`
`3rd
`
`January
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
`
`Civil Action No. 20-05784-ZNQ-DEA
`ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION
`FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE
`
`Document Filed Electronically
`
`)))))))))))))
`
`OANDA CORPORATION,
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`GAIN CAPITAL HOLDINGS, INC., and GAIN
`CAPITAL GROUP, LLC,
`Defendants.
`
`THIS MATTER having been opened to the Court by Arnold B. Calmann, Esq., attorney
`
`for Defendants GAIN Capital Holdings, Inc. and GAIN Capital Group, LLC (“GAIN”) for an
`
`Order allowing Neil N. Desai, Esq., of the law firm of Wilson, Sonsini, Goodrich & Rosati, to
`
`appear and participate pro hac vice in this matter, and the Court having considered said
`
`application; and there being no opposition; and for other and good cause having been shown,
`
`pursuant to L. Civ. R. 101.1(c) of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey;
`
`IT IS on this ______ day of
`
`, 2023, hereby
`
`ORDERED that Neil N. Desai, Esq., a member in good standing of the bar of the state of
`
`California, be permitted to appear pro hac vice in the above-captioned matter pursuant to L. Civ.
`
`R. 101.1(c) of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey; provided however,
`
`that all proceedings, briefs and other papers filed with the Court shall be signed by Arnold B.
`
`Calmann, Esq., or a designated attorney in his office, who is a member in good standing of the
`
`Bar of the Supreme Court of New Jersey and the Bar of this Court, who shall be held responsible
`
`
`
`Case 3:20-cv-05784-ZNQ-DEA Document 154 Filed 01/03/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 4910
`
`for said papers and for the conduct of the case and who shall be present before the Court during
`
`all phases of these proceedings, unless expressly excused by the Court, as well as be held
`
`responsible for the conduct of the attorney admitted pro hac vice pursuant to this Order; and it is
`
`further
`
`ORDERED that Neil N. Desai, Esq., shall pay the annual fee to the New Jersey
`
`Lawyers’ Fund for Client Protection in accordance with New Jersey Court Rule 1:28-2; and it is
`
`further
`
`ORDERED that Neil N. Desai, Esq., shall pay $150.00 to the Clerk of the United States
`
`District Court for the District of New Jersey in payment of the fee for admission pro hac vice in
`
`accordance with L. Civ. R. 101.1(c)(3), Appearance Pro Hac Vice; Local Counsel; and it is
`
`further
`
`ORDERED that Neil N. Desai, Esq., shall be bound by the Local Civil Rules of the
`
`United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, including, but not limited to, the
`
`provisions of L. Civ. R. 103.1, Judicial Ethics and Professional Responsibility, and L. Civ. R.
`
`104.1, Discipline of Attorneys; and it is further
`
`ORDERED that Neil N. Desai, Esq., shall be deemed to have agreed to take no fee in
`
`any tort case in excess of the New Jersey State Court Contingency Fee Rule, Rule 1:21-7, as
`
`amended; and it is further
`
`ORDERED, that Saiber LLC may file a request, the form of which is available at the
`
`Court’s website, with the Clerk of the Court for pro hac vice counsel to receive electronic
`
`notifications in this matter.
`
`HONORABLE DOUGLAS E. ARPERT
`UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
`
`2
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
