throbber
Case 3:20-cv-00603-MMD-CLB Document 20 Filed 12/14/20 Page 1 of 2
`Case 3:20-cv-00603-MMD-CLB Document 19 Filed 12/14/20 Page 1 of 2
`
`
`ADAM K. YOWELL
`Nevada Bar No. 11748
`Adam.yowell@fisherbroyles.com
`FISHERBROYLES, LLP
`59 Damonte Ranch Pkwy
`Ste B # 508
`Reno, NV 89521
`Telephone: (775) 230-7364
`Counsel for Plaintiff
`Alastair J. Warr
`IN Bar #15873-49
`FisherBroyles, LLP
`203 N. LaSalle St., #2100
`Chicago, IL 60601
`Telephone: 317.407.5260
`Email: Alastair.warr@fisherbroyles.com
`(pro hac vice)
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`DISTRICT OF NEVADA
`
`
`
`NexRF Corp.,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`Playtika Ltd., Playtika Holding Corp., Caesars
`Interactive Entertainment, LLC
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`Civil Action No. 3:20-CV-603-MMD-CLB
`
`
`
`STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND
`TIME TO COMPLY WITH 26-1
`REQUIREMENTS
`(First Request)
`
`
`At the time of submitting the now-granted motions for extending the Playtika
`
`Defendants’ time to respond to the Complaint until February 18, 2021, the parties contemplated
`
`that no actions by the parties would be required by the parties until that date, and the parties
`
`contemplated that Plaintiff’s submission of the motion for extension of the Playtika Defendants’
`
`time to respond would not constitute an appearance on behalf of the Playtika Defendants. Given
`
`subsequent orders (ECF Nos. 14 & 18) from the Court indicating that a return of the waiver of
`
`4835-4522-4916, v. 1
`
`1
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-00603-MMD-CLB Document 20 Filed 12/14/20 Page 2 of 2
`Case 3:20-cv-00603-MMD-CLB Document 19 Filed 12/14/20 Page 2 of 2
`
`
`service to Plaintiff constituted an appearance (which under the Local Rules might otherwise
`
`trigger Discovery Plans, a 26(f) conference, and Mandatory Disclosures under LR 26-1 within 30
`
`days). Plaintiff represents that all parties have stipulated and Plaintiff hereby moves for an order
`
`that the date for compliance with LR 26-1 requirements is extended until 30 days after the date
`
`for responding to the Complaint. Accordingly, consistent with an agreement of the parties,
`
`Plaintiff hereby moves to give all parties until March 22, 2021 to comply with LR 26-1
`
`requirements. Plaintiff understands and has been informed that in the interim, counsel for the
`
`Playtika Defendants intend to submit a Verified Petition and Designation of Local Counsel
`
`pursuant to Local Rule IA 11-2, as ordered by the Court in ECF No. 18.
`
`Dated: December 14, 2020
`
`
`
`
`
`s/ Adam Yowell
`Adam K. Yowell
`FISHERBROYLES, LLP
`59 Damonte Ranch Pkwy
`Ste B # 508
`Reno, NV 89521
`Telephone: (775) 230-7364
`Adam.yowell@fisherbroyles.com
`
`Attorney for Plaintiff NexRF Corp.
`
`
` It is so Ordered:
`
`
`
` _____________________________
`
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`4835-4522-4916, v. 1
`
`2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket