`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA
`BUTTE DIVISION
`
`LYNN LOWDER,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`vs.
`
`SAFEWAY INC., a Delaware
`corporation,
`
`Defendant.
`
` CV-22-23-BU-BMM
`
` ORDER
`
`Defendant has moved for an order allowing A. Dean Bennett, Esq., and
`
`Alexandra S. Grande, Esq. to appear pro hac vice in this case with Brianne C.
`
`McClafferty, designated as local counsel. (Docs. 3 and 4.) The applications of Mr.
`
`Bennett and Ms. Grande appear to be in compliance with L.R. 83.1(d).
`
`IT IS ORDERED:
`
`Defendant’s motions to allow Mr. Bennett and Ms. Grande to appear on its
`
`behalf (Docs. 3 and 4) are GRANTED, subject to the following conditions:
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-cv-00023-BMM-JTJ Document 8 Filed 03/31/22 Page 2 of 3
`
`1. Local counsel shall exercise the responsibilities required by L.R.
`
`83.1(d)(5) and must be designated as lead counsel or as co-lead counsel;
`
`2. Only one attorney appearing pro hac vice may act as co-lead counsel;
`
`3. Mr. Bennett and Ms. Grande must each do their own work. Each must
`
`do their own writing, sign their own pleadings, motions, briefs, and, if designated
`
`co-lead counsel, must appear and participate personally in all proceedings before
`
`the Court;
`
` 4. The Applicant Attorney shall take steps to register in the Court’s
`
`electronic filing system (“CM-ECF”). Further information is available on the
`
`Court’s website, www.mtd.uscourts.gov.
`
`5. Local counsel shall also sign all such pleadings, motions and briefs and
`
`other documents served or filed; and
`
`6. Admission is personal to Mr. Bennett and Ms. Grande, not the law firm
`
`they work for.
`
`7. Local counsel will provide a copy of this order to pro hac counsel.
`
`IT IS FURTHER ORDERED:
`
`Each applicant shall file, within fifteen (15) days from the date of this Order,
`
`an acknowledgment and acceptance of their admission under the terms set
`
`forth above.
`
`-2-
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-cv-00023-BMM-JTJ Document 8 Filed 03/31/22 Page 3 of 3
`
`DATED this 31st day of March, 2022.
`
`-3-
`
`

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ ChargeStill Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site