Case 1:14-cv-02396-PGG-MHD Document 153-5 Filed 06/28/19 Page 1 of 22
`Case 1:14-cv-02396—PGG-MHD Document 153-5 Filed 06/28/19 Page 1 of 22
`
`EXHIBIT D
`
`EXHIBIT D
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-02396-PGG-MHD Document 153-5 Filed 06/28/19 Page 2 of 22
`AECEIVE8J 0061011
`.. 10/14/2009 17: 30 FAX
`17329361401
`CENTRAL FAX CENTER
`OCT l 4 2009
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES
`PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`Attorney Docket No.: Cox-lCIP
`
`Appl. No.: 11/445,928
`
`Confirmation No.: 8119
`
`Applicant: Ingemar J. COX
`
`Filed: June 2, 2006
`
`Title: USING FEATURES EXTRACTED FROM AN AUDIO AND/OR 'TIDEO WORK
`TO OBTAIN INFORMATION ABOUT THE WORK
`
`TC/A.U.: 2425
`
`Examiner: Cai Y. Chen
`
`Mail Stop Amendment
`Commissioner for Patents
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`AMENDMENT
`
`Sir:
`
`In response to the Office Action mailed on April 15, 2009
`(Paper No. 20090403), which set a period for response to
`expire on July 15, 2009, that period being extended three (3)
`months to expire on October 15, 2009, please amend the
`above-identified application as follows:
`
`Amendments to the Claims are reflected in the listing of
`claims which begins on page 2 of this paper.
`
`Remarks/Argwnents begin on page 8 of this paper.
`
`PAGE 6117" RCVD AT 10/1412009 5:20:16 PM [Eastern Daylight Time)' SVR:USPTO·EFXRF~/15 • DNIS:2738300 • CSID:17329361401 • DURATION (mm-ss):05-26
`
`10/15/2009 JVONG1
`U2 tC:2202
`
`00000054 501049
`156.00 DA
`
`11445928
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-02396-PGG-MHD Document 153-5 Filed 06/28/19 Page 3 of 22
`RECEIVED
`10/14/2009 17:30 FAX
`17329361401
`CENTRAL FAX CENr3koo11011
`OCT 1 4 2009
`
`AMENDMENTS TO THE CLAIMS
`
`This listing of claims will replace all prior ve1·sions,
`
`and listings, of claims in the application:
`
`Claims 1-27 (canceled)
`
`(New): A method for associating an electronic
`Claim 28
`work with an action, the electronic work compris:.ng at
`least one of audio and video, the method compris .. ng:
`a) electronically extracting within a portable
`client device features from the electronic work;
`b) transmitting the extracted features from the
`portable client device to one or more servers;
`c) receiving at the portable client device ~ram the
`one or more servers an identification of the ele:::tronic
`work based on the extracted features, wherein th0
`identification is based on a non-exhaustive sear:::h
`identifying a neighbor;
`d) electronically determining an action bas~d on the
`identification of the electronic work; and
`e) electronically performing the action on the
`portable client device.
`
`Claim 29 (New): A method of claim 28, wherein the
`
`identification is based on a non-exhaustive search
`identifying a neighbor within a fixed radius.
`
`Claim 30 (New): The method of claim 28, wherein the
`
`non-exhaustive search is sublinear.
`
`1
`
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`15 ·
`16
`
`1
`2
`3
`
`1
`2
`
`PAGE 711 7 • RCVO AT 10/14/2009 :S:20:16 PM (Eastern Daylight Time]' SVR:USPTO-EFXRF~/15 • ONIS:2738300 • CSIO:17329361401 • DURATION (mm-ss):05•26
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-02396-PGG-MHD Document 153-5 Filed 06/28/19 Page 4 of 22
`· ,10/14/2009 17:30 FAX
`17329361401
`
`~ 008/017
`
`1
`2
`
`1
`2
`
`1
`2
`3
`
`1
`2
`
`1
`2
`3
`
`1
`2
`3
`
`1
`2
`
`1
`2
`3
`
`1
`
`2
`3
`4
`
`Claim 31 (New): The method of claim 28, wherein the
`non-exhaustive search is based on kd-trees.
`
`Claim 32 (New): The method of claim 28, wherein the
`non-exhaustive search is based on vantage point trees.
`
`Claim 33 (New}: The method of claim 28, wherein the
`non-exhaustive search is based on excluded middle vantage
`point forest.
`
`Claim 34 (New): The method of claim 28, wherein the
`electronic work is an audio work.
`
`Claim 35 (New): The method of claim 34, wherein the
`audio work is obtained from at least one of a broadcast
`and an audio file format.
`
`Claim 36 (New): The method of claim 34, wherein the
`information includes at least one of a song title, an
`album title, and a performer name.
`
`Claim 37 (New): The method of claim 28, wherein the
`electronic work is a video work.
`
`Claim 38 (New): The method of claim 37, wherein the
`video work is obtained from at least one of a broadcast
`and a video file format.
`
`Claim 39 (New}: The method of claim 37, wherein the
`information includes at least one of a title of the video
`work, a director of the video work, and names of
`performers in the video work.
`
`PAGE 8117" RCVD AT 10/14/2009 5:20:16 PM [Eastern Daylight Time]• SVR:USPTO•EFXRF-6115 • DNIS:2738300 • CSID:17329361401 'DURATION (mm-ss):05,26
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-02396-PGG-MHD Document 153-5 Filed 06/28/19 Page 5 of 22
`10/14/2009 17:30 FAX
`17329361401
`
`~009/017
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`2
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`1
`
`2
`
`Claim 40 (New}: The method of claim 28, wherein the step
`
`of electronically determining the action includes
`
`receiving at the portable client device an acticn based
`
`on the identification of the electronic work fro~ the one
`or more servers.
`
`Claim 41 (New): The method of claim 28, wherein the step
`of electronically extracting the features is pe~formed by
`at least one of a microprocessor of the portable client
`
`device and a digital signal processor of the portable
`
`client device.
`
`Claim 42
`
`(New}: A method for associating an electronic
`
`document work with an action, the document work
`
`comprising at least one of an image and text, the method
`
`comprising:
`a} electronically extracting within a client device
`features from the electronic document work;
`
`b) transmitting the extracted features fro~ the
`
`client device to one or more servers;
`
`c) receiving at the client device from the one or
`
`more servers an identification of the electronic document
`
`work based on the extracted features, wherein the
`
`identification is based on a sub-linear search;
`
`d) electronically determining an action based on the
`
`identification of the electronic document work; and
`
`e) electronically performing the action on the
`
`client device.
`
`Claim 43 (New): The method of claim 42, wherein the
`
`electronic document work comprises an image.
`
`PAGE 9/17 • RCVD AT 10/14/2009 5:20:16 PM [Eastern Daylight Time)• SVR:USPTO•EFXRF~/15 • DNIS:2738300 • CSID:17329361401 • DURATION (mm-ss):05·26
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-02396-PGG-MHD Document 153-5 Filed 06/28/19 Page 6 of 22
`10•/~4/2009 17: 31 FAX 17329361401
`~010/017
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`
`1
`
`2
`
`2
`
`3
`4
`
`1
`2
`3
`
`4
`5
`
`1
`2
`3
`
`4
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`
`5
`6
`
`(New): The method of claim 43, where~n the
`Claim 44
`information includes at least one of a title of the
`image, a subject of the image, a category of th(~ image, a
`publisher of the image, and a source citation o= the
`image.
`
`Claim 45 (New): The method of claim 42, wherein the
`electronic document work comprises text.
`
`Claim 46 (New): The method of claim 45, wherein the
`information includes at least one of a title of the text,
`a publisher of the text, and a source citation of the
`text.
`
`(New): The method of claim 42, wherein the step
`Claim 47
`of electronically determining the action includes
`receiving at the client device an action based on the
`identification of the electronic document work from the
`one or more servers.
`
`Claim 48 (New): The method of claim 42, wherein the step
`of electronically extracting the features is performed by
`at least one of a microprocessor of the client device and
`a digital signal processor of the client device.
`
`Claim 49 (New): A method for associating an ele~tronic
`document work with an action, the document work
`comprising at least one of an image and text, the method
`comprising:
`
`a) electronically extracting within a portaJle
`client device features from the electronic document work;
`
`PAGE 10/17 • RCVD AT 10/14/2009 5:20:16 PM [Eastern Daylight Time)• SVR:USPTO.£FXRF•6/15 • DNIS:2738300 • CSID:17329361401 • DURATION (mm•ss):05·26
`
`5
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-02396-PGG-MHD Document 153-5 Filed 06/28/19 Page 7 of 22
`10~1~/2009 17:31 FAX 17329361401
`~011/017
`
`7
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`17
`
`1
`
`2
`3
`
`b) transmitting the extracted features from the
`
`portable client device to one or more servers;
`
`c) receiving at the portable client device from the
`
`one or more servers an identification of the electronic
`
`document work based on the extracted features, wherein
`
`the identification is based on a non-exhaustive search
`
`identifying a neighbor;
`
`d) electronically determining an action based on the
`
`identification of the electronic document work; and
`
`e) electronically performing the action on the·
`
`portable client device.
`
`Claim 50 (New): The method of claim 49 wherein the
`
`the identification is based on a non-exhaustive search
`
`identifying a neighbor within a fixed radius.
`
`Claim 51 (New): The method of claim 49, wherein the
`
`2
`
`electronic document work comprises an image.
`
`Claim 52 (New): The method of claim 49, whereir. the
`
`information includes at least one of a title of the
`
`image, a subject of the image, a category of th€
`
`image, a
`
`publisher of the image, and a source citation of the
`
`image.
`
`Claim 53 (New): The method of claim 49, whereic; the
`
`electronic document work comprises text.
`
`Claim 54
`
`(New): The method of claim 52, whereir. the
`
`information includes at least one of a title of the text,
`
`a publisher of the text, and a source citation cf the
`
`text.
`
`2
`3
`4
`
`5
`
`1
`
`2
`
`1
`
`2
`3
`4
`
`PAGE 11/17' RCVD AT 10/1412009 5:20:16 PM [Eastern Dayll9ht Time)' SVR:USPTO-EFXRF•6/15 • DNIS:2738300 • CSID:17329361401 • DURATION (mm,ss):05•26
`
`6
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-02396-PGG-MHD Document 153-5 Filed 06/28/19 Page 8 of 22
`~012/017
`1-0/14/2009 17:31 FAX 17329361401
`
`I
`2
`3
`4
`5
`
`2
`3
`4
`5
`
`2
`
`1
`2
`
`1
`2
`
`1
`2
`3
`
`Claim. 55 (New): The method of claim 49, wherein the step
`of electronically determining the action includ(~s
`receiving at the portable client device an acticn based
`on the identification of the electronic docurner.t work
`from the one or more servers.
`
`Claim 56 (New) : The method of claim 49, wherein the step
`of electronically extracting the features is pe~formed by
`at least one of a microprocessor of the portable client
`device and a digital signal processor of the portable
`client device.
`
`(New): The method of claim 49, wherein the
`Claim 57
`non-exhaustive search is sublinear.
`
`(New): The method of claim 49, wherein che
`Claim 58
`non-exhaustive search is based on kd-trees.
`
`Claim 59 (New): The method of claim 49, wherein =he
`non-exhaustive search is based on vantage point :rees.
`
`(New): The method of claim 49, wherein :he
`Claim 60
`non-exhaustive search is based on excluded rniddl·::'! vantage
`point forest.
`
`PAGE 12/17 • RCVD AT 1011412009 5:20:16 PM [Eastern Daylight Time)• SVR:USPTO-eFXRf-6I15 • DNIS:2738300 • CSID:17329361401 • DURATION (mm-ss):05-26
`
`7
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-02396-PGG-MHD Document 153-5 Filed 06/28/19 Page 9 of 22
`· 10/14/2009 17:31 FAX 17329361401
`
`141013/017
`
`REMARKS/ARGUMENTS
`
`In view of the foregoing amendments and the
`
`following remarks, the applicant respectfully sut®its
`
`that the pending claims comply with 35 U.S.C. § ;01, are
`
`not anticipated under 35 U.S.C. § 102 and are not.
`rendered obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103. Accordir.gly, it
`
`is believed that this application is in conditior1 for
`allowance. If, however, the Examiner bel..ieves that there
`
`are any unresolved issues, or believes that some or all
`
`of the claims are not in condition for allowance, the
`
`applicant respectfully requests that the Examiner contact
`
`the undersigned to schedule a telephone Examiner
`Interview before any further actions on the merits.
`
`The applicant will now address each of the
`
`ssues
`
`raised in the outstanding Office Action.
`
`Rejections under Double Patenting
`
`Claims 1-8 and 11-14 are rejected on the ground of
`nonstatutory obviousness-type double patenting a,; being
`
`unpatentable over claims 1, 8-13, 15, 21, 23 and 24 of
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,058,223. Since claims 1-8 and 11-14
`
`have been canceled, this ground of rejection is 1:endered
`
`moot.
`
`Further, the applicant respectfully submits that new
`
`claims 28-60 are patentably distinct from the claims of
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,058,223.
`
`PAGE 13/17' RCVD AT 10/14/2009 5:20:16 PM [Eastern Daylight Time)• SVR:USPTO-eFXRF-6/15 • DNIS:2738300 • CSI0:17329361401 • DURATION (mm-ss):05-26
`
`-8-
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-02396-PGG-MHD Document 153-5 Filed 06/28/19 Page 10 of 22
`!0/14/2009 17:32 FAX
`17329361401
`
`14)014/017
`
`Rejections under 35 U.S.C. § 101
`
`Claims 1-11, 14 and 20-27 are rejected under 35
`
`U.S.C. §101 as not faliing within one of the fo~r
`
`statutory categories of invention. Since claims 1-11, 14
`
`and 20-27 have been canceled, this ground of rejrc!ction is
`rendered moot.
`
`The applicant respectfully submits that ne\v claims
`
`28-60 are patent eligible processes, since each claim is
`
`tied to one or more machines.
`
`Rejections under 35 O.S.C. § 102.
`
`Claims 1-2, 4, 9-13, 20, 23, 26 and 27 are ~ejected
`
`under 35 U.S.C. § 102 (e} as being anticipated b/ U.S.
`Patent Application Publication No. 2001/0001160 ,n ( "the
`Shoff publication"). Claims 1-11, 14 and 20-27 ctre
`rejected under 35 U.S.C. §101 as not falling within one
`
`of the four statutory categories of invention. 3ince
`claims 1-2, 4, 9-13, 20, 23, 26 and 27 have been
`
`canceled, this ground of rejection is rendered m~ot.
`
`Rejections under 35 O.S.C. § 103
`
`Claim 3 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. §103(a; as being
`unpatentable over the Shoff publication in view of U.S.
`
`Patent Application Publication No. 2003/0146940 ("the
`
`Ellis publication"). Since claim 3 has been carceled,
`
`this ground of rejection is rendered moot.
`
`PAGE 14117 ' RCVO AT 10/14/2009 5:20:16 PM [Eastern Daylight Time)' SVR:USPTO-EFXRF-6/15 • DNIS:2738300 • CSID:17329361401 • DURATION (mrn-ss):05•26
`
`-9-
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-02396-PGG-MHD Document 153-5 Filed 06/28/19 Page 11 of 22
`· 10/14/2009 17:32 FAX
`17329361401
`
`@] 015/017
`
`Claims 5-7, 21 and 22 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. §
`103a) as being unpatentable over the Shoff publication in
`
`view of U.S. Patent No. 6,834,308 ("the Ikezoye patent"}.
`
`Since claims 5-7, 21 and 22 have been canceled, I.his
`ground of rejection is rendered moot.
`
`Claims 8 and 14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. §
`
`103 (a) as being unpatentable over the Shoff publ:.cation
`
`in view of U.S. Patent Application Publication No.
`
`2002/0120925 ( "the Logan publication"). Since c:.aims 8
`
`and 14 have been canceled, this ground of reject:.on is
`
`rendered moot.
`
`Claims 24 and 25 are rejected under 35 u.s.c. §
`103(a) as being unpatentable over the Shoff publ..cation
`in view of U.S. Patent No. 6,408,128 ("the Abeca:,sis
`
`patent"). "}. Since claims 24 and 25 have been canceled,
`
`this ground of rejection is rendered moot.
`
`New claims
`
`New claims 28-60 are patentable over the ci·:ed art.
`At least elements (c) of independent claims 28, 12, and
`49 are not taught in the cited art. These claim3 are
`supported, for example, by Figure 4 and paragra;,1s
`[0050]-[0054] and [0068]-[0072] of the present
`
`application.
`
`PAGE 15/17' RCVO AT 10/14/2009 5:20: 16 PM [Eastern Daylight Time)' SVR:USPTO-EFXRF-6I15 • ONIS:273830D • CSID: 173293614D1 • DURATION (mm-ss):D5-26
`
`-10-
`
`,
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-02396-PGG-MHD Document 153-5 Filed 06/28/19 Page 12 of 22
`10/14/2009 17:32 FAX
`17329361401
`
`@] 016/017
`
`Conc1usion
`
`In view of the foregoing amendments and ren3rks, the
`
`applicant respectfully submits that the pending ~laims
`are in condition for allowance. Accordingly, th3
`applicant requests that the Examiner pass this
`application to issue.
`Any arguments made in this amendment pertai1 onl.y to
`the specific aspects of the invention c:1aimed.
`.'.\ny claim
`amendments or cancellations, and any arguments, 3re made
`without prejudice to, or d.:i.sc1auner 0£, the applLcant's
`
`right to seek patent protection of any unclaimed (e.g.,
`
`narrower, broader, different) subject matter, su,:h as by
`l
`way of a continuation or divisional patent appli::ation
`for example.
`Since the applicant's remarks, amendments, .:1.nd/or
`
`filings with respect to the Examiner's objectio~:3 and/or
`rejections are sufficient to overcome these obje,;tions
`
`and/or rejections, the applicant's silence as tc
`assertions by the Examiner in the Office Action ;1nd/or to
`
`certain facts or conclusions that may be implied by
`objections and/or rejections in the Office Acticn (such
`
`as, for example, whether a reference constitutes prior
`art, whether references have been properly combined or
`modified, whether dependent claims are separatel:1
`patentable, etc.) is not a concession by the app:_icant
`that such assertions and/or implications are accurate,
`
`and that all requirements for an objection and/o;: a
`rejection have been met. Thus, the applicant rei;erves
`
`PAGE 16/17 • RCVD AT 10/14/2009 5:20:16 PM [Eastern Daylight TlmeJ • SVR:USPTO-EFXRF-~/15 • DNIS:2738300 • CSID:17329361401' DURATION (mm-ss):05-26
`
`-11-
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-02396-PGG-MHD Document 153-5 Filed 06/28/19 Page 13 of 22
`10/14/2009 17:33 FAX
`17329361401
`
`141017/017
`
`the right to analyze and dispute any such assertions and
`
`implications in the future.
`
`October 14, 2009
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`C. Pokotylo,
`Reg. No. 36,242
`Tel.: (732) 936-1400
`
`CERTIFICATE OF FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION
`
`I hereby certify that this paper (and any
`accompanying paper(s)) is being facsimile transmLtted to
`the United States Patent Office on the date show.1 below.
`
`John C. Pokotylo
`Type or print name of person signing certificati,)n
`
`s~~ (:_ Qi,_i,y
`
`October 14, 2 1)09
`Date
`
`PAGE 17/17 • RCVD AT 10114/2009 5:20:16 PM [Eastern Daylight Time)• SVR:USPTO-EFXRF-6/15 • DNIS:2738300 • CSID:17329361401 • DURATION (mrn-ss):05•26
`
`-12-
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-02396-PGG-MHD Document 153-5 Filed 06/28/19 Page 14 of 22
`RECEiw~O
`10/2'3/2007 16: 11 FAX 17325429071
`14)004/012
`CENTRAL FAX CENT&R
`OCT 2 3 2007
`
`ModifiedPTOJSBf17(01-03)
`Approved for use through 04f.l0/2003. 0MB 0651-0032
`U.S. Patent and Tradomark Office; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`Under the PapelWO<ll Reduction Act of 1995, no persona are required to respond to a collection of lnfoiination unless ii displays a vaUd 0MB control number.
`Complete if Known
`11/445,928
`June 2, 2006
`Ineemar J. COX
`
`Aoolication Number
`Fifing Date
`
`Firsl Named Inventor
`
`Examiner Name
`
`Art Unit
`
`Attomev Docket No.
`
`Not vet assiened
`2624
`Cox-ICIP
`
`FEE CALCULATION (continued)
`
`FEE TRANS MITT AL
`for FY 2007
`Effsctivs ~007. Patent fees are subject to anmnd r911fs/on.
`D Applicant claims small entity status. See 37 CFR 1.27
`1,$> 00.00
`TOTAL AMOUNT OF PAYMENT
`METHOD OF PAYMENT (check all that sppty}
`D Money
`Order D Other
`
`NOile
`
`3. ADDITIONAL FEES
`•-E...a.. SmaHEntltv
`Fee Fee Fee Fee
`
`Fee DescrtpUon
`
`I Colle ($) Code ($)
`I 1052 50 2062
`
`(cid:143) Ch8Ck D Credit card
`Deposit I
`Deposit I
`
`[&I
`
`Deposit Account
`
`Account
`Number
`
`50-1049
`
`Straub & Pokotylo
`
`Account
`Name
`Thll Commissioner la aulhorfzad to: (ch9ck all thal apply)
`!81Charge any underpayment o1
`(gj Credit any overpayments
`fee(a) Indicated below
`lii!Charge any lee~) due In conneclion with the tiling
`albmitted herewit
`IBICharge lee(s) indicated below, except for the flllng fee in Iha
`to the ebove-klenlilled deposit account.
`
`1051 130 2051
`
`65 Su n:harge - late filing lee or oath
`25 Surcharge • !ale provisional fiHng fee or
`oover sheet
`130 Non-English specification
`1053 130 1063
`1812 2,520 1812 2,520
`For filing a request for eK parte reexallinatlon
`Requesting publicatlofl of SIR prior to
`1804 920° 1804 920-
`Examiner action
`18051,840· 1805 1,840· Requesting publloation ol SI A after
`Examiner action
`60 Extension tor reply within first month
`1251 120 2251
`1252 460 2252 230
`E,ctension for reply within second month
`1253 1,050 2253
`.525
`Extension for reply within third month
`1254 1,640
`2264 820
`Extension for reply within fourth month
`
`Utllltyfae § 1255 2,230 2255 1,115 Exten&ion for reply within fifth month
`
`FEE CALCULATION
`1. BASIC FILING, SEARCH & EXAMINATION FEES
`Large ::.,.uty Small !_ntlty
`c-- -
`Fee Paid
`(S)
`($)
`1030
`615
`440
`220
`680
`1440
`210
`
`340
`720
`105
`
`Design fee
`
`Plant fee
`Reissue lee
`Provialonal fee
`
`SUBTOTAL (1) I {$} 00.00
`2. EXTRA CLAIM FEES FOR UTILITY AND REISSUE
`~rowm
`EXlra Claima
`Fee Paid
`Total Claims 12D -27"' ~ CJ X c::::::J=I
`Independent II:] • 5 .. = CJ xc=::J=I
`c:::Joj
`
`1401 510
`2401 256 Notice of Appeal
`2402 255 Allng a brief In support of an appeal
`1402 510
`2403
`615 Raquesl for oral hearing
`14031,030
`1451 1,510 1451 1,510 Petition to institute a pubOc use prooeedlng
`255 Petllloo 10 revive - unavoidable
`TIO PeHllon to revive - unintenHonal
`720 UIUily isSIJe lee (or r11iasue}
`410
`Design issue fee
`
`I 1452 510 2452
`
`1453 1,540 2453
`1601 1,440 2501
`1502 820 2602
`I 15031,130 2503
`I
`I 1807 60 1807
`1808 180 1806
`8021
`
`Claims
`Multiple Dependent
`
`\
`Fee DescrlR!!oo
`
`i:: .. trru
`!': .... 11
`Fee Fee
`Code ($)
`2202
`25 Claims in exoess of 20
`2201 105
`Independent claims In excess of 3
`2203 185 Mulllple dapendenl clalm. If not paid
`
`Laroe EnlllY
`Fee Fee
`.Code
`($)
`1202 60
`1201 210
`1203
`370
`1204 210
`
`2204 105
`
`1205 50
`
`2205
`
`25
`
`"Reissue independent claims
`over orig;ial palan1
`.. Reissue claims in excess of 20
`and over original patant
`
`SUBTOTAL (2)
`"or number previously paid, if greater, For Reissue·'" ... ii illiovii
`
`~$te 00.00
`
`665
`
`405
`
`405
`
`Plan! i1111Ue fee
`Petitions to the Comml881oner - check fee sheet
`Processing fee under 37 CFR 1.17(c)
`50
`180
`Submission of Information Disclosure Slmt
`40 Recording each pal8lll 8881gnment par
`property (times number of properties)
`Flllng a submission after !Ina! rejeclial
`(37 CFA 1.1~9(a})
`For each additional invenllon lo be
`examined (37 CFR 1. 129(b))
`405 Request lor Continued Exarnnatlon (RCE)
`900 Reqilesl for expedited examination
`or a design application
`
`8021
`
`40
`
`1809 810 2809
`
`1810 810 2810
`
`1801 810 2801
`1802 900 1802
`
`• Reduced by Basic Filing Fee Paid
`
`I
`
`I Ottler fee (specify)
`SUBTOTAL (3) Its\ 00.00
`(Comliele (d l!Dfll/cableJ
`f JoJw.. c: ~okotylo ...,. n, ,. _ I Registration No. I 36,242
`I TBlsphone (732) 542-9070
`IL_ th.AA L- I , ..... o V\O vy.,.
`I Date
`I October 23, 2007
`WARN l'lG: lnformatlon on this form nby become public. Credit card Information should not
`belncll.J tied on this form. Provide credit card Information and authorization on PTO-2038.
`This collection of inlormalion is requi~ by 37 CFR 1.17 and 1.27. The information is required IOobtain or retain a benefit by the public which 18 loflle (and by Iha
`USPTO to process) an application. Confidentiality is governed by 35 U.S.C. 122 and XI CFR 1.14. This collection Is estimated to take 12 minutes to complete,
`Including gathering, preparing, and submitting the completed appl!cation form to the USPTO. Ti'ne -Mil vary depending upon lhe Individual case. Any oomments on
`the amoont of time you require to complete this form and/or suggestions for reducing 1his burden, should be sent 1o the Chiel lnformallon Officer. U.S. Patent and
`Trademark Office. U.S. Department of Commerce, Washinglon. DC 20231.
`
`SUBMITTED BY
`Name (Pllt!Vrype}
`
`Signature
`
`PAGE 4/12 • RCVD AT 10/23/2007 4:53:5J PM (Eastern Daylight Time]• SVR:USPTO-EFXRF-1/2 • DNIS:2738300 • CSID:1~25429071 • DURATION (mm-ss):04-22
`
`(cid:143)
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-02396-PGG-MHD Document 153-5 Filed 06/28/19 Page 15 of 22
`~005/012
`• 10/23/2007 16:11 FAX 17325429071
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES
`PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`RECEIVED
`CENTRAL FAX CENTSR
`OCT 2 ·3 2007
`
`Attorney Docket No.: cox-1C:IP
`Appl. No.: 11/445,928
`
`Applicant: Ingemar J. cox
`
`Filed: June 2, 2006
`
`Title: tJS:ING FEATURES EXTRAC'l'BD FROM AN A1JD:IO AND/OR VXDEO WORK
`TO OBTAI:N :INFORMA.T:ION ABOUT THE WORX
`
`TC/A.U.: 2624
`
`Examiner: Hot yet assigned
`
`Commissioner for Patents
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 2231.3-1450
`
`Sir:
`
`Before examining the above-referenced application, please
`amend the application as follows:
`
`.Amendments to the C1aims are reflected in the listing of
`claims which begins on page 2 of this paper.
`
`Remarks/Arguments begin on page 8 of this paper.
`
`PAGE 5f12 • RCVD AT 10f23f2007 4:53:51 PM [Eastern Daylight Tune]• SVR:USPTO·EFXRF•1f2 • DNIS:2738300 • CSID:17325429071 • DURATION (mm-ss):04•22
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-02396-PGG-MHD Document 153-5 Filed 06/28/19 Page 16 of 22
`~006/012
`10/23/2007 16:11 FAX 17325429071
`
`This listing of claims will replace all prior versions,
`and listings, of claims in the application:
`
`l Claim 1 (original): A computer-implemented method for
`2
`associating extra work information with an identification
`3
`of a work, the method comprising:
`4
`a) accepting a work and extra-work information
`5
`associated with the work;
`6
`b)
`identifying the work as one of a predetermined
`7
`number of known works, each of the predetermined
`8
`number of known works having an identifier; and
`9
`c) associating the identifier of the one of the
`predetermined number of known works with the
`10
`extra-work information.
`
`11
`
`1 Claim 2 (original}: The computer-implemented method of
`2
`claim 1 wherein the extra-work information includes at
`3
`least one of (A} a channel over which the work is or was
`4
`broadcast,
`(B) a station which broadcast the work, {C) a
`time that the work broadcast is or was received,
`(D) a time
`5
`6
`that the work is or was broadcast, and (E) a geographic
`7
`region in which the work is or was broadcast.
`
`1 Claim 3 (original): The computer-implemented method of
`2
`claim 1 wherein the act of associating the identifier of
`3
`the one of the predetermined number of known works with the
`4
`extra-work information uses a monitoring of the works and
`5 uses a comparison technique selected from a group
`6
`consisting of (A) linear correlation, (B) statistical
`7
`correlation, (C) mutual information,
`(D) Euclidean
`8 distance,
`(E) Lp-norms,
`(F) clustering, (G) kd-trees,
`
`(H}
`
`PAGE 6112 • RCVO AT 10/2312007 4:~3:51 PM [Eastern Daylight Time)• SVR:USPTO-EFXRF-112 • ONIS:2738300 • CSID:1732'429071 • DURATION (mm-ss):04-22
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-02396-PGG-MHD Document 153-5 Filed 06/28/19 Page 17 of 22
`[4)007/012
`10/23/2007 16:12 FAX 17325429071
`\
`
`9 vantage point trees~ and (I) excluded middle vantage point
`10
`forest.
`
`1 Claim 4 (original): The computer-implemented method of
`2
`claim 1 further comprising:
`3
`d)
`storing the associated the identifier of the one
`4
`of the predetermined number of known works and the
`S
`extra-work information in a database.
`
`1 Claim 5 (original): The computer-implemented method of
`2
`claim 4 further comprising:
`3
`e)
`accepting a client query including extra-work
`4
`information; and
`f) using the accepted extra-work information to
`lookup an identifier in the database.
`
`5
`6
`
`1 Claim 6 (original): The computer-implemented method of
`2
`claim 5 further comprising:
`3
`g) using an identifier found in the database to
`4
`lookup a work-related action.
`
`I Claim 7 {original): The computer-implemented method of
`2
`claim 6 wherein the work-related action is transiting the
`3 client sourcing the client query to an Internet web site.
`
`1 Claim 8 (original): The computer-implemented method of
`2
`claim 1, wherein if the work is not identified as one of a
`3 predetermined number of known works, then d) ·assigning a
`4
`new work identifier to the work; and e) storing the
`5
`identifier and work as a known work.
`
`PAGE 7/12 • RCVD AT 10/23/2007 4:53:51 PM (Eastern Daylight Time]• SVR:USPTO-EFXRF-1I2' DNIS:2738300' CSID:17325429071 • DURATION cmm-ss):04-22
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-02396-PGG-MHD Document 153-5 Filed 06/28/19 Page 18 of 22
`~008/012
`10/23/2007 16:12 FAX 17325429071
`
`1 Claim 9 (original): One or more machine-readable storage
`2 medium having stored th~reon:
`3
`a)
`a first plurality of records, each of said first
`plurality of records including:
`i)
`a first field for storing features of a first
`work;
`ii}
`a second field for storing an identifier of
`the first work; and
`a second plurality of records, each of said second
`b)
`plurality of recording including:
`i)
`a first field for storing extra-work
`information associated with the first work; and
`ii)
`a second field for s~oring an identifier of
`the first work.
`
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`
`1 Claim 10 (original}: The one or more machine readable
`2 medium of claim 9 wherein the extra-work information
`3
`includes at least one of (A)· a channel over which the work
`4
`is or was broadcast, (B) a station which broadcast the
`5 work,
`(C) a time that the work broadcast is or was
`6
`received,
`(D} a time that the work is or was broadcast, and
`7
`{E} a geographic region in which the work is or was
`8 broadcast .
`
`l Claim 11 (original}: A monitoring apparatus, the
`2 monitoring apparatus comprising:
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`in input for accepting a work and extra-work
`a)
`information associated with the work;
`b} means for identifying the work as one of a
`predetermined number of known works, each of the
`
`PAGE 8112 • RCVD AT 10/23/2007 4:53:51 ~M (Eastern Daylight Time]• SVR:USPTO·EFXRF-112 • DNIS:2738300 • CSID:17325429071 • DURATION jmm-ss):04-22
`
`-4-
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-02396-PGG-MHD Document 153-5 Filed 06/28/19 Page 19 of 22
`~009/012
`10/23/2007 16:12 FAX 17325429071
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`predetermined number of known works having an
`identifier; and
`c) means for associating the identifier of the one of
`the predetermined number of known works with the
`extra-work information.
`
`1 Claim 12. (original}: The monitoring apparatus of claim 11
`2 wherein the extra-work information includes at least one of
`3
`(A) a·channel over which the work is or was broadcast,
`(B)
`4
`a station which broadcast the work,
`(C} a time that the
`5 work broadcast is or was received,
`(D) a time that the work
`6
`is or was broadcast, and (E) a geographic region in which
`7
`the work is or was broadcast.
`
`1 Claim 13 (original): The monitoring apparatus of claim 11
`2
`further comprising:
`3
`d)
`a database for storing records, one of the records
`4
`including the associated the identifier of the one of
`5
`the predetermined number of known works and the
`6
`extra-work information.
`
`1 Claim 14 (original): The monitoring apparatus of claim 11
`2
`further comprising means for assigning an identifier to a
`3 previously unknown work, wherein if the means for
`4
`identifying does not identify the work as one of a
`predetermined number of known works, then providing the
`6 work to the means for assigning.
`
`5
`
`Claims 15-19 (canceled)
`
`PAGE 9f12 • RCVD AT 10123120D7 4:53:51 PM J.Eastem Daylight Time)• SVR:USPTO-EFXRF-112 • DNJS:2738300 • CSID:17325429071 • DURATION (mm-ss):04•22
`
`-5-
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-02396-PGG-MHD Document 153-5 Filed 06/28/19 Page 20 of 22
`~010/012
`101/23/2007 16:13 FAX 17325429071
`
`4
`5
`
`1 Claim 20 (original): A computer-implemented method of
`2 providing information about an audio or video file played
`3
`on a device, the computer-implemented method comprising:
`a) extracting features from the audio or video file;
`b)
`communicating the features to a database; and
`c)
`receiving the information about the audio or video
`file from the database.
`
`6
`
`7
`
`1 Claim 21 (original) : The computer-implemented method of
`claim 20 wherein the file is an audio file, and wherein the
`2-
`audio file is one of (A) an mp3 file, and (B) a digital
`3
`representation of an audio signal.
`
`4
`
`1 Claim 22 (original): The computer-implemented method of
`2
`claim 21 wherein the information includes a song title, an
`3
`album title, and a performer name.
`
`1 Claim 23 (original): The computer-implemented method of
`2
`claim 20 wherein the act of extracting the features is
`3
`performed by at least one of (A) a microprocessor of the
`4
`device, and (B) a digital signal processor of the device.
`
`1 Claim 24 (original): The computer-implemented method of
`2
`claim 20 wherein the file is a video file, and wherein the
`3
`video file is one of (A) an MPEG file, and (B} a digital
`
`4
`
`representation of a video signal.
`
`1 Claim 25 (original); The computer-implemented method of
`2
`claim 24 the video file is a video work, and
`3
`wherein the information includes a title of the video
`4 work, a director of the video work, and names of performers
`5
`in the video work.
`
`PAGE 10/12 • RCVD AT 10/23/2007 4:53:51 PM (Eastern Daylight Time)• SVR:USPTO-cFXRF-112 • DNIS:2738300 • CSID:17325429071' DURATION (mm-ss):04-22
`
`-6-
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-02396-PGG-MHD Document 153-5 F