`
`CARELLA, BYRNE, CECCHI, OLSTEIN, BRODY & AGNELLO, P.C.
`COUNSELLORS AT LAW
`
`_____________
`
`5 BECKER FARM ROAD
`ROSELAND, N.J. 07068-1739
`PHONE (973) 994- 1700
`FAX (973) 994- 1744
`www.carellabyrne.com
`
`February 7, 2025
`
`RAYMOND J. LILLIE
`GREGORY G. MAROTTA
`MARYSSA P. GEIST
`JORDAN M. STEELE**
`ROBERT J. VASQUEZ
`BRITTNEY M. MASTRANGELO
`GRANT Y. LEE***
`MAYBOL HALL
`WILLIAM J. MANORY
`
` PETER G. STEWART
` FRANCIS C. HAND
` JAMES A. O’BRIEN, III
` JOHN G. ESMERADO
` STEVEN G. TYSON
` MATTHEW J. CERES
` ZACHARY A. JACOBS***
` JASON H. ALPERSTEIN+ +
`
`OF COUNSEL
`
`*CERTIFIED BY THE SUPREME COURT OF
`NEW JERSEY AS A CIVIL TRIAL ATTORNEY
`**MEMBER NY BAR ONLY
`***MEMBER IL BAR ONLY
`+MEMBER FL BAR ONLY
`+ + MEMBER NY & FL BAR ONLY
`
`JAN ALAN BRODY
`JOHN M. AGNELLO
`CHARLES M. CARELLA
`JAMES E. CECCHI
`
`
`
`
`CHARLES C. CARELLA
`1933 – 2023
`
`
`
`DONALD F. MICELI
`CARL R. WOODWARD, III
`MELISSA E. FLAX
`DAVID G. GILFILLAN
`G. GLENNON TROUBLEFIELD
`BRIAN H. FENLON
`CAROLINE F. BARTLETT
`ZACHARY S. BOWER+
`DONALD A. ECKLUND
`CHRISTOPHER H. WESTRICK*
`STEPHEN R. DANEK
`MICHAEL A. INNES
`MEGAN A. NATALE
`KEVIN G. COOPER
`
`By ECF
`
`Hon. Leda Dunn Wettre, U.S.M.J.
`Martin Luther King Bldg.
`& U.S. Courthouse
`50 Walnut Street
`Newark, New Jersey 07102
`
`Re:
`
`In re: Apple Inc. Smartphone Antitrust Litigation,
`Civil Action No. 2:24-md-03113
`
`Dear Judge Wettre:
`
`We write on behalf of Co-Lead Interim Class Counsel representing the direct purchasers
`of iPhones (“DPP Plaintiffs”), direct purchasers of Apple Watches (“DAWP Plaintiffs) and the
`indirect purchasers of iPhones (“IIP Plaintiffs”) in this litigation (collectively, “Private Plaintiffs”).
`We write to update the Court on the status of our ongoing efforts to further this litigation and to
`request permission for the Private Plaintiff tracks to attend the Court’s upcoming Rule 16
`Conference in the parallel action brought by the Department of Justice, Antitrust Division (“DOJ”).
`
`Regarding our progress, counsel for the DPP Plaintiffs are actively negotiating a protective
`order with Apple and have initiated the meet-and-confer process pursuant to Local Rule 26.1. 1
`Additionally, all parties—including the DOJ—agree that close and effective coordination between
`the DOJ and Private Plaintiffs is essential to ensure efficiency, minimize the duplication of
`discovery, and expedite all proceedings. Further, our request for the production of documents and
`materials previously provided by Apple to the DOJ remains pending before the Court.
`
`As such, considering the paramount importance of maintaining parallel cooperation, we
`respectfully request that counsel for the Private Plaintiffs be permitted to attend the Rule 16
`Conference in the DOJ action on February 27.
`
`1 The Private Plaintiffs are willing to abide by the terms of Apple’s protective order with the DOJ
`as an interim arrangement so as to avoid delaying discovery while the parties negotiate a permanent
`protective order in this matter. ECF 66 at 2.
`
`
`
`Case 2:24-md-03113-JXN-LDW Document 75 Filed 02/14/25 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 1088
`
`February 7, 2025
`Page 2 of 2
`
`We appreciate the Court’s time and attention to this important matter and we thank Your
`Honor for considering our request. Please let us know if the Court requires any additional
`information.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`CARELLA, BYRNE, CECCHI,
`OLSTEIN, BRODY & AGNELLO, P.C.
`
`/s/ James E. Cecchi
`JAMES E. CECCHI
`
`cc: Counsel of Record (via ECF)
`
`** Application denied in accordance with the Court's February 14, 2025 Order in Civil Action
`No. 24-4055 (JXN) (LDW).
`
`2/14/2025
`
` CARELLA, BYRNE, CECCHI, OLSTEIN, BRODY & AGNELLO
`A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
`
`