throbber
Case 2:21-cv-16866-MEF-ESK Document 136 Filed 06/07/23 Page 1 of 28 PageID: 2778
`
`
`Marie L. Mathews (N.J. Attorney No.
`002432011)
`Adam K. Derman (N.J. Attorney No.
`007131995)
`CHIESA SHAHINIAN & GIANTOMASI PC
`105 Eisenhower Parkway
`Roseland, NJ 07068
`Telephone: (973) 530-2099
`
`Michael Sheetz (pro hac vice)
`COOLEY LLP
`500 Boylston St.
`Boston, MA 02116
`Telephone: (617) 937-2300
`
`Christa Anderson (pro hac vice)
`COOLEY LLP
`3 Embarcadero Center, 20th Fl.
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`Telephone: (415) 693-2191
`
`John Paul Oleksiuk (pro hac vice)
`Stephanie Schuyler (pro hac vice)
`Katelyn Kang (pro hac vice)
`COOLEY LLP
`55 Hudson Yards
`New York, NY 10001
`Telephone: (212) 479-6000
`
`Laurence Pulgram (pro hac vice forthcoming)
`David Hayes (pro hac vice forthcoming)
`FENWICK & WEST LLP
`555 California St.
`San Francisco, CA 94104
`Telephone: (415) 875-2300
`Attorneys for Defendant Chegg, Inc.
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
`
`PEARSON EDUCATION, INC.,
`
`Civil Action No. 2:21-cv-16866
`(EP-ESK)
`
`-against-
`
`CHEGG, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`DEFENDANT CHEGG, INC’S ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT
`FOR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES
`
`Defendant Chegg, Inc. (“Chegg”), through its counsel, Cooley LLP, hereby answers the
`
`allegations in the First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) of Plaintiff Pearson Education, Inc.
`
`(“Plaintiff” or “Pearson”) in the above action as follows:
`
`4889-5381-1817.v1
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-16866-MEF-ESK Document 136 Filed 06/07/23 Page 2 of 28 PageID: 2779
`
`
`GENERAL RESPONSE
`
`Chegg is an innovative, publicly held education technology company that has put students’
`
`needs first since its founding in 2005. Chegg strives to make academic support affordable and
`
`accessible to students of all economic means. To that end, it offers students on-demand, low-cost
`
`educational support to supplement and complement traditional, in-classroom learning. Chegg
`
`supports students with tools designed to help them learn course materials, succeed in their classes,
`
`save money on required materials, and realize the value of the courses for which they pay. Because
`
`Chegg’s products are available anytime online, Chegg’s products also assist students when they
`
`are in a remote environment without access to many traditional educational resources. One of its
`
`products, Chegg Study, does this by providing students with new learning tools and resources that
`
`include original, step-by-step solutions to textbook questions to help students better understand
`
`the concepts being taught in their coursework and apply those principles in other contexts. Chegg’s
`
`solutions walk students through the process of solving problems incrementally, through structured
`
`analysis. Chegg Study teaches students how to solve not only individual end-of-chapter questions,
`
`but also how to approach solving other problems of the same type. A student accessing Chegg’s
`
`solutions learns by using them, just as a student learns when a teacher or tutor guides the student
`
`through the steps of solving a problem. As discussed at www.chegg.com/about/, at a time when
`
`classes and homework have gone digital, Chegg provides the kind of learning assistance that
`
`students need and value.
`
`Chegg Study has invested in providing original, step-by-step solutions to textbook
`
`questions, including from Pearson textbooks, since approximately 2010. And for over a decade,
`
`Pearson not only acquiesced in the lawfulness of this practice, Pearson endorsed it and profited
`
`from it. Pearson’s FAC has obscured these facts. From April 2016 through May 2021, Pearson
`
`and Chegg had a Textbook Questions Distribution Agreement (the “License Agreement”), under
`
`-2-
`
`4889-5381-1817.v1
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-16866-MEF-ESK Document 136 Filed 06/07/23 Page 3 of 28 PageID: 2780
`
`
`which Pearson went so far as to license to Chegg the verbatim text of end-of-chapter problems
`
`from many of Pearson’s textbooks, authorizing Chegg to add the display of the problems’ text next
`
`to the millions of solutions that Chegg had already independently developed and the millions more
`
`that Chegg continued to create. Before the License Agreement, Chegg identified its step-by-step
`
`solutions through a combination of publication title, chapter, and question numbers so that students
`
`could locate the solution corresponding to a given problem. For over five years (pursuant to the
`
`License Agreement), Chegg Study also displayed the full problem text for those Pearson textbooks
`
`next to the solution that Chegg experts had created. Both during the License Agreement, and
`
`without it, the parties fully and explicitly understood that Chegg had and has every right to operate
`
`a platform displaying the independent solutions that Chegg creates, and that Pearson’s alleged
`
`copyrights in its questions do not cover Chegg’s solutions. Indeed, the License Agreement
`
`acknowledged what Pearson and the market already knew: that even prior to the License
`
`Agreement, Chegg “has developed websites that provide online homework help questions and
`
`solutions to students.”
`
`Over the years, Pearson watched Chegg grow and succeed by providing students affordable
`
`and convenient access to a suite of new educational services, including step-by-step solutions. In
`
`February 2021, after years of endorsing and profiting from Chegg’s textbook solutions platform,
`
`Pearson demanded for the first time that Chegg take down the original step-by-step solutions to
`
`Pearson textbook questions from Chegg Study, taking the position that a copyright in a textbook
`
`grants Pearson a monopoly over, and the ability to preclude anyone else from independently
`
`creating, solutions to the questions in textbooks. Pearson’s position is legally flawed, and
`
`fundamentally contrary to students’ interests in full and equal access to learning opportunities.
`
`-3-
`
`4889-5381-1817.v1
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-16866-MEF-ESK Document 136 Filed 06/07/23 Page 4 of 28 PageID: 2781
`
`
`Pearson’s textbook copyrights do not grant it a monopoly over the right to solve an end-
`
`of-chapter problem. The step-by-step solutions that Chegg has created and made available on
`
`Chegg’s innovative platform do not infringe any Pearson copyrights. To the contrary, the
`
`fundamental purpose of copyright is to promote creativity and expand public knowledge and
`
`understanding in furtherance of the public interest. Pearson’s assertions in this action seek to
`
`prohibit and deprive students of alternative learning resources, lock them in to paying for and using
`
`only Pearson services, and block innovation in and the accessibility of learning techniques that can
`
`help level the uneven playing field for access to educational success. Pearson’s assertion also
`
`defies—and obscures from the Court—the parties’ course of dealing for over a decade. As Pearson
`
`itself had long recognized, the mere fact that Pearson’s textbooks contain “end-of-chapter
`
`questions” as alleged in the FAC does not preclude innovators like Chegg from providing
`
`independently created solutions to those questions, nor from providing them in a manner that
`
`students can find and use.
`
`Chegg responds to the FAC’s specific allegations further below.
`
`RESPONSES TO FAC ALLEGATIONS
`
`RESPONSES TO “NATURE OF THE CASE”
`
`1.
`
`Chegg denies the allegations in Paragraph 1. Responding further, Chegg states that
`
`Pearson, through this lawsuit, is attempting to throttle lawful innovation by weaponizing Pearson’s
`
`limited copyright interests and thereby reducing learning opportunities available to students.
`
`2.
`
`Chegg denies the allegations in Paragraph 2, except that Chegg admits that Pearson
`
`textbooks can contain hundreds or thousands of end-of-chapter questions.
`
`3.
`
`Chegg states that the allegations in Paragraph 3 are legal conclusions to which no
`
`response is required, but to the extent a response may be deemed required, Chegg lacks knowledge
`
`-4-
`
`4889-5381-1817.v1
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-16866-MEF-ESK Document 136 Filed 06/07/23 Page 5 of 28 PageID: 2782
`
`
`or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of certain allegations in Paragraph 3 and
`
`denies other allegations. Chegg lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to
`
`whether Pearson owns and/or controls the exclusive rights to the copyrights of the textbooks, and
`
`as to whether such copyright includes end-of-chapter questions typically contained within each
`
`textbook. Chegg denies that Pearson has the exclusive right to control the preparation and
`
`distribution of answer sets to the questions in Pearson’s textbooks, and Chegg denies that the sale
`
`of a work that is based on, and copies from, the creative efforts of Pearson and its authors
`
`necessarily violates Pearson’s exclusive rights under the Copyright Act. Chegg denies the
`
`remaining allegations in Paragraph 3.
`
`4.
`
`Chegg admits in part the allegations in Paragraph 4. Chegg admits that Chegg
`
`experts prepare solutions to textbook questions. Chegg denies the remaining allegations in
`
`Paragraph 4.
`
`5.
`
`Chegg states that the allegations contained in Paragraph 5 are legal conclusions to
`
`which no response is required, but to the extent a response may be deemed required, Chegg denies
`
`the allegations in Paragraph 5.
`
`6.
`
`Chegg denies in part and admits in part the allegations in Paragraph 6 and lacks
`
`knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of other allegations in Paragraph
`
`6. Chegg admits that, as a general proposition and from time to time, educators assign selected
`
`questions found in textbooks as homework and as study aids as part of the education process.
`
`Chegg lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of Pearson’s
`
`allegation that Pearson intends its textbook questions to be part of the learning progression. Chegg
`
`denies the remaining allegations in Paragraph 6.
`
`-5-
`
`4889-5381-1817.v1
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-16866-MEF-ESK Document 136 Filed 06/07/23 Page 6 of 28 PageID: 2783
`
`
`7.
`
`Chegg admits in part the allegations in Paragraph 7. Chegg admits that Pearson
`
`and Chegg have done business with each other in several ways over the years. Answering further,
`
`Chegg states that over the last decade, Pearson authorized Chegg’s display of step-by-step
`
`solutions to Pearson textbook questions on its Chegg Study platform. Chegg notes that on or about
`
`April 26, 2016, Pearson and Chegg executed the License Agreement, by which Pearson granted
`
`Chegg a license to display the question text from Pearson textbooks alongside corresponding step-
`
`by-step solutions that had been created by Chegg for Chegg Study. Chegg admits that not all
`
`textbooks listed on Exhibit A were covered by the License Agreement and that the License
`
`Agreement ceased as of June 1, 2021. Answering further, Chegg states that the License Agreement
`
`expressly included the text of the textbook problems and did not include solutions to those
`
`problems because—as both parties knew and acknowledged—Chegg had been creating original
`
`solutions to textbook questions for years, and Pearson’s copyright did not cover those solutions.
`
`8.
`
`Chegg admits that Pearson told Chegg both verbally and in writing for the first time
`
`in or about February 2021, to remove “answers” from Chegg Study, following a decade of
`
`endorsing and profiting from Chegg’s display of such solutions. The remaining allegations in
`
`Paragraph 8 are legal conclusions to which no response is required, but to the extent a response
`
`may be deemed required, Chegg denies the allegations.
`
`9.
`
`Chegg denies the allegations in Paragraph 9.
`
`RESPONSES TO “JURISDICTION AND VENUE”
`
`10.
`
`Chegg states that the allegations in Paragraph 10 are legal conclusions to which no
`
`response is required.
`
`-6-
`
`4889-5381-1817.v1
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-16866-MEF-ESK Document 136 Filed 06/07/23 Page 7 of 28 PageID: 2784
`
`
`11.
`
`Chegg states that the allegations in Paragraph 11 are legal conclusions to which no
`
`response is required, but to the extent a response may be deemed required, Chegg denies the
`
`allegations in Paragraph 11.
`
`12.
`
`Chegg states that the allegations in Paragraph 12 are legal conclusions to which no
`
`response is required, but to the extent a response may be deemed required, Chegg denies the
`
`allegations in Paragraph 12.
`
`RESPONSES TO “GENERAL ALLEGATIONS”
`
`Responses to “Pearson and Its Business”
`
`13.
`
`Chegg lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of
`
`Pearson’s allegations about its own business contained in Paragraph 13.
`
`14.
`
`Chegg lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of
`
`Pearson’s allegations about its own business contained in Paragraph 14.
`
`15.
`
`Chegg lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of
`
`Pearson’s allegations about its own business contained in Paragraph 15.
`
`16.
`
`Chegg admits that Pearson textbooks in some cases include hundreds or thousands
`
`of questions. Chegg lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of
`
`the remaining allegations in Paragraph 16.
`
`17.
`
`Chegg lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of
`
`Pearson’s allegations about its own business contained in Paragraph 17.
`
`18.
`
`Chegg states that the allegations in Paragraph 18 are legal conclusions to which no
`
`response is required, but to the extent one may be deemed required, Chegg denies the allegation
`
`that it has infringed any of Pearson’s copyrights and lacks knowledge or information sufficient to
`
`form a belief as to the truth of the remaining allegations in Paragraph 18.
`
`-7-
`
`4889-5381-1817.v1
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-16866-MEF-ESK Document 136 Filed 06/07/23 Page 8 of 28 PageID: 2785
`
`
`19.
`
`Chegg admits that the 11th edition of CAMPBELL BIOLOGY contains eight separate
`
`units, containing 56 individual chapters, and that each chapter contains end-of-chapter questions.
`
`Chegg states that the allegation in Paragraph 19 that the identified questions are protected by
`
`copyright is a legal conclusion to which no response is required, but to the extent one may be
`
`deemed required, Chegg denies the allegation. Chegg lacks knowledge or information sufficient
`
`to form a belief as to the truth of the remaining allegations in Paragraph 19.
`
`20.
`
`Chegg admits that the 11th edition of MARIEB HUMAN ANATOMY & PHYSIOLOGY is
`
`organized into five units, containing 29 individual chapters, and that each chapter is followed by a
`
`set of end-of-chapter questions. Chegg states that the allegation in Paragraph 20 that the identified
`
`questions are protected by copyright is a legal conclusion to which no response is required, but to
`
`the extent one may be deemed required, Chegg denies the allegation. Chegg lacks knowledge or
`
`information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the remaining allegations in Paragraph 20.
`
`21.
`
`Chegg admits that the 6th edition of MARTIN-GAY BASIC COLLEGE MATHEMATICS
`
`contains 11 chapters and that those chapters include end-of-chapter questions. Chegg states that
`
`the allegation in Paragraph 21 that the identified questions are protected by copyright is a legal
`
`conclusion to which no response is required, but to the extent one may be deemed required, Chegg
`
`denies the allegation. Chegg lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the
`
`truth of the remaining allegations in Paragraph 21.
`
`22.
`
`Chegg lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of
`
`the allegations in Paragraph 22.
`
`23.
`
`Chegg lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of
`
`the allegations in Paragraph 23.
`
`-8-
`
`4889-5381-1817.v1
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-16866-MEF-ESK Document 136 Filed 06/07/23 Page 9 of 28 PageID: 2786
`
`
`24.
`
`Chegg lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of
`
`the allegations in Paragraph 24.
`
`Responses to “Chegg and Its Infringing Conduct”
`
`25.
`
`Chegg admits the allegations in Paragraph 25.
`
`26.
`
`Chegg admits that it started as a company that bought and rented and/or sold
`
`textbooks and that it does not create its own textbooks or end-of-chapter questions. Answering
`
`further, Chegg states that Chegg Study is an innovative educational resource to millions of students
`
`that provides solutions to end-of-chapter textbook questions, among many other services designed
`
`to assist students with challenges they face during the educational process. Chegg denies the
`
`remaining allegations in Paragraph 26.
`
`27.
`
`Chegg admits in part and denies in part the allegations in Paragraph 27. Chegg
`
`denies Pearson’s allegation that it offers “answer sets,” but admits that students can access
`
`approximately 6 million original, structured, step-by-step solutions to approximately 9,000
`
`textbooks on Chegg Study in order to assist them in understanding the concepts they learn in their
`
`textbooks. Chegg denies that it “outsources” its work to “a force of 70,000 freelancers,” but admits
`
`that Chegg experts participate in creating the original, step-by-step solutions available on Chegg
`
`Study. Chegg denies “disclaiming any responsibility for the accuracy or quality of the answers”
`
`for which it contracts, but admits that its Terms of Use state the following: “Chegg does not
`
`guarantee the accuracy or quality of answers or other study material that appear on the Services,
`
`some of which may be posted by other users.” Chegg admits that a basic subscription to Chegg
`
`Study costs $14.95 per month, but states that a subscription provides access to multiple Chegg
`
`Study services, not just Chegg’s step-by-step solutions. Chegg admits that its subscription-based
`
`services account for more than 80% of its revenues but denies that Chegg Study is either “the
`
`-9-
`
`4889-5381-1817.v1
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-16866-MEF-ESK Document 136 Filed 06/07/23 Page 10 of 28 PageID: 2787
`
`
`central offering” of those subscription-based services or Chegg’s “primary revenue driver.” Chegg
`
`denies that the majority of its 2020 revenue came from the “sale of answers.”
`
`28.
`
`Chegg denies the allegations in Paragraph 28.
`
`29.
`
`Chegg admits in part and denies in part the allegations in Paragraph 29. Chegg
`
`admits that a Forbes article refers to Chegg as a “superspreader,” that the article alleges that 48 of
`
`52 students Forbes selected to interview stated that they cheated using Chegg Study, and that
`
`Forbes uses the term “Chegging” to refer to cheating. Answering further, Chegg states that the
`
`author of the Forbes article relied on anecdotal evidence from a select group of children of her
`
`friends and did not interview a representative sample of Chegg users, including those from low-
`
`income, first-generation, and minority backgrounds. Despite Chegg’s notifying the author of the
`
`shortcomings of her methods and providing access to blind studies that demonstrated different
`
`results, the author of the Forbes article published an incomplete profile based on her preconceived
`
`(and incorrect) notions of what Chegg does. Chegg admits that Pearson’s partial quotation of a
`
`study published in the International Journal for Educational Integrity is accurate but notes that it
`
`is incomplete and misleading. Nowhere does the study state that “Chegg’s purported academic
`
`integrity efforts are ‘not working.’” Answering further, Chegg states that the study measured only
`
`the number of questions posted on Chegg Study over a yearlong period and demonstrated no clear
`
`correlation between the observed increase in Chegg use and an increase in cheating or abuse of the
`
`Chegg platform. Chegg also takes issue with the methodology of the research. As the study author
`
`acknowledged, “the researchers did not subscribe to the Chegg service,” so they would not have
`
`been in a position to determine (i) the full scope of questions that were asked and answered, (ii)
`
`whether those questions were related to exams or graded work (as opposed to homework), or (iii)
`
`-10-
`
`4889-5381-1817.v1
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-16866-MEF-ESK Document 136 Filed 06/07/23 Page 11 of 28 PageID: 2788
`
`
`which questions had solutions on the platform. Chegg denies the remaining allegations in
`
`Paragraph 29.
`
`30.
`
`Chegg states that the allegations in Paragraph 30 are legal conclusions to which no
`
`response is required, but to the extent a response may be deemed required, Chegg denies the
`
`allegations in Paragraph 30.
`
`31.
`
`Chegg admits that it does not produce its own textbooks with original end-of-
`
`chapter questions but denies the remaining allegations in Paragraph 31.
`
`32.
`
`Chegg admits in part and denies in part the allegations in Paragraph 32. Chegg
`
`denies Pearson’s characterization of Chegg Study’s original, step-by-step solutions as “answers,”
`
`but admits that Chegg provides step-by-step solutions to end-of-chapter questions from certain
`
`Pearson textbooks and that for each such textbook, Chegg Study generally provides such solutions
`
`to most of the questions in the textbook, as Chegg has done for a decade without objection by
`
`Pearson. Chegg denies the remaining allegations in Paragraph 32.
`
`33.
`
`Chegg denies the allegations in Paragraph 33.
`
`34.
`
`Chegg denies the allegations in Paragraph 34.
`
`35.
`
`Chegg denies the allegations in Paragraph 35.
`
`36.
`
`Chegg admits in part and denies in part the allegations in Paragraph 36. Chegg
`
`denies any “infringement” of Pearson’s copyrights in any respect. Chegg admits that, in some
`
`cases, Chegg provides solutions for more than 10,000 questions for a single Pearson textbook, and
`
`that, across the 150 Pearson titles listed in Exhibit A, Chegg provides approximately hundreds of
`
`thousands of solutions to Pearson’s end-of-chapter textbook questions. Chegg denies the
`
`remaining allegations in Paragraph 36.
`
`-11-
`
`4889-5381-1817.v1
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-16866-MEF-ESK Document 136 Filed 06/07/23 Page 12 of 28 PageID: 2789
`
`
`37.
`
`Chegg admits in part and denies in part the allegations in Paragraph 37. Chegg
`
`admits that some step-by-step solutions on Chegg Study incorporate certain language contained in
`
`Pearson’s end-of-chapter questions and that some others paraphrase certain language contained in
`
`end-of-chapter questions in Pearson textbooks. Answering further, Chegg states that in order to
`
`teach students the concepts embodied in the end-of-chapter questions, some Chegg Study solutions
`
`necessarily may refer to elements of those questions. Chegg denies that doing so constitutes any
`
`infringement of Pearson’s copyright or protectable expression. Chegg denies the remaining
`
`allegations in Paragraph 37.
`
`38.
`
`Chegg admits in part and denies in part the allegations in Paragraph 38. Chegg
`
`admits that some of Pearson’s end-of-chapter questions include “fictitious fact patterns.” Chegg
`
`admits that some step-by-step solutions on Chegg Study incorporate certain language contained in
`
`Pearson’s end-of-chapter questions and that some others paraphrase certain language contained in
`
`end-of-chapter questions in Pearson textbooks. Answering further, Chegg states that in order to
`
`teach students the concepts embodied in the end-of-chapter questions, some Chegg Study solutions
`
`necessarily may refer to elements of those questions. Chegg denies that doing so constitutes any
`
`infringement of Pearson’s copyright or protectable expression. Chegg denies the remaining
`
`allegations in Paragraph 38.
`
`39.
`
`Chegg admits that Pearson’s quotation of the Chegg Study solution for the indicated
`
`question is accurate, but notes that the quotation is incomplete and misleading. The FAC uses
`
`ellipses to omit Chegg’s original work product from the quotation. Chegg Study goes on to provide
`
`an original, step-by-step solution to the textbook question. Chegg denies the remaining allegations
`
`in Paragraph 39.
`
`-12-
`
`4889-5381-1817.v1
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-16866-MEF-ESK Document 136 Filed 06/07/23 Page 13 of 28 PageID: 2790
`
`
`40.
`
`Chegg admits that Pearson’s quotation of the Chegg Study solution for the indicated
`
`question is accurate, but notes that the quotation is incomplete and misleading. The FAC uses
`
`ellipses to omit Chegg’s original work product from the quotation. Chegg Study goes on to provide
`
`an original, step-by-step solution to the textbook question. Chegg denies the remaining allegations
`
`in Paragraph 40.
`
`41.
`
`Chegg admits that Pearson’s quotation of the Chegg Study solution for the indicated
`
`question is accurate, but notes that the quotation is incomplete and misleading. The FAC uses
`
`ellipses to omit Chegg’s original work product from the quotation. Chegg Study goes on to provide
`
`an original, step-by-step solution to the textbook question. Chegg denies the remaining allegations
`
`in Paragraph 41.
`
`42.
`
`Chegg admits that Pearson’s quotation of the Chegg Study solution for the indicated
`
`question is accurate, but notes that the quotation is incomplete and misleading. The FAC uses
`
`ellipses to omit Chegg’s original work product from the quotation. Chegg Study goes on to provide
`
`an original, step-by-step solution to the textbook question. Chegg denies the remaining allegations
`
`in Paragraph 42.
`
`43.
`
`Chegg admits that Pearson’s quotation of the Chegg Study solution for the indicated
`
`question is accurate, but notes that the quotation is incomplete and misleading. The FAC uses
`
`ellipses to omit Chegg’s original work product from the quotation. Chegg Study goes on to provide
`
`an original, step-by-step solution to the textbook question. Chegg denies the remaining allegations
`
`in Paragraph 43.
`
`44.
`
`Chegg denies the allegations in Paragraph 44.
`
`45.
`
`Chegg denies Pearson’s characterization of videos available on Chegg Study as
`
`“video answers,” but admits that Chegg has posted instructional videos on Chegg Study that teach
`
`-13-
`
`4889-5381-1817.v1
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-16866-MEF-ESK Document 136 Filed 06/07/23 Page 14 of 28 PageID: 2791
`
`
`students, step-by-step, how to solve not only the end-of-chapter questions from the textbooks, but
`
`also other questions of the same type. Chegg denies that such instructional videos infringe
`
`Pearson’s copyrights in any respect. Chegg denies the remaining allegations in Paragraph 45.
`
`46.
`
`Chegg admits that Question 6 from Chapter 1 of CAMPBELL BIOLOGY includes the
`
`indicated language. Chegg admits that a corresponding Chegg Study video repeated language
`
`from the question. Answering further, Chegg states that such use of the question text in an
`
`instructional video for the pedagogical purposes of teaching students the concepts embodied by
`
`the question and assisting them to understand their homework constitutes a fair use and is not an
`
`infringement of copyright. Chegg denies the remaining allegations in Paragraph 46.
`
`47.
`
`Chegg admits that the screenshot excerpted at Paragraph 47 was part of a video
`
`available on Chegg Study and admits that it contains language from the indicated textbook
`
`question. Answering further, Chegg states that such use of the question text in an instructional
`
`video for the pedagogical purposes of teaching students the concepts embodied by the question
`
`and assisting them to understand their homework constitutes a fair use and is not an infringement
`
`of copyright. Chegg denies the remaining allegations in Paragraph 47.
`
`48.
`
`Chegg denies that for every solution on Chegg Study, the experts who prepared
`
`solutions obtained or had in their possession copies of all of Pearson’s textbooks. Chegg answers
`
`further that, in conjunction with the License Agreement, from 2016 through 2021, Pearson itself
`
`provided copies of the questions in many Pearson textbooks to Chegg with the express
`
`understanding that Chegg had already created or would create solutions to Pearson textbook
`
`questions and display the text of those questions in conjunction with the solutions on Chegg Study.
`
`49.
`
`Chegg denies the allegations in Paragraph 49. Answering further, Chegg states that
`
`the Chegg experts who prepare the original, step-by-step solutions to textbook questions that
`
`-14-
`
`4889-5381-1817.v1
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-16866-MEF-ESK Document 136 Filed 06/07/23 Page 15 of 28 PageID: 2792
`
`
`appear on Chegg Study do not refer to or rely on the textbooks, rather than simply the problems to
`
`which they provide solutions, and the guidelines Chegg provides to those experts require all work
`
`done by them to be original.
`
`50.
`
`Chegg states that the allegations in Paragraph 50 are legal conclusions to which no
`
`response is required, but to the extent a response may be deemed required, Chegg denies the
`
`allegations in Paragraph 50.
`
`51.
`
`Chegg denies the allegations in Paragraph 51.
`
`52.
`
`Chegg states that the allegations in Paragraph 52 are legal conclusions to which no
`
`response is required, but to the extent a response may be deemed required, Chegg denies the
`
`allegations in Paragraph 52.
`
`53.
`
`Chegg states that the allegations in Paragraph 53 are legal conclusions to which no
`
`response is required, but to the extent a response may be deemed required, Chegg denies those
`
`allegations. Answering further, Chegg states that, contrary to the FAC’s allegation that Chegg was
`
`not authorized to use end-of chapter questions, the parties’ License Agreement provided exactly
`
`that: from no later than April 26, 2016 until at least May 31, 2021, Pearson expressly authorized
`
`Chegg to display the text of Pearson end-of-chapter questions in conjunction with Chegg’s
`
`original, step-by-step solutions to Chegg users who were residents of North America. Before that
`
`time period, Chegg had also provided solutions for at least five years, without complaint or a
`
`license. And following termination of the License Agreement, the agreement also still permits
`
`Chegg to continue to display question text along with Chegg’s solutions on Chegg Study to any
`
`Chegg Study subscriber whose membership predates May 31, 2021.
`
`54.
`
`Chegg denies the allegations in Paragraph 54.
`
`-15-
`
`4889-5381-1817.v1
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-16866-MEF-ESK Document 136 Filed 06/07/23 Page 16 of 28 PageID: 2793
`
`
`DEFENDANT’S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF
`Direct Copyright Infringement—17 U.S.C. § 106(1)
`Unauthorized Reproduction
`
`55.
`
`Chegg incorporates and restates its answers to Paragraphs 1 through 54 as if fully
`
`set forth herein.
`
`56.
`
`Chegg states that the allegations in Paragraph 56 are legal conclusions to which no
`
`response is required, but to the extent a response may be deemed required, Chegg states that it
`
`lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations in
`
`Paragraph 56.
`
`57.
`
`Chegg denies the allegations in Paragraph 57. Answering further, Chegg states that
`
`Pearson expressly authorized Chegg under the License Agreement to display Pearson end-of-
`
`chapter questions on Chegg Study from no later than April 26, 2016 until at least May 31, 2021,
`
`and that agreement permits Chegg to continue to display those questions to legacy subscribers (i.e.,
`
`those with a subscription prior to termination) following the termination of the license.
`
`58.
`
`Chegg states that the allegations in Paragraph 58 are legal conclusions to which no
`
`response is required, but to the extent a response may be deemed required, Chegg denies those
`
`allegations. Answering further, Chegg states that Pearson expressly authorized Chegg under the
`
`License Agreement to display Pearson end-of-chapter questions on Chegg Study from no later than
`
`April 26, 2016 until at least May 31, 2021, and that agreement permits Chegg to continue to display
`
`those questions to legacy subscribers following the termination of the license.
`
`59.
`
`Chegg denies the allegations in Paragraph 59.
`
`60.
`
`Chegg denies the allegations in Paragraph 60.
`
`-16-
`
`4889-5381-1817.v1
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-16866-MEF-ESK Document 136 Filed 06/07/23 Page 17 of 28 PageID: 2794
`
`
`DEFENDANT’S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF
`Direct Copyright Infringement—17 U.S.C. § 106(2)
`Unauthorized Derivative Work
`
`61.
`
`Chegg incorporates and restates its answers to Paragraphs 1 through 54 as if fully
`
`set forth herein.
`
`62.
`
`Chegg states that the allegations in Paragraph 62 are legal conclusions to which no
`
`response is required, but to the extent a response may be deemed required, Chegg states that it
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket