throbber
Case 3:20-cv-05784-ZNQ-DEA Document 207 Filed 01/19/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 7023
`
`Cynthia S. Betz
`Partner
`T. 973-848-5377
`F. 973-297-6636
`cbetz@mccarter.com
`
`McCarter & English, LLP
`Four Gateway Center
`100 Mulberry Street
`Newark, NJ 07102-4056
`www.mccarter.com
`
`January 19, 2024
`
`VIA ECF
`
`Hon. Douglas E. Arpert, U.S.M.J.
`U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey
`Clarkson S. Fisher Building & U.S. Courthouse
`402 East State Street
`Trenton, NJ 08608
`
`Re: OANDA Corporation v. GAIN Capital Holdings, Inc., et al.
`No. 3:20-cv-05784-ZNQ-DEA
`
`Dear Judge Arpert:
`
`We, along with our co-counsel from Koning Zollar LLP, represent Plaintiff OANDA
`Corporation in this matter. Pursuant to the Court’s Order (D.E. 204), Plaintiff and Defendant
`GAIN Capital Holdings, Inc. submit this joint letter regarding the Court’s request for a status
`report, including a proposed scheduling order.
`
`Joint Status Report & Scheduling:
`
`The parties are engaged in discovery and are awaiting issuance of a claim construction
`ruling, after Judge Quraishi held a Markman hearing on August 4, 2022. This Court previously
`approved a case schedule on February 1, 2023 (Dkt. 166), which sets dates based upon the date of
`issuance of the Markman order. The parties are in agreement that this schedule is appropriate and
`should remain unchanged.
`Separate Statements Re Other Issues:
`Defendant GAIN’s Statement:
`Mindful that this Court prefers to be apprised of anticipated docketing events, GAIN
`wishes to apprise the Court of the following anticipated events:
`First, GAIN anticipates bringing a motion to amend its non-infringement contentions
`under Local Patent Rule 3.2A and to amend its invalidity contentions under Local Patent Rule 3.3
`in January in direct response to OANDA’s amended infringement contentions which this Court
`permitted by Order dated December 29, 2023 (Dkt. 202). Whether OANDA should be permitted
`to amend had been a disputed issue until this Court’s December 29th ruling. In light of the Court
`having granted OANDA’s application, such amendments have necessarily compelled GAIN to
`evaluate OANDA’s submission and consider appropriate responses in light of those amendments.
` Second, GAIN has also identified certain issues regarding the sufficiency of OANDA’s
`contention disclosures by letter to OANDA. GAIN anticipates meeting and conferring regarding
`such issues with OANDA, but if such issues cannot be resolved between the parties, further motion
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-05784-ZNQ-DEA Document 207 Filed 01/19/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 7024
`
`Hon. Douglas E. Arpert, U.S.M.J.
`Page 2
`
`practice may be required to resolve remaining disputes. We shall keep Your Honor informed of
`any developments or the need for judicial assistance.
`Third, GAIN may bring a motion to compel to address OANDA’s failure to substantively
`respond to GAIN’s interrogatories seeking damages-related information.
`Plaintiff OANDA’s Statement:
`While OANDA has not yet been apprised of the substance of GAIN’s anticipated motion
`to amend its non-infringement contentions under Local Patent Rule 3.2A and to amend its
`invalidity contentions under Local Patent Rule 3.3, OANDA is willing to meet and confer with
`GAIN in good faith about any such motion. The parties already have a meet and confer scheduled
`for Friday, January 26, 2024, to discuss GAIN’s letter raising purported deficiencies in OANDA’s
`infringement contentions.
`OANDA also anticipates bringing a motion to compel to address deficiencies in some of
`GAIN’s interrogatory responses related to damages.
`
`The parties thank the Court for its continued assistance in this matter.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ Cynthia S. Betz
`
`Cynthia S. Betz
`
`cc: All Counsel of Record (via ECF)
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket