throbber
Case 2:16-cv-00260-RFB-VCF Document 34 Filed 12/13/17 Page 1 of 3
`
`ALVERSON, TAYLOR,
`
`MORTENSEN & SANDERS
`KURT R. BONDS, ESQ.
`Nevada Bar No. 6228
`ADAM R. KNECHT, ESQ.
`Nevada Bar No. 13166
`6605 Grand Montecito Pkwy, Ste 200
`Las Vegas, NV 89149
`(702) 384-7000
`efile@alversontaylor.com
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`Voip-Pal.com, Inc.
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`DISTRICT OF NEVADA
`
`* * *
`
`VOIP-PAL.COM, INC., a Nevada corporation,
`
`CASE NO.: 2:16-cv-00260-RFB-VCF
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`APPLE, INC., a California corporation,
`
`Defendants.
`
`STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
`EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE
`JOINT STATUS REPORT
`
`Plaintiff Voip-Pal.com, Inc. (“Plaintiff” or “Voip-Pal”) and Defendant Apple, Inc.
`
`(“Defendant” or “Apple”), through undersigned counsel, stipulate and request the Court to continue
`
`the deadline to file a Joint Status Report from December 12, 2017 to January 26, 2018.
`
`1.
`
`On February 9, 2016, VoIP-Pal filed this action against Apple alleging infringement
`
`of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,542,815 (the “‘815 patent”) and 9,179,005 (the “‘005 patent”). (ECF No. 1).
`
`2.
`
`On May 5, 2016, this Court entered an order extending the time for Apple to answer
`
`the complaint until July 29, 2016. (ECF No. 13);
`
`3.
`
`On June 15, 2016, Apple filed a petition with the PTAB to institute IPR proceedings
`
`on the asserted claims of the ’815 patent. (See ECF No. 24 at ¶ 3.) Apple also petitioned the PTAB
`
`to institute IPR proceedings on the asserted claims of the ’005 patent. (See id.);
`
`1
`
`23443
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
` 10
` 11
` 12
` 13
` 14
` 15
` 16
` 17
` 18
` 19
` 20
` 21
` 22
` 23
` 24
` 25
` 26
` 27
`28
`
`ALVERSON, TAYLOR, MORTENSEN & SANDERS
`
`LAWYERS
`
`6605 GRAND MONTECITO PKWY, STE 200
`
`LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89149
`
`(702) 384-7000
`
`

`

`Case 2:16-cv-00260-RFB-VCF Document 34 Filed 12/13/17 Page 2 of 3
`
`4.
`
`On July 19, 2016, the parties filed a stipulation and proposed order seeking a stay of
`
`this litigation pending the PTAB’s decisions on whether to institute IPR on the ’815 and ’005
`
`patents. (ECF No. 24);
`
`5.
`
`On July 20, 2016, this Court granted the parties’ stipulation, ordering a stay of this
`
`litigation pending the Court’s review of a Joint Status Report outlining the parties’ respective
`
`positions on how the case should proceed in light of the PTAB’s institution decisions. (ECF No.
`
`25);
`
`6.
`
`On November 21, 2016, the PTAB instituted IPR on all asserted claims of the ’815
`
`patent. (Decision, Institution of Inter Partes Review of United States Patent No. 8,542,815, Apple
`
`Inc. v. VoIP-Pal.com, Inc., IPR2016-01201 (P.T.A.B. Nov. 21, 2016) at 32);
`
`7.
`
`Likewise, on November 21, 2016, the PTAB instituted IPR on all asserted claims of
`
`the ’005 patent. (Decision, Institution of Inter Partes Review of United States Patent No. 9,179,005,
`
`Apple Inc. v. VoIP-Pal.com, Inc., IPR2016-01198 (P.T.A.B. Nov. 21, 2016) at 31);
`
`8.
`
`By statute, the PTAB must issue final written decisions in the ’815 patent and ’005
`
`patent IPR proceedings no later than November 21, 2017. 35 U.S.C. § 316(a)(11);
`
`9.
`
`On November 20, 2017, the PTAB issued final written decisions denying Apple’s
`
`challenged claims in the ’815 patent and ’005 patent IPR proceedings (IPR2016-01201 and IPR2016-
`
`01198). Additionally, the PTAB denied institution of IPRs for five other petitions filed against the
`
`‘815 and ‘005 patents, namely, three IPR petitions filed by AT&T (IPR2017-01382, IPR2017-01383,
`
`and IPR2017-01384), and two follow-on petitions filed by Apple (IPR2017-01398 and IPR2017-
`
`01399).
`
`10.
`
`A joint status report is due in a similar case before this Court in Voip-Pal.com, Inc., v.
`
`Twitter, Inc., Case No. 2:16-cv-2338 on January 26, 2017. Because of the similarity of issues and
`
`procedural history involving the two cases, the parties desire to extend the deadline to file their joint
`
`/ / /
`
`/ / /
`
`/ / /
`
`/ / /
`
`2
`
`23443
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
` 10
` 11
` 12
` 13
` 14
` 15
` 16
` 17
` 18
` 19
` 20
` 21
` 22
` 23
` 24
` 25
` 26
` 27
`28
`
`ALVERSON, TAYLOR, MORTENSEN & SANDERS
`
`LAWYERS
`
`6605 GRAND MONTECITO PKWY, STE 200
`
`LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89149
`
`(702) 384-7000
`
`

`

`Case 2:16-cv-00260-RFB-VCF Document 34 Filed 12/13/17 Page 3 of 3
`
`
`status report in this matter to correlate with the current deadline in Voip-Pal.com, Inc., v. Twitter,
`
`Inc. The parties intend to meet and confer and jointly prepare a joint status report. There is good
`
`cause to continue the the deadline to file a joint status report until January 26, 2018.
`
`DATED the 12th day of December, 2017.
`
`IT IS SO AGREED AND STIPULATED:
`
`ALVERSON, TAYLOR,
`MORTENSEN & SANDERS
`
`LEWIS ROCA ROTHGERBER
`CHRISTIE LLP
`
`/s/ Adam R. Knecht
`Kurt R. Bonds
`Nevada State Bar No. 6228
`Adam R. Knecht
`Nevada State Bar No. 13166
`6605 Grand Montecito Pkwy, Ste. 200
`Las Vegas, NV 89149
`Tel: 702.384.7000
`E-mail: kbonds@alversontaylor.com
`E-mail: aknecht@alversontaylor.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff Voip-Pal.com, Inc.
`
`/s/ Ameet Modi
`Jonathan W. Fountain
`Nevada State Bar No. 10351
`3993 Howard Hughes Pkwy, Suite 600
`Las Vegas, NV 89169-5996
`Tel: 702.949.8200
`E-mail: jfountain@lrrc.com
`
`DESMARAIS LLP
`John M. Desmarais, Pro hac vice
`Michael P. Stadnick, Pro hac vice
`Ameet Modi, Pro hac vice
`Kerri-Ann Limbeek, Pro hac vice
`230 Park Avenue
`New York, New York 10169
`Tel: 212.351.3400
`E-mail: jdesmarais@desmaraisllp.com
`E-mail: mstadnick@desmaraisllp.com
`E-mail: amodi@desmaraisllp.com
`E-mail: klimbeek@desmaraisllp.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendant Apple, Inc.
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED:
`
`_______________________________
`UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
`
`December 13, 2017
`Dated:__________________________
`
`3
`
`23443
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
` 10
` 11
` 12
` 13
` 14
` 15
` 16
` 17
` 18
` 19
` 20
` 21
` 22
` 23
` 24
` 25
` 26
` 27
`28
`
`ALVERSON, TAYLOR, MORTENSEN & SANDERS
`
`LAWYERS
`
`6605 GRAND MONTECITO PKWY, STE 200
`
`LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89149
`
`(702) 384-7000
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket