Case 1:14-cv-02396-PGG-MHD Document 146 Filed 04/30/19 Page 1 of 4
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
`
`
`
`
`NETWORK-1 TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`GOOGLE LLC and YOUTUBE, LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`14 Civ. 2396 (PGG)
`
`14 Civ. 9558 (PGG)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`AMENDED JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION CHART
`
`Pursuant to Paragraph 10(b) of the Joint Proposed Civil Case Management Plan and
`
`Scheduling Order filed on January 17, 2019 (Dkt. No. 137-1),1 Plaintiff Network-1 Technologies,
`
`Inc. and Defendants Google LLC and YouTube, LLC (collectively, “Defendants”) submit this
`
`Joint Claim Construction Chart for certain limitations of the asserted claims of U.S. Patent Nos.
`
`8,010,988 (“the ’988 patent”), 8,205,237 (“the ’237 patent”), and 8,904,464 (“the ’464 patent”).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 Citations to the docket correspond to documents filed in Case No. 14 Civ. 2396 (PGG).
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-02396-PGG-MHD Document 146 Filed 04/30/19 Page 2 of 4
`
`
`
`I.
`
`Agreed Upon Constructions
`
`The parties agree upon the following constructions:
`
`Claim Term
`
`“sublinear” [search]
`
`“neighbor”
`“near neighbor”
`
`
`“near neighbor search”
`
`
`“approximate nearest
`neighbor search”
`
`“machine-readable
`instructions”
`
`Agreed Construction
`
`Asserted Claims2 in
`which Term Appears
`’988 patent: 17
`
`’237 patent: 33, 34, 35
`
`’988 patent: (15), 17
`
`’464 patent: 1, 8, 10,
`16, 18, 25, 27, 33
`
`“A search whose execution time scales with a
`less than linear relationship to the size of the
`data set to be searched, assuming computing
`power is held constant.”
`“A close, but not necessarily exact or the
`closest, match of a feature vector, compact
`electronic representation, or set of extracted
`features to another, wherein the distance or
`difference between the two feature vectors,
`compact electronic representations, or sets of
`extracted features falls within a defined
`threshold.”
`“A search using an algorithm designed to
`identify a close, but not necessarily exact or the
`closest, match of a feature vector, compact
`electronic representation, or set of extracted
`features to another, wherein the distance or
`difference between the two feature vectors,
`compact electronic representations, or sets of
`extracted features falls within a defined
`threshold.”
`’237 patent: 33, 34, 35 “A search using an algorithm designed to
`identify a close, but not necessarily exact or the
`closest, match of a feature vector, compact
`electronic representation, or set of extracted
`features to another, wherein the distance or
`difference between the two feature vectors,
`compact electronic representations, or sets of
`extracted features falls within a defined
`threshold.”
`“code or pseudocode that is executed using a
`computer processor, i.e., that is discernable by
`a computer processor and dictates steps to be
`carried out by one or more computer
`processors”
`
`’464 patent: 1, 8, 10,
`16, 18, 25, 27, 33
`
`’464 patent: 1, 8, 10,
`16, 18, 25, 27, 33
`
`
`2 Bold numbers indicate claims explicitly reciting the claim term. Non-bold numbers indicate
`claims depending from claims that explicitly recite the claim term. Numbers in parentheses
`indicate a claim that is not currently asserted recites the claim term, and a claim depending from
`that non-asserted claim is asserted.
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-02396-PGG-MHD Document 146 Filed 04/30/19 Page 3 of 4
`
`
`
`II.
`
`Disputed Constructions
`
`The parties propose different constructions for the following terms:
`
`Claim Term
`
`“non-exhaustive
`search”
`“non-exhaustive
`. . . search”
`
`Asserted Claims in
`which Term Appears
`’988 patent: (15), 17
`
`’464 patent: 1, 8, 10,
`16, 18, 25, 27, 33
`
`“correlation
`information”
`
`’464 patent: 1, 8, 10,
`16, 18, 25, 27, 33
`
`“extracted
`features”
`
`’988 patent: (15), 17
`
`’237 patent: 33, 34, 35
`
`“extracting
`features”
`
`’988 patent: (15), 17
`
`
`
`
`
`Network-1’s Proposed
`Construction
`“A search designed to
`locate a [near] neighbor
`without comparing to all
`possible matches (i.e., all
`records in the reference
`data set), even if the search
`does not locate a [near]
`neighbor.”
`Ordinary meaning.
`
`Alternatively:
`“information that
`associates the first
`electronic media work
`with an electronic media
`work identifier”
`“Electronic data sampled,
`calculated, or otherwise
`derived from a work itself,
`as opposed to from
`information added or
`appended to the work.”
`“Sampling, calculating, or
`otherwise deriving
`electronic data from a
`work itself, as opposed to
`from information added or
`appended to the work.”
`
`Defendants’ Proposed
`Construction
`Indefinite.
`
`Indefinite.
`
`“Electronic data derived
`from a work itself, as
`opposed to from
`information added or
`appended to the work.”
`
`“Deriving electronic
`data from a work itself,
`as opposed to from
`information added or
`appended to the work.”
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-02396-PGG-MHD Document 146 Filed 04/30/19 Page 4 of 4
`
`
`
`Dated: April 30, 2019
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`RUSS, AUGUST & KABAT
`
`BY: /s/ Marc A. Fenster
`
`Marc A. Fenster (pro hac vice)
`Brian D. Ledahl (pro hac vice)
`Adam S. Hoffman (pro hac vice)
`Paul A. Kroeger (pro hac vice)
`Amy E. Hayden (pro hac vice)
`12424 Wilshire Blvd. 12th Floor
`Los Angeles, CA 90025
`Phone: (310) 826-7474
`Fax: (310) 826-6991
`mfenster@raklaw.com
`bledahl@raklaw.com
`ahoffman@raklaw.com
`pkroeger@raklaw.com
`ahayden@raklaw.com
`
`Charles R. Macedo
`AMSTER, ROTHSTEIN &
`EBENSTEIN LLP
`90 Park Avenue
`New York, NY 10016
`Phone: (212) 336-8074
`Fax: (212) 336-8001
`cmacedo@arelaw.com
`
`
`Attorneys for Network-1
`Technologies, Inc.
`
`
`
`
`WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY LLP
`
`BY: /s/ Kevin Hardy
`
`Samuel Bryant Davidoff
`650 Fifth Avenue, Suite 1500
`New York, NY 10022
`212-688-9224
`sdavidoff@wc.com
`
`Bruce R. Genderson (pro hac vice)
`Kevin Hardy (pro hac vice)
`Daniel P. Shanahan (pro hac vice)
`Andrew V. Trask (pro hac vice)
`Christopher A. Suarez (pro hac vice)
`725 Twelfth St. NW
`Washington, DC 20005
`Phone: (202) 434-5000
`Fax: (202) 434-5029
`bgenderson@wc.com
`khardy@wc.com
`dshanahan@wc.com
`atrask@wc.com
`csuarez@wc.com
`
`Attorneys for Google LLC and
`YouTube, LLC
`
`
`
`4
`
`