throbber
Case 2:13-cv-00391-ES-JAD Document 378 Filed 08/11/17 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 7470
`
`Case 2:13-cv-00391-ES-JAD Document 378 Filed 08/11/17 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 7470
`
`Charles M. Lizza
`William C. Baton
`SAUL EWING LLP
`
`One Riverfront Plaza, Suite 1520
`Newark, NJ 07102-5426
`
`(973) 286-6700
`clizza@saul.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintzflv
`Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and
`Jazz Pharmaceuticals Limited
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
`
`
`
`JAZZ PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and
`JAZZ PHARMACEUTICALS IRELAND
`
`LIMITED,
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 13-391 (ES)(JAD)
`
`(Filed Electronically)
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`V.
`
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`AMNEAL PHARMACEUTICAL, LLC, et
`a].
`
`ORDER ADMITTING JOHN P. GALANEK PRO HAC VICE
`
`This matter having come before the Court on the application of Saul Ewing LLP
`
`[“movant”], attorneys for plaintiffs Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Jazz Pharmaceuticals Ireland
`
`Limited (collectively, “Jazz”), for the pro hac vice admission of John P. Galanek ["counsel”],
`
`pursuant to Local Civ. R. 101.1; and the Court having considered the Certifications in support of
`
`the application, which reflect that counsel satisfies the requirements set forth in Local Civ. R.
`
`101 .1(c)(1); and there being no opposition to this application; and for good cause shown,
`IT IS ON THIS \\‘fl\_ day of Adam“ , 2017,
`
`ORDERED that the application for the pro hac vice admission of counsel is granted;
`
`

`

`Case 2:13-cv-00391-ES-JAD Document 378 Filed 08/11/17 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 7471
`
`Case 2:13-cv-00391-ES-JAD Document 378 Filed 08/11/17 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 7471
`
`IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel shall abide by all rules ofthis Court, including
`
`all disciplinary rules, and shall notify the Court immediately of any matter affecting counsel’s
`
`standing at the bar of any court;
`
`IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel is deemed to consent to the appointment of the
`
`Clerk of the Court as the agent upon whom service of process may be made for all actions
`
`against counsel that may arise from counsel’s participation in this matter;
`
`IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the movant shall (a) be attorneys of record in this case
`
`in accordance with Local Civil R. 101.1(c); (b) be served all papers in this action and such
`
`service shall be deemed sufficient service upon counsel; (c) sign (or arrange for a member of the
`
`firm admitted to practice in New Jersey to sign) all pleadings, briefs, and other papers submitted
`
`to this Court; (d) appear at all proceedings; and (e) be responsible for the conduct of the cause
`
`and counsel in this matter;
`
`IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel shall make payment to the New Jersey
`
`Lawyer’s Fund for Client Protection, pursuant to NJ. Court Rule 128-2, for each year in which
`
`counsel represents the client in this matter;
`
`IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel shall pay $150.00 to the Clerk of the United
`
`States District Court for the District of New Jersey for admission pro hac vice in accordance with
`
`Local Civ. R. 101.1(3)(c); and
`
`IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all terms of the Orders entered in this case, including
`
`all deadlines set forth therein, shall remain in full force and effect and no delay in discovery,
`
`motions, trial or any other proceeding shall occur because of the participation of counsel or
`
`counsel’s inability to be in attendance at proceedings.
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket