throbber
Case 2:13-cv-00391-ES-JAD Document 173 Filed 10/16/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID: 2205
`
`Karen A. Confoy
`Direct Dial: (609) 844-3033
`Email Address: kconfoy@foxrothschild.com
`
`October 16, 2015
`
`Mail: P.O. Box 5231, Princeton, NJ 08543-5231
`
`Princeton Pike Corporate Center
`997 Lenox Drive, Building 3
`Lawrenceville, NJ 08648-2311
`Tel 609.896.3600 Fax 609.896.1469
`www.foxrothschild.com
`
`VIA ECF AND HAND DELIVERY
`
`Honorable Joseph A. Dickson, U.S.M.J.
`United States District Court
`District of New Jersey
`Martin Luther King, Jr. Bldg. & U.S. Courthouse
`50 Walnut Street
`Newark, New Jersey 07101
`
`Re:
`
`Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals, LLC, et al.
`C.A. No. 2:13-cv-00391 (ES) (JAD) (Consolidated)
`
`Dear Judge Dickson:
`
`together with Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP, represent
`The undersigned,
`Defendants Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Ohm Laboratories Inc., and Ranbaxy Inc.
`(“Sun”) in the above-referenced matter. We write concerning letters sent by Plaintiff Jazz
`Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Jazz”) on September 30, 2015 (“Jazz’s Letter”) and Defendant Par
`Pharmaceutical, Inc. (“Par”) on October 9, 2015 (“Par’s Letter”) regarding Jazz’s request for
`production of documents. Defendant Watson Laboratories Inc. (“Watson”) sent a letter to the
`Court on October 15, 2015 (“Watson’s Letter”) to confirm that those letters do not concern
`Watson. The undersigned likewise write to confirm our understanding that Jazz’s Letter and
`Par’s Letter do not concern Sun or the production of Sun documents.
`
`On September 30, 2015, Sun received a copy of Jazz’s Letter, which, aside from the
`opening and closing remarks, was redacted in its entirety. See Exhibit A. The un-redacted
`portions of the letter made an ambiguous request that the Court order “Defendants” to produce
`FDA correspondence. Id. Nothing in the un-redacted portion of Jazz’s Letter indicates which
`“Defendants” are the subject of Jazz’s Letter. Jazz has not separately informed Sun that it is
`seeking to compel the production of Sun documents, and no further discussion between Jazz and
`Sun concerning the matter has taken place.
`
`

`

`Case 2:13-cv-00391-ES-JAD Document 173 Filed 10/16/15 Page 2 of 12 PageID: 2206
`
`Honorable Joseph A. Dickson, U.S.M.J.
`October 16, 2015
`Page 2
`
`On October 9, 2015, Sun received a redacted copy of Par’s Letter that was sent to the
`Court in response to Jazz’s Letter. See Exhibit B. Although the undersigned have not seen un-
`redacted versions of either Jazz’s Letter or Par’s Letter, it is our understanding that the letters
`cannot concern Sun or the production of Sun documents. There is no pending motion to compel
`FDA correspondence from Sun, nor could there be as there has been no meet and confer between
`Jazz and Sun and any such motion would be premature. Also, to the extent Jazz’s Letter is
`directed to Sun,
`this would appear to be a violation of paragraph 17 of the Discovery
`Confidentiality Order (See Dkt. No. 144), which prohibits the use of one party’s confidential
`information in support of a claim or defense against another party.
`
`Therefore, we respectfully request that any order that may be entered in response to Jazz’s
`Letter and Par’s Letter explicitly exempt Sun or the production of Sun documents from its scope.
`We thank the Court for its attention to this matter.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ Karen A. Confoy
`
`Karen A. Confoy
`
`KAC:nmn
`Enclosure
`cc:
`All Counsel of Record
`
`

`

`Case 2:13-cv-00391-ES-JAD Document 173 Filed 10/16/15 Page 3 of 12 PageID: 2207
`Case 2:13-cv-00391-ES-JAD Document 173 Filed 10/16/15 Page 3 of 12 PageID: 2207
`
`EXHIBIT A
`
`EXHIBIT A
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:13-cv-00391-ES-JAD Document 173 Filed 10/16/15 Page 4 of 12 PageID: 2208
`
`Charles M. Lizza
`Phone: (973) 286-6715
`Fax: (973) 286-6815
`clizza@saul.com
`www.saul.com
`
`September 30, 2015
`
`Contains Highly Confidential
`Information Subject to
`Discovery Confidentiality Order
`
`VIA ECF & FEDEX
`
`The Honorable Joseph A. Dickson, U.S.M.J.
`United States District Court
`Martin Luther King, Jr. Federal Building
`50 Walnut Street, Room 2060
`Newark, New Jersey 07102
`
`Re:
`
`Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al. v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals, LLC, et al.
`Civil Action No. 13-391 (ES)(JAD)(consolidated)
`
`Dear Judge Dickson:
`
`This firm, together with Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP and Richard G. Greco
`PC, represents plaintiffs Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Jazz Pharmaceuticals Ireland Limited
`(collectively, “Jazz”) in the above-referenced matter. We write regarding Jazz’s request that the
`Court compel Defendants to produce FDA correspondence withheld in violation of Local Patent
`Rule 3.6(j). See D.I. 85, 90, 97.
`
`One Riverfront Plaza, Suite 1520  Newark, NJ 07102-5426  Phone: (973) 286-6700  Fax: (973) 286-6800
`
`D E L A W A R E M A R Y L A N D M A S S A C H U S E T T S N E W J E R S E Y N E W Y O R K P E N N S Y L V A N I A W A S H I N G T O N , D C
`
`A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP
`
`

`

`Case 2:13-cv-00391-ES-JAD Document 173 Filed 10/16/15 Page 5 of 12 PageID: 2209
`Case 2:13-cv-00391-ES-JAD Document 173 Filed 10/16/15 Page 5 of 12 PageID: 2209
`
`September 30, 2015
`
`Page 2
`
`
`
`1 y request t at t e C01u1 or er
`Accor mg y, we respect
`Defendants to innnediately produce the improperly withheld FDA correspondence.
`
`Thank you for Your Honor’s kind attention to this matter.
`
`Respectfully yours,
`
`@410. ct £551
`
`Charles M. Lizza
`
`Exhibits
`
`cc:
`
`All Counsel (via e-n1ail)
`
`

`

`Case 2:13-cv-00391-ES-JAD Document 173 Filed 10/16/15 Page 6 of 12 PageID: 2210
`
`EXHIBIT 1
`
`Confidential Material Redacted
`Pursuant to L. Civ. R. 5.3(c)(3)
`Filed Under Seal Pursuant to the Court's
`March 20, 2015 Order (D.I. 119)
`
`

`

`Case 2:13-cv-00391-ES-JAD Document 173 Filed 10/16/15 Page 7 of 12 PageID: 2211
`
`EXHIBIT 2
`
`Confidential Material Redacted
`Pursuant to L. Civ. R. 5.3(c)(3)
`Filed Under Seal Pursuant to the Court's
`March 20, 2015 Order (D.I. 119)
`
`

`

`Case 2:13-cv-00391-ES-JAD Document 173 Filed 10/16/15 Page 8 of 12 PageID: 2212
`Case 2:13-cv—00391—ES-JAD Document 173 Filed 10/16/15 Page 8 of 12 PageID: 2212
`
`EXHIBIT B
`
`EXHIBIT B
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:13-cv-00391-ES-JAD Document 173 Filed 10/16/15 Page 9 of 12 PageID: 2213
`Case 2:13-cv-00391-ES-JAD Document 173 Filed 10/16/15 Page 9 of 12 PageID: 2213
`
`Sean R. Kelly
`(973) 6224801
`skelly_@saiber.com
`
`Sd’lber
`
`ATTORNEYS AT LAW
`
`October 9, 2015
`
`CONTAINS HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION—
`SUBJECT TO DISCOVERY CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER
`
`BY ELECTRONIC FILING
`
`The Honorable Joseph A. Dickson, U.S.M.J.
`United States District Court
`
`Martin Luther King Jr. Federal Courthouse
`Newark, New Jersey 07101
`
`Re:
`
`Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals, LLC et a].
`CA. No. 13-cv-391 (ESngADMConsolidatedl
`
`Dear Judge Dickson:
`
`This firm, together with Arent Fox LLP, represents Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. (“Par”) in
`the above~captioned consolidated matter. We write in response to Jazz’s September 30, 201.5
`letter
`(“Jazz’s Letter”)
`requesting the Court
`to compel Defendants
`to produce FDA
`correspondence allegedly withheld in violation of Local Patent Rule 3.66). Specifically, Jazz
`requests that the Court u5e Par’s confidential correspondence with the FDA as a basis to compel
`further production of FDA correspondence from the other defendants in the above-captioned
`consolidated matter (cg. Amneal and Watson Laboratories, Inc.). Such a request, however, is
`still premature.
`
`As an initial matter, we note that the timing of Jazz’s re uest for Defendants’ FDA
`
`corres ondence is highly sus ect. As Your Honor ma recall
`
`information from Defendants -
`is attempting to obtain any and all
`Jazz, no doubt,
`_This explains Jazz’s efforts to use Par’s
`confidential FDA correspondence as a basis to request all Defendants’ correSpondence with the
`
`FDA. Accordinili, Jazz’s reiucst should be seen for what it is: a transiarent and eager attempt
`
`
`Salber LLC - 1.8 Columbia Turnpike ' Suite 200 - Florham Park, New Jersey - 07932 u Tel 973.622.3333 - Fax 973.622.3349 - www.5aiber.com
`Florham Park ' Newark - New York
`- Atlantic City ' Point Pleasant Beach
`
`

`

`Case 2:13-cv-00391-ES-JAD Document 173 Filed 10/16/15 Page 10 of 12 PageID: 2214
`
`The Honorable Joseph A. Dickson, U.S.M.J.
`October 9, 2015
`Page 2
`
`Furthermore the fact that
`
`Moreover, and further to our October 16, 2014 correspondence (EC'F No. 87), Jazz’s
`repeated allegations that Defendants have violated Local Patent Rule 3.60) are misguided and
`untrue. L. Pat. R. 3.6 (i) simply requires that “[e}ach party that has an ANDA application
`pending .
`.
`. provide a copy of all correSpondence between itself and the FDA pertainin to the
`endin ANDA a lication . ”
`See L P t R. 3 6 '
`emhasis added .
`
`
`
`
`
`_ Jazz cannot suffer any
`prejudice or harm through Defendants’ withholding of the documents in question, and in fact
`underscores that such documents are at this time irrelevant to infrinement of the atents-in-
`suit.
`
`‘
`
`

`

`Case 2:13-cv-00391-ES-JAD Document 173 Filed 10/16/15 Page 11 of 12 PageID: 2215
`Case 2:13-cv-00391-ES-JAD Document 173 Filed 10/16/15 Page 11 of 12 PageID: 2215
`
`The Honorable Joseph A. Dickson, U.S.M.J.
`October 9, 2015
`Page 3
`
`Accordingly, we respectfully request that the Court deny Jazz’s request to im
`
`'
`
`comiel the production ofthe FDA correspondence Defendants have withheld
`
`We thank the Court for its consideration in this matter.
`
`Respectfully yours,
`
`5/ Sean R. Kell
`
`Sean R. Kelly
`
`Enclosure
`
`cc: All counsel (Via e—mail)
`
`

`

`Case 2:13-cv-00391-ES-JAD Document 173 Filed 10/16/15 Page 12 of 12 PageID: 2216
`Case 2:13-cv-00391-ES-JAD Document 173 Filed 10/16/15 Page 12 of 12 PageID: 2216
`
`EXHIBIT 1 «- FILED UNDER SEAL
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket