`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`14 Civ. 2396 (PGG)
`
`14 Civ. 9558 (PGG)
`
`
`
`NETWORK-1 TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`GOOGLE LLC and YOUTUBE, LLC,
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`JOINT STIPULATION TO MODIFY THE PAGE LIMITS FOR
`CLAIM CONSTRUCTION BRIEFING
`
`Plaintiff Network-1 Technologies, Inc. and Defendants Google LLC and YouTube, LLC,
`
`through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate, subject to approval by this Court, to modify
`
`the page limits for two briefs.
`WHEREAS, Plaintiff Network-1 served and filed its opening claim constriction brief
`on May 30, 2019;
`WHEREAS, Defendants served and filed their response claim construction brief on
`June 28, 2019;
`WHEREAS, Network-1’s reply claim construction brief is currently due for service
`and filing on July 19, 2019;
`WHEREAS, Defendants’ sur-reply claim construction brief is currently due for service
`and filing on August 9, 2019;
`WHEREAS, this Court’s Individual Rules of Practice for Civil Cases, Section IV.B
`sets the page limit for Network-1’s reply and Defendants’ sur-reply claim construction briefs
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:14-cv-02396-PGG-MHD Document 156-1 Filed 07/16/19 Page 2 of 3
`
`
`
`at 10 pages;
`WHEREAS, the parties agree there are numerous issues to be addressed in these briefs,
`such that 5 additional pages per brief would be beneficial so that the parties may more fully
`explain their positions to the Court;
`
`NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
`
`Network-1 may serve and file a reply claim construction brief solely rebutting
`1.
`Defendants’ response brief by July 19, 2019 that is no more than 15 pages in length; and
`2.
`Defendants may serve and file a sur-reply claim construction brief solely in
`response to new arguments raised in Network-1’s reply brief by August 9, 2019 that is no
`more than 15 pages in length.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case 1:14-cv-02396-PGG-MHD Document 156-1 Filed 07/16/19 Page 3 of 3
`
`
`
`SO STIPULATED.
`Dated: July 16, 2019
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`RUSS, AUGUST & KABAT
`
`BY: /s/ Amy E. Hayden
`
`Marc A. Fenster (pro hac vice)
`Brian D. Ledahl (pro hac vice)
`Adam S. Hoffman (pro hac vice)
`Paul A. Kroeger (pro hac vice)
`Amy E. Hayden (pro hac vice)
`12424 Wilshire Blvd. 12th Floor
`Los Angeles, CA 90025
`Phone: (310) 826-7474
`Fax: (310) 826-6991
`mfenster@raklaw.com
`bledahl@raklaw.com
`ahoffman@raklaw.com
`pkroeger@raklaw.com
`ahayden@raklaw.com
`
`Charles R. Macedo
`AMSTER, ROTHSTEIN &
`EBENSTEIN LLP
`90 Park Avenue
`New York, NY 10016
`Phone: (212) 336-8074
`Fax: (212) 336-8001
`cmacedo@arelaw.com
`
`
`Attorneys for Network-1
`Technologies, Inc.
`
`
`
`
`WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY LLP
`
`BY: /s/ Samuel Bryant Davidoff
`
`Samuel Bryant Davidoff
`650 Fifth Avenue, Suite 1500
`New York, NY 10022
`212-688-9224
`sdavidoff@wc.com
`
`Bruce R. Genderson (pro hac vice)
`Kevin Hardy (pro hac vice)
`Daniel P. Shanahan (pro hac vice)
`Andrew V. Trask
`Christopher A. Suarez (pro hac vice)
`725 Twelfth St., N.W.
`Washington, DC 20005
`Phone: (202) 434-5000
`Fax: (202) 434-5029
`bgenderson@wc.com
`khardy@wc.com
`dshanahan@wc.com
`atrask@wc.com
`csuarez@wc.com
`
`Attorneys for Google LLC and
`YouTube, LLC
`
`
`
`
`
`
`SO ORDERED.
`
`_________________________________
`Paul G. Gardephe
`United States District Judge
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
