`
` TOMPKINS, McGUIRE, WACHENFELD & BARRY, LLP
`
`Counselors at Law
`3 B E C K E R F A R M R O A D , S U I T E 4 0 2
`R O S E L A N D , N E W J E R S E Y 0 7 0 6 8 - 1 7 2 6
`R o s e l a n d ( 9 7 3 ) 6 2 2 - 3 0 0 0
`New York (212) 714-1720
`
`FAX (973)623-7780
`www.tompkinsmcguire.com
`
`Direct Line (973) 623-7893
`wtrousdale@tompkinsmcguire.com
`
`William H. Trousdale
`Partner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`September 20, 2023
`
`
`
`
`Via Lawyer’s Service (with enclosures)
`Via ECF (letter only)
`Hon. Madeline Cox Arleo, U.S.D.J.
`United States District Court
`Martin Luther King Building & U.S. Courthouse
`50 Walnut Street
`Newark, NJ 07102
`
`Re: Monib Zirvi, M.D. v. Illumina, Inc., et al.,
`Case No. 2:23-cv-01997-MCA-JSA
`
`
`Dear Judge Arleo:
`
`This law firm represents Defendants Latham & Watkins LLP, Roger Chin, and Douglas
`Lumish in the above-referenced matter. Pursuant to Your Honor’s judicial preferences, we are
`submitting herewith an UNREDACTED Courtesy Copy of Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (ECF
`# 84).
`
`
`Exhibits A and B to the Declaration of William H. Trousdale, submitted in support of the
`motion, were filed in redacted format. A Motion to Seal the two exhibits has also been filed by
`Defendants (ECF # 85). Counsel for all parties have been sent an unredacted set of the motion
`papers via email.
`
`Please do not hesitate to have the Court’s staff contact me with any questions or if we may
`be of any further service to the Court.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Enc.
`cc. All Counsel of Record (via ECF)
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`s/ William H. Trousdale
`William H. Trousdale
`TOMPKINS, McGUIRE, WACHENFELD & BARRY
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`For
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
