`
`Liza M. Walsh
`Tricia 0 'Reilly
`Katelyn O'Reilly
`CONNELL FOLEY LLP
`One Newark Center
`1085 Raymond Boulevard, 19th Floor
`Newark, NJ 07102
`(973) 757-1100
`
`Of Counsel:
`
`Gary E. Hood (admitted pro hac vice)
`Mark T. Deming (admitted pro hac vice)
`Khurram Naik (pro hac vice to be submitted)
`POLSINELLI PC
`161 North Clark Street, Suite 4200
`Chicago, Illinois 60601
`(312) 819-1900
`
`Robyn Ast-Gmoser (pro hac vice to be submitted)
`POLSINELLI PC
`100 S. Fourth Street
`Suite 1000
`St. Louis, MO 63102
`(314) 889-8000
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`Watson Laboratories, Inc.,
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
`
`JAZZ PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.,
`et al.,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`
`AMNEAL PHARMACEUTICALS, LLC,
`et al.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-00391-ES-JAD
`
`CONSENT ORDER GRANTING
`PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION
`
`3564389-1
`
`
`
`Case 2:13-cv-00391-ES-JAD Document 189 Filed 12/04/15 Page 2 of 3 PageID: 2364
`
`THIS MATTER having been opened to the Court by Connell Foley LLP, counsel for
`
`Defendant, Watson Laboratories, Inc. ("Watson"), upon application for the entry of an Order
`
`admitting pro hac vice Robyn Ast-Gmoser and Khurram Naik of the law firm Polsinelli PC as
`
`counsel for Watson; and Plaintiffs, through counsel, having consented thereto; and the Court
`
`having considered all papers filed in support of said application; and for good cause having been
`
`~
`shown;
`IT IS on this\)\__,_ day of ~Q c
`ORDERED that Watson's application for the pro hac vice admissions of Robyn Ast-
`
`'2015,
`
`,
`
`Gmoser and Khurram Naik as counsel for Watson is hereby GRANTED; and it is further
`
`ORDERED that Robyn Ast-Gmoser and Khurram Naik are hereby admitted pro hac vice
`
`pursuant to Local Civil Rule 101.1 for the sole purpose of entering an appearance on behalf of
`
`Watson in this matter; and it is further
`
`ORDERED that Robyn Ast-Gmoser and Khurram Naik shall abide by the disciplinary
`
`rules of this Court; and it is further
`
`ORDERED that Robyn Ast-Gmoser and Khurram Naik shall, for the duration of the time
`
`that they serve as counsel pro hac vice in this matter, make annual payments to the New Jersey
`
`Lawyers' Fund for Client Protection as provided by New Jersey Court Rule 1:28-2(a) and shall c11-c~
`
`pay the sum of $150.00 to the Clerk of the United States District Court in accordance with Local
`
`Civil Rule 101.l(c)(3); and it is further
`
`ORDERED that Robyn Ast-Gmoser and Khurram Naik shall notify the Court
`
`immediately of any disciplinary matter affecting their standing at the bar of any jurisdiction; and
`
`it is further
`
`3564389-1
`
`
`
`Case 2:13-cv-00391-ES-JAD Document 189 Filed 12/04/15 Page 3 of 3 PageID: 2365
`
`ORDERED that Robyn Ast-Gmoser and Khurram Naik shall have all pleadings, briefs
`
`and other papers filed with the Court in this matter signed by Liza M. Walsh or her partners or
`
`associates as the attorneys of record in this matter pursuant to Local Civil Rule 101.1 ( c )(3).
`
`SO ORDERED.
`
`3564389-1
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
