throbber
Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 209-6, PageID.11931 Filed 12/29/23 Page 1 of 3
`
`Exhibit E
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 209-6, PageID.11932 Filed 12/29/23 Page 2 of 3
`
`Bjorn Blomquist
`Russell W. Warnick; Neo_JDG_All_Defs@fr.com
`neowireless@caldwellcc.com
`RE: In Re Neo Wireless, LLC Patent Litig., Case No. 2:22-md-3034-TGB - Notice of Subpoena to AT&T Mobility
`Wednesday, March 22, 2023 3:25:23 PM
`image001.png
`image002.png
`
`From:
`To:
`Cc:
`Subject:
`Date:
`Attachments:
`
`Counsel,
`
`I write on behalf of Plaintiff Neo Wireless, LLC as to the subpoena served on AT&T Mobility LLC
`(“AT&T”):
`
`Plaintiff objects to the burden and expense on the parties of this subpoena, given that many of the
`topics are overly broad, unduly burdensome, not proportional to the needs of this case, and seeking
`information that is not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. In
`particular, the requests aimed at uncovering additional prior art are untimely in view of the Court’s
`Scheduling Order, which required Defendants to serve invalidity contentions over four months ago
`and conduct timely discovery to update them as soon as possible. Given that Defendants did not, in
`three months of fact discovery prior to that deadline, even serve this subpoena, Defendants waived
`any claim of diligence in seeking to uncover additional system art after the deadline. Similarly, the
`requests aimed at pursuing Defendants’ baseless derivation or related unenforceability theories are
`unduly burdensome, untimely, and improper given that Defendants’ theories lack any foundation and
`fail as a matter of law. Defendants did not serve this subpoena in the four months of fact discovery
`prior to the pleading of their baseless derivation and unenforceability theories, and they now seek to
`conduct a fishing expedition in an attempt to shore up their improperly pleaded claims.
`
`Please let us know immediately if the noticed deposition is going forward, or when it is scheduled as
`soon as Defendants and AT&T determine an alternate date. Should the deposition go forward,
`Plaintiff reserves the right to serve a companion subpoena to AT&T for the sake of efficiency. Please
`also produce or include us in all communications with AT&T about the subpoena.
`
`Sincerely,
`-Bjorn
`
`Bjorn A. Blomquist /// Caldwell Cassady Curry P.C.
`2121 North Pearl Street, Suite 1200
`Dallas, Texas 75201
`Office Line: (214) 888-4960
`Mobile: (608) 790-0902
`bblomquist@caldwellcc.com
`
`NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY:
`The information contained in this e-mail is subject to the ATTORNEY-CLIENT and ATTORNEY WORK
`PRODUCT PRIVILEGE and is CONFIDENTIAL. It is intended only for the recipient(s) designated above. Any
`dissemination, distribution, copying, use or reliance upon the information contained in and transmitted with this e-
`mail by or to anyone other than the recipient(s) designated by the sender is unauthorized and prohibited. If you have
`received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply immediately. Any e-mail erroneously transmitted to
`you should be immediately destroyed.
`
`From: Russell W. Warnick <rwarnick@sternekessler.com>
`Sent: Wednesday, March 8, 2023 11:26 AM
`To: neowireless@caldwellcc.com
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 209-6, PageID.11933 Filed 12/29/23 Page 3 of 3
`
`Cc: Neo_JDG_All_Defs@fr.com
`Subject: In Re Neo Wireless, LLC Patent Litig., Case No. 2:22-md-3034-TGB - Notice of Subpoena to
`AT&T Mobility
`
`Counsel, please find attached:
`
`Notice of Subpoena to AT&T Mobility LLC
`
`Regards,
`
`Russell W. Warnick (he/him)
`Paralegal
`Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
`1100 New York Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20005
`
`Email: rwarnick@sternekessler.com
`Direct: 202.772.8883 Main: 202.371.2600
`
`Notice: The information in this electronic transmission (including any attachments)
`may contain confidential or legally privileged information and is intended solely for
`the individual(s) or entity(ies) named above. If you are not an intended recipient or
`an authorized agent, you are hereby notified that reading, distributing, or otherwise
`disseminating or copying, or taking any action based on the contents of this
`transmission is strictly prohibited. Any unauthorized interception of this
`transmission is illegal under the law. If you have received this transmission in error,
`please immediately notify the sender by return email and then destroy all copies of
`the transmission.
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket