`
`Case 2:13-cv-00391-ES-JAD Document 59 Filed 05/05/14 Page 1 of 3 PageID: 655
`Case 2:13-cv-00391-ES-JAD Document 58 Filed 05/02/14 Page 2 of 4 PageiD: 652
`
`Document Filed Electronically
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
`
`JAZZ PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`AMNEAL PHARMACEUTICALS, LLC
`
`Defendant.
`JAZZ PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.,
`
`X
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`PAR PHARMACEUTICAL, INC.
`
`Defendant.
`
`X
`
`Civil Action No. 13-391-ES-JAD
`
`District Judge Esther Salas
`Magistrate Judge Joseph A. Dickson
`
`Civil Action No. 13-7884-ES-MAH
`
`District Judge Esther Salas
`Magistrate Judge Michael A. Hammer
`
`ORDER ON CONSOLIDATION
`
`THIS MATER having been opened to the Court by counsel for defendant Amneal
`
`Pharmaceuticals, LLC in a letter dated April23, 2014 informally requesting the Court to
`
`consolidate the present action Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals, LLC, CA.
`
`No. 13-cv-391-ES-JAD with the later filed action Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Par
`
`Pharmaceutical, Inc., CA. No. 13-cv-7884-ES-MAH for all pretrial purposes and trial;
`
`Wherein defendant Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. has also requested consolidation;
`
`
`
`Case 2:13-cv-00391-ES-JAD Document 59 Filed 05/05/14 Page 2 of 3 PageID: 656
`Case 2:13-cv-00391-ES-JAD Document 58 Filed 05/02/14 Page 3 of 4 PageiD: 653
`
`Wherein the plaintiff in both actions Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc. has agreed not to oppose
`
`such consolidation;
`
`Wherein defendant Amneal Pharmaceuticals, LLC and plaintiff Jazz have agreed to
`
`request the Court to vacate the Pretrial Scheduling Order entered on November 7, 2013 in the
`
`Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals, LLC matter;
`
`Wherein the parties to the Jazz Pharmaceuticals v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. matter
`
`have agreed to present to the Court with Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. a newly proposed scheduling
`
`order in the consolidated action;
`
`Wherein, if the cases are consolidated, Amneal has agreed to extend the expiration date
`
`of its 30-month stay (presently calculated to be June 10, 2015) so as to coincide with the date
`
`that Par's 30-month stay period expires (calculated to be May 20, 2016); and
`
`Wherein, there is presently scheduled a Rule 16 conference in the Jazz Pharmaceuticals,
`
`Inc. v. Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. matter for May 14, 2014, before Magistrate Judge Michael A.
`
`Hammer; and for good cause shown, it is,
`
`ORDERED on thi~ day of~ , that
`
`1.
`
`Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals, LLC, CA. No. 13-cv-391-
`
`ES-JAD and Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Par Pharmaceutical, Inc., CA. No. 13-cv-7884-ES-
`
`MAH are and hereby consolidated for all pretrial proceedings and trial;
`
`2.
`
`The Pretrial Scheduling Order entered on November 7, 2013, in Jazz
`
`Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals, LLC, CA. No. 13-cv-391-ES-JAD is hereby
`
`vacated;
`
`3.
`
`The expiration of the 30-month stay relating to Amneal's Abbreviated New Drug
`
`Application No. 203631 (presently calculated to be June 10, 2015) shall be extended so as to
`
`
`
`Case 2:13-cv-00391-ES-JAD Document 59 Filed 05/05/14 Page 3 of 3 PageID: 657
`Case 2:13-cv-00391-ES-JAD Document 58 Filed 05/02/14 Page 4 of 4 PageiD: 654
`
`coincide with the date that Par's 30-month stay period expires relating to Abbreviated New Drug
`
`Application No. 205403 (calculated to be May 20, 2016); and
`
`4.
`
`The Initial Scheduling Conference set for May 14, 2014, in Jazz v. Par
`
`Pharmaceutical, Inc., CA. No. 13-cv-7884-ES-MAH is adjourned and the Initial Scheduling
`
`Conference in the consolidated action will take place on ~~~7~~0
`
`SO ORDERED:
`
`0
`
`United States Magistrate Judge
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
