`
`Exhibit M
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 252, PageID.15866 Filed 06/20/24 Page 2 of 47
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 203, PageID.11748 Filed 12/12/23 Page 1 of 46
`
`1
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
`
`TRANSCRIPT OF STATUS CONFERENCE
`BEFORE THE HONORABLE TERRENCE G. BERG
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`APPEARANCES:
`
`For the Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER S. STEWART
`JASON D. CASSADY
`Caldwell Cassady Curry PC
`2121 N. Pearl Street; Suite 1200
`Dallas, TX 75201
`
`For the Plaintiff: JAYE QUADROZZI
`YOUNG GARCIA & QUADROZZI, PC
`27725 Stansbury Blvd; Suite 125
`Farmington Hills, MI 48334
`
`17
`
`For Honda:
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`JOHN T. JOHNSON
`Fish & Richardson
`7 Times Square; Suite 20th Floor
`New York, MY 10036
`
`RUFFIN B. CORDELL
`Fish & Richardson
`1425 K Street NW; 11th Floor
`Washington, DC 20005
`
`BENJAMIN CHRISTOFF
`Fish & Richardson
`1000 Maine Avenue SW; Suite 1000
`Washington, DC 20024
`
`Detroit, Michigan
`
`November 27, 2023
`
`10:05 a.m.
`
`Case No. 22-03034
`
`)
`
`))
`
`))
`
`))
`
`)
`_________________________________)
`
`IN RE: NEO WIRELESS, LLC
`PATENT LITIGATION
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 252, PageID.15867 Filed 06/20/24 Page 3 of 47
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 203, PageID.11749 Filed 12/12/23 Page 2 of 46
`
`2
`
`APPEARANCES, CONT'D:
`
`THOMAS P. BRANIGAN
`Bowman & Brooke, LLP
`41000 Woodward Avenue; 200 East
`Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304
`
`JOHN S. LEROY
`Brooks Kushman, PC
`150 W. Second St.; Suite 400
`Royal Oak, MI 48067
`
`DANIEL YONAN
`Sterne Kessler Goldstein & Fox
`1101 K. Street NW; Suite 10th Floor
`Washington, DC 20005
`
`SUSAN M. MCKEEVER
`Bush Seyferth Paige
`100 W. Big Beaver Road; Suite 400
`Troy, MI 48084
`
`PAUL RICHARD STEADMAN
`MATTHEW D. SATCHWELL
`MATTHEW GANAS
`DLA Piper, LLP
`444 West Lake Street; Suite 900
`Chicago, IL 60606
`
`ANKUR VIJAY DESAI
`DLA Piper, LLP
`500 Eight Street, NW
`Washington, DC 20004
`
`JOSEPH A. HERRIGES, JR.
`Fish & Richardson, PC
`60 South Sixth Street
`Suite 3200 RBC Plaza
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`
`THOMAS REGER, II
`Fish & Richardson
`1717 Main Street; Suite 5000
`Dallas, TX 75201
`
`ELIZABETH G. H. RANKS
`Fish & Richardson
`One Marina Park Drive
`Boston, MA 02210
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`For Ford:
`
`For VW:
`
`12
`
`For Toyota:
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`For GM:
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`For Tesla:
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 252, PageID.15868 Filed 06/20/24 Page 4 of 47
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 203, PageID.11750 Filed 12/12/23 Page 3 of 46
`
`3
`
`APPEARANCES, CONT'D:
`
`For Nissan:
`
`For FCA:
`
`REGINALD J. HILL
`PETER J. BRENNAN
`PAARAS MODI
`Jenner & Block
`353 N. Clark St
`Chicago, IL 60654
`
`FRANK C. CIMINO, JR.
`JONATHAN L. FALKLER
`SUSAN M. MCKEEVER
`Venable, LLP
`600 Massachusetts Avenue, NW
`Washington, DC 20001
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`Court Reporter:
`
`Carol M. Harrison, RMR, FCRR
`1000 Washington Avenue
`Bay City, MI 48708
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Proceedings reported by stenotype reporter.
`Transcript produced by Computer-Aided Transcription.
`
`NEO Wireless - Status Conference - November 27, 2023
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 252, PageID.15869 Filed 06/20/24 Page 5 of 47
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 203, PageID.11751 Filed 12/12/23 Page 4 of 46
`
`4
`
`P R O C E E D I N G S
`
`(At 10:05 a.m., proceedings began.)
`
`THE COURT: We are on the docket here in our case of
`
`the NEO Wireless patent litigation, and this is
`
`No. 22-md-03034, and we're just having a status conference
`
`right now.
`
`And I want to thank our court reporter, Carol
`
`Harrison, for being here this morning and taking everything
`
`down, and I want to welcome all of our counsel, who I can see
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`over our Zoom connection. And let me just allow the lawyers to
`
`11
`
`indicate who they are so we'll have a record of them, and so
`
`12
`
`we'll start with NEO. So go ahead, sir.
`
`13
`
`MR. STEWART: Good morning, Your Honor. Chris
`
`14
`
`Stewart for NEO Wireless, with me my colleague Jason Cassady
`
`15
`
`and our local counsel Jaye Quadrozzi. And we have other
`
`16
`
`members of our firm on, but the three of us will be the only
`
`17
`
`ones likely speaking.
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`THE COURT: Welcome.
`
`MR. STEWART: Thank you.
`
`THE COURT: And so let's go ahead with -- I'm just
`
`21
`
`looking at the docket order here, so how about for Honda, who
`
`22
`
`do we have?
`
`23
`
`MR. JOHNSON: Good morning, Your Honor. John
`
`24
`
`Johnson, from Fish and Richardson, and with me also from Fish
`
`25
`
`are Ruffin Cordell and Ben Christoff, and our local counsel Tom
`
`NEO Wireless - Status Conference - November 27, 2023
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 252, PageID.15870 Filed 06/20/24 Page 6 of 47
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 203, PageID.11752 Filed 12/12/23 Page 5 of 46
`
`5
`
`Branigan from Bowman & Brooke is also here. Thank you.
`
`THE COURT: Good morning, sir.
`
`And for Ford?
`
`MR. LEROY: Good morning, Your Honor. This is John
`
`LeRoy for Ford from Brooks Kushman.
`
`THE COURT: Good morning, Mr. LeRoy. Nice to see you
`
`again. I see that you've managed to grow a beard since you
`
`completed our trial a few weeks ago.
`
`MR. LEROY: It's getting cold outside, Judge.
`
`THE COURT: Very good looking.
`
`Okay. And let's see, who do we have for Volkswagen?
`
`MR. YONAN: Hi, Your Honor. Good morning. Danny
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`Yonan from Sterne & Kessler for Volkswagen Group of America.
`
`14
`
`With me today as well is Susan McKeever.
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`THE COURT: Very good and welcome to both of you.
`
`And let's see, how about for Toyota?
`
`MR. STEADMAN: Good morning, Your Honor. Paul
`
`18
`
`Steadman from DLA Piper. With me are Matthew Satchwell, Matt
`
`19
`
`Ganas and Ankur Desai.
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`THE COURT: Good morning to you.
`
`MR. STEADMAN: Good morning.
`
`THE COURT: How about for GM?
`
`MR. HERRIGES: Good morning, Your Honor. Joe
`
`24
`
`Herriges from Fish & Richardson.
`
`25
`
`THE COURT: Good morning to you, sir.
`
`NEO Wireless - Status Conference - November 27, 2023
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 252, PageID.15871 Filed 06/20/24 Page 7 of 47
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 203, PageID.11753 Filed 12/12/23 Page 6 of 46
`
`6
`
`And how about Tesla? Let's see here, do we have
`
`anybody from Tesla? Ms. Ranks?
`
`MR. REGER: Good morning, Your Honor. This is Tom
`
`Reger on behalf of Tesla. I apologize. With me is Liz Ranks.
`
`THE COURT: Okay. Welcome to you as well and good
`
`morning.
`
`And Nissan?
`
`MR. HILL: Good morning, Your Honor. This is Reggie
`
`Hill with Jenner & Block. I have my colleagues Peter Brennan
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`and Paaras Modi, M-O-D-I, with me as well.
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`MR. BRENNAN: Good morning, Your Honor.
`
`THE COURT: And good morning to you.
`
`And, let's see, how about FCA?
`
`MR. CIMINO: Good morning, Your Honor. Frank Cimino
`
`15
`
`from Venable. Along with me is Jon Falkler from Venable and
`
`16
`
`Michigan counsel Susan McKeever from Bush Seyferth.
`
`17
`
`18
`
`THE COURT: Welcome to you as well.
`
`And, let's see, is there anybody who I did not call?
`
`19
`
`Any defendant who I did not mention?
`
`20
`
`Okay. Very good. Well, again, welcome everyone and
`
`21
`
`good morning, and I really just wanted to have a chance to
`
`22
`
`speak with you on some of the issues that are outstanding that
`
`23
`
`we have here that I've learned about either through some of
`
`24
`
`your motions or through some email correspondence that we've
`
`25
`
`had.
`
`NEO Wireless - Status Conference - November 27, 2023
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 252, PageID.15872 Filed 06/20/24 Page 8 of 47
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 203, PageID.11754 Filed 12/12/23 Page 7 of 46
`
`7
`
`And why don't I start with, we do have a motion to
`
`compel. We'll deal with some of these discovery matters, and
`
`that motion pertains essentially to records that relate to the
`
`plaintiff's interactions with the company Avanci -- I'm not
`
`sure if I'm pronouncing it correctly -- and I understand that
`
`you've had some progress in settling some of the matters that
`
`were raised in that motion, and so I think I might call on
`
`plaintiff first to just explain where are you with respect to
`
`that motion and what has been -- what has been happening in
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`terms of trying to resolve it?
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`Go ahead.
`
`MR. STEWART: Sure, Your Honor.
`
`THE COURT: Yeah, this is Docket No. 181, by the way.
`
`14
`
`MR. STEWART: Thank you, Your Honor. Chris Stewart
`
`15
`
`for NEO Wireless. As of the briefing I think the only
`
`16
`
`outstanding dispute was a subsidiary question about whether
`
`17
`
`defendants could ask questions in depositions or seek emails or
`
`18
`
`other related documents pertaining to an attempt by NEO to use
`
`19
`
`Avanci sort of as an agent to broker or assist with a group
`
`20
`
`settlement of this litigation.
`
`21
`
`The dispute initially started much broader about
`
`22
`
`NEO's discussions with Avanci about joining their patent pool
`
`23
`
`just as a normal patent pool member back in 2022, and we
`
`24
`
`ultimately capitulated on that and we produced all the
`
`25
`
`documents that we obtained with respect to attempting to join
`
`NEO Wireless - Status Conference - November 27, 2023
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 252, PageID.15873 Filed 06/20/24 Page 9 of 47
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 203, PageID.11755 Filed 12/12/23 Page 8 of 46
`
`8
`
`or proposing to join that patent pool. We are searching and
`
`collecting emails pursuant to a request made by defendants and
`
`will produce those if they relate to the joining of that patent
`
`pool.
`
`So the only thing that we're holding back -- and it's
`
`really not much. It's probably just questions in a deposition
`
`that we would object to as privileged -- is to the extent NEO
`
`sought Avanci's help in actually settling this litigation,
`
`right, private conversations between the plaintiff and one of
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`its agents about strategy for settling the case in a group
`
`11
`
`settlement involving all of the defendants. That's the only
`
`12
`
`thing we're holding back, and, as I understand the motion, the
`
`13
`
`defendants are still persisting in saying that they should get
`
`14
`
`to sort of peek behind that curtain and see into our sort of
`
`15
`
`private settlement deliberations, and that's the only objection
`
`16
`
`we have.
`
`17
`
`THE COURT: Okay. Thank you. And who would want to
`
`18
`
`take the other side of that? It looks like this motion was
`
`19
`
`filed by Ford, but it's possibly joined by everyone, so who
`
`20
`
`would like to respond to that?
`
`21
`
`MR. LEROY: Your Honor, this is John LeRoy, if I may
`
`22
`
`respond to that on behalf of the defendants. And you are
`
`23
`
`correct, we filed it, but the defendants, and to some degree
`
`24
`
`Avanci, have worked together, and we have resolved most of the
`
`25
`
`issues. I think there are two remaining. One is the one
`
`NEO Wireless - Status Conference - November 27, 2023
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 252, PageID.15874 Filed 06/20/24 Page 10 of 47
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 203, PageID.11756 Filed 12/12/23 Page 9 of 46
`
`9
`
`Mr. Stewart raised and another was a follow-up issue that I
`
`would hope we can work out without the Court's intervention,
`
`but if I may just briefly explain the issue or address what
`
`Mr. Stewart raised.
`
`And just for background context, Your Honor, Avanci,
`
`at least from defendant's perspective, generally sets the
`
`benchmark for the evaluation of what are called the standard
`
`essential patents -- I think Your Honor already made -- is
`
`aware of that -- and NEO has agreed to turn over its exchanges
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`with Avanci, and that was the lion's share of our motion, but a
`
`11
`
`secondary piece was this attempt by NEO to work with Avanci to
`
`12
`
`resolve the case.
`
`13
`
`NEO asserts that those exchanges are privileged
`
`14
`
`and/or work product. We assert that they are not because while
`
`15
`
`NEO and Avanci have a confidentiality agreement, they don't
`
`16
`
`have any joint defense agreement. They don't have any written
`
`17
`
`exchange or even -- I don't think Avanci has ever taken the
`
`18
`
`position that its exchanges with NEO are privileged or work
`
`19
`
`product, so we believe we're entitled to that information.
`
`20
`
`It's highly relevant. It would allow the defendants to see
`
`21
`
`NEO's and/or Avanci's evaluation of the asserted patents and
`
`22
`
`really move the needle towards ultimately resolving this case.
`
`23
`
`So that's the -- that's that issue. We've cited in
`
`24
`
`our response briefing some law that says, you know, where one
`
`25
`
`party openly shares even attorney communications with a
`
`NEO Wireless - Status Conference - November 27, 2023
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 252, PageID.15875 Filed 06/20/24 Page 11 of 47
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 203, PageID.11757 Filed 12/12/23 Page 10 of 46
`
`10
`
`third-party who's not subject to any common interest agreement,
`
`or hasn't at least agreed to treat the materials, even if not
`
`in writing, to maintain privilege of those materials, they're
`
`just not privileged, so we believe we're entitled to see them.
`
`MR. STEWART: Very briefly --
`
`THE COURT: Is there another issue, too?
`
`MR. LEROY: Yeah. The second issue, Judge, I hope we
`
`can resolve. NEO had supplemented an interrogatory response
`
`with a lot of the information we've been seeking from Avanci.
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`We obviously appreciate that, but there's one missing piece of
`
`11
`
`information, and I think Mr. Stewart knows what it is.
`
`12
`
`I'll just summarize it as we know Avanci allocated
`
`13
`
`three different categories of points to NEO. Those points
`
`14
`
`translate into dollars and we received a dollar figure from
`
`15
`
`NEO, so we have three points allocations and one dollar figure,
`
`16
`
`and we just don't know how the points correspond to the
`
`17
`
`dollars, because there's three different groups of them. And
`
`18
`
`it gets a little confusing but maybe Mr. Steward can tell us
`
`19
`
`now whether there's any dispute over them providing that
`
`20
`
`information.
`
`21
`
`22
`
`THE COURT: Understood, okay. Go ahead Mr. Stewart.
`
`MR. STEWART: Yes. As far as I'm aware, that
`
`23
`
`information just doesn't exist, but we're still, like I said,
`
`24
`
`reviewing emails exchanged between those parties for
`
`25
`
`production, and I think we're hoping to have those out this
`
`NEO Wireless - Status Conference - November 27, 2023
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 252, PageID.15876 Filed 06/20/24 Page 12 of 47
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 203, PageID.11758 Filed 12/12/23 Page 11 of 46
`
`11
`
`week. So to the extent there is some specific allocation of
`
`those dollars to individual types of points, I think we would
`
`produce that.
`
`THE COURT: Okay. And, Mr. Stewart, what do you --
`
`do you wish to respond to the legal arguments that Mr. LeRoy
`
`made regarding the information from Avanci about your
`
`settlement positions?
`
`MR. STEWART: Yes, Your Honor. Thank you. The short
`
`answer is I think there's an assumption by defendants that
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`there's some sort of interplay or overlay between the
`
`11
`
`discussions about the patent pool where Avanci sets the points
`
`12
`
`and has say in the particular dollar values that go along with
`
`13
`
`those points and this other discussion about a group settlement
`
`14
`
`when there really isn't.
`
`15
`
`What we're talking about with the group settlement
`
`16
`
`discussions, and the things that we're withholding, is just NEO
`
`17
`
`asking Avanci, hey, can you go help us drum up a group
`
`18
`
`settlement since we were unable and didn't decide to join your
`
`19
`
`patent pool, can you nevertheless use your connections and help
`
`20
`
`us as an agent to go and drum up a group settlement discussion.
`
`21
`
`Here are some thoughts we have about what a settlement might
`
`22
`
`look like. So it's just purely almost akin to attorney
`
`23
`
`communications about the strategy for conducting and arriving
`
`24
`
`at a settlement with these defendants.
`
`25
`
`So what they're essentially asking for is just to
`
`NEO Wireless - Status Conference - November 27, 2023
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 252, PageID.15877 Filed 06/20/24 Page 13 of 47
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 203, PageID.11759 Filed 12/12/23 Page 12 of 46
`
`12
`
`sort of peek behind the curtain at what NEO is thinking
`
`internally about the settlement thresholds and ranges it might
`
`agree to or the way a settlement license agreement might be
`
`structured, things that would be quintessentially privileged in
`
`any other context and definitely work product.
`
`And so our contention is by providing those -- or
`
`having those conversations and providing that information to an
`
`agent who was -- had a common interest in productively settling
`
`this litigation with NEO, there was no waiver. We maintain the
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`privilege and the work product protection over those
`
`11
`
`conversations and those details because of the relationship,
`
`12
`
`the common interest relationship, between us and Avanci. It's
`
`13
`
`a standard non-waiver of work product argument as well as a
`
`14
`
`common interest privilege argument.
`
`15
`
`THE COURT: All right. Thank you. So on this matter
`
`16
`
`I do think that I can understand why the defendants would want
`
`17
`
`to have access to this information, because it's similar to the
`
`18
`
`situation where the Court in a settlement conference would ask
`
`19
`
`the parties for their respective positions prior to the
`
`20
`
`settlement discussions and each side would indicate what the
`
`21
`
`last offer was or the demand and also what their, quote, final
`
`22
`
`position might be and indicate their strengths and weaknesses.
`
`23
`
`Of course that would be helpful to the other side to
`
`24
`
`know what that said, but I do think that there's a clear common
`
`25
`
`interest here between what the plaintiffs were trying to
`
`NEO Wireless - Status Conference - November 27, 2023
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 252, PageID.15878 Filed 06/20/24 Page 14 of 47
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 203, PageID.11760 Filed 12/12/23 Page 13 of 46
`
`13
`
`accomplish by having Avanci represent them in contacting the
`
`companies and possibly reaching some kind of a group
`
`settlement, and so I'm not going to allow discovery into those
`
`questions about what Avanci was communicating with the
`
`plaintiffs about prior to their attempts that may have been
`
`made to try to settle the case with the defendants. So that's
`
`my ruling on that part of that motion.
`
`The other part of the motion that Mr. LeRoy was
`
`talking about is something that I think the parties can
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`continue to work out. It sounds like you're trying to work it
`
`11
`
`out and so, I'll -- I'll not say anything about that aspect of
`
`12
`
`it and I hope that you are successful in working that out. So
`
`13
`
`I think that resolves that part of the motion to compel.
`
`14
`
`I know there was also an issue -- I don't think it's
`
`15
`
`a motion -- but in the email correspondence that we've seen
`
`16
`
`there's a question -- a discovery dispute, I guess I would call
`
`17
`
`it, that was raised by Toyota concerning the infotainment
`
`18
`
`systems, and I know that we discussed this previously when we
`
`19
`
`were together when all of the parties were concerned about this
`
`20
`
`and how much information would be developed about income
`
`21
`
`derived from different systems, but I think this is the only
`
`22
`
`thing left. And although I do want to hear, of course, from
`
`23
`
`Toyota, I -- because I think the plaintiffs are in a better
`
`24
`
`position to describe how much they have agreed to disclose, I
`
`25
`
`want to hear from again Mr. Stewart on this question.
`
`NEO Wireless - Status Conference - November 27, 2023
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 252, PageID.15879 Filed 06/20/24 Page 15 of 47
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 203, PageID.11761 Filed 12/12/23 Page 14 of 46
`
`14
`
`MR. STEWART: Thank you, Your Honor. That's right,
`
`so this is a follow-up to a call we had previously about
`
`financial data generally as it related to both infotainment
`
`systems and data monetization and the way that the defendants
`
`used data from the vehicles to monetize it.
`
`We compromised substantially and conferred a whole
`
`lot after the last call. We, the plaintiff, gave up on
`
`infotainment. We said fine, we'll compromise and not seek
`
`infotainment financials or any other financials related to the
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`vehicle itself, and we proposed a number of compromised
`
`11
`
`proposals on data monetization that seven of the eight
`
`12
`
`defendants agreed to.
`
`13
`
`Brief summary is that they will sort of explain to us
`
`14
`
`all the ways that they do use and monetize data within their
`
`15
`
`companies. They'll produce documents that either have explicit
`
`16
`
`revenue from those efforts or that assign a value of any kind
`
`17
`
`to those efforts, and then the crux of the dispute with Toyota
`
`18
`
`is the third piece, which is for some of the companies that had
`
`19
`
`large corporate structures with maybe foreign parent companies
`
`20
`
`that for which the defendant is an American subsidiary, or in
`
`21
`
`the case of Toyota who have a bunch of different subsidiaries
`
`22
`
`that handle issues related to data that are different from the
`
`23
`
`defendants being sued who sell the cars themselves.
`
`24
`
`What we asked was, tell us all the arrangements and
`
`25
`
`sort of relationships you have with your other affiliates and
`
`NEO Wireless - Status Conference - November 27, 2023
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 252, PageID.15880 Filed 06/20/24 Page 16 of 47
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 203, PageID.11762 Filed 12/12/23 Page 15 of 46
`
`15
`
`how you share this data with those affiliates, how they might
`
`monetize it and what your cut is. Basically tell us sort of
`
`the ecosystem of how the data that comes from the accused
`
`product vehicles is used and monetized within your corporate
`
`family so that if we need to we can go and serve a subpoena on
`
`some affiliate or we can have a dispute over whether we should
`
`be getting that information directly from you as well.
`
`The other defendants agreed to that proposal. Toyota
`
`put a caveat on it, a very important caveat, that they would
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`give us that information, but we had to pre-agree that we would
`
`11
`
`ask for nothing more, which sort of defeats the purpose of the
`
`12
`
`compromise, because the point of the compromise was to learn,
`
`13
`
`okay, what are we missing, right? What aspects of this data
`
`14
`
`monetization discovery are housed in some separate affiliate so
`
`15
`
`that we can then go and seek it if we think it's still relevant
`
`16
`
`and necessary, and Toyota wouldn't agree to give us that
`
`17
`
`opportunity to continue conferring on this.
`
`18
`
`So at this point, Your Honor, with the close of fact
`
`19
`
`discovery now kind of coming up post Markman order, I think we
`
`20
`
`really -- pending whatever Toyota says and whatever Your Honor
`
`21
`
`thinks, we might want to proceed to a motion or to a more
`
`22
`
`formal request for this information because we really just need
`
`23
`
`the information about this data monetization even if it is sort
`
`24
`
`of channeled through a sister company or an affiliate.
`
`25
`
`THE COURT: Okay. Thank you. And so, who would like
`
`NEO Wireless - Status Conference - November 27, 2023
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 252, PageID.15881 Filed 06/20/24 Page 17 of 47
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 203, PageID.11763 Filed 12/12/23 Page 16 of 46
`
`16
`
`to respond to this on behalf of Toyota?
`
`MR. STEADMAN: Your Honor, this is Paul Steadman for
`
`Toyota. Briefly, I agree with Mr. Stewart that this is not
`
`really briefed or fully put before the Court, and we agree that
`
`for it to be decided as a motion, it would require full
`
`briefing from both parties. Particularly, we'd like to set out
`
`why the information they're seeking is not relevant at all.
`
`So to give a sketch of that, as Your Honor knows,
`
`these patents are five or six, depending on their motion for
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`reconsideration, among thousands of patents that deal with
`
`11
`
`encoding data for sending across a network. They have nothing
`
`12
`
`to do with the data itself. That data could be the most
`
`13
`
`valuable data on the planet, or it could be absolute nonsense,
`
`14
`
`but their patents have nothing to do with collecting data,
`
`15
`
`deciding what data to use, how to use it, how to monetize it.
`
`16
`
`So they're really in a situation where they would
`
`17
`
`have to prove entitlement to unpatented features, which is the
`
`18
`
`Rite-Hite test and somehow get beyond the LaserDynamics and
`
`19
`
`VirnetX test for apportionment in order to even be able to
`
`20
`
`begin to get this -- get this into damages somehow. So they
`
`21
`
`are well beyond where any possible discovery would go.
`
`22
`
`We attempted to strike a compromise with them and
`
`23
`
`they refused the compromise. Essentially the compromise was
`
`24
`
`they would get this data from us and then be able to
`
`25
`
`iteratively ask for more and more and more information. And we
`
`NEO Wireless - Status Conference - November 27, 2023
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 252, PageID.15882 Filed 06/20/24 Page 18 of 47
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 203, PageID.11764 Filed 12/12/23 Page 17 of 46
`
`17
`
`said that's not really a compromise. That's just you getting
`
`more discovery so that you can get more discovery, and so that
`
`compromise is off the table. That's where the -- that's where
`
`the thing stands right now.
`
`THE COURT: Okay. I'm not sure --
`
`MR. STEADMAN: We would like to fully brief it.
`
`Yeah, go ahead.
`
`THE COURT: I'm not sure I understood what you said
`
`about -- what was the compromise that you had proposed?
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`MR. STEADMAN: We offered to give them some limited
`
`11
`
`information, including agreements regarding data use where the
`
`12
`
`data was actually monetized, that is money came in. Even
`
`13
`
`though we don't agree that that is relevant or can be used in
`
`14
`
`the damages case here, that is the farthest reaches of what
`
`15
`
`could possibly be relevant to damages, so we offered to give
`
`16
`
`them those agreements and tell them what data was collected, if
`
`17
`
`it resulted in money to the defendants in this case, the named
`
`18
`
`defendants.
`
`19
`
`They said they wanted all of that, but then they
`
`20
`
`would reserve the ability to ask for more, so they would ask
`
`21
`
`for additional discovery whatever, about that data, about how
`
`22
`
`it was used or whatever, and at that point negotiations broke
`
`23
`
`down because we didn't view that as a compromise.
`
`24
`
`25
`
`THE COURT: Do you wish to respond, Mr. Stewart?
`
`MR. STEWART: Yes, Your Honor. Thank you. It
`
`NEO Wireless - Status Conference - November 27, 2023
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 252, PageID.15883 Filed 06/20/24 Page 19 of 47
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 203, PageID.11765 Filed 12/12/23 Page 18 of 46
`
`18
`
`really -- the proposal we put forth is not that we just get to
`
`keep iteratively asking for more and more. It's really just
`
`about our dearth of knowledge right now about the ecosystem,
`
`like I was talking about earlier.
`
`And so what we are worried about is with them trying
`
`to sort of cut us off with just this cherry-picked set of data
`
`that they have self-selected for us to receive, we'll find out
`
`that, oh, actually Toyota Motor Company North America, the
`
`defendant in this case, they don't have any data monetization
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`agreements. They take the data from their cars, give it to
`
`11
`
`this subsidiary, Toyota Connected North America, and all the
`
`12
`
`agreements run through that subsidiary, even though it's the
`
`13
`
`same corporate family, it's the same data.
`
`14
`
`So our concern about reserving the right to seek more
`
`15
`
`information is making sure that we don't get hoodwinked and
`
`16
`
`agree to receive information from the defendant when it is just
`
`17
`
`actually siloed in a sister company, and so we can't --
`
`18
`
`THE COURT: Right now you have not received any
`
`19
`
`information from Toyota?
`
`20
`
`MR. STEWART: That's right. Right now we don't even
`
`21
`
`know whether Toyota North America, the actual defendant, even
`
`22
`
`has these agreements. We only know that they've agreed to
`
`23
`
`provide it from that defendant only and no other affiliates.
`
`24
`
`THE COURT: Do you -- have you received some of this
`
`25
`
`kind of information from the other defendants?
`
`NEO Wireless - Status Conference - November 27, 2023
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 252, PageID.15884 Filed 06/20/24 Page 20 of 47
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 203, PageID.11766 Filed 12/12/23 Page 19 of 46
`
`19
`
`MR. STEWART: This is the compromise that we agreed
`
`to with all defendants back in October. No defendant has yet
`
`actually followed through on that compromise and provided the
`
`information, but one of the things we were going to maybe talk
`
`to you about today if there was time, but we're expecting,
`
`hopefully very soon, to get that information from all the other
`
`defendants.
`
`THE COURT: Okay. Well, Mr. Steadman, let me just
`
`ask you this question because I'm wondering if we can possibly
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`kick the can down the road a little bit here or maybe just
`
`11
`
`resolve it if it's not going to come up again, which is what if
`
`12
`
`you were to say, okay, you will provide the information you
`
`13
`
`were initially saying that you would provide, and then if -- in
`
`14
`
`the event that Mr. Stewart ends up asking for a bunch of
`
`15
`
`additional information that you think under the different
`
`16
`
`authorities that you've raised they shouldn't be able to get,
`
`17
`
`then you can raise it at that time?
`
`18
`
`MR. STEADMAN: Well, obviously, Your Honor, we'll do
`
`19
`
`whatever you tell us to do. There's no hoodwinking going on.
`
`20
`
`There are a few limited agreements with some very limited
`
`21
`
`revenues attached to them from the defendants that are named in
`
`22
`
`this case. Notably they've had, you know, quite a long time to
`
`23
`
`name whatever defendants they wanted in this case. They've
`
`24
`
`named those defendants in this case. Those are the defendants
`
`25
`
`that are going to trial.
`
`NEO Wireless - Status Conference - November 27, 2023
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 252, PageID.15885 Filed 06/20/24 Page 21 of 47
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 203, PageID.11767 Filed 12/12/23 Page 20 of 46
`
`20
`
`There are a handful of agreements that we've
`
`collected that could be made available, but I think that if
`
`they want -- if this is going to be a compromise, then that
`
`ought to be the limit of the discovery, and if they want more,
`
`they should have to justify wanting more to the Court. I don't
`
`think it's fair to put us in the position where we produce it
`
`and then if we don't want to produce something else, we have to
`
`come and seek a protective order. If this is the compromise,
`
`then that ought to be the compromise and then we should be
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`done.
`
`11
`
`THE COURT: Well, I'd like you to be on the same
`
`12
`
`wavelength as all of the other defendants here and so that all
`
`13
`
`of the defendants who have agreed so far to provide what
`
`14
`
`they've agreed to provide will do that, so I'd like you to do
`
`15
`
`that.
`
`16
`
`And then I don't really see a big difference between
`
`17
`
`whether you object or whether he has to justify what he's
`
`18
`
`doing, what he's asking for. I mean, it may be -- I don't know
`
`19
`
`what he's going to ask for. It could be if he asks for
`
`20
`
`something that you'll say, oh, if that's all you want, then
`
`21
`
`that's fine. I just don't know what it is.
`
`22
`
`And so my feeling is let's do that, and then so,
`
`23
`
`Mr. Stewart, you know, ask for more information to Toyota, they
`
`24
`
`can object to that, and I'll have to take a look at it at that
`
`25
`
`time, okay?
`
`NEO Wireless - Status Conference - November 27, 2023
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 252, PageID.15886 Filed 06/20/24 Page 22 of 47
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 203, PageID.11768 Filed 12/12/23 Page 21 of 46
`
`21
`
`MR. STEWART: Very good, Your Honor.
`
`THE COURT: All right. So that takes care of that.
`
`I did want to ask you about your efforts regarding
`
`possible mediation, because I know there was some back and
`
`forth regarding that as well. So, Mr. Stewart, why don't you
`
`start on that and let me know what's happening with respect to
`
`any mediation efforts.
`
`MR. STEWART: Mr. Cassady can address that, Your
`
`Honor.
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`MR. CASSADY: Your Honor, Jason Cassady for NEO
`
`11
`
`Wireless. I think this is -- this is kind of a telling spot
`
`12
`
`for -- given the discovery fights that I've been listening to
`
`13
`
`on this call with Your Honor. I think the briefing told you a
`
`14
`
`lot of what I think needs to happen.
`
`15
`
`In this case it seems that there's a lot of parties
`
`16
`
`where information is not flowing through attorneys to their
`
`17
`
`client representatives or to certain agents and to only
`
`18
`
`other -- you know, only certain defendants, and it's one of the
`
`19
`
`reasons that we finally suggested to everybody why don't we
`
`20
`
`have a big -- let's just have a big team mediation with al