throbber
Case 4:12-cv-11758-GAD-MKM ECF No. 508, PageID.41011 Filed 04/30/15 Page 1 of 147
`
`1
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
`SOUTHERN DIVISION
`EVERLIGHT ELECTRONICS CO.,
`LTD, and EMCORE CORPORATION,
`Plaintiffs,
`
`No. 12-cv-11758
`
`v
`
`NICHIA CORPORATION, and
`NICHIA AMERICA CORPORATION,
`Defendants.
`_________________________/
`
`JURY TRIAL - VOLUME II of XII
`EXCERPTS OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE HONORABLE GERSHWIN A. DRAIN
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`Theodore Levin United States Courthouse
`231 West Lafayette Boulevard
`Detroit, Michigan
`Wednesday, April 8, 2015
`
`APPEARANCES:
`
`For the Plaintiffs:
`
`MR. A. MICHAEL PALIZZI
`MR. MICHAEL C. SIMONI
`Miller, Canfield, Paddock and
`Stone, PLC
`150 W. Jefferson Avenue, Suite 2500
`Detroit, Michigan
`48226
`(313) 486-7645
`MR. RAYMOND N. NIMROD
`MR. MATTHEW A. TRAUPMAN
`MS. ANASTASIA M. FERNANDS
`Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan,
`LLP
`51 Madison Avenue, 29th Floor
`New York, New York 10010
`(212) 849-7412
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`

`

`Case 4:12-cv-11758-GAD-MKM ECF No. 508, PageID.41012 Filed 04/30/15 Page 2 of 147
`
`2
`
`APPEARANCES:
`For the Defendants:
`
`MR. STEVEN J. RIZZI
`MR. RAMY E. HANNA
`MR. RYAN SCHMID
`Foley and Lardner, LLP
`90 Park Avenue, 37th Floor
`New York, New York 10016
`(212) 682-7474
`MS. LISA S. MANKOFSKY
`Foley & Lardner, LLP
`3000 K Street N. W,
`Washington, DC
`20007
`(202) 672-5300
`MR. JOHN R. TRENTACOSTA
`Foley & Lardner
`500 Woodward Avenue
`Detroit, Michigan
`(313) 234-2800
`
`48226
`
`Suite 600
`
`Reported by:
`
`Merilyn J. Jones, RPR, CSR
`Official Federal Court Reporter
`merilyn_jones@mied.uscourts.gov
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`

`

`Case 4:12-cv-11758-GAD-MKM ECF No. 508, PageID.41013 Filed 04/30/15 Page 3 of 147
`
`3
`
`TABLE OF CONTENTS
`PLAINTIFF
`WITNESSES:
`BERND KAMMERER
`Direct examination by Mr. Palizzi
`ERIC BRETSCHNEIDER
`Direct examination by Mr. Traupman
`
`WITNESSES:
`None
`
`DEFENDANT
`
`OTHER MATERIAL IN TRANSCRIPT:
`Plaintiffs' Opening Statement
`Defendants' Opening Statement
`
`PAGE
`73
`
`97
`
`4
`45
`
`EXHIBITS:
`
`Identified
`
`Received
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`

`

`Case 4:12-cv-11758-GAD-MKM ECF No. 508, PageID.41014 Filed 04/30/15 Page 4 of 147
`
`4
`
`Detroit, Michigan
`Wednesday, April 8, 2015
`(Excerpt of Proceedings - Judge's Opening Instructions
`not transcribed)
`
`*
`*
`*
`PLAINTIFFS' OPENING STATEMENT
`MR. NIMROD:
`Good morning, ladies and gentlemen.
`This is a case about a company, the Defendant
`Nichia here, not playing by the rules for patents.
`The Court
`played you a video yesterday that explained some of the rules
`for patents.
`
`And Everlight contends that Nichia did not play by
`the rules when it obtained the patents and is not playing by
`the rules in trying to assert those patents against Everlight.
`And that is why we're here today seeking a decision from you,
`the jury, that Nichia's patents are invalid for failure to
`follow the rules of patents and for lacking any invention.
`Let me reintroduce myself again.
`My name is Ray
`With me here today are my colleagues, Matt Traupman,
`Nimrod.
`Anastasia Fernands, co-counsel from Miller Canfield, Mike
`Palizzi and Mike Simoni.
`We also have at counsel table our
`corporate representative, Bernd Kammerer.
`Mr. Kammerer is the president and chief operating
`officer of Everlight Americas.
`You will be hearing testimony
`from Mr. Kammerer.
`In fact, he will be our first witness.
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`

`

`Case 4:12-cv-11758-GAD-MKM ECF No. 508, PageID.41015 Filed 04/30/15 Page 5 of 147
`
`5
`
`Everlight
`Who are the parties on our side?
`Electronics Company is one of the plaintiffs here.
`It is an
`LED manufacturer located in Taiwan, and it has been making LEDs
`for over 30 years.
`Everlight Americas is a subsidiary that
`sells those LEDs in the United States.
`Now, as you have heard repeatedly now, this case
`is about LEDs, which are light-emitting diodes, LEDs.
`And an
`LED is a type of semiconductor.
`A semiconductor is something
`that conducts electricity.
`An LED is a semiconductor that when
`you apply electricity to it, it emits light.
`That's why it's a
`light-emitting diode.
`LEDs have been part of our lives for quite a while
`now, but more recently it's very much exploded as to how much
`LEDs are used.
`Early uses were, for example, in calculators
`and some of the old mobile phones, with little green and red
`LEDs.
`
`But more recently as we see on the demonstrative
`I'm showing here, LEDs have expanded in their use; their use
`in, for example, a display sign at Comerica Park; touch
`screens, the backlight of that, that's all from LEDs; mobile
`phones, of course; the displays on the game devices, et cetera,
`those are all coming from LEDs.
`Now, LEDs have also moved into the light bulb
`market, as well.
`For many years incandescent bulbs were the
`only bulbs that were being sold.
`But the problem with the
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`

`

`Case 4:12-cv-11758-GAD-MKM ECF No. 508, PageID.41016 Filed 04/30/15 Page 6 of 147
`
`6
`
`incandescent bulb is that it burns too hot and consumes too
`much energy.
`
`An incandescent
`Let me show you how that works.
`bulb has a little wire here connecting up, when you apply
`electricity, it heats up.
`But a lot of the electricity,
`instead of going to light, goes to heat, which is just
`dissipated into the room, so it's very inefficient, consumes
`too much energy.
`An LED light bulb, we opened up the bulb here
`shown on the right, on the inside of this bulb, instead of a
`wire are these little yellow chips you see here.
`Each one of
`those little chips is an LED package.
`Each one of them is an
`LED package.
`And when you apply electricity, when you screw it
`into your socket and turn it on, those all light up and provide
`light.
`
`LEDs are for more efficient than incandescent
`They don't burn hot like that and they last far longer;
`bulbs.
`you're going to hear about that, years longer than incandescent
`bulbs.
`
`Not because of the
`Now, why are we here today?
`bulb-type issue, but we are here because of these little yellow
`kind of packages, those types of products.
`They are called LED
`packages that are found in many products, the kind of products
`I showed you on the earlier slide.
`As I mentioned, Everlight is a manufacturer of
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`

`

`Case 4:12-cv-11758-GAD-MKM ECF No. 508, PageID.41017 Filed 04/30/15 Page 7 of 147
`
`7
`
`It makes many different kinds of LEDs, different colors.
`LEDs.
`What is at issue here today are the LED packages that Everlight
`sells that are various tones of white, white LEDs.
`So there
`are red LEDs, for example, blue and other colors.
`What is at
`issue here today are white LEDs.
`I'm going to show you some examples of some of the
`products that you will be asked to make some decisions about.
`These are 12 white Everlight LED packages, 12
`different ones.
`There's actually over a hundred, hundreds of
`products at issue in the case, but these are 12 examples.
`Just
`like I showed you in the light bulb, these are used in
`different products, and when electricity is applied, these will
`emanate white light.
`Now, you will see, of course, these all look
`yellow on the top, but they turn white when you turn them on.
`The reason for that is, and we will talk a little bit more
`about that, is that the -- there's actually a source of blue
`underneath the yellow, so when you apply electricity to it, the
`blue and the yellow combine to make white light.
`Your eye then
`perceives that as white light, because they are complementary
`colors.
`
`And just very briefly, the experts will get into
`As his Honor informed you, of course, the evidence comes
`this.
`in from the witnesses.
`So experts will explain all this to you
`in more detail.
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`

`

`Case 4:12-cv-11758-GAD-MKM ECF No. 508, PageID.41018 Filed 04/30/15 Page 8 of 147
`
`8
`
`But here we have just shown an example of an LED
`lamp or a chip and what is shown on the right here is, there is
`a little chip that we have shown in blue just to designate that
`it emits blue light.
`And then there is a yellow powder, a
`phosphor, it's called, that when the blue light, the
`electricity is applied -- these are wires that are coming off,
`and it's a very, very, tiny product, and they have wires or
`conducting material -- that when electricity is applied this
`chip emits blue light.
`The blue light, some of it passes through
`unobstructed, but other blue light hits the phosphor and the
`phosphor turns it into yellow.
`It takes the blue light and
`converts it into yellow.
`So then what happens is, the blue and
`the yellow combine to make white light.
`As I said, the yellow is a powder; it's a
`phosphor; it's a yellow powder.
`So it's put into like a
`gel-like material when they make it that then hardens on top of
`the chip.
`So it's around the chip and hardens in there in a
`plastic resin.
`Now, this lawsuit, as I said, involves white LEDs
`that Everlight makes that it sells to customers in the United
`States.
`And Everlight initiated this action because Everlight
`believes that the Nichia patents are not valid and that their
`products do not infringe Nichia's patents.
`Okay.
`Before I get into the details of the
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`

`

`Case 4:12-cv-11758-GAD-MKM ECF No. 508, PageID.41019 Filed 04/30/15 Page 9 of 147
`
`9
`
`patents, I will talk about why we believe the patents are
`invalid and why they don't follow the rules of patents, but
`before doing that, I want to get into a little bit about LEDs
`and their history and colors.
`As I
`Today LEDs come in a wide variety of colors.
`showed you the Comerica Park sign, any color you want can come
`out of that.
`They just do different designations with the way
`they program it and they can show just about anything.
`But it was not always that way before.
`The
`primary colors of LEDs were developed at different times, with
`blue being the most recent one.
`So let's talk a little bit
`about colors before getting to LEDs.
`Now, as we learned in school when we were younger,
`for paint and pigments there are three primary colors; red,
`blue, and yellow.
`And when you combine, for example, blue and
`yellow, you get green.
`When you combine red and blue, you get
`a purplish color.
`When you combine all three, you get black,
`because it's actually blocking when they're combined together.
`Colors for visible light are a little different,
`the rules are a little different.
`For visible light the three
`primary colors are not red, yellow and blue, they are actually
`red, green and blue.
`Those are the three primary colors for
`visible light.
`And when you combine them together, instead of
`making black, you make white light.
`Your eye perceives the
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`

`

`Case 4:12-cv-11758-GAD-MKM ECF No. 508, PageID.41020 Filed 04/30/15 Page 10 of 147
`
`10
`
`And this is something
`three combined together as white light.
`that has been known for quite a long time.
`You'll
`And let me just show you one other thing.
`see the blue here, what's right across from it is yellow.
`Blue
`and yellow are called complementary colors for visible light.
`When you combine blue and yellow, you get white light.
`And I
`brought a little demonstrative to show that.
`You'll see here, I'm just going to tilt it up a
`little so it doesn't get too bright in your eyes, but this is a
`blue source of light.
`If I take yellow and put it on top of
`it, you'll see it turns white because they are complementary
`colors.
`
`Now, then if you have green, red, and blue, you
`can make pretty much any color you want.
`You can mix them how
`you want in different amounts and you can make all the
`different colors on the color wheel.
`And, of course, you also
`can make white, if you want to, for example, by mixing blue and
`yellow, the complementary colors.
`Now, if you want to use LEDs as a light source,
`then, and you want to make the different colors to make white,
`it's important, then, to have the different color sources.
`And
`since white light is what is emanated from the sun, it's
`probably the most important one to make.
`It's used inside your
`homes, in offices, industrial applications.
`These are white
`applications.
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`

`

`Case 4:12-cv-11758-GAD-MKM ECF No. 508, PageID.41021 Filed 04/30/15 Page 11 of 147
`
`11
`
`So the evidence will show here that red LEDs, if
`we go back, red LEDs were developed in the early 1960's.
`And
`green LEDs were developed shortly thereafter.
`You might ask yourself, then why is it that this
`explosion in the use of LEDs didn't take place for quite some
`time after that?
`One of the reasons was, was that they had
`trouble developing a blue LED.
`If you have red and green, which is what they were
`able to develop, you could make red, of course, you could make
`yellow, you can make green and things in between there, but you
`couldn't make blue, and more importantly, you couldn't make
`white.
`
`So this might be fine for a traffic light and
`other applications, maybe a blinking red light on some of those
`old game things and phones, but you could not make white light
`with this.
`
`So, of course, the next logical step was to make a
`And, of course, LED-makers knew how to combine
`
`blue LED.
`colors.
`
`The concept of the color wheel, of mixing red and
`green and blue and the complementary colors of blue and yellow,
`that has been known for 300 years.
`It was discovered by Sir
`Isaac Newton 300 years ago.
`So this is an old concept.
`It's not like the blue -- the LED makers thought,
`well, how do I make white?
`They knew how to do it.
`They just
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`

`

`Case 4:12-cv-11758-GAD-MKM ECF No. 508, PageID.41022 Filed 04/30/15 Page 12 of 147
`
`12
`
`So
`
`couldn't make that blue LED in a commercially feasible way.
`they kept working on that.
`In the meantime, of course, there were other
`sources of lighting.
`Of course, we have what are called
`mercury vapor lamps.
`Those are the kinds of lamps you would
`see, for example, in streetlights.
`They are also used in what
`are called CFLs, which I will talk about in a minute.
`Mercury vapor lamps were used in street lamps and
`in stadium lighting, but mercury vapor lamps can be bluish in
`color.
`
`So the evidence will show, then, that scientists,
`LED or lighting scientists, knowing the color wheel for visible
`light and complementary colors, combined blue mercury vapor
`light sources with yellow to try and make it more white.
`And the evidence will also show that this was
`known decades before the supposed invention here by the Nichia
`scientists.
`
`Persons also knew the source of yellow, sources of
`One way was to use a phosphor, like I talked about
`yellow.
`earlier, a yellow powder.
`I brought a little just to show of
`that.
`
`This is a yellow powder, it's called YAG, and
`that's one of the terms you're going to hear a lot about in
`this trial.
`The element is called yttrium, that's what the Y
`stands for, aluminum, and garnet.
`Garnet is the structure of
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`

`

`Case 4:12-cv-11758-GAD-MKM ECF No. 508, PageID.41023 Filed 04/30/15 Page 13 of 147
`
`13
`
`But it's referred to in this case, and as I say,
`the crystal.
`you'll hear it quite a bit, as YAG, Y-A-G.
`So the evidence will show that people used YAG in
`combination with the blue light source, mercury vapor, to make
`white, because they knew, of course, they were complementary
`colors.
`
`This is described, for example, in a publication
`that one of the experts will talk about, Dr. Bretschneider,
`which is from -- as you will see, it's from 1977, and it's by
`an author, Mary Hoffman.
`And she is talking about improved
`color rendition in high-pressure mercury vapor lamps.
`And what
`she is doing is, she is taking the blue HG mercury radiation
`and combining it with a phosphor, YAG, explaining how you can
`take that to make the blue light more white.
`So this was known
`for applications like mercury vapor lamps in the 1970s.
`So that was not the only group that knew about
`using YAG for that application.
`Another example is in 1988.
`Once again, at this point they don't have the blue LEDs, so
`they're working with what may be something that's close or the
`next-best kind of thing, the mercury vapor.
`And as you know from bulb purposes, light bulbs,
`we had the incandescent bulbs that we all grew up with, and
`then the next thing that they said you should start buying is
`the CFLs.
`They look like swirls sometimes in the store; also,
`they have the U, upside-down U-shape, like the one shown here.
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`

`

`Case 4:12-cv-11758-GAD-MKM ECF No. 508, PageID.41024 Filed 04/30/15 Page 14 of 147
`
`14
`
`That's actually a mercury vapor lamp, a small version of what
`would be in the street lights.
`And the mercury vapor lamps, of
`course, have mercury inside them.
`And if you want to make the emission more white,
`what Philips did -- this a Philips, and Philips, by the way, is
`one of -- that's a major lighting manufacturer in the world,
`Philips, and you'll hear about that company a bit in this case.
`So this is 1988 and they wanted to make the
`mercury vapor more white.
`So what did they do?
`The experts
`will explain, they have the yttrium here, this formula here,
`it's a formula that when you apply yttrium, it's saying to use
`this yellow powder, YAG, to make the blue mercury vapor lamp
`more white.
`
`Now, while all this work was going on with mercury
`vapor lamps, people were still, of course, working on the
`elusive blue LED.
`The LEDs, of course, were still known to be the
`most efficient source of light.
`They burn more efficiently
`than CFLs.
`They don't have mercury, which, of course, is a
`benefit, and they last longer.
`So work was going on, trying to
`make blue LEDs.
`In the late 1980's two scientists from Nagoya
`University in Japan developed the first high-brightness blue
`LEDs.
`
`And in the early 1990s, Shuji Nakamura, who at
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`

`

`Case 4:12-cv-11758-GAD-MKM ECF No. 508, PageID.41025 Filed 04/30/15 Page 15 of 147
`
`15
`
`that time was at Nichia, and is now a professor at the
`University of California in Santa Barbara, came up with a
`commercially promising LED using gallium nitride, which we
`abbreviate as G-A-N, or GAN, GA for gallium, and N for nitride.
`And you'll hear that phrase a lot in the case, GAN, G-A-N.
`Now, once they developed a blue LED, a
`commercially promising one, which was then worked on by others
`to make it even more commercially feasible, you then had blue.
`So instead of being limited to red and green with LEDs, you now
`had blue, red and green.
`What that meant, of course, was that you could
`make various colors,and even more importantly, you could make
`white simply by combining blue with its complementary color,
`yellow, with things like YAG that had been used in the mercury
`vapor lamps.
`
`Now, no one here disputes that Dr. Nakamura and
`the two professors at Nagoya University
`were instrumental in a
`major breakthrough in the LED industry by making a commercially
`promising blue light LED.
`In fact, those three professors won
`the Nobel Prize in physics just last year for this
`breakthrough.
`The Nobel Prize Committee, even though the work
`took place in the late '80's and early 1990's, what it does is
`it looks to see what research was done, what was accomplished,
`and they look back to see what really made a big difference.
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`

`

`Case 4:12-cv-11758-GAD-MKM ECF No. 508, PageID.41026 Filed 04/30/15 Page 16 of 147
`
`16
`
`The Nobel Prize Committee
`And this made a big difference.
`awarded the Nobel Prize in physics to the three professors that
`I just mentioned.
`As it says right here, the Nobel Prize in physics
`honors the inventors of efficient blue LEDs, Akasaki, Amano,
`and Nakamura.
`Nakamura is a former employee of Nichia.
`Now, what did the Nobel Prize Committee say was
`the reason why that was so important?
`Why was it such a
`breakthrough?
`It says right here, efficient blue
`light-emitting diode, leading to what?
`Bright and
`energy-saving white light sources.
`Because everyone knew, this
`is what we were waiting for.
`People weren't just trying to develop blue so they
`could make a blue LED and stick it on some kind of display.
`Blue was what was so critical to try and get to white, as
`recognized by the Nobel Prize Committee.
`Then, of course, you
`could then take blue, with its complementary color, yellow, and
`make white.
`And that's why Dr. Nakamura and the two professors
`from Nagoya made such an important breakthrough.
`The people that knew, LED scientists, if I take a
`blue light, there's actually LEDs in this, and I take something
`like that yellow powder I was mentioning, if it's blue, then it
`starts to turn white as the yellow powder goes over it.
`So at that point, once you add blue, it's a simple
`thing, then, to take something like the YAG that was being used
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`

`

`Case 4:12-cv-11758-GAD-MKM ECF No. 508, PageID.41027 Filed 04/30/15 Page 17 of 147
`
`17
`
`in mercury vapor lamps and apply it to the new light source,
`the blue LED.
`And in fact, others did that, because it is a
`natural thing to do.
`Once you had that blue LED, you would go,
`of course, and make white.
`Which is why the Nobel Prize Committee recognized
`that that was the importance of a blue light-emitting diode.
`That's what it led to.
`It didn't take any extra inventive
`thought to say, now I have got blue, what should I do with it?
`It was obvious as can be that then you would take it to make
`white.
`That's why they were working so hard on it.
`Of course, the New York Times ran an article on
`this, as well.
`It was very important news.
`It says the 2014
`physics award went to Isamu Akasaki and Hiroshi Amano of Japan
`and Shuji Nakamura of the University of California Santa
`Barbara for the "invention of efficient blue light-emitting
`diodes, which has enabled bright and energy-saving white light
`sources."
`
`So people started doing exactly what you would
`expect them to do once they had the blue LED.
`For example, of
`course, well, the first thing they did was start
`commercializing blue LEDs.
`It takes some time once you have a
`project that's been shown in a lab to make a commercial
`product.
`
`So then blue LEDs were then -- started to be
`manufactured. And then what did people do?
`Well, as I said,
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`

`

`Case 4:12-cv-11758-GAD-MKM ECF No. 508, PageID.41028 Filed 04/30/15 Page 18 of 147
`
`18
`
`here's an example from 1997 where a group from the Fraunhofer
`Institute, that's like the MIT of Germany, it's a group of
`Schlatter and some others.
`And what they do, they took a blue
`chip -- Cree is one of the companies that started making blue
`chips after the professors from Japan came up with this -- and
`what they combined it with, the experts will tell you, this
`formula Y3AL5012, that's YAG.
`No one disputes, everyone here,
`that's YAG.
`So just YAG, think of it that way.
`And they did it to do what?
`To make a
`white-emitting LED.
`And they actually show a picture of it.
`Figure 6, there it is.
`Inside there is a little chip that's
`giving blue, there's some YAG in there, and then you get white
`coming out of it, because that was, in fact, the natural thing
`to do once that blue LED came out.
`Dr. Nakamura, I
`Now, this case -- excuse me.
`should say, and Nichia, were issued patents for his work, his
`part of the work on blue LEDs, but this case does not involve
`any of Dr. Nakamura's patents.
`Nichia has a separate set of
`patents on those.
`They licensed those patents.
`They made
`whatever money they were going to make off those from that
`invention.
`
`The two Nichia patents in this case are not for
`the blue LED invention.
`The patents Nichia obtained that are
`in this case came after the blue LED patents and they are
`trying to claim the use of the blue LED in combination with a
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`

`

`Case 4:12-cv-11758-GAD-MKM ECF No. 508, PageID.41029 Filed 04/30/15 Page 19 of 147
`
`19
`
`yellow powder like this, and say, well, that was something that
`was just sort of unexpected, it was inventive to think that you
`could take this blue and add a yellow powder to it, which had
`been done -- was being done for 20 years with mercury vapor
`lamps.
`That does not constitute an invention.
`As I said, we are not here disputing anything
`about Dr. Nakamura's contribution.
`The Nobel Prize Committee
`recognized his contribution and it also recognized what blue
`led to.
`It led to white.
`The idea that I'm taking the color
`chart and saying that I'm going to take blue and now combine it
`with yellow to make white with a common yellow source is not an
`invention.
`
`That, in fact, is what the patent video you heard
`yesterday calls obvious, and that is a patent that would be
`invalid, as the jury is entitled to find.
`So I'm going to talk about the invalidity issues,
`but I would like to first just take a quick look at the patents
`that you are going to be looking at in this case.
`And you'll
`note when we get to them that, as I said, Dr. Nakamura is not a
`named inventor on those patents.
`These are the patents of
`other Nichia scientists who said, after Dr. Nakamura came up
`with his idea, that they, too, had some inventions, but they
`didn't follow the rules, as I said, so the patents are invalid.
`The patents are actually in your juror notebooks,
`and the first patent is 5,998,925.
`And as the Judge informed
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`

`

`Case 4:12-cv-11758-GAD-MKM ECF No. 508, PageID.41030 Filed 04/30/15 Page 20 of 147
`
`20
`
`you, this is referred to as the '925 patent, just by the last
`three numbers.
`And the cover page gives you information, as you
`have already heard from the video, about the title and the
`inventors.
`There are four inventors on that patent.
`And then it has a filing date for the United
`States, at least, and some other information.
`And the filing
`date in the United States was July 29, 1997.
`The filing dates
`are important for determining what is prior art, as the video
`talked about, what came before the filing by the inventors in
`this application.
`Now, in this case, Nichia is asserting that
`Everlight's products infringe five claims of the '925 patent,
`Claims 2, 3, 5, 6 and 8.
`I'm going to focus on Claim 3, just as an example.
`This is just an opening statement.
`Obviously, the experts will
`get into all the claims and explain the details about that to
`you.
`But just to help you understand what the basic thing
`that's being claimed here in this Nichia patent, I've
`highlighted Claim 3 and also put in Claim 1.
`Of course, you just heard I didn't name Claim 1 as
`one of the asserted claims.
`That's because it's not being
`asserted.
`But Claim 3 and others depend from Claim 1.
`You
`will see it says, a light-emitting device according to Claim 1,
`which means that the statements in here apply to Claim 3, as
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`

`

`Case 4:12-cv-11758-GAD-MKM ECF No. 508, PageID.41031 Filed 04/30/15 Page 21 of 147
`
`21
`
`well, so I'm putting both up for you.
`Well, it starts with
`So what does Claim 3 claim?
`a light-emitting component, and I put that in blue, because
`basically there's a lot of words here, but it boils down to two
`components:
`One is the blue chip; and the second is the
`phosphor that's going to convert some of the light from the
`blue chip.
`The idea I just talked about, liquid mercury vapor
`lamp, blue source, put a phosphor on it, make white, change the
`wavelength and make another color, make white.
`Okay.
`So you have got a light-emitting component,
`and we go down here, this is more about what the blue is about,
`wherein said light-emitting component comprises a nitride
`compound semiconductor, and then it's got a formula.
`That
`would include the GAN-type blue LED that Dr. Nakamura invented,
`Dr. Nakamura and the two scientists from Nagoya University,
`what they helped commercialize.
`And then the second part I put in yellow, just to
`represent that's the part that has to do with what you're going
`to be doing to convert some of the blue source into yellow, and
`it says:
`A phosphor capable of absorbing part of a light
`emitted from a light-emitting component and emitting a light of
`a wavelength different from that of the absorbed light.
`And that's -- I showed you earlier that little
`diagram that just showed some of the blue came up, passed
`through, some of the blue came up and was changed from blue to
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`

`

`Case 4:12-cv-11758-GAD-MKM ECF No. 508, PageID.41032 Filed 04/30/15 Page 22 of 147
`
`22
`
`yellow, and that is how you are making white light.
`The claim goes on in Claim 3 to say that there are
`certain types of garnet, it's a complicated equation the
`experts can get into, but the bottom line is, everybody agrees,
`that would include YAG.
`So this claim claims the idea of using the GAN
`that Dr. Nakamura and the other professors came up with.
`And
`these inventors do not assert that that blue chip is their
`invention, the inventors in this patent.
`And it's using things
`like YAG, and they don't contend that that is their invention,
`either.
`That was used in mercury vapor lamps, as I said, and
`other sources, for years.
`They say their invention was the idea of combining
`the two together to make white light, but that is just the old
`color concept.
`That was not invented.
`In fact, the Nobel
`Prize Committee understood what everyone else in the industry
`understood right away.
`The three professors, the development
`of this blue chip led directly to white light.
`That's what
`people were doing the research for.
`It wasn't inventive, then,
`to do what was obvious after that.
`So this is not an invention
`at all.
`
`The other patent at issue is the '960 patent.
`It's in your binder, as well.
`U.S. Patent 7,531,960.
`It's the
`exact same three -- four inventors, excuse me.
`The title is
`Light-Emitting Device With Blue Light LED and Phosphor
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`

`

`Case 4:12-cv-11758-GAD-MKM ECF No. 508, PageID.41033 Filed 04/30/15 Page 23 of 147
`
`23
`
`Components.
`
`Blue light LED, that's Dr. Nakamura and the other
`professors, what they developed, and the phosphor would be
`things like the YAG here.
`And the earliest filing date for the
`U.S. on this application is the same date of July 29, 1997.
`And in this case Nichia is asserting Claims 1, 2,
`4 through -- excuse me -- 4, 8 through 14, and 16 to 21.
`And I'm just once again going to give you an
`example of one claim to generally understand what the patent is
`claiming.
`The experts will get into the detail of all the
`claims, of course.
`So Claim 1, as an example, requires a
`light-emitting component having gallium nitride based
`semiconductor, that's like the kind of blue LED that the three
`professors came up with.
`And then it goes on to a resin containing at least
`one phosphor capable of absorbing light from the blue color
`from this one up here, and emitting from that light-emitting
`component, emitting a second light of a wavelength different
`from that of the absorbed light.
`So once again, it's the idea of taking the blue
`LED that was invented by the others, taking the YAG and other
`things that would convert that to another color and making
`white light.
`
`There are some other limitations.
`
`They talk about
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`

`

`Case 4:12-cv-11758-GAD-MKM ECF No. 508, PageID.41034 Filed 04/30/15 Page 24 of 147
`
`24
`
`concentrations, and things having to do with particle size,
`which you will hear is routine and old, and in fact, almost
`required when you're dealing with these kind of materials;
`like, to make sure that when you have got a bag of this powder,
`you don't want big chunks in it.
`But there's nothing inventive
`about taking a screen and sifting it to make sure there's no
`big chunks in it.
`So you'll hear from the experts that there is
`nothing in this patent that is inventive over the simple
`concept of taking blue, combining it with yellow to make white.
`Now, why am I telling you all this?
`Because a
`patent is a government monopoly, a government-granted monopoly.
`It gives you the right to keep others out of the market with
`less competition.
`But the government permits that if you have
`a real invention.
`So it's a big deal to get a patent.
`But it comes with rules, the rules a lot of you
`heard on the video yesterday.
`One of the rules is a rule that
`a patent cannot

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket