throbber
Case 1:18-cv-12029-ADB Document 27 Filed 12/12/18 Page 1 of 3
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
`
`TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS
`
`INTERNATIONAL GMBH and
`TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC.
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`
`ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`Case No. 1:18-cv-12029-ADB
`
`DEFENDANT ELI LILLY AND COMPANY’S
`MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A REPLY MEMORANDUM IN FURTHER SUPPORT
`OF ITS MOTION TO TRANSFER, OR, IF NOT TRANSFERRED, THEN TO
`STAY THIS LITIGATION PENDING INTER PARTES REVIEW
`
`Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(b)(3), Defendant Eli Lilly and Company (“Lilly”),
`
`respectfully moves for leave to file a reply memorandum not exceeding ten (10) pages in further
`
`support of its Motion To Transfer, Or, If Not Transferred, Then To Stay This Litigation Pending
`
`Inter Partes Review [Dkt 18]. Lilly will be prepared to file such a reply within ten (10) days of
`
`any order by this Court granting leave.
`
`In their opposition brief [Dkt 26], Plaintiffs raise for the first time various facts and new
`
`contentions regarding the purported relevance of Arteaus Therapeutics, LLC, including citing
`
`seven new documents. A reply brief is necessary in order to correct inaccuracies raised in
`
`Plaintiffs’ opposition brief and to properly address Plaintiffs’ characterization of the cited case
`
`law and arguments not discussed in Lilly’s opening brief.
`
`Therefore, Lilly respectfully requests that the Court enter an order granting leave to file a
`
`ten (10) page reply to the opposition within ten (10) days of such an order.
`
`

`

`Case 1:18-cv-12029-ADB Document 27 Filed 12/12/18 Page 2 of 3
`
`Dated: December 12, 2018
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`ELI LILLY AND COMPANY,
`
`By Its Attorneys,
`
`/s/Andrea L. Martin
`Andrea L. Martin (BBO 666117)
`BURNS & LEVINSON LLP
`125 Summer Street
`Boston, MA 02110-1624
`(617) 345-3000
`
`Charles E. Lipsey (pro hac vice)
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
` GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
`Two Freedom Square
`11955 Freedom Square
`Reston, VA 20190-5675
`
`William B. Raich (pro hac vice)
`Danielle A. Duszczyszyn (pro hac vice)
`Emily R. Gabranski (pro hac vice)
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
` GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
`901 New York Avenue, NW
`Washington, DC 20001-4413
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 1:18-cv-12029-ADB Document 27 Filed 12/12/18 Page 3 of 3
`
`LR 7.1(a)(2) CERTIFICATION
`
`I hereby certify that Lilly’s counsel conferred with Plaintiffs’ counsel by telephone and
`email on December 11, 2018. On December 12, 2018, Plaintiffs’ counsel stated that they oppose
`this motion.
`
`/s/Andrea L. Martin
`Andrea L. Martin
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I, Andrea L. Martin, hereby certify that this document filed through the CM/ECF system
`will be sent electronically to the registered participants as identified on the Notice of Electronic
`Filing (NEF) and paper copies shall be served by first class mail postage prepaid on all counsel
`of record who are not served through the CM/ECF system on December 12, 2018.
`
`/s/Andrea L. Martin
`Andrea L. Martin
`
`3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket