throbber
Plaintiffs,
`
`
`v.
`
`ELI LILLY AND COMPANY,
`Defendant.
`
`Civil Action No.
`1:18-cv-12029-ADB
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:18-cv-12029-ADB Document 434 Filed 07/27/22 Page 1 of 4
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
`
`
`
`
`TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS
`INTERNATIONAL GMBH and
`TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS
`USA, INC.,
`
`
`
`
`PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO EXCLUDE CERTAIN OPINIONS OF
`DEFENDANT’S EXPERT DR. ANDREW CHARLES
`
`
`Pursuant to Fed. R. Evid. 702 and 703, Plaintiffs Teva Pharmaceuticals International
`
`GmbH and Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. (collectively, “Teva”) move to exclude certain
`
`opinions of Dr. Andrew Charles. Dr. Charles’ opinions fail to meet the standards for admissibility
`
`under the Federal Rules of Evidence and applicable Supreme Court and Federal Circuit law, and
`
`must be excluded for the reasons provided in Teva’s attached Memorandum. In addition to the
`
`Memorandum, this Motion is supported by the Declaration of Elaine Herrmann Blais.
`
`REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(d), Teva respectfully requests oral argument.
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case 1:18-cv-12029-ADB Document 434 Filed 07/27/22 Page 2 of 4
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
`/s/ Elaine Herrmann Blais
`Douglas J. Kline (BBO# 556680)
`Elaine Herrmann Blais (BBO# 656142)
`Robert Frederickson III (BBO# 670111)
`Joshua S. Weinger (BBO# 690814)
`Alexandra Lu (BBO# 691114)
`Eric T. Romeo (BBO# 691591)
`Kathleen A. McGuinness (BBO# 693760)
`GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
`100 Northern Avenue
`Boston, MA 02210
`Tel.: (617) 570-1000
`Fax: (617) 523-1231
`dkline@goodwinlaw.com
`eblais@goodwinlaw.com
`rfrederickson@goodwinlaw.com
`jweinger@goodwinlaw.com
`alu@goodwinlaw.com
`eromeo@goodwinlaw.com
`kmcguinness@goodwinlaw.com
`
`I. Neel Chatterjee (pro hac vice)
`GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
`601 Marshall St.
`Redwood City, CA 94063
`Tel.: (650) 752-3100
`Fax: (650) 853-1038
`nchatterjee@goodwinlaw.com
`
`Natasha E. Daughtrey (pro hac vice)
`GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
`601 S. Figueroa St.
`Los Angeles, CA 90017
`Tel.: (213) 426-2500
`Fax: (213) 623-1673
`ndaughtrey@goodwinlaw.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiffs
`
`
`
`
`Dated: March 28, 2022
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 1:18-cv-12029-ADB Document 434 Filed 07/27/22 Page 3 of 4
`
`LR 7.1(a)(2) CERTIFICATION
`
`I, Elaine Herrmann Blais, hereby certify that Plaintiffs’ counsel conferred with Defendant’s
`
`counsel regarding this motion and attempted in good faith to resolve or narrow the issues presented
`
`in this motion. Lilly opposes this motion.
`
`/s/ Elaine Herrmann Blais
`Elaine Herrmann Blais
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 1:18-cv-12029-ADB Document 434 Filed 07/27/22 Page 4 of 4
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I, Elaine Hermann Blais, hereby certify that this document filed through the ECF system
`
`will be sent electronically to the registered participants as identified on the Notice of Electronic
`
`Filing (“NEF”) and paper copies will be sent to those indicated as non-registered participants
`
`on July 27, 2022.
`
`/s/ Elaine Herrmann Blais
`Elaine Herrmann Blais (BBO# 656142)
`GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
`100 Northern Avenue
`Boston, MA 02210
`Tel.: (617) 570-1000
`Fax: (617) 523-1231
`eblais@goodwinlaw.com
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket