throbber
Case 1:14-cv-02396-PGG-MHD Document 132 Filed 12/17/18 Page 1 of 2
`
`Of Counsel
`Philip H. Gottfried
`Anne Hassett
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` *
`
` Not admitted in New York
`
`Partners
`Daniel Ebenstein
`Neil M. Zipkin
`Anthony F. Lo Cicero
`Kenneth P. George
`Chester Rothstein
`Craig J. Arnold
`Charles R. Macedo
`Brian A. Comack
`Max Vern
`Holly Pekowsky
`Benjamin M. Halpern*
`Douglas A. Miro
`
`Founding Partners
`Morton Amster, Of Counsel
`Jesse Rothstein (1934-2003)
`
`Senior Counsel
`Marion P. Metelski
`Alan D. Miller, Ph.D.
`Marc J. Jason
`Richard S. Mandaro
`Matthieu Hausig
`Jung S. Hahm
`Mark Berkowitz
`
`Associates
`Benjamin Charkow
`Suzue Fujimori
`Jessica Capasso
`Brian Amos, Ph.D.
`Hajime Sakai, Ph.D.
`David P. Goldberg
`Sandra A. Hudak
`Tzvi Hirshaut
`Tuvia Rotberg
`Dexter Chang
`Keith J. Barkaus
`Michael R. Jones
`
`Charles R. Macedo
`Direct 212 336 8074
`E-mail CMacedo@arelaw.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`90 Park Avenue
`New York NY 10016
`Main 212 336 8000
`Fax
`212 336 8001
`Web www.arelaw.com
`
`December 17, 2018
`
`VIA ECF
`The Honorable Paul G. Gardephe
`United States District Judge
`United States District Court
`Southern District of New York
`40 Foley Square, Room 2204
`New York, NY 10007
`
`
`
`Dear Judge Gardephe:
`
`Re: Network-1 Technologies, Inc.
`v. Google, Inc. and YouTube, LLC.
`Civil Action No. 1:14-cv-02396 PGG-MHD and 1:14-cv-09558-PGG
`Our File: 63121/62 and 63121/78
`
`We write to update the Court regarding the status of this matter as relates to
`various proceedings in the patent office and appeals thereof. Pursuant to a Stipulation and
`Proposed Order separately submitted to the Court via ECF, the parties have reached agreement
`regarding resolution of the remaining patent office proceedings and the lifting of the stay in these
`matters. To that end, the parties request that the Court set a scheduling conference to address
`continued proceedings in these matters.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-02396-PGG-MHD Document 132 Filed 12/17/18 Page 2 of 2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Charles R. Macedo
`
`Charles R. Macedo
`AMSTER, ROTHSTEIN
`& EBENSTEIN LLP
`90 Park Avenue
`New York, New York 10016
`Telephone: (212) 336-8074
`Fax: (212) 336-8001
`cmacedo@arelaw.com
`
`OF COUNSEL:
`Marc A. Fenster (pro hac vice)
`Brian D. Ledahl (pro hac vice)
`Benjamin T. Wang (pro hac vice)
`RUSS AUGUST & KABAT
`12424 Wilshire Boulevard 12th Floor
`Los Angeles, California 90025
`Telephone: (310) 826-7474
`Fax: (310) 826-6991
`mfenster@raklaw.com
`bledahl@raklaw.com
`bwang@raklaw.com
`
`Attorneys for Network-1
`Technologies, Inc.
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`December 17, 2018
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ Samuel Bryant Davidoff
`
`Samuel Bryant Davidoff
`WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY LLP
`650 Fifth Avenue, Suite 1500
`New York, NY 10022
`212-688-9224
`sdavidoff@wc.com
`
`OF COUNSEL:
`Bruce R. Genderson
`Kevin Hardy
`Daniel P. Shanahan
`Christopher A. Suarez
`WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY LLP
`725 Twelfth Street, N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20005
`Telephone: (202) 434-5000
`Fax: (202) 434-5029
`bgenderson@wc.com
`khardy@wc.com
`dshanahan@wc.com
`csuarez@wc.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendants Google LLC
`and YouTube LLC
`
`
`
`4839-3641-4083, v. 1
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket