throbber
Case 2:13-cv-00391-ES-JAD Document 327 Filed 11/14/16 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 6698
`
`
`
`NOT FOR PUBLICATION
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
`
`
`
`
` Civil Action No. 13-0391 (ES) (JAD)
`
` ORDER
`
`
`JAZZ PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.,
`et al.,
`
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`
`
`AMNEAL PHARMACEUTICALS
`LLC, et al.,
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`SALAS, DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`
`
`
`WHEREAS presently pending before the Court is a motion for judgment on the pleadings
`
`as to U.S. Patent No. 8,772,306 (the “’306 patent”) filed by Defendant Par Pharmaceutical, Inc.
`
`(“Par”) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c) (D.E. No. 244);
`
`WHEREAS matters outside the pleadings have been presented to the Court in conjunction
`
`with the pending motion for judgment on the pleadings, namely communications to and from the
`
`U.S. Food and Drug Administration (see D.E. No. 280-1, Exhs. 2-4), which appear critical to the
`
`Court’s resolution of the pending motion;
`
`WHEREAS the Federal Circuit has determined that a district court is entitled to examine
`
`documents “integral to or explicitly relied upon in the complaint” in evaluating a Rule 12(c) motion
`
`and, in particular, may examine “ANDA filings, Section viii statements, and proposed labeling”
`
`where a patentee’s complaint in an ANDA case “referenced and relied on [an ANDA filer’s] FDA
`
`filings, and the parties do not dispute the authenticity of the documents that are before the court,”
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case 2:13-cv-00391-ES-JAD Document 327 Filed 11/14/16 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 6699
`
`see AstraZeneca Pharm. LP v. Apotex Corp., 669 F.3d 1370, 1378 n.5 (Fed. Cir. 2012) (citing In
`
`re Burlington Coat Factory Sec. Litig., 114 F.3d 1410, 1426 (3d Cir. 1997));
`
`WHEREAS the Court is concerned, however, that communications to and from the U.S.
`
`Food and Drug Administration do not plainly appear to fall within the ambit of what the Court
`
`may consider at this stage under AstraZeneca Pharm. LP v. Apotex Corp., 669 F.3d 1370, 1378
`
`n.5 (Fed. Cir. 2012) and In re Burlington Coat Factory Sec. Litig., 114 F.3d 1410, 1426 (3d Cir.
`
`1997);
`
`WHEREAS the Court, in its discretion, has accordingly elected to administratively
`
`terminate the instant motion for judgment on the pleadings and to grant Par leave to file a motion
`
`for summary judgment concerning the ’306 patent at a time it considers appropriate;
`
`IT IS on this 14th day of November 2016,
`
`ORDERED that Par’s motion pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c) (D.E. No.
`
`244) is administratively terminated; and it is further
`
`ORDERED that Par may file a motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of
`
`Civil Procedure 56 when it sees fit; and it is further
`
`ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall terminate docket entry number 244.
`
`s/Esther Salas
`Esther Salas, U.S.D.J.
`
`2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket