Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 224, PageID.12234 Filed 01/25/24 Page 1 of 10
`
`
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
`SOUTHERN DIVISION
`
`IN RE NEO WIRELESS, LLC
`
`PATENT LITIG.
`
`NEO WIRELESS LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO.
`& HONDA DEVELOPMENT &
`MFG. CO. OF AMERICA, LLC,
`
`Defendants.
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`
`
`2:22-md-03034-TGB
`
`HON. TERRENCE G. BERG
`
`2:22-cv-11403-TGB
`
`HON. TERRENCE G. BERG
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`JOINT STIPULATION FOR A LIMITED EXTENSION
`OF THE FACT DISCOVERY DEADLINE
`
`Plaintiff Neo Wireless LLC (“Neo”) and Defendants General Motors Co. and
`
`General Motors LLC (collectively “GM”), Tesla, Inc. (“Tesla”), Honda Motor Co.,
`
`Inc. and Honda Development & Manufacturing of America, LLC (collectively
`
`“Honda”), Toyota Motor North America, Inc., Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. and
`
`Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc. and Toyota Motor
`
`Credit Corporation (collectively “Toyota”), Nissan North America Inc. and Nissan
`
`Motor Acceptance Corporation a/k/a Nissan Motor Acceptance Company LLC
`
`(collectively “Nissan”), Ford Motor Company (“Ford”), and FCA US LLC (“FCA”)
`
`(together, “Defendants”) jointly stipulate, subject to the approval of the Court, to a
`
`limited-purpose extension of the fact discovery deadline.
`
`29143803v1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
`SOUTHERN DIVISION
`
`IN RE NEO WIRELESS, LLC
`
`PATENT LITIG.
`
`NEO WIRELESS LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO.
`& HONDA DEVELOPMENT &
`MFG. CO. OF AMERICA, LLC,
`
`Defendants.
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`
`
`2:22-md-03034-TGB
`
`HON. TERRENCE G. BERG
`
`2:22-cv-11403-TGB
`
`HON. TERRENCE G. BERG
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`JOINT STIPULATION FOR A LIMITED EXTENSION
`OF THE FACT DISCOVERY DEADLINE
`
`Plaintiff Neo Wireless LLC (“Neo”) and Defendants General Motors Co. and
`
`General Motors LLC (collectively “GM”), Tesla, Inc. (“Tesla”), Honda Motor Co.,
`
`Inc. and Honda Development & Manufacturing of America, LLC (collectively
`
`“Honda”), Toyota Motor North America, Inc., Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. and
`
`Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc. and Toyota Motor
`
`Credit Corporation (collectively “Toyota”), Nissan North America Inc. and Nissan
`
`Motor Acceptance Corporation a/k/a Nissan Motor Acceptance Company LLC
`
`(collectively “Nissan”), Ford Motor Company (“Ford”), and FCA US LLC (“FCA”)
`
`(together, “Defendants”) jointly stipulate, subject to the approval of the Court, to a
`
`limited-purpose extension of the fact discovery deadline.
`
`29143803v1
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 224, PageID.12235 Filed 01/25/24 Page 2 of 10
`
`
`
`Specifically, Defendants request that the Court approve a one-day extension
`
`through January 30, 2024, for the purpose of facilitating the deposition of third-party
`
`Avanci LLC (“Avanci”). Avanci has agreed to be deposed on January 30, 2024, and
`
`does not oppose Defendants’ request. Plaintiff Neo Wireless LLC does not oppose
`
`the Defendants’ request, and has filed its own motion for a broader two-week
`
`extension of the fact discovery period.1
`
`Good cause exists for this stipulation in that Avanci-related evidence is
`
`relevant at least to the damages determination in this case, and the proposed
`
`extension is necessary to accommodate Avanci. The parties’ proposed extension in
`
`this stipulation would apply only to the deposition of Avanci.
`
`
`
`Dated: January 25, 2024
`
` Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`1 Neo states that in addition to this Avanci deposition, Honda, Ford, and Nissan
`have asked that certain of their party depositions take place after the close of
`discovery. And Neo has also been attempting to confer with Defendants about
`issues with other third-party discovery for several weeks, but except as to Toyota
`and FCA, those issues may be unresolved by the close of discovery. Neo proposed
`that the parties continue conferring to determine if one filing could resolve all the
`outstanding issues, but counsel for Honda insisted on filing this stipulation first.
`Because Neo does not oppose the relief sought, it does not oppose the stipulation.
`
`29143803v1
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 224, PageID.12236 Filed 01/25/24 Page 3 of 10
`
`
`
`
`
`29143803v1
`
`By: /s/ Joseph A. Herriges
`
`Joseph A. Herriges, MN Bar No.
`390350
`Conrad A. Gosen, MN Bar No. 0395381
`James Huguenin-Love, MN Bar No.
`0398706
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`60 South Sixth Street, Suite 3200
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`Telephone: (612) 335-5070
`Facsimile: (612) 288-9696
`herriges@fr.com, gosen@fr.com,
`huguein-love@fr.com
`
`Michael J. McKeon, DC Bar No. 459780
`Christian Chu, DC Bar No. 483948
`Jared Hartzman, DC Bar No. 1034255
`Joshua Carrigan, VA Bar No. 96911
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`1000 Maine Avenue SW, Suite 1000
`Washington, DC 20024
`Telephone: (202) 783-5070
`Facsimile: (202) 783-2331
`mckeon@fr.com, chu@fr.com,
`hartzman@fr.com, carrigan@fr.com
`
`J. Michael Huget (P39150)
`Sarah E. Waidelich (P80225)
`HONIGMAN LLP
`315 East Eisenhower Parkway
`Suite 100
`Ann Arbor, MI 48108
`Tel: (734) 418-4254
`Fax: (734) 418-4255
`mhuget@honigman.com,
`swaidelich@honigman.com
`
`Counsel for Defendants General Motors
`Company and General Motors LLC
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 224, PageID.12237 Filed 01/25/24 Page 4 of 10
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`29143803v1
`
`By: /s/ Thomas H. Reger II
`
`Thomas H. Reger II
`Texas Bar No. 24032992
`reger@fr.com
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`1717 Main Street, Suite 5000
`Dallas, TX 75201
`Telephone: (214) 747-5070
`
`Lawrence Jarvis
`Georgia Bar No. 102116
`jarvis@fr.com
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`1180 Peachtree Street NE, 21st Floor
`Atlanta, GA 30309
`Telephone: (404) 892-5005
`
`Elizabeth G.H. Ranks
`Mass Bar No. 693679
`ranks@fr.com
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`1 Marina Park Drive
`Boston, MA 02210
`Telephone: (617) 542-5070
`
`J. Michael Huget (P39150)
`Sarah E. Waidelich (P80225)
`HONIGMAN LLP
`315 East Eisenhower Parkway
`Suite 100
`Ann Arbor, MI 48108
`Tel: (734) 418-4254
`Fax: (734) 418-4255
`mhuget@honigman.com,
`swaidelich@honigman.com
`
`Counsel for Defendant Tesla, Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 224, PageID.12238 Filed 01/25/24 Page 5 of 10
`
`By: /s/ John T. Johnson
`
`John T. Johnson
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`7 Times Square, 20th Floor
`New York, NY 10036
`Telephone: (212) 765-5070
`Facsimile: (212) 258-2291
`E-mail: jjohnson@fr.com
`
`Ruffin B. Cordell
`Benjamin J Christoff
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`1000 Maine Avenue, S.W.
`Suite 1000 Washington, D.C. 20024
`Telephone: (202) 783-5070
`Facsimile: (202) 783-2331
`E-mail: Cordell@fr.com
`
`Thomas Branigan (P41774)
`Bowman and Brooke LLP
`41000 Woodard Avenue, 200 East
`Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304
`Telephone: (248) 205-3300
`Facsimile: (248) 205-3399
`thomas.branigan@bowmanandbrooke.com
`
`Counsel for Defendants
`American Honda Motor Co., Inc. and Honda
`Development & Manufacturing of America,
`LLC
`
`
`
`
`
`29143803v1
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 224, PageID.12239 Filed 01/25/24 Page 6 of 10
`
`By: /s/ Paul R. Steadman
`
`Paul R. Steadman (Illinois Bar No.
`6238160)
`Matthew Satchwell (Illinois Bar No.
`6290672)
`Shuzo Maruyama (Illinois Bar No.
`6313434)
`DLA PIPER LLP (US)
`444 West Lake Street, Suite 900
`Chicago, IL 60606-0089
`Tel: 312.368.2135
`Fax: 312.251.2850
`paul.steadman@us.dlapiper.com
`matthew.satchwell@us.dlapiper.com
`shuzo.maruyama@us.dlapiper.com
`
`Brian Erickson (Texas Bar No.
`24012594)
`DLA PIPER LLP (US)
`303 Colorado Street, Suite 3000
`Austin, Texas 78701-4653
`Tel: 512.457.7059
`Fax: 512.721.2263
`brian.erickson@us.dlapiper.com
`
`Counsel for Defendants Toyota Motor
`North America, Inc., Toyota Motor Sales,
`U.S.A., Inc. and Toyota Motor Engineering
`& Manufacturing North America, Inc. and
`Toyota Motor Credit Corporation
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`29143803v1
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 224, PageID.12240 Filed 01/25/24 Page 7 of 10
`
`By: /s/ Peter J. Brennan
`
`Reginald J. Hill (IL Bar #6225173)
`Peter J. Brennan (IL Bar #6190873)
`JENNER & BLOCK LLP
`353 N. Clark St.
`Chicago, IL 60654
`Tel: 312-222-9350
`rhill@jenner.com
`pbrennan@jenner.com
`
`Counsel for Defendants
`NISSAN NORTH AMERICA INC. AND
`NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE
`CORPORATION a/k/a NISSAN MOTOR
`ACCEPTANCE COMPANY LLC
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`29143803v1
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 224, PageID.12241 Filed 01/25/24 Page 8 of 10
`
`By: /s/ John S. LeRoy
`
`John S. LeRoy (P61964)
`Christopher C. Smith (P73936)
`BROOKS KUSHMAN P.C.
`1000 Town Center, 22nd Floor
`Southfield, MI 48075
`Telephone: (248) 358-4400
`jleroy@brookskushman.com
`csmith@brookskushman.com
`
`Counsel for Defendant Ford Motor
`Company
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`29143803v1
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 224, PageID.12242 Filed 01/25/24 Page 9 of 10
`
`By: /s/ Robert C. Tapparo
`
`Patrick G. Seyferth (P47575)
`Susan M. McKeever (P73533)
`BUSH SEYFERTH PLLC
`100 W. Big Beaver Rd, Suite 400
`Troy, MI 48084
`(248) 822-780
`seyferth@bsplaw.com
`mckeever@bsplaw.com
`
`Frank C. Cimino, Jr.
`Megan S. Woodworth
`Jonathan L. Falkler
`Robert C. Tapparo
`VENABLE LLP
`600 Massachusetts Avenue, NW
`Washington, DC 20001
`(202) 344-4569
`FCCimino@Venable.com
`MSWoodworth@Venable.com
`JLFalkler@Venable.com
`RCTapparo@Venable.com
`
`Counsel for Defendant FCA US LLC
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`29143803v1
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 224, PageID.12243 Filed 01/25/24 Page 10 of 10
`
`By: /s/ Christopher S. Stewart
`
`Jason D. Cassady, TX Bar #24045625
`Email: jcassady@caldwellcc.com
`Christopher S. Stewart, TX Bar
`#24079399
`Email: cstewart@caldwellcc.com
`Daniel R. Pearson, TX Bar #24070398
`Email: dpearson@caldwellcc.com
`Bailey A. Blaies, TX Bar #24109297
`Email: bblaies@caldwellcc.com
`
`CALDWELL CASSADY CURRY
`P.C.
`2121 N. Pearl St., Suite 1200
`Dallas, Texas 75201
`Telephone: (214) 888-4848
`
`Jaye Quadrozzi (P71646)
`YOUNG, GARCIA &
`QUADROZZI, PC
`2775 Stansbury Blvd., Suite 125
`Farmington Hills, MI 48334
`Telephone: (248) 353-8620
`Email: quadrozzi@youngpc.com
`
`Counsel for Plaintiff
`NEO WIRELESS, LLC
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`29143803v1
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
