throbber
4:12-cv-11758-GAD-MKM Doc # 390 Filed 11/05/14 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 33206
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
`SOUTHERN DIVISION
`
`Civil Action No.12-cv-11758
`HON. GERSHWIN A. DRAIN
`
`EVERLIGHT ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,
`and EMCORE CORPORATION,
`
`Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants,
`
`v.
`
`NICHIA CORPORATION, and
`NICHIA AMERICA CORPORATION,
`
`Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`
`EVERLIGHT AMERICAS, INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`____________________________________/
`
`ORDER GRANTING NICHIA’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUR-REPLY [#375]
`
`Presently before the Court is Nichia’s Motion for Leave to File Sur-Reply, filed on
`
`September 22, 2014. The motion is fully briefed and for the reasons that follow, the Court will grant
`
`Nichia’s motion.
`
`The filing of a sur-reply is appropriate when new evidence relevant to a party’s summary
`
`judgment motion becomes available after the completion of summary judgment briefing. Mauer v.
`
`Deloitte & Touche, LLP, 752 F.Supp. 2d 819, 824-25 (S.D. Ohio 2010); Nolan LLC c. TDC Int’l
`
`Corp., No. 06-14907, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47445, *4-5 (E.D. Mich. Jun. 5, 2009). Additionally,
`
`Rule 56(c) precludes the consideration of new evidence and argument in a summary judgment reply
`
`brief without providing the non-moving party adequate opportunity to respond. Eng’g & Mfg.
`
`-1-
`
`

`
`4:12-cv-11758-GAD-MKM Doc # 390 Filed 11/05/14 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 33207
`
`Servs., LLC v. Ashton, 387 F. App’x 575, 583 (6th Cir. 2010); Seay v. Tenn. Valley Auth., 339 F.3d
`
`454, 480-82 (6th Cir. 2003).
`
`Here, Nichia has established good cause for granting its requested relief. Nichia should be
`
`permitted to bring the testimony of Mr. Bernd Kammerer, President and COO of Everlight Americas
`
`and CEO of Everlight Europe, to the attention of the Court because it is relevant to the issue of
`
`injunctive relief. The Court rejects Everlight’s arguments that Nichia had this evidence long before
`
`summary judgment briefing began and that Nichia has not been diligent in the prosecution of this
`
`case. Additionally, the Court agrees with Nichia that a sur-reply is required with respect to the
`
`issues concerning the terms “white” and “white light” and marking, given that Everlight raised new
`
`arguments and evidence in its reply brief, and not, typical “rebuttal evidence” as it claims.
`
`Accordingly, Nichia’s Motion for Leave to File Sur-Reply [#375] is GRANTED.
`
`SO ORDERED.
`
`Dated: November 5, 2014
`
`/s/Gershwin A Drain
`GERSHWIN A. DRAIN
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`-2-

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket