`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`vs.
`
`
`
`
`JEREMY D. SANDERS, LAKEDA R. SANDERS,
`BION A. FLINT,
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`8:21CR253
`
`ORDER
`
`This matter is before the court on the request of the government made at the Initial Appearance on
`
`January 12, 2022 to declare this case as complex and to adjust the discovery and pretrial motions deadline.
`
`The defendants agreed to the request. The court finds from the representations by counsel for the parties
`
`that this case is so unusual and so complex due to the nature of the prosecution, the existence of novel
`
`questions of fact and law, and the amount of discovery, it would be unreasonable to expect adequate
`
`preparation for pretrial proceedings or for the trial within the time limits established by the Speedy Trial
`
`Act. See 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(ii).
`
`IT IS ORDERED:
`
`1. The government shall provide Rule 16 discovery no later than January 26, 2022. A Status
`
`Conference is set for 2/7/2022 at 2:00 PM by Telephone before Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis to set
`
`further progression deadlines. Counsel will follow the call-in instructions sent to them by e-mail.
`
`2. The ends of justice have been served by granting such request and outweigh the interests of the
`
`public and the defendants in a speedy trial. The additional time arising as a result of the granting of the
`
`motion, i.e., from January 12, 2022, through February 7, 2022, shall be deemed excludable time in any
`
`computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act for the reason counsel require additional
`
`time to adequately prepare the case, taking into consideration due diligence of counsel, and the novelty and
`
`complexity of this case. The failure to grant additional time might result in a miscarriage of justice. 18
`
`U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B).
`
`Dated this 12th day of January, 2022.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BY THE COURT:
`
`
`s/ Michael D. Nelson
`United States Magistrate Judge
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
