`
`MICHAEL C. VAN, ESQ.
`Nevada Bar No. 3876
`GARRETT R. CHASE, ESQ.
`Nevada Bar No. 14498
`JOSHUA J. FLOTH, ESQ.
`Nevada Bar No. 16860
`VC2 LAW
`8985 South Eastern Avenue, Suite 100
`Las Vegas, Nevada 89123
`Telephone: (702) 478-7770
`Facsimile: (702) 478-7779
`Email: michael@vc2law.com
`garrett@vc2law.com
`josh@vc2law.com
`Attorneys for Counterdefendant Jeri Wiedemer
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`DISTRICT OF NEVADA
`
`RES EXHIBIT SERVICES, LLC, a New
`York limited liability company;
`
` Case No.: 2:21-cv-01953-APG-EJY
`
`STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
`ORDER TO EXTEND DISCOVERY
`DEADLINES
`
`(Fourth Request)
`
`vs.
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`LNW GAMING, INC. f/k/a SG GAMING,
`INC. f/k/a BALLY GAMING, INC., a
`Nevada corporation,
`
` Defendant.
`
`LNW GAMING, INC. f/k/a SG GAMING,
`INC. f/k/a BALLY GAMING, INC., a
`Nevada corporation,
`
`Counterclaimant,
`
`vs.
`
`RES EXHIBIT SERVICES, LLC, a New
`York limited liability company; JAMES
`LEONARDO, an individual; JERI
`WIEDEMER, an individual; and ROBERT
`REYES, an individual,
`
`Counterdefendants.
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Page 1 of 5
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-01953-APG-EJY Document 161 Filed 03/19/25 Page 2 of 4
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DISCOVERY DEADLINES
`
`(Fourth Request)
`
`Pursuant to Local Rule (“LR”) IA 6-1, Plaintiff/Counterdefendant RES Exhibit Services,
`
`LLC (“RES”), Defendant/Counterclaimant LNW Gaming, Inc. f/k/a SG Gaming, Inc. f/k/a Bally
`
`Gaming, Inc. (“LNW”), Defendant James Leonardo (“Leonardo”), Defendant Jeri Wiedemer
`
`(“Wiedemer”) and Defendant Robert Reyes (“Reyes”) (collectively, the “Parties”), by and through
`
`their undersigned counsel of record, hereby request and stipulate to a 60-day extension of all
`
`discovery deadlines in light of the broad scope of discovery in this case, the recent appearance of
`
`counsel, the discovery remaining to be done, scheduling conflicts of the parties and witnesses, and
`
`10
`
`the length of time it has taken to review and produce voluminous amount of documents and
`
`11
`
`electronically stored information (“ESI”) which may be relevant to issues in this matter.
`
`12
`
`This is the Parties’ fourth request for an extension of time, and the first request to extend
`
`13
`
`the deadlines entered in the Court’s recent Scheduling Order [ECF No. 156]. This request is not
`
`14
`
`intended for delay and is made in good faith.
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`I.
`
`DISCOVERY COMPLETED
`
`1. RES has served its initial disclosures and one (1) supplement thereto;
`
`2. LNW has served its initial disclosures and eight (8) supplements thereto;
`
`3. Wiedemer, Leonardo and Reyes have served their initial disclosures;
`
`4. The Parties have each propounded and responded to written discovery requests and
`
`produced the vast majority of responsive documents and ESI in this action.
`
`II.
`
`DISCOVERY TO BE COMPLETED
`
`1. The Parties intend to notice and/or issue subpoenas for several party and non-party
`
`depositions of witnesses located throughout the United States;
`
`2. The Parties may propound additional written discovery requests;
`
`3. The Parties may disclose expert witnesses and reports pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.
`
`26(a)(2); and
`
`4. The Parties may notice the depositions of expert witnesses.
`
`28
`
`/ / /
`
`Page 2 of 5
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-01953-APG-EJY Document 161 Filed 03/19/25 Page 3 of 4
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`III.
`
`PROPOSED UPDATED DISCOVERY PLAN AND SCHEDULING ORDER
`
`The Court adopted a Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order on January 30, 2025 [ECF
`
`No. 156]. For the reasons discussed herein and as suggested by the Court in its March 9, 2025
`
`Minute Order [ECF No. 159], the Parties now propose that the Court adopt the following deadlines:
`
`A. Discovery Cut-Off
`
`The current discovery cut-off date is Tuesday, July 29, 2025. The Parties propose to
`
`extend that deadline by 60 days to Monday, September 29, 2025.
`
`B. Deadline to Amend Pleadings/Add Parties.
`
`The deadline to amend pleadings/add parties is Wednesday, April 30, 2025. The Parties
`
`10
`
`propose to extend that deadline by 60 days to Monday, June 30, 2025.
`
`11
`
`12
`
`C. Deadline to Disclose Experts
`
`The current deadline to disclose expert witnesses is Friday, May 30, 2025, and the
`
`13
`
`deadline to disclose rebuttal experts is Sunday, June 29, 2025. The Parties propose to extend the
`
`14
`
`deadline for filing expert disclosures by 60 days to Tuesday, July 29, 2025. Rebuttal disclosures
`
`15
`
`shall be made thirty (30) days later on Thursday, August 28, 2025.
`
`16
`
`17
`
`D. Deadline to File Dispositive Motions
`
`The current dispositive motion deadline is Friday, August 29, 2025. The Parties
`
`18
`
`propose to extend that deadline by 60 days to Tuesday, October 28, 2025.
`
`19
`
`20
`
`E. Deadline for Joint Pre-Trial Order
`
`Pursuant to LR 26-1(b)(5), the parties shall have until 30 days after the deadline for
`
`21
`
`filing dispositive motion to file the joint pretrial order. Alternatively, if dispositive motions are
`
`22
`
`filed, the Parties will have 30 days after the date that the Court decides any dispositive motions
`
`23
`
`within which to file the joint pretrial order. The deadline to file the joint pretrial order is currently
`
`24
`
`Monday, September 29, 2025. The Parties propose to extend that deadline by 60 days to Friday,
`
`25
`
`November 28, 2025. This deadline is suspended if the dispositive motions are timely filed and the
`
`26
`
`joint pretrial order will be due 30 days following disposition of any dispositive motion.
`
`27
`
`…
`
`28
`
`…
`
`Page 3 of 5
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-01953-APG-EJY Document 161 Filed 03/19/25 Page 4 of 4
`
`F. FRCP 26(a)(3) Disclosures
`
`The Parties agree to include their disclosures required by FRCP 26(a)(3) and any
`
`objections thereto in the joint pretrial order.
`
`IT IS SO STIPULATED.
`
`DATED this 19th day of March 2025.
`
`VC2 LAW
`
`RICE REUTHER SULLIVAN & CARROLL,
`LLP
`
`/s/ Garrett R. Chase________
`MICHAEL C. VAN, ESQ.
`Nevada Bar No. 3876
`GARRETT R. CHASE, ESQ.
`Nevada Bar No. 14498
`JOSHUA J. FLOTH, ESQ.
`Nevada Bar No. 16860
`8985 S. Eastern Ave., Suite 100
`Las Vegas, NV 89123
`Attorneys for Counterdefendant
`Jeri Wiedemer
`
`/s/ Chad W. Flansburg
`DAVID A. CARROLL, ESQ. (7643)
`ANTHONY J. DIRAIMONDO, ESQ. (10875)
`ROBERT E. OPDYKE, ESQ. (12841)
`3800 Howard Hughes Pkwy., Suite 1200
`Las Vegas, Nevada 89169
`-and-
`CHAD W. FLANSBURG, ESQ.
`(Pro Hac Vice)
`28 East Main Street, Suite 1400
`Rochester, New York 14614-1935
`Attorneys for RES Exhibit Services, LLC, James
`Leonardo, and Robert Reyes
`
`CAMPBELL & WILLIAMS
`
`/s/ Philip R. Erwin____________________
`PHILIP R. ERWIN, ESQ. (11563)
`SAMUEL R. MIRKOVICH (11662)
`ARIANA N. REED (15310)
`710 South Seventh Street, Suite A
`Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
`Attorneys for LNW Gaming Inc. f/k/a
`SG Gaming Inc. f/k/a Bally Gaming Inc.
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`____________________________________
`U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
`
`Date: March 19, 2025
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Page 4 of 5
`
`

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ ChargeStill Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site