`
`UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
`
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`
`
`
`TAMIKA R. CROSS and RONNIE E. CROSS,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`8:21CR253
`
`ORDER
`
`8:21-cr-00253-RFR-SMB Doc # 20 Filed: 09/30/21 Page 1 of 2 - Page ID # 64
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
`
`vs.
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`This matter is before the court on the request of the government made at the Initial
`Appearance on September 30, 2021 to declare this case as complex and to adjust the discovery and
`pretrial motions deadline. The defendant agreed to the request. The court finds from the
`representations by counsel for the parties that this case is so unusual and so complex due to the
`nature of the prosecution, the existence of novel questions of fact and law, and the amount of
`discovery, it would be unreasonable to expect adequate preparation for pretrial proceedings or for
`the trial within the time limits established by the Speedy Trial Act. See 18 U.S.C. §
`3161(h)(7)(B)(ii).
`IT IS ORDERED:
`1. The government shall provide Rule 16 discovery no later than October 29, 2021. A
`Status Conference is set for 11/30/2021 at 10:00 a.m. by telephone before Magistrate Judge Susan
`M. Bazis to set further progression deadlines. Counsel will follow the call-in instructions sent to
`them by e-mail.
`2. The ends of justice have been served by granting such request and outweigh the interests
`of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial. The additional time arising as a result of the
`granting of the motion, i.e., from today’s date through November 30, 2021, shall be deemed
`excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act for the
`reason counsel require additional time to adequately prepare the case, taking into consideration
`due diligence of counsel, and the novelty and complexity of this case. The failure to grant
`additional time might result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B).
`
`
`
`Dated this 30th day of September, 2021.
`
`

`

`8:21-cr-00253-RFR-SMB Doc # 20 Filed: 09/30/21 Page 2 of 2 - Page ID # 65
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BY THE COURT:
`
`
`s/ Susan M. Bazis
`United States Magistrate Judge
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.