`
`
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 268-2, PageID.29342 Filed 07/18/24 Page 2 of 45
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 268-2, PageID.29343 Filed 07/18/24 Page 3 of 45
`
`
`CONTROLLING OR MOST APPROPRIATE AUTHORITY
`
`PAGE(S)
`
`
`
`CASES
`
`
`Adaptix, Inc. v. Apple, Inc. et al,
`Civ. No. 5:13-cv-01776 (N.D. Cal.) .................................................................passim
`Allergan, Inc. v. Teva Pharms. USA, Inc.,
`No. 2:15-CV-1455-WCB, 2017 WL 11807449 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 3,
`2017) ..................................................................................................................... 6
`American Calcar, Inc. v. Am. Honda Motor Co., Inc.,
`768 F.3d 1185 (Fed. Cir. 2014) .......................................................................... 32
`ASUS Computer Int’l v. Round Rock Rsch., LLC,
`No. 12–cv–02099 JST (NC), 2014 WL 1463609 (N.D. Cal. Apr.
`11, 2014) ............................................................................................................... 6
`Babcock Power, Inc. v. Kapsalis,
`854 F. App'x 1 (6th Cir. 2021) ............................................................................ 27
`Baumel v. Barber Power L. Grp.,
`No. 322CV00170, 2023 WL 6121001 (W.D. N.C. Sept. 18, 2023) .................. 26
`
`Better Mouse Co. v. SteelSeries ApS,
`No. 2:14-CV-198-RSP, 2016 WL 3611560 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 5,
`2016) ..................................................................................................................... 8
`C.f. LaserDynamics, Inc. v. Quanta Computer, Inc.,
`694 F.3d 51 (Fed. Cir. 2012) .............................................................................. 14
`In re Cole v. Patton,
`No: 6:19-cv-699-Orl-40, 2019 WL 3413525 (M.D. Fla. Jul. 29,
`2019) ................................................................................................................... 27
`ContentGuard Holdings, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc.,
`No. 2:13-cv-1112, 2015 WL 4944514 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 19, 2015) ...................... 8
`
`
`
`ii
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 268-2, PageID.29344 Filed 07/18/24 Page 4 of 45
`
`
`CONTROLLING OR MOST APPROPRIATE AUTHORITY
`PAGE(S)
`
`Deere & Co. v. Int’l Harvester Co.,
`710 F.2d 1551 (Fed. Cir. 1983) .................................................................... 10, 12
`Eggerson v. U.S.,
`No. 1:5-cv-594, 2006 WL 1720252 (W.D. Mich. 2006) .................................... 27
`Engebretsen v. Fairchild Aircraft Corp.,
`21 F.3d 721 (6th Cir. 1994) ................................................................................ 28
`Entropic Commc’ns, LLC v. Charter Commc’ns, Inc.,
`No. 2:22-CV-00125-JRG, 2023 WL 8437839 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 5,
`2023) ..................................................................................................................... 8
`EQT Prod. Co. v. Magnum Hunter Prod., Inc.,
`768 F. App’x 459 (6th Cir. 2019) ....................................................................... 24
`Ford Motor Co. v. InterMotive, Inc.,
`No. 4:17-CV-11584-TGB, 2022 WL 4596306 (E.D. Mich. Sept.
`30, 2022) ............................................................................................................. 27
`In re Homestore.com, Inc.,
`CV 01-11115 RSWL (CWx), 2011 WL 291176 (C.D. Cal. Jan. 25,
`2011) ................................................................................................................... 25
`Howe v. City of Akron,
`801 F.3d 718 (6th Cir. 2015) .............................................................................. 16
`Innovention Toys, LLC v. MGA Ent., Inc.,
`No. 07-6510, 2012 WL 5398476 (E.D. La. Nov. 4, 2012) ................................... 8
`Killion v. KeHE Distributors, LLC,
`761 F.3d 574 (6th Cir. 2014) .............................................................................. 29
`Kumho Tire Co., Ltd. v. Carmichael,
`526 U.S. 137 (1999) ............................................................................................ 29
`
`
`
`iii
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 268-2, PageID.29345 Filed 07/18/24 Page 5 of 45
`
`
`CONTROLLING OR MOST APPROPRIATE AUTHORITY
`PAGE(S)
`
`Magna Mirrors v. Samvardhana Motherson,
`No. 1:17-cv-00077-JMB-PJG, Dkt. 661, (W.D. Mich. Nov. 30,
`2022) ..................................................................................................................... 9
`Master-Halco, Inc. v. Scillia, Dowling & Natarelli, LLC,
`739 F.Supp.2d 125 (D. Conn. 2010) ................................................................... 11
`In re MSTG, Inc.,
`675 F.3d 1337 (Fed. Cir. 2012) .......................................................................... 13
`Netscape Commc's Corp. v. ValueClick, Inc.,
`707 F. Supp. 2d 640 (E.D. Va. 2010) ................................................................... 6
`
`Putnam v. Henkel Consumer Adhesives, Inc.,
`No. 1:05-cv-02011, 2007 WL 4794115 (N.D. Ga. Oct. 29, 2007)..................... 11
`Randall Mfg. v. Rea,
`733 F.3d 1355 (Fed. Cir. 2013) ........................................................................ 2, 9
`Regents of Univ. of Cal. v. Affymetrix, Inc.,
`2019 WL 1298094 (S.D. Cal. Mar. 21, 2019) ...................................................... 6
`
`Riverwood Int’l Corp. v. R.A. Jones & Co.,
`324 F.3d 1346 (Fed. Cir. 2003) ............................................................................ 7
`RJ Control Consultants, Inc. v. Multiject, LLC,
`100 F.4th 659 (6th Cir. 2024) ............................................................................. 24
`Roberts ex rel. Johnson v. Galen of Virginia, Inc.,
`325 F.3d 776 (6th Cir. 2003) ........................................................................ 16, 19
`Robocast, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.,
`No. 10-1055-RGA, 2014 WL 202399 (D. Del. Jan. 16, 2014) .......................... 14
`SanDisk Corp. v. STMicroelectronics, Inc.,
`480 F.3d 1372 (Fed. Cir. 2007) .......................................................................... 10
`
`
`
`iv
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 268-2, PageID.29346 Filed 07/18/24 Page 6 of 45
`
`
`CONTROLLING OR MOST APPROPRIATE AUTHORITY
`PAGE(S)
`
`Standard Havens Prods., Inc. v. Gencor Indus., Inc.,
`897 F.2d 511 (Fed. Cir. 1990) ............................................................................ 26
`Therasense, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson & Co.,
`649 F.3d 1276 (Fed. Cir. 2011) .......................................................................... 30
`United States v. Scott,
`716 F. App'x 477 (6th Cir. 2017) ........................................................................ 27
`Viskase Corp. v. Am. Nat'l Can Co.,
`261 F.3d 1316 (Fed. Cir. 2001) .......................................................................... 26
`Yeda Rsch. v. Mylan Pharms. Inc.,
`906 F.3d 1031 (Fed. Cir. 2018) ............................................................................ 6
`Zurich Am. Ins. Co. v. Watts Indus., Inc.,
`417 F.3d 682 (7th Cir. 2005) .............................................................................. 11
`Other Authorities
`Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(B) ...................................................................................... 16
`Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(e)(2) ...................................................................................... 16, 23
`Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(a)(2) ............................................................................................ 21
`Fed. R. Civ. P. 37 ..................................................................................................... 16
`Fed. R. Evid. 102 ..................................................................................................... 14
`Fed. R. Evid. 403 ..................................................................................... 1, 10, 13, 14
`Fed. R. Evid. 703 ............................................................................................... 27, 28
`Fed. R. Evid. 803 ..................................................................................................... 26
`Fed. R. Evid. 804 ..............................................................................................passim
`Fed. R. Evid. 807 ..................................................................................................... 26
`
`
`
`v
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 268-2, PageID.29347 Filed 07/18/24 Page 7 of 45
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 268-2, PageID.29348 Filed 07/18/24 Page 8 of 45
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 268-2, PageID.29349 Filed 07/18/24 Page 9 of 45
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 268-2, PageID.29350 Filed 07/18/24 Page 10 of 45
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 268-2, PageID.29351 Filed 07/18/24 Page 11 of 45
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 268-2, PageID.29352 Filed 07/18/24 Page 12 of 45
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 268-2, PageID.29353 Filed 07/18/24 Page 13 of 45
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 268-2, PageID.29354 Filed 07/18/24 Page 14 of 45
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 268-2, PageID.29355 Filed 07/18/24 Page 15 of 45
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 268-2, PageID.29356 Filed 07/18/24 Page 16 of 45
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 268-2, PageID.29357 Filed 07/18/24 Page 17 of 45
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 268-2, PageID.29358 Filed 07/18/24 Page 18 of 45
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 268-2, PageID.29359 Filed 07/18/24 Page 19 of 45
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 268-2, PageID.29360 Filed 07/18/24 Page 20 of 45
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 268-2, PageID.29361 Filed 07/18/24 Page 21 of 45
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 268-2, PageID.29362 Filed 07/18/24 Page 22 of 45
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 268-2, PageID.29363 Filed 07/18/24 Page 23 of 45
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 268-2, PageID.29364 Filed 07/18/24 Page 24 of 45
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 268-2, PageID.29365 Filed 07/18/24 Page 25 of 45
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 268-2, PageID.29366 Filed 07/18/24 Page 26 of 45
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 268-2, PageID.29367 Filed 07/18/24 Page 27 of 45
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 268-2, PageID.29368 Filed 07/18/24 Page 28 of 45
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 268-2, PageID.29369 Filed 07/18/24 Page 29 of 45
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 268-2, PageID.29370 Filed 07/18/24 Page 30 of 45
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 268-2, PageID.29371 Filed 07/18/24 Page 31 of 45
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 268-2, PageID.29372 Filed 07/18/24 Page 32 of 45
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 268-2, PageID.29373 Filed 07/18/24 Page 33 of 45
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 268-2, PageID.29374 Filed 07/18/24 Page 34 of 45
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 268-2, PageID.29375 Filed 07/18/24 Page 35 of 45
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 268-2, PageID.29376 Filed 07/18/24 Page 36 of 45
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 268-2, PageID.29377 Filed 07/18/24 Page 37 of 45
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 268-2, PageID.29378 Filed 07/18/24 Page 38 of 45
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 268-2, PageID.29379 Filed 07/18/24 Page 39 of 45
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 268-2, PageID.29380 Filed 07/18/24 Page 40 of 45
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 268-2, PageID.29381 Filed 07/18/24 Page 41 of 45
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 268-2, PageID.29382 Filed 07/18/24 Page 42 of 45
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 268-2, PageID.29383 Filed 07/18/24 Page 43 of 45
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 268-2, PageID.29384 Filed 07/18/24 Page 44 of 45
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 268-2, PageID.29385 Filed 07/18/24 Page 45 of 45
`
`