`
`TOMPKINS, McGUIRE, WACHENFELD & BARRY, LLP
`Counselors at Law
`3 B E C K E R F A R M R O A D , S U I T E 4 0 2
`R O S E L A N D , N E W J E R S E Y 0 7 0 6 8 - 1 7 2 6
`R o s e l a n d ( 9 7 3 ) 6 2 2 - 3 0 0 0
`New York (212) 714-1720
`
`William H. Trousdale
`Partner
`
`FAX (973)623-7780
`www.tompkinsmcguire.com
`
`Direct Line (973) 623-7893
`wtrousdale@tompkinsmcguire.com
`
`July 10, 2024
`
`Via ECF
`Hon. Jessica S. Allen, U.S.M.J.
`United States District Court
`Martin Luther King Building & U.S. Courthouse
`50 Walnut Street
`Newark, NJ 07102
`
`Re: Monib Zirvi, M.D. v. Illumina, Inc., et al.,
`Case No. 2:23-cv-01997-MCA-JSA
`
`Dear Magistrate Judge Allen:
`
`This law firm represents Defendants Latham & Watkins LLP (“Latham”) and its attorneys
`Roger Chin and Douglas Lumish in the above-referenced matter. We write regarding the in-person
`settlement conference scheduled for July 31, 2024, at 11:00 A.M. (ECF # 121). I will represent
`these Defendants in person at the settlement conference along with Natalie Weiss, who is Assistant
`General Counsel at Latham.
`
`We respectfully request permission for the attorney at Latham who has been principally
`responsible for handling this matter, Charles Sanders, to attend the settlement conference by
`telephone. Mr. Sanders is based in Boston and will be in California during the week of the
`settlement conference for a hearing in federal court and client meetings. Regardless of his location
`at the time of the settlement conference, Mr. Sanders will be available to participate by telephone.
`
`We note that Plaintiff previously indicated that this approach was acceptable (ECF # 128
`at 2), and we have endeavored to follow the Court’s instructions to Akin Gump (ECF # 129).
`
`We thank the Court for its consideration of this request.
`
`For
`
`cc. All Counsel of Record (via ECF)
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`s/ William H. Trousdale
`William H. Trousdale
`TOMPKINS, McGUIRE, WACHENFELD & BARRY
`SO ORDERED
`
`/s/ Jessica S. Allen
`Hon. Jessica S. Allen, U.S.M.J.
`
`Date:
`
`7/11/24
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
