`DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
`NEWARK DIVISION
`
`
`Case No. 2:18-cv-08962-JLL-CLW
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`SIPCO, LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`RAB LIGHTING INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 2:18-cv-08962-JLL-CLW Document 16 Filed 07/03/18 Page 1 of 3 PageID: 720
`
`
`Cassandra Roth
`cassandra.roth@ropesgray.com
`ROPES & GRAY LLP
`1211 Avenue of the Americas
`New York, NY 10036-8704
`Telephone: (212) 596-9000
`Facsimile: (212) 596-9090
`
`Attorney for Defendant
`RAB LIGHTING INC.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ORDER FOR THE ADMISSIONS PRO HAC VICE OF
`JAMES L. DAVIS, JR.,
`JAMES R. BATCHELDER,
`SCOTT MCKEOWN, AND
`STEVEN PEPE
`
`THIS MATTER having come before the Court on the applications of ROPES & GRAY,
`
`LLP (“the movant”), attorneys for Defendant RAB LIGHTING INC. (“Defendant”), in the
`
`above-captioned matter, seeking the pro hac vice admissions of James L. Davis, Jr., James R.
`
`Batchelder, Scott McKeown, and Steven Pepe (collectively “counsel”) on behalf of Defendant
`
`pursuant to L. Civ. R. 101.1; and the Court having considered the submissions in support of and
`
`if any in opposition to said application; and for good cause shown,
`
`IT IS on this
`
` day of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`, 2018,
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`Case 2:18-cv-08962-JLL-CLW Document 16 Filed 07/03/18 Page 2 of 3 PageID: 721
`
`
`ORDERED that the applications for the pro hac vice admissions of counsel is granted in
`
`the above-captioned matter;
`
`IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel shall abide by all rules of this Court, including
`
`all disciplinary rules, and shall notify the Court immediately of any matter affecting counsel’s
`
`standing at the bar of any court;
`
`IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel is deemed to consent to the appointment of the
`
`Clerk of the Court as the agent upon whom service of process may be made for all actions
`
`against counsel that may arise from counsel’s participation in this matter;
`
`IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the movant shall (a) be attorney of record in this case
`
`in accordance with L. Civ. R. 101.1(c); (b) be served all papers in this case, and such service
`
`shall be deemed sufficient service upon counsel; (c) sign (or arrange for a member of the firm
`
`admitted to practice in New Jersey to sign) all pleadings, briefs, and other papers submitted to
`
`this Court in this case; (d) appear at all proceedings; and (e) be responsible for the conduct of this
`
`case and of counsel admitted hereby;
`
`IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel shall make payment to the New Jersey
`
`Lawyers’ Fund for Client Protection, pursuant to N.J. Court Rule 1:28-2, for each year in which
`
`counsel represents the client in this matter;
`
`IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel shall each make payment in the amount of
`
`$150.00 to the Clerk of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey;
`
`IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all terms of the Orders entered in this case, including
`
`all deadlines set forth therein, shall remain in full force and effect and no delay in discovery,
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case 2:18-cv-08962-JLL-CLW Document 16 Filed 07/03/18 Page 3 of 3 PageID: 722
`
`
`motions, trial, or any other proceeding shall occur because of the participation of counsel or his
`
`inability to be in attendance at proceedings.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`THE HONORABLE CATHY L. WALDOR
`United States Magistrate Judge
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
