`
`23 clarification.
`
`24 MR. NEMEC: And I apologize if that
`
`25 wasn't communicated previously.
`
`25
`
`DAVID ERB, 30(b)(6) - VOLUME I
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-02396-PGG-SN Document 241-3 Filed 11/12/20 Page 27 of 428
`
` 1 Erb - Confidential - Outside Counsel Only
`
` 2 MR. LEDAHL:

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket