throbber
Case 3:15-cv-05723-PGS-LHG Document 49 Filed 06/21/16 Page 1 of 17 PageID: 394
`
`
`
`William J. O’Shaughnessy
`MCCARTER & ENGLISH LLP
`Four Gateway Center
`100 Mulberry Street
`Newark, NJ 07102
`(973) 639-2094
`woshaughnessy@mccarter.com
`
`OF COUNSEL:
`Douglas Carsten
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`12235 El Camino Real
`Suite 200
`San Diego, CA 92130
`
`William C. Jackson
`BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
`5301 Wisconsin Avenue, NW
`Washington, DC 20015
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`United Therapeutics Corporation
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`
`UNITED THERAPEUTICS CORPORATION )
`)
`)
`)
`) Civil Action No.: 3:15cv-05723-PGS-LHG
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`WATSON LABORATORIES, INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND
`
`Plaintiff United Therapeutics Corporation (“UTC”), by its undersigned attorneys, for its
`
`First Amended Complaint against Watson Laboratories, Inc. (“Watson”), alleges as follows:
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case 3:15-cv-05723-PGS-LHG Document 49 Filed 06/21/16 Page 2 of 17 PageID: 395
`
`
`
`NATURE OF THE ACTION
`
`1.
`
`This is an action for patent infringement arising under the patent laws of the
`
`United States, Title 35, United States Code, Sections 100 et seq., involving United States Patent
`
`Nos. 6,521,212 (“the ’212 patent”) (attached as Exhibit A hereto), 6,756,033 (“the ’033 patent”)
`
`(attached as Exhibit B hereto), 8,497,393 (“the ’393 patent”) (attached as Exhibit C hereto),
`
`9,339,507 (“the ’507 patent”) (attached as Exhibit D hereto), and 9,358,240 (“the ’240 patent”)
`
`(attached as Exhibit E hereto).
`
`2.
`
`This action arises out of Watson’s submission of Abbreviated New Drug
`
`Application (“ANDA”) No. 208172 to the United States Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”)
`
`seeking approval, prior to the expiration of the ’212, ’393, ’033, ’507, and ’240 patents, to
`
`manufacture, market, and sell a generic copy of UTC’s TYVASO® (treprostinil) Inhalation
`
`Solution, 0.6 mg/ml that is approved by FDA for treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension.
`
`THE PARTIES
`
`3.
`
`UTC is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of
`
`Delaware, and having a place of business at 1040 Spring Street, Silver Spring, Maryland 20910.
`
`UTC is a biotechnology company focused on the development and commercialization of
`
`products designed to address the needs of patients with chronic and life-threatening conditions.
`
`4.
`
`Upon information and belief, Watson is a corporation organized and existing
`
`under the laws of the State of California and has a principal place of business at Morris
`
`Corporate Center III, 400 Interpace Parkway, Parsippany, New Jersey 07054.
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`5.
`
`This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action pursuant to the
`
`provisions of 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1338(a), 2201, and 2202.
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 3:15-cv-05723-PGS-LHG Document 49 Filed 06/21/16 Page 3 of 17 PageID: 396
`
`
`
`6.
`
`7.
`
`Venue is proper in this Court under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391 and 1400(b).
`
`Upon information and belief, this Court has personal jurisdiction over Watson
`
`with respect to this Complaint because, inter alia, of its continuous and systematic contacts with
`
`this judicial district. The notice letter was sent from Watson at Morris Corporate Center III, 400
`
`Interpace Parkway, Parsippany, New Jersey, NJ 07054. Upon information and belief, Watson
`
`derives substantial revenue from articles used and consumed in this judicial district, and
`
`consistent with its practice with respect to other generic products, following any FDA approval
`
`of Watson’s ANDA, Watson will sell its generic product throughout the United States, including
`
`in New Jersey. Upon information and belief, Watson is registered to conduct business in the
`
`State of New Jersey and employs people throughout New Jersey, including at least the following
`
`locations: Morris Corporate Center III, 400 Interpace Parkway, Parsippany, New Jersey 07054;
`
`100 Enterprise Drive, Rockaway, New Jersey 07866; and 350 Mt. Kemble Avenue, Morristown,
`
`New Jersey 07960. In addition, Watson has previously availed itself of this Court as a forum in
`
`which to bring patent litigation against others.
`
`BACKGROUND
`
`8.
`
`UTC holds an approved New Drug Application (No. 22-387) for TYVASO®
`
`(treprostinil) Inhalation Solution, 0.6 mg/ml, which UTC markets and sells under the registered
`
`trademark TYVASO®.
`
`9.
`
`TYVASO® is a pharmaceutical product initially approved by FDA in the United
`
`States in July 2009, and is indicated for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension.
`
`Pulmonary arterial hypertension is a rare disease affecting the pulmonary vasculature and results
`
`in high pressure in the pulmonary arteries, which increases strain on the right ventricle of the
`
`heart, thereby leading to heart failure and death.
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 3:15-cv-05723-PGS-LHG Document 49 Filed 06/21/16 Page 4 of 17 PageID: 397
`
`
`
`10.
`
`TYVASO® is an inhalable product approved for sale in a 0.6 mg/mL
`
`concentration.
`
`11.
`
`The ’212 patent, entitled “Method for treating peripheral vascular disease by
`
`administering benzindene prostaglandins by inhalation” was duly and legally issued by the
`
`United States Patent and Trademark Office on February 18, 2003. The named inventors are
`
`Gilles Cloutier, James Crow, Michael Wade, Richard E. Parker, and James E. Loyd.
`
`12.
`
`UTC is the lawful owner of the ’212 patent by assignment of all right, title, and
`
`interest in and to the ’212 patent, including the right to bring infringement suits thereon.
`
`13.
`
`The ’393 patent, entitled “Process to Prepare Treprostinil, the Active Ingredient in
`
`Remodulin®,” was duly and legally issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office on
`
`July 30, 2014. The named inventors are Hitesh Batra, Sudersan M. Tuladhar, Raju Penmasta,
`
`and David A. Walsh.
`
`14.
`
`UTC is the lawful owner of the ’393 patent by assignment of all right, title, and
`
`interest in and to the ’393 patent, including the right to bring infringement suits thereon.
`
`15.
`
`The ’033 patent, entitled “Method for delivering benzindene prostaglandins by
`
`inhalation,” was duly and legally issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office on
`
`June 29, 2004. The named inventors are Gilles Cloutier, James Crow, Michael Wade, Richard E.
`
`Parker, and James E. Loyd.
`
`16.
`
`UTC is the lawful owner of the ’033 patent by assignment of all right, title, and
`
`interest in and to the ’033 patent, including the right to bring infringement suits thereon.
`
`17.
`
`The ’507 patent, entitled “Treprostinil administration by inhalation,” was duly and
`
`legally issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office on May 17, 2016. The named
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 3:15-cv-05723-PGS-LHG Document 49 Filed 06/21/16 Page 5 of 17 PageID: 398
`
`
`
`inventors are Horst Olschewski, Robert Roscingo, Lewis Rubin, Thomas Schmehl, Werner
`
`Seeger, Carl Sterritt, and Robert Voswinckel.
`
`18.
`
`UTC is the lawful owner of the ’507 patent by assignment of all right, title, and
`
`interest in and to the ’507 patent, including the right to bring infringement suits thereon.
`
`19.
`
`The ’240 patent, entitled “Treprostinil administration by inhalation,” was duly and
`
`legally issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office on June 7, 2016. The named
`
`inventors are Horst Olschewski, Robert Roscingo, Lewis Rubin, Thomas Schmehl, Werner
`
`Seeger, Carl Sterritt, and Robert Voswinckel.
`
`20.
`
`UTC is the lawful owner of the ’240 patent by assignment of all right, title, and
`
`interest in the ‘240 patent, including the right to bring infringement suits thereon.
`
`21.
`
`TYVASO® and its FDA approved manufacture and uses are covered by one or
`
`more claims of the ’212, ’033, ’393, ’507, and ’240 patents, which have all been listed in
`
`connection with TYVASO® in the FDA’s Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic
`
`Equivalents publication (also known as the “Orange Book”).
`
`ACTS GIVING RISE TO THIS ACTION
`
`22. Watson notified UTC by letter dated June 12, 2015, which was delivered to UTC
`
`on or about, Saturday, June 13, 2015 (“Watson’s Notice Letter”), that it had filed ANDA No.
`
`208172 with the FDA seeking approval to commercially manufacture, market, use, and sell
`
`generic copies of TYVASO® (treprostinil) Inhalation Solution, 0.6 mg/mL (“Watson’s ANDA
`
`Products”) prior to the expiration of the ’212, ’033, and ’393 patents.
`
`23. Watson’s Notice Letter included a statement pursuant to 21 U.S.C. §
`
`355(j)(2)(vii)(IV) purporting to recite Watson’s “factual and legal basis” for its opinion that the
`
`’212, ’033, and ’393 patents are not valid, are unenforceable, and/or would not be infringed by
`
`
`
`5
`
`

`

`Case 3:15-cv-05723-PGS-LHG Document 49 Filed 06/21/16 Page 6 of 17 PageID: 399
`
`
`
`the commercial manufacture, use, or sale of Watson’s ANDA Products. Yet that statement did
`
`not include any explanation as to why claims 1-5 and 9-12 of the ’212 patent, claims 4 and 6-10
`
`of the ’033 patent, and any claim of the ’393 patent were invalid. The statement also did not
`
`include anything beyond conclusory statements as to why claims 6-8 of the ’212 patent and
`
`claims 1-3 and 5 of the ’033 patent were invalid. The statement also did not include anything
`
`beyond conclusory statements regarding alleged non-infringement. Watson provided no
`
`explanation as to the alleged unenforceability.
`
`24.
`
`Upon information and belief, Watson submitted ANDA No. 208172 with FDA
`
`seeking approval to commercially manufacture, market, use, and sell generic copies of
`
`TYVASO® (treprostinil) Inhalation Solution, 0.6 mg/mL (“Watson’s ANDA Products”) prior to
`
`the expiration of the ’212, ’033, ’393,’507, and ’240 patents.
`
`25.
`
`UTC commenced this action before the expiration of forty-five days from the date
`
`UTC received Watson’s Notice Letter.
`
`26.
`
`Upon information and belief, Watson’s ANDA Products contains the same active
`
`compound as UTC’s approved TYVASO® product.
`
`27.
`
`Upon information and belief, Watson’s ANDA No. 208172 seeks approval from
`
`the FDA to market Watson’s ANDA Products for the same indication as UTC’s approved
`
`TYVASO® product.
`
`28.
`
`Upon information and belief, Watson represented to FDA in ANDA No. 208172
`
`that Watson’s ANDA Products is bioequivalent to UTC’s approved TYVASO® product.
`
`29.
`
`Upon information and belief, Watson intends to commercially manufacture, sell,
`
`offer for sale, and/or import Watson’s ANDA Products upon, or in anticipation of, FDA
`
`approval.
`
`
`
`6
`
`

`

`Case 3:15-cv-05723-PGS-LHG Document 49 Filed 06/21/16 Page 7 of 17 PageID: 400
`
`
`
`30.
`
`According to Watson’s Notice Letter, Watson’s ANDA No. 208172 contained a
`
`“Paragraph IV” certification pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 355(j)(2)(vii)(IV) stating that in Watson’s
`
`opinion the ’212, ’033, and ’393 patents are invalid, unenforceable, and/or would not be
`
`infringed by the manufacture, use or sale of Watson’s ANDA Products.
`
`31.
`
`Upon information and belief, as of the date of Watson’s Notice Letter, Watson
`
`was aware of the statutory provisions and regulations set forth in 21 U.S.C. §§
`
`355(j)(2)(B)(iv)(II) and 21 C.F.R. § 314.95(c)(6).
`
`32.
`
`Upon information and belief, the acts of infringement by Watson have been
`
`intentional and willful.
`
`COUNT 1 INFRINGEMENT OF THE ’212 PATENT UNDER 35 U.S.C. § 271(e)
`
`33.
`
`UTC repeats and realleges each of the foregoing paragraphs as if fully set forth
`
`herein.
`
`34.
`
`Upon information and belief, Watson’s ANDA Products or an intermediate in its
`
`manufacture is covered by one or more claims of the ’212 patent.
`
`35. Watson had knowledge of the ’212 patent when it submitted ANDA No. 208172.
`
`36. Watson’s submission of ANDA No. 208172 for the purpose of obtaining approval
`
`to engage in the commercial manufacture, use, sale, and/or offer for sale of Watson’s ANDA
`
`Products was an act of infringement of the ’212 patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271(e)(2).
`
`37.
`
`Upon information and belief, the commercial manufacture, use, offer for sale, sale
`
`and/or importation of Watson’s ANDA Products would infringe one or more claims of the ’212
`
`patent.
`
`
`
`7
`
`

`

`Case 3:15-cv-05723-PGS-LHG Document 49 Filed 06/21/16 Page 8 of 17 PageID: 401
`
`
`
`38.
`
`Upon information and belief, Watson was and is aware of the existence of the
`
`’212 patent and acted without a reasonable basis for believing that it would not be liable for
`
`infringement of the ’212 patent, thus rendering this case “exceptional” under 35 U.S.C. § 285.
`
`39.
`
`UTC will be substantially and irreparably damaged and harmed if Watson’s
`
`infringement of the ’212 patent is not enjoined by this Court. UTC does not have an adequate
`
`remedy at law.
`
`40.
`
`Upon information and belief, the acts of infringement by Watson have been
`
`intentional and willful.
`
`COUNT 2: INFRINGEMENT OF THE ’393 PATENT UNDER 35 U.S.C. § 271(e)
`
`41.
`
`UTC repeats and realleges each of the foregoing paragraphs as if fully set forth
`
`herein.
`
`42.
`
`Upon information and belief, Watson’s ANDA Products or an intermediate in its
`
`manufacture is covered by one or more claims of the ’393 patent.
`
`43. Watson had knowledge of the ’393 patent when it submitted ANDA No. 208172.
`
`44. Watson’s submission of ANDA No. 208172 for the purpose of obtaining approval
`
`to engage in the commercial manufacture, use, sale, and/or offer for sale of Watson’s ANDA
`
`Products was an act of infringement of the ’393 patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271(e)(2).
`
`45.
`
`Upon information and belief, the commercial manufacture, use, offer for sale, sale
`
`and/or importation of Watson’s ANDA Products would infringe one or more claims of the ’393
`
`patent.
`
`46.
`
`Upon information and belief, Watson was and is aware of the existence of the
`
`’393 patent and acted without a reasonable basis for believing that it would not be liable for
`
`infringement of the ’393 patent, thus rendering this case “exceptional” under 35 U.S.C. § 285.
`
`
`
`8
`
`

`

`Case 3:15-cv-05723-PGS-LHG Document 49 Filed 06/21/16 Page 9 of 17 PageID: 402
`
`
`
`47.
`
`UTC will be substantially and irreparably damaged and harmed if Watson’s
`
`infringement of the ’393 patent is not enjoined by this Court. UTC does not have an adequate
`
`remedy at law.
`
`48.
`
`Upon information and belief, the acts of infringement by Watson have been
`
`intentional and willful.
`
`COUNT 3: INFRINGEMENT OF THE ’033 PATENT UNDER 35 U.S.C. § 271(e)
`
`49.
`
`UTC repeats and realleges each of the foregoing paragraphs as if fully set forth
`
`herein.
`
`50.
`
`Upon information and belief, use of Watson’s ANDA Products is covered by one
`
`or more claims of the ’033 patent.
`
`51. Watson had knowledge of the ’033 patent when it submitted ANDA No. 208172.
`
`52. Watson’s submission of ANDA No. 208172 for the purpose of obtaining approval
`
`to engage in the commercial manufacture, use, sale, and/or offer for sale of Watson’s ANDA
`
`Products was an act of infringement of the ’033 patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271(e)(2).
`
`53.
`
`Upon information and belief, the commercial manufacture, use, offer for sale, sale
`
`and/or importation of Watson’s ANDA Products would directly or indirectly infringe one or
`
`more claims of the ’033 patent.
`
`54.
`
`Upon information and belief, Watson will induce others to infringe one or more
`
`claims of the ’033 patent by, among other things, actively and knowingly aiding and abetting
`
`others to infringe, including, but not limited to patients or health care providers that administer
`
`Watson’s ANDA Product in diluted form for intravenous administration, which use constitutes
`
`direct infringement of one or more claims of the ’033 patent. Upon information and belief,
`
`Watson’s aiding and abetting includes Watson’s active steps to promote its ANDA Product for
`
`
`
`9
`
`

`

`Case 3:15-cv-05723-PGS-LHG Document 49 Filed 06/21/16 Page 10 of 17 PageID: 403
`
`
`
`infringing uses, and encourage and instruct such use as stated in, for example and without
`
`limitation, proposed product package insert labeling pursuant to Watson’s ANDA.
`
`55.
`
`Upon information and belief, Watson was and is aware of the existence of the
`
`’033 patent and acted without a reasonable basis for believing that it would not be liable for
`
`infringement of the ’033 patent, thus rendering this case “exceptional” under 35 U.S.C. § 285.
`
`56.
`
`UTC will be substantially and irreparably damaged and harmed if Watson’s
`
`infringement of the ’033 patent is not enjoined by this Court. UTC does not have an adequate
`
`remedy at law.
`
`57.
`
`Upon information and belief, the acts of infringement by Watson have been
`
`intentional and willful.
`
`COUNT 4: INFRINGEMENT OF THE ’507 PATENT UNDER 35 U.S.C. § 271(e)
`
`58.
`
`UTC repeats and realleges each of the foregoing paragraphs as if fully set forth
`
`herein.
`
`59.
`
`Upon information and belief, use of Watson’s ANDA Products is covered by one
`
`or more claims of the ’507 patent.
`
`60. Watson’s submission of ANDA No. 208172 for the purpose of obtaining approval
`
`to engage in the commercial manufacture, use, sale, and/or offer for sale of Watson’s ANDA
`
`Products was an act of infringement of the ’507 patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271(e)(2).
`
`61.
`
`Upon information and belief, the commercial manufacture, use, offer for sale, sale
`
`and/or importation of Watson’s ANDA Products would directly or indirectly infringe one or
`
`more claims of the ’507 patent.
`
`62.
`
`Upon information and belief, Watson will induce others to infringe one or more
`
`claims of the ’507 patent by, among other things, actively and knowingly aiding and abetting
`
`
`
`10
`
`

`

`Case 3:15-cv-05723-PGS-LHG Document 49 Filed 06/21/16 Page 11 of 17 PageID: 404
`
`
`
`others to infringe, including, but not limited to patients or health care providers that administer
`
`Watson’s ANDA Product by inhalation, which use constitutes direct infringement of one or more
`
`claims of the ’507 patent. Upon information and belief, Watson’s aiding and abetting includes
`
`Watson’s active steps to promote its ANDA Product for infringing uses, and encourage and
`
`instruct such use as stated in, for example and without limitation, proposed product package
`
`insert labeling pursuant to Watson’s ANDA.
`
`63.
`
`Upon information and belief, Watson was and is aware of the existence of the
`
`’507 patent and lacks a reasonable basis for believing that it would not be liable for infringement
`
`of the ’507 patent, thus rendering this case “exceptional” under 35 U.S.C. § 285.
`
`64.
`
`UTC will be substantially and irreparably damaged and harmed if Watson’s
`
`infringement of the ’507 patent is not enjoined by this Court. UTC does not have an adequate
`
`remedy at law.
`
`65.
`
`Upon information and belief, the acts of infringement by Watson have been
`
`intentional and willful.
`
`COUNT 5: INFRINGEMENT OF THE ’507 PATENT UNDER 35 U.S.C. § 271(e)
`
`66.
`
`UTC repeats and realleges each of the foregoing paragraphs as if fully set forth
`
`herein.
`
`67.
`
`Upon information and belief, use of Watson’s ANDA Products is covered by one
`
`or more claims of the ’240 patent.
`
`68. Watson’s submission of ANDA No. 208172 for the purpose of obtaining approval
`
`to engage in the commercial manufacture, use, sale, and/or offer for sale of Watson’s ANDA
`
`Products was an act of infringement of the ’240 patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271(e)(2).
`
`
`
`11
`
`

`

`Case 3:15-cv-05723-PGS-LHG Document 49 Filed 06/21/16 Page 12 of 17 PageID: 405
`
`
`
`69.
`
`Upon information and belief, the commercial manufacture, use, offer for sale, sale
`
`and/or importation of Watson’s ANDA Products would directly or indirectly infringe one or
`
`more claims of the ’240 patent.
`
`70.
`
`Upon information and belief, Watson will induce others to infringe one or more
`
`claims of the ’240 patent by, among other things, actively and knowingly aiding and abetting
`
`others to infringe, including, but not limited to patients or health care providers that administer
`
`Watson’s ANDA Product by inhalation, which use constitutes direct infringement of one or more
`
`claims of the ’240 patent. Upon information and belief, Watson’s aiding and abetting includes
`
`Watson’s active steps to promote its ANDA Product for infringing uses, and encourage and
`
`instruct such use as stated in, for example and without limitation, proposed product package
`
`insert labeling pursuant to Watson’s ANDA.
`
`71.
`
`Upon information and belief, Watson was and is aware of the existence of the
`
`’240 patent and lacks a reasonable basis for believing that it would not be liable for infringement
`
`of the ’240 patent, thus rendering this case “exceptional” under 35 U.S.C. § 285.
`
`72.
`
`UTC will be substantially and irreparably damaged and harmed if Watson’s
`
`infringement of the ’240 patent is not enjoined by this Court. UTC does not have an adequate
`
`remedy at law.
`
`73.
`
`Upon information and belief, the acts of infringement by Watson have been
`
`intentional and willful.
`
`PRAYER FOR RELIEF
`
`WHEREFORE, UTC requests the following relief:
`
`1.
`
`A judgment that Watson:
`
`
`
`12
`
`

`

`Case 3:15-cv-05723-PGS-LHG Document 49 Filed 06/21/16 Page 13 of 17 PageID: 406
`
`
`
`A. has infringed the ’212 patent, the ’033 patent, the ’393 patent, the ’507 patent,
`
`and the ’240 patent;
`
`B. will induce infringement of the ’212 patent, the ’033 patent, the ’393 patent,
`
`the ’507 patent, and the ’240 patent, and
`
`C. will contribute to the infringement by others of the ’212 patent, the ’033
`
`patent, the ’393 patent, the ’507 patent, and the ’240 patent;
`
`2.
`
`A judgment ordering that the effective date of any FDA approval for Watson to
`
`commercially manufacture, make, use, offer to sell, sell, market, or import into the United States
`
`Watson’s ANDA Products be not earlier than the latest of the expiration dates of the ’212 patent,
`
`the ’033 patent, the ’393 patent, the ’507 patent, and the ’240 patent, inclusive of any
`
`extension(s) and additional period(s) of exclusivity to which UTC is or may become entitled;
`
`3.
`
`A judgment pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 271(e)(4)(B) preliminarily and permanently
`
`enjoining Watson, its officer, agents, servants, employees, parents, subsidiaries, affiliate
`
`corporations, other business entities and all other persons acting in concert, participation, or
`
`privity with them, their successors, and assigns, from infringing, contributorily infringing, or
`
`inducing others to infringe the ’212 patent, the ’033 patent, the ’393 patent, the ’507 patent,
`
`and/or the ’240 patent, including engaging in the commercial manufacture, use, sale, offer to sale
`
`and/or importation in the United States of the product that is the subject of ANDA No. 208172
`
`and/or any applicable DMF until the expiration of the ’212 patent, the ’033 patent, the ’393
`
`patent, the ’507 patent, and the ’240 patent, inclusive of any extension(s) and additional period(s)
`
`of exclusivity to which UTC is or may become entitled;
`
`4.
`
`A judgment declaring that making, using, selling, offering for sale, or importing
`
`into the United States of Watson’s ANDA Products, or any product or compound that infringes
`
`
`
`13
`
`

`

`Case 3:15-cv-05723-PGS-LHG Document 49 Filed 06/21/16 Page 14 of 17 PageID: 407
`
`
`
`one or more of the ’212 patent, the ’033 patent, the ’393 patent, the ’507 patent, and/or the ’240
`
`patent prior to the expiration dates of the respective patents, will infringe, actively induce
`
`infringement of, and will contribute to the infringement by others of the ’212 patent, the ’033
`
`patent, the ’393 patent, the ’507 patent, and the ’240 patent;
`
`5.
`
`Temporary, preliminary, permanent, or other injunctive relief as necessary or
`
`appropriate should Watson seek to commercially manufacture, use, sell, offer to sell, or import
`
`Watson’s ANDA Products prior to disposition of this action and/or the expiration of the ’212
`
`patent, the ’033 patent, the ’393 patent, the ’507 patent, and the ’240 patent;
`
`6.
`
`A judgment awarding UTC damages or other monetary relief, pursuant to 35
`
`U.S.C. §§ 271(e)(4)(c) and 284, if Watson commercially manufactures, uses, sells, offers to sell
`
`and/or imports any product that is the subject of ANDA No. 208172 that infringes one or more of
`
`the ’212 patent, the ’033 patent, the ’393 patent, the ’507 patent, and/or the ’240 patent;
`
`7.
`
`8.
`
`9.
`
`A judgment declaring that Watson’s infringement has been willful;
`
`A judgement awarding UTC its actual damages for willful infringement;
`
`A judgment declaring that, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 285, this is an exceptional
`
`case and awarding UTC its attorney’s fees;
`
`10.
`
`Costs and expenses in this action; and
`
`11.
`
`Such further and other relief as this Court may deem just and proper.
`
`JURY DEMAND
`
`UTC requests trial by jury for any issues so triable.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`14
`
`

`

`Case 3:15-cv-05723-PGS-LHG Document 49 Filed 06/21/16 Page 15 of 17 PageID: 408
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`s/ William J. O’Shaughnessy
`William J. O’Shaughnessy
`MCCARTER & ENGLISH LLP
`Four Gateway Center
`100 Mulberry Street
`Newark, NJ 07102
`(973) 639-2094
`woshaughnessy@mccarter.com
`
`
`
`
`
`Of Counsel
`
`Douglas Carsten
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`12235 El Camino Real
`Suite 200
`San Diego, CA 92130
`
`Veronica S. Ascarrunz
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`1700 K Street, NW
`Suite 500
`Washington, DC 20006
`
`William C. Jackson
`BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
`5301 Wisconsin Avenue, NW
`Washington, DC 20015
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`Dated: June 21, 2016
` United Therapeutics Corporation
`
`
`
`15
`
`

`

`Case 3:15-cv-05723-PGS-LHG Document 49 Filed 06/21/16 Page 16 of 17 PageID: 409
`
`
`
`LOCAL CIVIL RULE 11.2 CERTIFICATION
`
`UTC hereby certifies that, to its knowledge, the matter in controversy in this action is not
`
`the subject of any other pending lawsuit, arbitration, or administrative proceeding other than the
`
`following identified proceedings:
`
` Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Hon. Michelle K. Lee, Civil Action No. 16-cv-
`342 (GBL)(IDD) (E.D. Va.); and
`
` 
`
` United Therapeutics Corporation v. Actavis Laboratories FL, Inc., Civil Action
`No. 3:16-cv-1816 (PGS)(LHG) (D.N.J.).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`s/ William J. O’Shaughnessy
`William J. O’Shaughnessy
`MCCARTER & ENGLISH LLP
`Four Gateway Center
`100 Mulberry Street
`Newark, NJ 07102
`(973) 639-2094
`woshaughnessy@mccarter.com
`
`
`Of Counsel
`
`Douglas Carsten
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`12235 El Camino Real
`Suite 200
`San Diego, CA 92130
`
`Veronica S. Ascarrunz
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`1700 K Street, NW
`Suite 500
`Washington, DC 20006
`
`William C. Jackson
`BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
`5301 Wisconsin Avenue, NW
`Washington, DC 20015
`
`
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`Dated: June 21, 2016
` United Therapeutics Corporation
`
`
`
`
`
`
`16
`
`

`

`Case 3:15-cv-05723-PGS-LHG Document 49 Filed 06/21/16 Page 17 of 17 PageID: 410
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I certify that on this day I caused to be served by the ECF system copies of the First
`
`Amended Complaint upon the following:
`
`Walsh Pizzi O’Reilly Falanga LLP
`Liza M. Walsh
`Tricia B. O’Reilly
`Joseph L. Linares
`One Newark Center
`1085 Raymond Boulevard, 6th Floor
`Newark, NJ 07102
`(973) 757-1100
`
`OF COUNSEL:
`
`WINSTON STRAWN LLP
`Michael K. Nutter
`Kurt A. Mathas
`35 West Wacker Drive
`Chicago, Illinois 60601
`Tel: (312) 558-5600
`Fax: (312) 558-5700
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: June 21, 2016
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`s/ William J. O’Shaughnessy
`William J. O’Shaughnessy
`
`
`
`
`
`17
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket