`
`Deverie J. Christensen
`Nevada State Bar No. 6596
`JACKSON LEWIS P.C.
`300 South Fourth Street, Suite 900
`Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
`Tel: (702) 921-2460
`Email: deverie.christensen@jacksonlewis.com
`Attorney for Defendant
`Tesla, Inc. fka Tesla Motors, Inc.
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`DISTRICT OF NEVADA
`Case No. 3:25-cv-00137-ART-CSD
`
`MALCOLM SHEPHERD,
`Plaintiff,
`
`vs.
`TESLA, INC., (a.k.a. TESLA MOTORS, INC.)
`a Delaware Corporation; DOES I-X; and, ROE
`Business Entities I-X,
`Defendants.
`
`ORDER GRANTING
`STIPULATION TO EXTEND
`DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANTS
`TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S
`COMPLAINT
`(FIRST REQUEST)
`
`IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Malcolm Shepherd, (“Plaintiff”),
`by and through his counsel, Kemp & Kemp, and Defendant, Tesla, Inc. fka Tesla Motors, Inc.
`(“Defendant”), by and through their counsel, the law firm of Jackson Lewis P.C., that Defendant
`shall have an extension up to and including March 28, 2025, in which to file its response to
`Plaintiff’s Complaint. This Stipulation is submitted and based upon the following:
`Plaintiff filed his Complaint on November 29, 2024 in the District Court, Clark
`1.
`County Nevada, Case No. A-24-907076-C. The Summons and Complaint were served on
`Defendant on or about February 14, 2025.
`2.
`On March 7, 2025, the Defendant filed a Notice to Federal Court of Removal of
`Civil Action from State Court, Case No. 3:25-cv-00137-ART-CSD.
`3.
`Defendant’s response to the Complaint, following removal, is due on March 14,
`
`2025.
`
`Undersigned Defense Counsel represents Tesla Inc. in an unrelated arbitration case
`4.
`pending before JAMS and for which Plaintiff’s counsel represents the claimant in that arbitration
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`Case 3:25-cv-00137-ART-CSD Document 6 Filed 03/11/25 Page 2 of 2
`
`case. Both Counsels are preparing for an arbitration hearing that begins on March 31, including
`meeting and conferring regarding exhibits, witnesses, objections, and other matters for which
`deadlines are fast approaching in the next two weeks.
`5.
`Accordingly, Undersigned Defense Counsel needs additional time to prepare a
`response to the complaint filed in this case, and requested Plaintiff agree to a two-week extension
`to March 28, 2025. Plaintiff has kindly agreed to the requested extension.
`6.
`Thus, the parties hereby stipulate to extend the deadline to March 28, 2025, for
`Defendant to file its response to the Complaint.
`7.
`This is the first request for an extension of time for Defendant to file its response to
`Plaintiff’s Complaint.
`8.
`This Stipulation is made in good faith and not for the purpose of delay.
`9.
`Nothing in this Stipulation and Order shall operate to waive, relinquish, or impair
`any claim, defense, objection, or right of any party in this case. Further, nothing in this Stipulation
`and Order shall be construed as an admission of or consent to the merit or validity of any claim,
`defense, objection, or right by any party in this case.
`Dated this 11th day of March, 2025.
`KEMP & KEMP
`
`JACKSON LEWIS P.C.
`
`/s/ James P. Kemp
`James P. Kemp, Esq., Bar #6375
`7435 W. Azure Drive, Ste. 110
`Las Vegas, Nevada 89130
`Attorney for Plaintiff
`Malcolm Shepherd
`
`/s/ Deverie J. Christensen
`Deverie J. Christensen, Bar # 6596
`300 South Fourth Street, Suite 900
`Las Vegas, Nevada 8910
`Attorney for Defendant
`Tesla, Inc. fka Tesla Motors, Inc.
`
`ORDER
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`United States Magistrate Judge
`Dated:
`
`March 11, 2025.
`
`4907-6867-5110, v. 1
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ ChargeStill Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site