USA v. Moore-Bush et al

3:18-cr-30001 | Massachusetts District Court

Interested in this case?

Request a Demo Track this case, and find millions of cases like it, let us show you how.
Division Springfield
Filed Jan. 11, 2018
The docket is incomplete. Sign up for verified information.
Filing Date # Docket Text
4/24/2025~Util - Set/Reset Hearings
3/27/2025~Util - Set/Reset Hearings
3/26/2025Notice of Hearing for Initial Appearance
3/4/2025CJA 20 - Appointment
2/21/2025Notice of Hearing for Initial Appearance, Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge
2/11/2025Notice of Reassignment, Order
12/13/2024CJA 20 - Appointment
12/4/2024Notice of Hearing
11/22/2024Order on Motion to Transfer Case
11/21/2024Transfer Case
11/15/2024Pretrial Services/Probation - Request/Memo/Summons/Warrant
10/2/2024Mail Returned
9/19/2024Order on Motion for Release from Custody
9/13/2024Hearing
9/13/2024Notice of change of address or firm
8/27/2024Copy Mailed, Order on Motion for Release from Custody
8/27/2024Mail Returned
8/14/2024Judgment of Revocation
8/9/2024Release from Custody
7/25/2024Pretrial Services/Probation - Request/Memo/Summons/Warrant
7/25/2024Pretrial Services/Probation - Request/Memo/Summons/Warrant
7/15/2024Order
7/15/2024Order
7/9/2024Pretrial Services/Probation - Request/Memo/Summons/Warrant
7/9/2024Pretrial Services/Probation - Request/Memo/Summons/Warrant
6/28/2024Miscellaneous Relief
5/29/2024Order on Motion to Correct
5/27/2024Correct
5/22/2024Letter- non-motion
4/1/2024Judgment of Revocation
4/1/2024Judgment
4/1/2024Judgment
4/1/2024Order on Sealed Motion, Order on Sealed Motion, Order on Motion for Departure, Order on Sealed Motion
4/1/2024Plea Agreement
3/22/2024Sentencing Memorandum
3/21/2024Response - unrelated to a motion
2/14/2024Notice of Hearing
2/7/2024Order On Excludable Delay, Notice of Hearing, Order On Excludable Delay, Notice of Hearing
1/26/2024Order Of Detention
1/22/2024Order on Motion to Appoint Counsel, Notice of Hearing
1/19/2024Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge
1/17/2024Appoint Counsel
1/16/2024Notice Canceling Hearing or Other Deadline, Notice Canceling Hearing or Other Deadline
1/10/2024Notice of Hearing, Notice of Hearing
12/19/2023Notice Canceling Hearing or Other Deadline, Notice Canceling Hearing or Other Deadline
12/19/2023Sealed Document
12/19/2023Sealed Motion
12/19/2023Sealed Document
12/19/2023Sealed Motion
12/18/2023Plea Agreement
12/12/2023Dismissal by Government
12/6/2023Notice of Hearing, Notice of Hearing
11/28/2023Information - Felony
11/28/2023Information - Felony
11/3/2023Order on Motion to Travel
11/2/2023Travel
10/13/2023Order On Excludable Delay, Order on Motion to Continue
10/12/2023Continue
10/10/2023Notice Canceling Hearing or Other Deadline, Notice Canceling Hearing or Other Deadline, Order on Motion to Withdraw Plea of Guilty, Order on Motion to Withdraw Plea of Guilty
10/4/2023Order on Motion for Early Termination of Probation
10/4/2023Withdraw Plea of Guilty
9/26/2023Pretrial Services/Probation - Request/Memo/Summons/Warrant
9/23/2023Withdraw Plea of Guilty
9/6/2023Early Termination of Probation
8/17/2023Order
8/11/2023Order Canceling Deadline
8/4/2023Order on Motion to Travel
8/1/2023Pretrial Services/Probation - Request/Memo/Summons/Warrant
7/27/2023Travel
7/18/2023Order on Motion to Travel
7/17/2023Travel
7/17/2023Order Canceling Deadline
7/6/2023Judgment
6/23/2023Order Canceling Deadline
6/21/2023Notice of Hearing
6/14/2023Order
6/13/2023Pretrial Services/Probation Request
6/13/2023Order On Excludable Delay, Notice of Rescheduling, Order on Motion to Continue
6/12/2023Continue
6/2/2023Plea Agreement
5/25/2023Writ of Certiorari Denied - Supreme Court
5/23/2023Notice of Hearing
5/16/2023Order For Forfeiture of Property
5/16/2023Order on Motion for Forfeiture of Property
5/9/2023Miscellaneous Relief
5/6/2023Notice Canceling Hearing or Other Deadline
5/5/2023Memorandum - not related to a motion
4/27/2023Forfeiture of Property
4/19/2023Notice of Hearing, Notice Canceling Hearing or Other Deadline
4/13/2023Information - Felony
4/13/2023Order on Motion to Withdraw Plea of Guilty
4/13/2023Withdraw Plea of Guilty
3/14/2023Order
3/10/2023Notice of Hearing
1/31/2023Order
1/19/2023Order on Motion to Continue
1/19/2023Continue
1/13/2023Notice of Hearing
12/29/2022Judgment
12/21/2022Transcript
12/21/2022Order on Motion for Departure
12/20/2022Modify Conditions of Release
12/20/2022Order on Motion to Modify Conditions of Release
12/16/2022Order on Motion to Seal
12/12/2022Miscellaneous Relief
12/12/2022Miscellaneous Relief
12/8/2022Seal Document
12/8/2022Sentencing Memorandum
11/29/2022Case Appealed
11/17/2022Notice of Rescheduling
11/14/2022Order On Excludable Delay
11/2/2022Notice of Filing of Official Transcript
11/2/2022Transcript
10/26/2022Judgment
10/25/2022Order On Excludable Delay, Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, Notice of Hearing, Order on Motion to Substitute Attorney
10/24/2022Substitute Attorney
10/19/2022Miscellaneous Relief
10/18/2022Order on Motion for Leave to File Document, Order on Motion to Dismiss for lack of a Speedy Trial
10/17/2022Reply to Response
10/17/2022Leave to File Document
10/11/2022Opposition to Motion
10/11/2022Notice of Hearing on Motion
10/1/2022Memorandum in Support
9/30/2022Memorandum in Support
9/30/2022Dismiss/Speedy Trial
9/29/2022Sentencing Memorandum
9/29/2022Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File
9/28/2022Extension of Time to File Document
9/28/2022Pretrial Services/Probation Request
9/28/2022Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief
9/28/2022Miscellaneous Relief
9/27/2022Notice of Reassignment
9/26/2022Miscellaneous Relief
9/26/2022Order For Forfeiture of Property
9/26/2022Order on Motion for Forfeiture of Property
9/23/2022Forfeiture of Property
9/23/2022Notice of Rescheduling
9/12/2022Notice of Attorney Appearance - USA
7/28/2022Order On Excludable Delay
7/19/2022Order On Excludable Delay, Notice of Hearing
7/13/2022Procedural Order re Sentencing Hearing
7/12/2022Plea Agreement
7/8/2022Notice of Rescheduling
7/5/2022Notice of Hearing
7/3/2022USCA Mandate
6/30/2022Notice of Hearing
6/29/2022Information - Felony
6/22/2022USCA Mandate
6/10/2022USCA Opinion, USCA Opinion
6/10/2022USCA Order, USCA Order
5/29/2022USCA Judgment
5/29/2022USCA Judgment
5/29/2022USCA Order, USCA Order
2/18/2022Order on Motion to Appoint Counsel
2/16/2022Amended Judgment
2/14/2022Appoint Counsel
2/10/2022Judgment
2/1/2022Sentencing Memorandum
2/1/2022Sentencing Memorandum
2/1/2022Seal
1/24/2022Order on Motion to Modify Conditions of Release
1/21/2022Opposition to Motion
1/14/2022Modify Conditions of Release
9/1/2021Notice of Hearing
12/10/2020USCA Order
12/10/2020USCA Order
6/22/2020Order on Motion for Order
6/18/2020Order on Motion for Release from Custody
6/12/2020Order on Motion for Leave to File Document
6/11/2020Order on Motion for Leave to File Document
6/8/2020Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge
5/19/2020Protective Order
5/19/2020Order on Motion for Protective Order
4/10/2020Order on Motion for Order
4/10/2020Order on Motion for Order
3/25/2020Order on Motion for Release from Custody
3/23/2020Order on Motion to Modify Conditions of Release
3/11/2020Order on Motion to Withdraw Document
3/3/2020~Util - Set/Reset Hearings
12/30/2019~Util - Set/Reset Hearings
12/16/2019Order on Motion for Transcript at Government Expense
12/5/2019Order on Motion to Continue
11/21/2019Order
10/10/2019Statement of Reasons
10/10/2019Judgment
9/27/2019Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File
9/25/2019Order For Forfeiture of Property
9/25/2019Order on Motion for Forfeiture of Property
9/24/2019Protective Order
9/24/2019Order on Motion for Protective Order
8/1/2019Statement of Reasons
8/1/2019Judgment
7/30/2019Order on Motion to Seal Document
7/29/2019Order on Motion to Continue
7/18/2019Order on Motion to Continue
6/5/2019Order on Motion to Continue, Order on Motion for Reconsideration, Order on Motion for Reconsideration, Order on Motion to Continue
6/4/2019Judge William G. Young: ORDER entered. AMENDED MEMORANDUM AND ORDER* (Sonnenberg, Elizabeth)Judge William G. Young: ORDER entered. AMENDED MEMORANDUM AND ORDER* (Sonnenberg, Elizabeth)
6/3/2019Judge William G. Young: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER "In sum, this Court does not rule that the use of a pole camera necessarily constitutes a search. Instead, the Court rules narrowly that several aspects of the Governments use of this Pole Camera does. Those aspects are the Pole Cameras (1) continuous video recording for approximately eight months; (2) focus on the driveway and front of the house; (3) ability to zoom in so close that it can read license plate numbers; and (4) creation of a digitally searchable log. Taken together, these features permit the Government to piece together intimate details of a suspects life. See Carpenter, 138 S. Ct. at 2217 (quoting Jones, 565 U.S. at 415 (Sotomayor, J., concurring)). Therefore, the Court ALLOWS Moore-Bush and Moores motions to suppress evidence obtained directly from the Pole Camera, ECF Nos. 326, 358. Although Moore-Bush and Moore say that the Pole Camera may have led to the discovery of other tainted evidence, they do not identify that evidence for the Court. The Court thus takes no action with regard to evidence collected indirectly from the Pole Camera. SO ORDERED." (Sonnenberg, Elizabeth)Judge William G. Young: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER "In sum, this Court does not rule that the use of a pole camera necessarily constitutes a search. Instead, the Court rules narrowly that several aspects of the Governments use of this Pole Camera does. Those aspects are the Pole Cameras (1) continuous video recording for approximately eight months; (2) focus on the driveway and front of the house; (3) ability to zoom in so close that it can read license plate numbers; and (4) creation of a digitally searchable log. Taken together, these features permit the Government to piece together intimate details of a suspects life. See Carpenter, 138 S. Ct. at 2217 (quoting Jones, 565 U.S. at 415 (Sotomayor, J., concurring)). Therefore, the Court ALLOWS Moore-Bush and Moores motions to suppress evidence obtained directly from the Pole Camera, ECF Nos. 326, 358. Although Moore-Bush and Moore say that the Pole Camera may have led to the discovery of other tainted evidence, they do not identify that evidence for the Court. The Court thus takes no action with regard to evidence collected indirectly from the Pole Camera. SO ORDERED." (Sonnenberg, Elizabeth)Judge William G. Young: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER "In sum, this Court does not rule that the use of a pole camera necessarily constitutes a search. Instead, the Court rules narrowly that several aspects of the Governments use of this Pole Camera does. Those aspects are the Pole Cameras (1) continuous video recording for approximately eight months; (2) focus on the driveway and front of the house; (3) ability to zoom in so close that it can read license plate numbers; and (4) creation of a digitally searchable log. Taken together, these features permit the Government to piece together intimate details of a suspects life. See Carpenter, 138 S. Ct. at 2217 (quoting Jones, 565 U.S. at 415 (Sotomayor, J., concurring)). Therefore, the Court ALLOWS Moore-Bush and Moores motions to suppress evidence obtained directly from the Pole Camera, ECF Nos. 326, 358. Although Moore-Bush and Moore say that the Pole Camera may have led to the discovery of other tainted evidence, they do not identify that evidence for the Court. The Court thus takes no action with regard to evidence collected indirectly from the Pole Camera. SO ORDERED." (Sonnenberg, Elizabeth)Judge William G. Young: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER "In sum, this Court does not rule that the use of a pole camera necessarily constitutes a search. Instead, the Court rules narrowly that several aspects of the Governments use of this Pole Camera does. Those aspects are the Pole Cameras (1) continuous video recording for approximately eight months; (2) focus on the driveway and front of the house; (3) ability to zoom in so close that it can read license plate numbers; and (4) creation of a digitally searchable log. Taken together, these features permit the Government to piece together intimate details of a suspects life. See Carpenter, 138 S. Ct. at 2217 (quoting Jones, 565 U.S. at 415 (Sotomayor, J., concurring)). Therefore, the Court ALLOWS Moore-Bush and Moores motions to suppress evidence obtained directly from the Pole Camera, ECF Nos. 326, 358. Although Moore-Bush and Moore say that the Pole Camera may have led to the discovery of other tainted evidence, they do not identify that evidence for the Court. The Court thus takes no action with regard to evidence collected indirectly from the Pole Camera. SO ORDERED." (Sonnenberg, Elizabeth)Judge William G. Young: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER "In sum, this Court does not rule that the use of a pole camera necessarily constitutes a search. Instead, the Court rules narrowly that several aspects of the Governments use of this Pole Camera does. Those aspects are the Pole Cameras (1) continuous video recording for approximately eight months; (2) focus on the driveway and front of the house; (3) ability to zoom in so close that it can read license plate numbers; and (4) creation of a digitally searchable log. Taken together, these features permit the Government to piece together intimate details of a suspects life. See Carpenter, 138 S. Ct. at 2217 (quoting Jones, 565 U.S. at 415 (Sotomayor, J., concurring)). Therefore, the Court ALLOWS Moore-Bush and Moores motions to suppress evidence obtained directly from the Pole Camera, ECF Nos. 326, 358. Although Moore-Bush and Moore say that the Pole Camera may have led to the discovery of other tainted evidence, they do not identify that evidence for the Court. The Court thus takes no action with regard to evidence collected indirectly from the Pole Camera. SO ORDERED." (Sonnenberg, Elizabeth)Judge William G. Young: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER "In sum, this Court does not rule that the use of a pole camera necessarily constitutes a search. Instead, the Court rules narrowly that several aspects of the Governments use of this Pole Camera does. Those aspects are the Pole Cameras (1) continuous video recording for approximately eight months; (2) focus on the driveway and front of the house; (3) ability to zoom in so close that it can read license plate numbers; and (4) creation of a digitally searchable log. Taken together, these features permit the Government to piece together intimate details of a suspects life. See Carpenter, 138 S. Ct. at 2217 (quoting Jones, 565 U.S. at 415 (Sotomayor, J., concurring)). Therefore, the Court ALLOWS Moore-Bush and Moores motions to suppress evidence obtained directly from the Pole Camera, ECF Nos. 326, 358. Although Moore-Bush and Moore say that the Pole Camera may have led to the discovery of other tainted evidence, they do not identify that evidence for the Court. The Court thus takes no action with regard to evidence collected indirectly from the Pole Camera. SO ORDERED." (Sonnenberg, Elizabeth)Judge William G. Young: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER "In sum, this Court does not rule that the use of a pole camera necessarily constitutes a search. Instead, the Court rules narrowly that several aspects of the Governments use of this Pole Camera does. Those aspects are the Pole Cameras (1) continuous video recording for approximately eight months; (2) focus on the driveway and front of the house; (3) ability to zoom in so close that it can read license plate numbers; and (4) creation of a digitally searchable log. Taken together, these features permit the Government to piece together intimate details of a suspects life. See Carpenter, 138 S. Ct. at 2217 (quoting Jones, 565 U.S. at 415 (Sotomayor, J., concurring)). Therefore, the Court ALLOWS Moore-Bush and Moores motions to suppress evidence obtained directly from the Pole Camera, ECF Nos. 326, 358. Although Moore-Bush and Moore say that the Pole Camera may have led to the discovery of other tainted evidence, they do not identify that evidence for the Court. The Court thus takes no action with regard to evidence collected indirectly from the Pole Camera. SO ORDERED." (Sonnenberg, Elizabeth)Judge William G. Young: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER "In sum, this Court does not rule that the use of a pole camera necessarily constitutes a search. Instead, the Court rules narrowly that several aspects of the Governments use of this Pole Camera does. Those aspects are the Pole Cameras (1) continuous video recording for approximately eight months; (2) focus on the driveway and front of the house; (3) ability to zoom in so close that it can read license plate numbers; and (4) creation of a digitally searchable log. Taken together, these features permit the Government to piece together intimate details of a suspects life. See Carpenter, 138 S. Ct. at 2217 (quoting Jones, 565 U.S. at 415 (Sotomayor, J., concurring)). Therefore, the Court ALLOWS Moore-Bush and Moores motions to suppress evidence obtained directly from the Pole Camera, ECF Nos. 326, 358. Although Moore-Bush and Moore say that the Pole Camera may have led to the discovery of other tainted evidence, they do not identify that evidence for the Court. The Court thus takes no action with regard to evidence collected indirectly from the Pole Camera. SO ORDERED." (Sonnenberg, Elizabeth)Judge William G. Young: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER "In sum, this Court does not rule that the use of a pole camera necessarily constitutes a search. Instead, the Court rules narrowly that several aspects of the Governments use of this Pole Camera does. Those aspects are the Pole Cameras (1) continuous video recording for approximately eight months; (2) focus on the driveway and front of the house; (3) ability to zoom in so close that it can read license plate numbers; and (4) creation of a digitally searchable log. Taken together, these features permit the Government to piece together intimate details of a suspects life. See Carpenter, 138 S. Ct. at 2217 (quoting Jones, 565 U.S. at 415 (Sotomayor, J., concurring)). Therefore, the Court ALLOWS Moore-Bush and Moores motions to suppress evidence obtained directly from the Pole Camera, ECF Nos. 326, 358. Although Moore-Bush and Moore say that the Pole Camera may have led to the discovery of other tainted evidence, they do not identify that evidence for the Court. The Court thus takes no action with regard to evidence collected indirectly from the Pole Camera. SO ORDERED." (Sonnenberg, Elizabeth)
6/3/2019 Judge William G. Young: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER "In sum, this Court does not rule that the use of a pole camera necessarily constitutes a search. Instead, the Court rules narrowly that several aspects of the Governments use of this Pole Camera does. Those aspects are the Pole Cameras (1) continuous video recording for approximately eight months; (2) focus on the driveway and front of the house; (3) ability to zoom in so close that it can read license plate numbers; and (4) cre ation of a digitally searchable log. Taken together, these features permit the Government to piece together intimate details of a suspects life. See Carpenter, 138 S. Ct. at 2217 (quoting Jones, 565 U.S. at 415 (Sotomayor, J., concurring)). Theref ore, the Court ALLOWS Moore-Bush and Moores motions to suppress evidence obtained directly from the Pole Camera, ECF Nos. 326 , 358 . Although Moore-Bush and Moore say that the Pole Camera may have led to the discovery of other tainted evidence, they do not identify that evidence for the Court. The Court thus takes no action with regard to evidence collected indirectly from the Pole Camera. SO ORDERED." (Sonnenberg, Elizabeth)
5/22/2019Order Appointing Federal Defender Program.
5/21/2019Order on Motion to Withdraw as Attorney
5/15/2019Order on Motion for Protective Order, Order on Motion for Protective Order
5/15/2019Protective Order, Protective Order
5/14/2019Procedural Order re Sentencing Hearing
5/14/2019Order on Motion to Suppress, ~Util - Set/Reset Hearings, Order on Motion to Suppress, Order on Motion for Bill of Particulars, Order on Motion for Bill of Particulars, Order on Motion to Suppress, Order on Motion to Suppress, ~Util - Set/Reset Hearings
5/10/2019Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply, Order on Motion for Leave to File Document
5/8/2019Procedural Order re Sentencing Hearing
5/6/2019Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply
5/2/2019Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply
5/1/2019Procedural Order re Sentencing Hearing
4/25/2019Order on Motion for Protective Order
4/25/2019Protective Order
4/23/2019Order on Motion to Seal, Order on Motion to Seal Document, Order on Motion to Seal Document, Order on Motion to Seal, Order on Motion to Sever, Order on Motion to Sever
4/19/2019Order on Motion to Continue
4/18/2019Order on Motion to Unseal Document, Order on Motion to Unseal Document, Order on Motion to Unseal Document, Order on Motion to Unseal Document
2/14/2019Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief
2/5/2019Scheduling Order, Scheduling Order, Scheduling Order, Scheduling Order, Scheduling Order, Scheduling Order, Scheduling Order, Scheduling Order
2/4/2019Order on Motion to Withdraw Document
1/8/2019Order On Excludable Delay
1/8/2019Order on Motion for Detention, Order Of Detention
12/27/2018Order on Motion for Detention
12/27/2018Order On Excludable Delay
12/27/2018Order On Excludable Delay
12/24/2018Order Setting Conditions of Release
12/21/2018Order Setting Conditions of Release
12/21/2018Order on Motion to Unseal Case, Order on Motion to Unseal Case, Order on Motion to Unseal Case, Order on Motion to Unseal Case, Order on Motion to Unseal Case, Order on Motion to Unseal Case, Order on Motion to Unseal Case, Order on Motion to Unseal Case, Order on Motion to Unseal Case, Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge, Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge, Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge, Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge, Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge, Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge, Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge, Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge, Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge
12/20/2018Order on Motion to Seal Document, Order on Motion to Seal Document, Order on Motion to Seal Document, Order on Motion to Seal Document, Order on Motion to Seal Document, Order on Motion to Seal Document, Order on Motion to Seal Document, Order on Motion to Seal Document, Order on Motion to Seal Document
12/20/2018Order Of Recusal, Order Of Recusal, Order Of Recusal, Order Of Recusal, Order Of Recusal, Order Of Recusal, Order Of Recusal, Order Of Recusal, Order Of Recusal
12/20/2018Order Of Recusal, Order Of Recusal, Order Of Recusal, Order Of Recusal, Order Of Recusal, Order Of Recusal, Order Of Recusal, Order Of Recusal, Order Of Recusal
12/19/2018Order On Excludable Delay
12/18/2018Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File
12/17/2018Order on Motion to Continue, Order on Motion to Continue, Order on Motion to Continue, Order on Motion to Continue
12/11/2018Order on Motion to Continue
11/19/2018Order on Motion to Continue
11/15/2018Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply
11/13/2018Order on Motion to Continue
10/29/2018Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply
9/12/2018Order On Excludable Delay, Order On Excludable Delay, Order On Excludable Delay, Order On Excludable Delay, Order On Excludable Delay
9/10/2018Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief
4/9/2018Order On Excludable Delay, Order On Excludable Delay, Order On Excludable Delay, Order On Excludable Delay, Order On Excludable Delay
4/5/2018Order on Motion to Exclude, Order on Motion to Exclude, Order on Motion to Exclude, Order on Motion to Exclude, Order on Motion to Exclude
3/27/2018Order Of Detention
3/19/2018Order Setting Conditions of Release
2/28/2018Order Setting Conditions of Release
2/6/2018Order on Motion to Exclude, Order on Motion to Exclude, Order on Motion to Exclude, Order on Motion to Exclude, Order on Motion to Exclude, Order on Motion for Extension of Time, Order on Motion for Extension of Time, Order on Motion for Extension of Time, Order on Motion for Extension of Time, Order on Motion for Extension of Time
1/30/2018Scheduling Order, Scheduling Order, Scheduling Order, Scheduling Order, Scheduling Order
1/26/2018Order Of Detention
1/26/2018Order on Motion for Detention, Order on Motion for Detention
1/23/2018Order Of Detention
1/23/2018Order Of Detention
1/23/2018Order Of Detention
1/23/2018Order Of Detention
1/17/2018Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge, Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge, Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge, Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge, Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge