`1- Case 3:13—cv—OOO91—MLC—DEA Document 26 Filed 05/15/13 Page 1 of 3 Page|D: 179
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE D~ISTR,I.CT OF NEW JERSEY
`
`Civil Action No. 1 1-2317 (JAP-DEA)
`I
`'
`
`Civil Action No. l I-04275 (JAP-DEA)
`
`Civil Action No. 11-06348 (JAP-DEA)
`
`Civil Action No. 13-00091 (JAP)(DEA)
`
`ASTRAZENECA AB, ASTRAZENEC/\f
`LP, and ‘POZEN INC.,
`_
`I
`
`:
`:
`:
`:
`I
`'
`v,
`DR. REDDY’S LABO.RA.TORI.ES INC. and:
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`DR. REDDY’S LABORATORIES [.TD.,
`Defendémtsp
`
`'
`.
`
`A
`
`ASTRAZENECA AB, ASTRAZENECA :
`LP, KB]-E INC, and POZEN INC.,
`'
`Plaintiffs,"
`
`v.
`
`LUPIN LTD. and LUPIN
`
`PHARMACEUTICALS jlNC.,
`Defendants.
`
`ASTRAZENECA AB, ASTRAZENECA
`LP, KB]-E INC, and POZEN 1NC.,
`Plaintiffs.
`
`v.
`
`.
`
`ANCHEN .P.HAR.MA.C.EUTlCA.LS, lNC.,.
`-
`Defendants)
`
`ASTRAZENECA AB, ASTRAZENECA ’
`LP, and POZEN INC.',
`’
`‘Plaintiffs,
`
`.
`
`:
`'
`
`.
`
`:
`'
`
`:
`-
`'v_.j
`DR. REDDY’S LABORATORIES INC. and:
`
`DR. REDDY’S LABORATORIES LTD,
`
`:
`
`Defendants.
`
`STIPULATEHD CONSENT ORDER
`
`WHEREAS, Plaintiffs ASTRAZENECA AB, ASTRAZENECA LP, and POZEN
`
`INC. have filed AsI“raZerzeca AB, A.s'traZe71eca LP, and Pozen Inc., v. Dr. Reddy’s
`
`Laboratories Inc. ana’.Dr. .Reddy’s Laboratories Ltd, Civil Action. No. 1 1-2317 (JAP-
`
`DEA) (“AstraZeneca v. DRL I”), allcgingginter alia, infringement of U.S. Patent Nos.
`
`5,714,504, 6,369,085, 6,875,872, 6,926,907, 7,4l 1,070, and 7,745,466, which are listed
`
`in the Orange Book for Plaintiffs’ VImOV0®pt'()duCt;
`
`R E C E I V E D
`
`92307lv2
`
`MAY 14 2013
`
`AT 8:30_j_______,_l‘.A
`WILLIAM T. WALSH
`CLERK
`
`
`
`Case 3:13-cv-00091-MLC-DEA Document 26 Filed 05/15/13 Page 2 of 3 PageID: 180
`Case 3:13—cv—OOO91—MLC—DEA Document 26 Filed 05/15/13 Page 2 of 3 Page|D: 180
`
`WHEREAS, Plaintiffs ASTRAZEN ECA AB, ASTRAZENECA LP, and POZEN
`
`INC. have filed As/raZeneca AB, AstraZeneca LP, and Pozen Inc., v. Lupin Ltd. and
`
`Lupin Pharmaceuticals 1110., Civil Action No. 11-4275 (JAP-DEA) (“Astraleneca v.
`
`Lupin”), alleging, inter alia. infringement vofU.S. Patent Nos. 5,714,504, 6,369,085,
`6,875,872, 6,926,907, 7,41 1,070, and 7,745,466, which are listed in the Orange Book for
`
`Plaintiffs’ Vimovo® product;
`
`I
`
`WHEREAS, Plaintiffs ASTRAZE_N'ECA AB, ASTRAZENECA LP, and POZEN
`INC. have filed A.s'traZeneca AB, A.s'traZeneca
`and Pozen Inc., v. Anchen
`
`Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Civil Action No. 1 l-06348 (JAP-DEA) (“Astrazeneca v.
`
`Anchen”), alleging, inter alia, infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,369,085, 6,926,907,
`
`7,41 1,070, and 7,745,466, which are listed in the Orange Book for Plaintiffs’ Vimovo®
`
`product;
`
`WHEREAS, Plaintiffs ASTRAZBNECA AB, ASTRAZENECA LP, and POZEN
`
`INC. have filed AstraZenecaAB. AStraZeneca LP, and Pozen Inc., v. Dr. Reddy’s
`
`Laboratories Inc. and Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories Ltd.-, Civil Action No, 13-00091 (JAP-
`
`DEA) (“Astrazeneca v. DRL 11”), alleging, inter alia, infringement of U.S. Patent Nos.
`
`5,714,504, 6,369,085, 6,926,907, _7,41.1.,070,.and 7,745,466, which are listed in the
`Orange Book for Plaimiffs’ Vimovo® product;
`
`WHEREAS, the Courtlpreviously consolidated Aslr_aZeneca v. DRL I with
`
`AstraZeneca v. Lupin for discovery purposes (DE. 41), and subsequently consolidated
`
`AstraZeneca v. Aachen with the consolidated AstraZeneca v. D_RL I with AsI’raZeneca v.
`
`Lupin actions for discovery purposes (D13. 82),
`
`92307lv2
`
`
`
`Case 3:13-cv-00091-MLC-DEA Document 26 Filed 05/15/13 Page 3 of 3 PageID: 181
`. Case 3:13—cv—OOO91—MLC—DEA Document 26 Filed 05/15/13 Page 3 of 3 Page|D: 181
`
`I
`
`WHEREAS, Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories inc. and Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories Ltd.
`
`seeks consolidation, for discovery purposes, of Asl1'aZeneca v. DRL 11 with AstraZeneca
`
`v. DRL I. AstraZcm*c'a v. Lupin and /lstraZeneca v. Aachen, and all other parties in each
`of these actions consents to such consolidation and further agree that proceedings,
`
`submissions and findings from DRL I will be integrated individually or otherwise into
`
`DRL Has the parties will later agree or the Court will decide;
`WHEREAS; the parties further agree that the propriety of consolidating any
`
`combination of these actions for pretrial and trial purposes shall be considered at such
`
`time as may be appropriate;
`
`THEREFORE, these matters, having come before the Court on the joint
`
`application of the parties for the entry of this Stipulated Consent Order, and for good
`
`cause shown:
`
`IT IS on this
`
`day of May, 201 3,
`
`ORDERED that A.<itraZeneca v. DRL II (1 3-cv—O009l) be consolidated with
`
`A.straZeneca v. DRL I_, /1straZe/vecia v. iLu/Jin and Aslraleneca v. Anchen for discovery
`
`purposes; and it is
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that all future filings and submissions to the Court shall
`
`be made in AstraZeneca v. DRL 1 under Civil Action No. l l-2317 until further Order of
`
`
` DOUGLAS '
`
`PERT
`
`United State
`
`H. istrate Judge
`
`the Court.
`
`.
`
`92307lv2
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
