`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
`SOUTHERN DIVISION
`
`
`IN RE NEO WIRELESS, LLC
`PATENT LITIG.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2:22-MD-03034-TGB
`
`HON. TERRENCE G. BERG
`
`
`
`CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER
`NUMBER ONE
`
`
`
`
`
`The Court held a Status Conference on July 18, 2022. Counsel for
`
`all parties were present. As discussed at that conference, the following
`
`deadlines are imposed:
`
`1. Plaintiff shall file all Amended Complaints by July 20, 2022.
`
`2. Any Motions to Dismiss shall be filed no later than August 10, 2022.
`
`3. Answers shall be due August 24, 2022.
`
`4. A Rule 26(f) Scheduling Conference shall be held on August 31,
`
`2022.
`
`If any Motions to Dismiss are filed, Defendants’ counsel shall
`
`coordinate to avoid duplicative briefing on issues common to all
`
`Defendants. Redundant briefing will not be permitted as it taxes the
`
`resources of the parties, counsel, and the Court.
`
`At least two business days prior to the Scheduling Conference,
`
`counsel shall file a joint Rule 26(f) Report and Proposed Scheduling Order
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 27, PageID.51 Filed 07/19/22 Page 2 of 2
`
`using the template for patent cases provided in the Court’s practice
`
`guidelines.
`
`In addition to scheduling matters, all counsel should also be
`
`prepared to discuss the following at the Scheduling Conference:
`
`1. The parties’ proposed candidates, if any, for appointment as a
`
`technical advisor to the Court;
`
`2. An update on any settlement discussions that have taken place
`
`prior to the Scheduling Conference or are scheduled to take place;
`
`3. An update on Defendants’ intention to request inter partes review
`
`of any patent at issue in this litigation; and,
`
`4. The status of the newly-filed cases against Mercedes and FCA.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`SO ORDERED this 19th day of July, 2022.
`
`BY THE COURT:
`
`/s/Terrence G. Berg
`TERRENCE G. BERG
`United States District Judge
`
`
`
`2
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
