`Case 3:13—cv—OOO91—MLC—DEA Document 17 Filed 04/29/13 Page 1 of 2 Page|D: 154
`R E C E l V-E
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
`
`M
`AT 330
`WILLIAM 7. WALSH CLERK
`
`APR 2 9 2013
`
`ATRAZENECA AB, ASTRAZENECA LP,
`KBI-E INC., and POZEN INC.,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`V.
`
`DR. REDDY’S LABORATORIES, INC. and
`
`DR. REDDY’S LABORATORIES, LTD.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`\)\/\J\-/L/\.J\/\/\./\2%%A\/
`
`CIVIL ACTION NO.: 3-13-cv-00091 (JAP)(DEA)
`
`CONSENT ORDER FOR PRO HAC VICE
`ADMISSIONS OF EINAR STOLE,
`EDWARD H. RIPPEY, ENRIQUE D.
`LONGTON, AND ERICA N. ANDERSEN
`
`This matter having been opened to the court by McCarter & English, LLP, attorneys for
`
`plaintiffs AstraZeneca AB, AstraZeneca LP, KBI-E Inc., and Pozen Inc., John E. Flaherty
`
`appearing, for an Order, pursuant to Local Civil Rule 101.1(c), allowing Einar Stole, Edward H.
`
`Rippey, Enrique D. Longton, and Erica N. Andersen of the firm Covington Burling LLP to
`
`appear and participate pro hac vice on behalf of plaintiffs AstraZeneca AB and AstraZeneca LP
`
`(“Plaintiffs”); counsel for defendants having consented to the form and entry of this Order; and
`
`the Court having considered this matter pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 78, and for good case
`
`shown,
`
`IT IS on thisgfiday of [§grf/
`
`, 2013, ORDERED that:
`
`1.
`
`Einar Stole, Edward H. Rippey, Enrique D. Longton, and Erica N. Andersen of
`
`Covington Burling LLP, with offices located at 1201 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington,
`
`DC 20004-2401, members in good Standing of the Bars in which they are admitted, be hereby
`
`permitted to appear pro hac vice in this action pursuant to Local Civil Rule l01.1(c); however,
`
`all pleadings, briefs and other papers filed with the Court on behalf of Plaintiffs shall be signed
`
`by a member or associate of the firm of McCarter & English, LLP, who shall be responsible for
`
`ME! 15428l76v.1
`
`
`
`I
`
`Case 3:13-cv-00091-MLC-DEA Document 17 Filed 04/29/13 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 155
`Case 3:13—cv—OOO91—MLC—DEA Document 17 Filed 04/29/13 Page 2 of 2 Page|D: 155
`
`said papers, and for the conduct of the cause, and who shall be present in Court during all phases
`
`of these proceedings, unless expressly excused by the Court, and who will be held responsible
`
`for the conduct of the attorney admitted hereby; and it is
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Einar Stole, Edward H, Rippey, Enrique D. Longton, and
`
`Erica N. Andersen make payment to the Clerk of the Court of this Court in the amount of
`
`$150.00; and it is
`
`FURTHER ORDERED thatiEinar Stole, Edward H. Rippey, Enrique D. Longton, and
`
`Erica N. Andersen shall be bound by the General and Admiralty Rules of the United States
`
`District Court for the District of New Jersey, including, but not limited to the provisions of
`
`L.Civ.R. 103.1, Judicial Ethics and Professional Responsibility, and L.Civ.R. 104.1, Discipline
`
`of Attorneys; and it is _
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Einar Stole, Edward H. Rippey, Enrique D. Longton, and
`
`Erica N. Andersen shall be deemed to have agreed to take no fee in any tort case in excess of the
`new Jersey State Court Contingency Fee Rule, Rule 1:21-7, as amended,‘ «mg
`3
`
`SO ORDERED,
`
`1 H
`
`on. Douglas E.
`t I.
`H'.\_ U.S.M.J.
`£
`gum .5, 3;/an/fl’ /v’- R;/a9,
`Fvmnat oasawsi y M4
`6/:‘ri\7Ve
`/.1.
`éd"Zl€w’v, «J an?“ A/.
`/4»..»(ea-ac. 59'” ’'''‘‘‘-/‘\‘e
`. W K}-
`“H4l
`01///filo; 1.94}/t"’
`)9
`‘HM
`5””?/I
`J
`
`Cit‘ owl
`
`V4 ilfcllfétn .
`
`MEI l5428l76v.l
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
