`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
`
`
`
`WAG Acquisition, L.L.C.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Action
`Civil
`(ES)(MAH)
`
`No.
`
`2:14-cv-01661
`
`v.
`
`
`
`Sobonito Investments, LTD., et al.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`WAG Acquisition, L.L.C.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`Multi Media, L.L.C., et al.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`WAG Acquisition, L.L.C.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`Data Conversions, Inc., et al.
`
`Defendants.
`
`WAG Acquisition, L.L.C.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`Flying Crocodile, Inc., et al.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`Action
`Civil
`(ES)(MAH)
`
`No.
`
`2:14-cv-02340
`
`Action
`Civil
`(ES)(MAH)
`
`No.
`
`2:14-cv-02345
`
`Action
`Civil
`(ES)(MAH)
`
`No.
`
`2:14-cv-02674
`
`
`
`Case 2:15-cv-03581-ES-MAH Document 32-3 Filed 01/19/16 Page 2 of 3 PageID: 475
`
`
`
`
`
`WAG Acquisition, L.L.C.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`Gattyán Group S.à r.l., et al.,
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`WAG Acquisition, L.L.C.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`FriendFinder Networks Inc., et al.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`WAG Acquisition, L.L.C.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`Vubeology, Inc. et al.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`WAG Acquisition, L.L.C.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`Action
`Civil
`(ES)(MAH)
`
`No.
`
`2:14-cv-02832
`
`Action
`Civil
`(ES)(MAH)
`
`No.
`
`2:14-cv-03456
`
`Action
`Civil
`(ES)(MAH)
`
`No.
`
`2:14-cv-04531
`
`Action
`Civil
`(ES)(MAH)
`
`No.
`
`2:15-cv-3581
`
`WEBPOWER, Inc. d/b/a WP Associates et
`al.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 2:15-cv-03581-ES-MAH Document 32-3 Filed 01/19/16 Page 3 of 3 PageID: 476
`
`
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT TO FED. R. EVID. 502(d)
`
`
`
`Because the parties to this case or third parties may be required to produce documents,
`
`answer interrogatories, and provide testimony and other information that may contain
`
`information covered by the attorney-client privilege or work product protection, and in order to
`
`permit discovery to proceed without delay and avoid possible disputes regarding the privileged
`
`or protected nature of such information, the Court hereby ORDERS:
`
`1.
`
`No waiver of attorney-client privilege and/or work product protection for any
`
`information or materials shall be deemed to have been made by reason of disclosure in
`
`connection with this litigation.
`
`2.
`
`Any such disclosure shall also not be a waiver in any other federal or state
`
`proceedings.
`
`3.
`
`This Order shall be interpreted to provide the greatest protection allowed by Fed.
`
`R. Evid. 502(d), or otherwise permitted by law.
`
`4.
`
` Nothing contained herein is intended to or shall serve to limit a party’s right to
`
`conduct a review of documents or information for relevance, responsiveness, and/or segregation
`
`of privileged and/or protected information before production.
`
`
`
`
`____________________________
`Michael A. Hammer, U.S.M.J.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated this ____ day of January 2016
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`