`
`
`
`Sean R. Kelly
`(973) 622-4801
`skelly@saiber.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`August 5, 2014
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`VIA ELECTRONIC FILING AND FIRST CLASS MAIL
`The Honorable Esther Salas, U.S.D.J.
`United States District Court
`Martin Luther King Jr. Federal Courthouse
`50 Walnut Street, Room 2060
`Newark, New Jersey 07101
`
`Re:
`
`
`Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals, LLC
`C.A. No. 13-cv-391
`
`
`
`
`
`Dear Judge Salas,
`
`
`
`This firm, together with Arent Fox LLP, represents Defendant Par Pharmaceutical, Inc.
`(“Par”) in the above-captioned consolidated matter. We write today to inform you that Par and
`Roxane Laboratories, Inc. have filed a petition for Covered Business Method Patent review of
`one of the patents at issue in this Action, U.S. Patent No. 7,765,106 (“the ’106 patent”) under 35
`U.S.C. § 321 and § 18 of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (“Petition”) in the United States
`Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) on August 4, 2014. The Petition is assigned Trial No.
`CBM2014-00161.
`
`
`
`The Petition seeks for the USPTO to admit the ’106 patent to Covered Business Method
`Patent Review and, subsequently, to cancel all claims of the ’106 patent on multiple grounds. As
`the outcome of the Petition could result in the cancellation of one or more claims of the ’106
`patent and affect Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc.’s ability to assert infringement of those claims in this
`case, we wanted to inform Your Honor of the concurrent proceedings before the USPTO.
`
`
`
`The USPTO has discretion over whether to grant the Petition and admit the ’106 patent to
`Covered Business Method Patent review and has not yet done so. Accordingly, no action is
`required or sought from Your Honor at this time.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`s/ Sean R. Kelly
`Sean R. Kelly
`
`
`
`
`
` cc: All counsel of record (by CM/ECF)
`
`
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
