Case 2:23-cv-01997-MCA-JSA Document 134 Filed 07/15/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 3816
`THREE GATEWAY CENTER
`100 Mulberry Street, 15th Floor
`Newark, NJ 07102
`T: 973.757.1100
`F: 973.757.1090
`WALSH.LAW
`
`
`
`Marc D. Haefner
`Direct Dial: (973) 757-1013
`mhaefner@walsh.law
`
`July 15, 2024
`
`VIA ECF
`Honorable Jessica S. Allen, U.S.M.J.
`U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey
`Martin Luther King Jr. Building & U.S. Courthouse
`50 Walnut Street
`Newark, New Jersey 07102
`
`Re: Monib Zirvi, M.D., Ph.D. v. Illumina, Inc. et al.
`Civil Action No.: 2:23-cv-1997 (MCA/JSA)
`
`
`
`Dear Judge Allen:
`
`
`This firm, along with Shapiro Arato Bach LLP, represents Defendants Thermo Fisher
`Scientific, Rip Finst, and Sean Boyle (collectively “Thermo Fisher”) in the above-referenced
`matter.
`
` We write briefly in reply to Plaintiff Zirvi’s letter of earlier today, which insists that individual
`
`defendants Rip Finst and Sean Boyle be required to travel across the country to appear in-person
`for a settlement conference in a case in which all charges have already been dismissed, including
`charges premised on the absurd notion that these Thermo Fisher in-house counsel formerly
`represented Mr. Zirvi, even though he was not a Thermo Fisher employee and never retained
`them.
`
`
`This Court, with Plaintiff Zirvi’s consent, has already permitted other similarly situated
`defendants to participate in the upcoming conference by phone, while a representative appears
`on their behalf in person. (Dkt. Entry 129). Mr. Finst and Mr. Boyle are no different. Their
`physical presence can add limited if any value because their defense is being fully presented and
`indemnified by Thermo Fisher, which will have an in-person representative present. The
`convenience of individual defendants is often taken into consideration when determining whether
`they should appear at settlement conferences in person. Indeed, common sense dictates that
`forcing individual defendants (especially those that are being indemnified and thus have no true
`personal liability in the matter) to travel across the country for the sake of their alleged “firsthand
`perspectives and immediate decision-making capabilities” has a greater likelihood of alienating
`these defendants (and their indemnifying corporate employer) than of providing any real benefit.
`Simply, Mr. Finst and Mr. Boyle, having already been dismissed from this case, may well wonder
`to what use Dr. Zirvi hopes to put their putative “substantial knowledge.” These two busy
`attorneys, one of whom no longer works for Thermo Fisher (Boyle), should be permitted to attend
`remotely.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:23-cv-01997-MCA-JSA Document 134 Filed 07/15/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 3817
`
`Honorable Jessica S. Allen, U.S.M.J.
`July 15, 2024
`Page 2
`
`As always, we thank the Court for its attention to this matter and we are available should
`
`the Court have any questions.
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`s/Marc D. Haefner
`
`Marc D. Haefner
`
`All Counsel of Record (via ECF)
`
`
`cc:
`
`
`
`
`
`

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.

We are unable to display this document.

PTO Denying Access

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket