`
`Joel N. Bock
`joel.bock@dentons.com
`Andrew M. Grodin
`andrew.grodin@dentons.com
`Dentons US LLP
`101 JFK Parkway
`Short Hills, New Jersey 07078
`(973) 912-7100
`
`Of Counsel:
`Mark L. Hogge (pro hac vice pending)
`mark.hogge@dentons.com
`Shailendra Maheshwari
`shailendra.maheshwari@dentons.com
`Nicholas H. Jackson (pro hac vice pending)
`nicholas.jackson@dentons.com
`Dentons US LLP
`1301 K. Street, NW
`Washington, D.C. 20005
`(202) 408-6400
`
`Anne K. W. Sutton (pro hac vice pending)
`anne.sutton@dentons.com
`Dentons US LLP
`233 South Wacker Drive
`Suite 7800
`Chicago, IL 60606
`Telephone: (312) 876-8000
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff Synchronoss Technologies, Inc.
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
`
`SYNCHRONOSS
`TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`CARBONITE, INC.
`
`Defendant.
`
`Civil Action No. _________
`Document filed electronically
`
`COMPLAINT FOR PATENT
`INFRINGEMENT AND
`DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`
`
`
`Case 3:15-cv-00964-MLC-TJB Document 1 Filed 02/06/15 Page 2 of 6 PageID: 2
`
`THE PARTIES
`
`1.
`
`Plaintiff Synchronoss Technologies, Inc. (“Plaintiff” or “Synchronoss”) is a
`
`company incorporated under the laws of Delaware having a business address at 200
`
`Crossing Blvd., 8th Floor, Bridgewater, New Jersey 08807.
`
`2. Upon information and belief, Carbonite, Inc. ("Defendant" or "Carbonite") is
`
`a Delaware Corporation with an address at 2 Avenue de la Lafayette, Boston, MA 02111.
`
`3.
`
`Upon information and belief, Carbonite may be served through its registered
`
`agent, Corporation Service Company 2711 Centerville Road, Suite 400, Wilmington, DE
`
`19808.
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`4. This is an action for patent infringement arising under the patent laws of the
`
`United States, Title 35 of the United States Code. Accordingly, this Court has federal
`
`question jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 271, et seq., 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and original
`
`jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1338(a).
`
`5.
`
`Venue is proper in this district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2) because on
`
`information and belief, Defendant has committed and continues to commit a substantial part
`
`of the events giving rise to the patent infringement claims herein in this judicial district.
`
`6. The Court has personal jurisdiction over Carbonite because Defendant is
`
`engaged in substantial and not isolated activities within this state, including providing,
`
`using, offering for sale, and selling its infringing Sync and Share products within this state
`
`and judicial district. Due to these infringing activities, Synchronoss has suffered injury in
`
`this judicial district. Upon information and belief, Defendant also directly solicits,
`
`
`
`Case 3:15-cv-00964-MLC-TJB Document 1 Filed 02/06/15 Page 3 of 6 PageID: 3
`
`promotes, and provides its infringing products in this state and judicial district through its
`
`active website at www.carbonite.com from which consumers and businesses can directly
`
`access and download the Carbonite products.
`
`SYNCHRONOSS’S PATENTS
`
`7.
`
`On December 30, 2003, the United States Patent and Trademark Office duly
`
`and legally issued United States Patent No. 6,671,757 (the “‘757 Patent”), entitled “Data
`
`Transfer and Synchronization System.” A true and correct copy of the ‘757 Patent is
`
`attached hereto as Exhibit A. Plaintiff is the owner of the ‘757 patent by assignment.
`
`8.
`
`On June 29, 2004, the United States Patent and Trademark Office duly and
`
`legally issued United States Patent No. 6,757,696 (the “‘696 Patent”), entitled “Management
`
`Server for Synchronization System.” A true and correct copy of the ‘696 Patent is attached
`
`hereto as Exhibit B. Plaintiff is the owner of the ‘696 patent by assignment.
`
`9.
`
`On September 8, 2009, the United States Patent and Trademark Office duly
`
`and legally issued United States Patent No. 7,587,446 (the “‘446 Patent”), entitled
`
`“Acquisition And Synchronization Of Digital Media To A Personal Information Space.” A
`
`true and correct copy of the ‘446 patent is attached hereto as Exhibit C. Plaintiff is the
`
`owner of the ‘446 patent by assignment.
`
`COUNT I — INFRINGEMENT OF THE ‘757 PATENT
`
`10.
`
`Synchronoss restates and incorporates by reference paragraphs 1 through 9 as
`
`if fully stated herein.
`
`11.
`
`Defendant has infringed and is still infringing the ‘757 patent by making,
`
`using, offering for sale, or selling its Sync and Share products, including but not limited to
`
`its Sync and Share App. product, covered by the '757 patent and without authority from
`
`
`
`Case 3:15-cv-00964-MLC-TJB Document 1 Filed 02/06/15 Page 4 of 6 PageID: 4
`
`Synchronoss. Defendant will continue to do so unless enjoined by this Court.
`
`12.
`
`As a direct and proximate result of Defendant's direct infringement of the
`
`‘757 Patent, Synchronoss is suffering damages and irreparable injury for which it has no
`
`adequate remedy at law.
`
`COUNT II — INFRINGEMENT OF THE ‘696 PATENT
`
`13.
`
`Synchronoss restates and incorporates by reference paragraphs 1 through 12
`
`as if fully stated herein.
`
`14.
`
`Defendant has infringed and is still infringing the ‘696 patent by making,
`
`using, offering for sale, or selling its Sync and Share products, including but not limited to
`
`its Sync and Share App. products, covered by the '696 patent and without authority from
`
`Synchronoss. Defendant will continue to do so unless enjoined by this Court.
`
`15.
`
`As a direct and proximate result of Defendant's direct infringement of the
`
`‘696 patent, Synchronoss is suffering damages and irreparable injury for which it has no
`
`adequate remedy at law.
`
`COUNT III — INFRINGEMENT OF THE ‘446 PATENT
`
`16.
`
`Synchronoss restates and incorporates by reference paragraphs 1 through 15
`
`as if fully stated herein.
`
`17.
`
`Defendant has infringed and is still infringing the ‘446 patent by making,
`
`using, offering for sale, or selling its Sync and Share products, including but not limited to
`
`its Sync and Share App. products, covered by the '446 patent and without authority from
`
`Synchronoss. Defendant will continue to do so unless enjoined by this Court.
`
`18.
`
`As a direct and proximate result of Defendant's direct infringement of the
`
`‘446 Patent, Synchronoss is suffering damages and irreparable injury for which it has no
`
`
`
`Case 3:15-cv-00964-MLC-TJB Document 1 Filed 02/06/15 Page 5 of 6 PageID: 5
`
`adequate remedy at law.
`
`JURY DEMAND
`
`19.
`
`Plaintiff hereby demands a jury trial on all issues triable to the jury.
`
`WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands:
`
`(a)
`
`judgment that the asserted patents are enforceable and infringed by
`
`Defendant;
`
`(b)
`
`permanent injunctive relief prohibiting further infringement of the
`
`asserted patents;
`
`damages for Defendant's infringements;
`
`prejudgment interest on the damages;
`
`that the Court find this is an exceptional case, and award Synchronoss
`
`(c)
`
`(d)
`
`(e)
`
`costs and fees for this lawsuit under 35 U.S.C. § 285; and
`
`(f)
`
`any other relief that the Court may deem just and proper.
`
`Dated: February 6, 2015
`
`s/ Andrew M. Grodin
`Joel N. Bock
`joel.bock@dentons.com
`Andrew M. Grodin
`andrew.grodin@dentons.com
`Dentons US LLP
`101 JFK Parkway
`Short Hills, NJ 07078-2708
`Telephone: (973) 912-7100
`Mark L. Hogge (pro hac vice pending)
`mark.hogge@dentons.com
`Shailendra Maheshwari
`shailendra.maheshwari@dentons.com
`Nicholas H. Jackson (pro hac vice pending)
`nicholas.jackson@dentons.com
`
`
`
`Case 3:15-cv-00964-MLC-TJB Document 1 Filed 02/06/15 Page 6 of 6 PageID: 6
`
`Dentons US LLP
`1301 K. Street, NW
`Washington, D.C. 20005
`Telephone: (202) 408-6400
`Anne K. W. Sutton (pro hac vice pending)
`anne.sutton@dentons.com
`Dentons US LLP
`233 South Wacker Drive
`Suite 7800
`Chicago, IL 60606
`Telephone: (312) 876-8000
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff Synchronoss
`Technologies, Inc.
`
`83768722
`
`