Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 281, PageID.30889 Filed 08/01/24 Page 1 of 7
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
`SOUTHERN DIVISION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IN RE: NEO WIRELESS, LLC,
`PATENT LITIGATION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. 2:22-MD-03034-TGB
`HON. TERRENCE G. BERG
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`DEFENDANTS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE UNDER
`SEAL PORTIONS OF THEIR REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF ITS
`MOTION TO EXCLUDE THE OPINIONS OF NEO’S DAMAGES
`EXPERT, MS. HARVEY, AND CERTAIN OPINIONS OF
`NEO’S TECHNICAL EXPERTS, DR. MAHON AND MR. JONES,
`AND RELATED EXHIBITS
`Pursuant to Local Rule 5.3(b), Defendants respectfully move for an Order
`
`permitting them to file portions of their Reply Brief in Support of Its Motion to
`
`Exclude the Opinions of Neo’s Damages Expert, Ms. Harvey, and Certain
`
`Opinions of Neo’s Technical Experts, Dr. Mahon and Mr. Jones (“Defendants’
`
`Reply”), and the following exhibits, under seal:
`
`Exhibit BB – Excerpt of Deposition Transcript of Nigel Andrew Jones,
`
`dated May 3, 2024;
`
`Exhibit CC – Third party component and code document, produced as
`
`QCNEOWIRELESS3034_0000009.
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
`SOUTHERN DIVISION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IN RE: NEO WIRELESS, LLC,
`PATENT LITIGATION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. 2:22-MD-03034-TGB
`HON. TERRENCE G. BERG
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`DEFENDANTS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE UNDER
`SEAL PORTIONS OF THEIR REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF ITS
`MOTION TO EXCLUDE THE OPINIONS OF NEO’S DAMAGES
`EXPERT, MS. HARVEY, AND CERTAIN OPINIONS OF
`NEO’S TECHNICAL EXPERTS, DR. MAHON AND MR. JONES,
`AND RELATED EXHIBITS
`Pursuant to Local Rule 5.3(b), Defendants respectfully move for an Order
`
`permitting them to file portions of their Reply Brief in Support of Its Motion to
`
`Exclude the Opinions of Neo’s Damages Expert, Ms. Harvey, and Certain
`
`Opinions of Neo’s Technical Experts, Dr. Mahon and Mr. Jones (“Defendants’
`
`Reply”), and the following exhibits, under seal:
`
`Exhibit BB – Excerpt of Deposition Transcript of Nigel Andrew Jones,
`
`dated May 3, 2024;
`
`Exhibit CC – Third party component and code document, produced as
`
`QCNEOWIRELESS3034_0000009.
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 281, PageID.30890 Filed 08/01/24 Page 2 of 7
`
`(referred to collectively as “the Sealed Exhibits”).
`
`Both Defendants’ Reply and the Sealed Exhibits contain highly confidential
`
`information regarding technical information that has been designated Confidential,
`
`Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only, or Outside Attorneys’ Eyes Only –
`
`Source Code by Neo or third-parties pursuant to the Protective Orders (ECF Nos.
`
`125, 126) entered in this case. Additional information about the particular privacy
`
`interests that apply to Defendants’ Reply and to the Sealed Exhibits is provided in
`
`the attached Index of Documents Proposed for Sealing.
`
`A determination on a motion for leave to file under seal is made pursuant to
`
`the sound discretion of the district court. Meyer Goldberg, Inc. v. Fisher Foods,
`
`Inc., 823 F.2d 159, 161 (6th Cir. 1987). The right of the public to access judicial
`
`records “is not absolute.” Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. F.T.C., 710 F.2d
`
`1165, 1179 (6th Cir. 1983). The Sixth Circuit recognizes that “certain privacy
`
`rights of participants” are significant interests which can outweigh the public’s
`
`right to access. Id. (citing Nixon v. Warner Commc’ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 598
`
`(1978)) (additional citations omitted).
`
`Here, the information sought to be filed under seal includes confidential
`
`technical and business information designated Confidential, Highly Confidential –
`
`Attorneys’ Eyes Only, or Outside Attorneys’ Eyes Only by a third party. Such
`
`information should therefore be permitted to be filed under seal to respect the
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 281, PageID.30891 Filed 08/01/24 Page 3 of 7
`
`parties’ privacy and to respect that parties’ competitive advantages gains by
`
`maintaining such information confidential. See Brown & Williams, 710 F.2d at
`
`1179; Apple Inc. v. Samsung Elecs., Co., 727 F.3d 1214, 1225-26 (Fed. Cir. 2013).
`
`Good cause therefore exists, and there is no opposition.
`
`Redacted and unredacted copies of Defendants’ Reply are provided with this
`
`filing pursuant to L.R. 5.3(b)(3)(A)(v) and (vi), demonstrating that the proposed
`
`redactions are narrowly tailored. Because of the nature of the material in the
`
`Sealed Exhibits, Defendants request these documents be kept under seal in their
`
`entirety.
`
`Counsel for Plaintiff Neo Wireless, LLC confirmed via email that it does not
`
`oppose the relief requested in this motion.
`
`For the reasons set forth above, the Defendants respectfully requests that the
`
`Court grant its Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Under Seal. A proposed Order
`
`is concurrently submitted through the ECF system.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Thomas H. Reger II
`Thomas H. Reger II
`Texas Bar No. 24032992
`reger@fr.com
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`1717 Main Street, Suite 5000
`Dallas, TX 75201
`
`3
`
`
`Date: August 1, 2024
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Joseph A. Herriges
`Joseph A. Herriges, MN Bar No.
`390350
`Conrad A. Gosen, MN Bar No.
`0395381
`James Huguenin-Love, MN Bar No.
`0398706
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 281, PageID.30892 Filed 08/01/24 Page 4 of 7
`
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`60 South Sixth Street, Suite 3200
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`Telephone: (612) 335-5070
`herriges@fr.com, gosen@fr.com,
`huguein-love@fr.com
`
`Michael J. McKeon, DC Bar No.
`459780
`Christian Chu, DC Bar No. 483948
`Jared Hartzman, DC Bar No. 1034255
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`1000 Maine Avenue SW, Suite 1000
`Washington, DC 20024
`Telephone: (202) 783-5070
`mckeon@fr.com, chu@fr.com,
`hartzman@fr.com
`
`J. Michael Huget (P39150)
`Sarah E. Waidelich (P80225)
`HONIGMAN LLP
`315 East Eisenhower Prkwy., Ste. 100
`Ann Arbor, MI 48108
`Tel: (734) 418-4254
`mhuget@honigman.com,
`swaidelich@honigman.com
`
`Counsel for Defendants General
`Motors Company and General
`Motors LLC
`
`Telephone: (214) 747-5070
`
`Lawrence Jarvis
`Georgia Bar No. 102116
`jarvis@fr.com
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`1180 Peachtree Street NE, 21st Floor
`Atlanta, Georgia 30309
`Telephone: (404) 892-5005
`
`Elizabeth Ranks
`Massachusetts Bar No. 693679
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`1 Marina Park Drive
`Boston, Massachusetts 02210
`Telephone: (617) 542-5070
`ranks@fr.com
`
`J. Michael Huget (P39150)
`Sarah E. Waidelich (P80225)
`HONIGMAN LLP
`315 East Eisenhower Prkwy., Ste. 100
`Ann Arbor, MI 48108
`Tel: (734) 418-4254
`mhuget@honigman.com
`swaidelich@honigman.com
`
`Counsel for Defendant Tesla Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ John S. LeRoy
`John S. LeRoy (P61964)
`Christopher C. Smith (P73936)
`Kyle G. Konz (P79452)
`BROOKS KUSHMAN P.C.
`1000 Town Center, 22nd Floor
`Southfield, MI 48075
`Telephone: (248) 358-4400
`
`
`/s/ Peter J. Brennan
`
`Reginald J. Hill (IL Bar #6225173)
`Peter J. Brennan (IL Bar #6190873)
`JENNER & BLOCK LLP
`353 N. Clark St.
`Chicago, IL 60654
`Telephone: (312) 222-9350
`rhill@jenner.com
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 281, PageID.30893 Filed 08/01/24 Page 5 of 7
`
`jleroy@brookskushman.com
`csmith@brookskushman.com
`kkonz@brookskushman.com
`
`Counsel for Defendant
`Ford Motor Company
`
`
`
`/s/ Frank C. Cimino, Jr.
`Frank C. Cimino, Jr.
`Megan S. Woodworth
`Jonathan L. Falkler
`Robert C. Tapparo
`VENABLE LLP
`600 Massachusetts Avenue, NW
`Washington, DC 20001
`(202) 344-4569
`FCCimino@Venable.com
`MSWoodworth@Venable.com
`JLFalkler@Venable.com
`RCTapparo@Venable.com
`
`Patrick G. Seyferth (P47575)
`Susan M. McKeever (P73533)
`BUSH SEYFERTH PLLC
`100 W. Big Beaver Road, Suite 400
`Troy, MI 48084
`(248) 822-7800
`seyferth@bsplaw.com
`mckeever@bsplaw.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`FCA US LLC
`
`
`
`pbrennan@jenner.com
`
`Counsel for Defendants
`Nissan North America Inc. and Nissan
`Motor Acceptance Corporation A/K/A
`Nissan Motor Acceptance Company LLC
`
`
`
`/s/ John T. Johnson
`John T. Johnson (New York Bar
`No.2589182)
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`7 Times Square, 20th Floor
`New York, NY 10036
`Telephone: (212) 765-5070
`Facsimile: (212) 258-2291
`E-mail: jjohnson@fr.com
`
`Ruffin B. Cordell (DC Bar #445801)
`Benjamin J Christoff (DC Bar #1025635)
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`1000 Maine Ave., S.W., Suite 1000
`Washington, D.C. 20024
`Telephone: (202) 783-5070
`Facsimile: (202) 783-2331
`E-mail: cordell@fr.com; christoff@fr.com
`
`Thomas Branigan (P41774)
`Matin Fallahi (P84524)
`Bowman and Brooke LLP
`41000 Woodard Avenue, 200 East
`Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304
`Telephone: (248) 205-3300
`Facsimile: (248) 205-3399
`thomas.branigan@bowmanandbrooke.com
`matin.fallahi@browmanandbrook.com
`
`Counsel for Defendants
`American Honda Motor Co., Inc. and
`Honda Development & Manufacturing of
`America, LLC
`5
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 281, PageID.30894 Filed 08/01/24 Page 6 of 7
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Paul R. Steadman
`Paul R. Steadman (Illinois Bar No.
`6238160)
`Matthew Satchwell (Illinois Bar No.
`6290672)
`Shuzo Maruyama (Illinois Bar No.
`6313434)
`DLA PIPER LLP (US)
`444 West Lake Street, Suite 900
`Chicago, IL 60606-0089
`Tel: 312.368.2135
`Fax: 312.251.2850
`paul.steadman@us.dlapiper.com
`matthew.satchwell@us.dlapiper.com
`shuzo.maruyama@us.dlapiper.com
`
`Brian Erickson (Texas Bar No.
`24012594)
`DLA PIPER LLP (US)
`303 Colorado Street, Suite 3000
`Austin, Texas 78701-4653
`Tel: 512.457.7059
`Fax: 512.721.2263
`brian.erickson@us.dlapiper.com
`
`Counsel for Defendants Toyota
`Motor Corporation, Toyota Motor
`North America, Inc., Toyota Motor
`Sales, U.S.A., Inc., Toyota Motor
`Engineering & Manufacturing
`North America, Inc. and Toyota
`Motor Credit Corporation
`
`
`
`
`6
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 281, PageID.30895 Filed 08/01/24 Page 7 of 7
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I certify that counsel of record is being served with a copy of the foregoing
`
`document via the Court CM/ECF system on August 1, 2024.
`
`
`
`s/ Joseph A. Herriges
`Joseph A. Herriges
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`7
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
