throbber
Case 2:13-cv-00391-ES-JAD Document 292 Filed 05/18/16 Page 1 of 5 PageID: 5416
`
`Charles M. Lizza
`William C. Baton
`SAUL EWING LLP
`One Riverfront Plaza, Suite 1520
`Newark, NJ 07 102-5426
`(973) 286-6700
`
`Attorneysfor Plaintffs
`Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and
`Jazz Pharmaceuticals Ireland Limited
`
`Karen A. Confoy
`Christopher R. Kinkade
`Kai W. Marshall-Otto
`Fox ROTHSCHILD LLP
`Princeton Pike Corporate Center
`997 Lenox Drive, Building 3
`Lawrenceville, NJ 08648-2311
`(609) 896-3600
`kconfoy@foxrothschild.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendants Sun
`Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Ohm
`Laboratories Inc., and Ranbaxy Inc.
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
`
`JAZZ PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., et
`aL,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`V.
`
`AMNEAL PHARMACEUTICALS,
`LLC, etal.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`Civil Action No. 13-391 (ES)(JAD)
`Civil Action No. 15-8229 (ES)(JAD)
`(consolidated)
`
`(Filed Electronically)
`
`STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL
`
`The Court, upon the consent and request of Plaintiffs Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Jazz
`
`Pharmaceuticals Ireland Limited (collectively, “Jazz”) and Defendants Sun Pharmaceutical
`
`Industries Ltd., Ohm Laboratories Inc., and Ranbaxy Inc. (collectively, “Ranbaxy”), hereby
`
`enters into the record the following Stipulated Facts and issues the following Order of Dismissal:
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case 2:13-cv-00391-ES-JAD Document 292 Filed 05/18/16 Page 2 of 5 PageID: 5417
`
`STIPULATED FACTS
`
`1.
`
`This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over these patent infringement actions
`
`(the “Actions”). This Court has personal jurisdiction over Jazz and Ranbaxy, and venue is
`
`proper in this Court.
`
`2.
`
`In this Action, Jazz has charged Ranbaxy with infringement of certain claims of
`
`United States Patent Nos. 6,472,431, 6,780,889, 7,262,219, 7,851,506, 8,263,650, 8,324,275,
`
`8,461,203, 7,668,730, 7,765,106, 7,765,107, 7,895,059, 8,457,988, 8,589,182, 8,731,963,
`
`8,772,306, 8,859,619, 8,952,062, and 9,050,302 (“the Asserted Patents”) in connection with
`
`Ranbaxy’s submission of Abbreviated New Drug Application (“ANDA”) No. 203351, directed
`
`to a generic 500 mg/mE sodium oxybate oral solution product for the treatment of cataplexy and
`
`excessive daytime sleepiness in narcolepsy (hereinafter, the “Generic Product”), to the U.S. Food
`
`and Drug Administration (“FDA”).
`
`3.
`
`Ranbaxy has not, at this time, rebutted the statutory presumption that the Asserted
`
`Patents are valid and enforceable in this Action.
`
`4.
`
`Ranbaxy admits that the submission of ANDA No. 203351 to the FDA for the
`
`purpose of obtaining regulatory approval to engage in the commercial manufacture, use and/or
`
`sale of the Generic Product within the United States prior to the expiration of the Asserted
`
`Patents was a technical act of patent infringement with respect to one or more claims of each of
`
`the Asserted Patents.
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 2:13-cv-00391-ES-JAD Document 292 Filed 05/18/16 Page 3 of 5 PageID: 5418
`
`Dated: May 12, 2016
`
`By: s/ Charles M. Lizza
`Charles M. Lizza
`William C. Baton
`SAUL EWING LLP
`One Riverfront Plaza, Suite 1520
`Newark, NJ 07102-5426
`(973) 286-6700
`clizza@saul.com
`
`Attorneysfor Plaintffs
`Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Jazz
`Pharmaceuticals Ireland Limited
`
`OfCounsel:
`
`F. Dominic Cerrito
`Eric C. Stops
`Gabriel P. Brier
`QUmns EMANUEL URQUHART &
`SULLIVAN, LLP
`51 Madison Avenue, 22w’ Floor
`New York, New York 10010
`
`Richard G. Greco
`RICHARD G. GREc0 PC
`90 State Street, Suite 700
`Albany, New York 12207
`
`By: 5/ Karen A. Confoy
`Karen A. Confoy
`Christopher R. Kinkade
`Kai W. Marshall-Otto
`Fox ROTHSCHILD LLP
`Princeton Pike Corporate Center
`997 Lenox Drive, Building 3
`Lawrenceville, NJ 08648-2311
`(609) 896-3600
`kconfoy@foxrothschild.com
`
`Attorneysfor Defendants Sun
`Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Ohm
`Laboratories Inc., and Ranbaxy Inc.
`
`Of Counsel:
`
`William R. Zimmerman
`KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR,
`LLP
`1717 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
`Suite 900
`Washington, D.C. 20006
`
`Carol Pitzel Cruz
`Christie R.W. Matthaei
`KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON &
`BEAR, LLP
`925 Fourth Avenue, Suite 2500
`Seattle, WA 98104
`
`Benjamin B. Anger
`KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON &
`BEAR, LLP
`12790 El Camino Real San Diego,
`CA 92130
`
`Karen M. Cassidy
`KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON &
`BEAR, LLP
`2040 Main Street, 14th Floor
`Irvine, CA 92614
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 2:13-cv-00391-ES-JAD Document 292 Filed 05/18/16 Page 4 of 5 PageID: 5419
`
`ORDER OF DISMISSAL
`
`Accordingly, pursuant to the above Stipulated Facts, and upon the consent and request of
`
`Jazz and Ranbaxy, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED THAT:
`
`1.
`
`The filing of ANDA No. 203351 was a technical act of infringement of each of
`
`the Asserted Patents under 35 U.S.C. § 271(e)(2)(A).
`
`2.
`
`Ranbaxy admits that the commercial manufacture, use, selling, offering for sale,
`
`or importing of the Generic Product would infringe each of the Asserted Patents.
`
`3.
`
`All claims, defenses, and counterclaims in this Action are hereby dismissed,
`
`without prejudice.’
`
`4.
`
`Ranbaxy, its officers, agents, servants, employees and attorneys, and those
`
`persons in active concert or participation with them who receive actual notice of this Order by
`
`personal service or otherwise, are hereby enjoined from manufacturing, using, offering to sell or
`
`selling within the United States, or importing into the United States, the Generic Product during
`
`the life of the Asserted Patents, including any extensions and pediatric exclusivities, except only
`
`as expressly permitted by the License Agreement entered into between Jazz and Ranbaxy on
`
`May 9, 2016, unless all of the asserted claims of the Asserted Patents are found invalid,
`
`unpatentable or unenforceable by a court or patent office decision from which no appeal has
`
`been or can be taken, other than a petition for a writ of certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court, and
`
`any marketing of the Generic Product, except as allowed in this paragraph, would cause
`
`irreparable harm to Jazz.
`
`The dismissal of the parties’ claims, defenses, and counterclaims in Civil Action No.
`13-391 with respect to Ranbaxy shall not result in the dismissal of claims, defenses, and
`counterclaims in that Action with respect to Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC, Par Pharmaceutical,
`Inc., Watson Laboratories, Inc., Lupin Ltd., Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Lupin Inc.
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 2:13-cv-00391-ES-JAD Document 292 Filed 05/18/16 Page 5 of 5 PageID: 5420
`
`5.
`
`This Court retains jurisdiction over Jazz and Ranbaxy for purposes of enforcing
`
`this Stipulation And Order Of Dismissal.
`
`6.
`
`The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter this final judgment forthwith.
`
`SO ORDERED:
`
`This ,L/yof 71’1 ;
`
`,2016
`
`HONO
`,UNIT
`
`ER SALAS
`ES
`STATES ISTRICT JUDGE
`
`5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket