throbber
Case 1:18-cv-12029-ADB Document 173 Filed 10/04/21 Page 1 of 4
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
`
`TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS
`
`INTERNATIONAL GMBH and
`TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC.
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`
`ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`Case No. 1:18-cv-10242-ADB
`
`ASSENTED-TO MOTION FOR LEAVE TO IMPOUND CONFIDENTIAL EXHIBITS
`TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND ANSWER
`
`Pursuant to Local Rule 7.2(d) and the Protective Order [Dkt 58], Defendant, Eli Lilly and
`
`Company (“Lilly” or “Defendant”), hereby moves this Court for an Order to impound or otherwise
`
`seal the following documents relating to Lilly’s forthcoming Motion for Leave to Amend Answer,
`
`on the grounds that these documents contain or reveal Plaintiffs’ Teva Pharmaceuticals
`
`International GmbH and Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. (“Teva” or “Plaintiffs”) and Lilly’s
`
`designated confidential and/or proprietary information. Specifically, the documents to be sealed
`
`are Lilly’s Memorandum of Law In Support of Eli Lilly and Company’s Motion for Leave to
`
`Amend Answer (document no. 1 below) (“Lilly’s Memorandum”), exhibits to Lilly’s
`
`Memorandum and exhibits to the Declaration of Emily R. Gabranski in support of Lilly’s Motion
`
`for Leave to Amend Answer (“Gabranski Declaration”), each of which is listed below. Lilly will
`
`coordinate with Plaintiffs to promptly prepare and file a redacted version of Lilly’ Memorandum
`
`on the public ECF system. The list of documents to be sealed is as follows:
`
`

`

`Case 1:18-cv-12029-ADB Document 173 Filed 10/04/21 Page 2 of 4
`
`1. Memorandum of Law In Support of Defendant Eli Lilly and Company’s Motion for Leave
`to Amend Answer;
`
`2. Eli Lilly and Company’s Amended Answer (to be attached as Exhibit A to Lilly’s
`Memorandum);
`
`3. Eli Lilly and Company’s Amended Answer (redlined version) (to be attached as Exhibit
`B to Lilly’s Memorandum);
`
`4. List of documents produced in this matter and cited in Eli Lilly and Company’s Amended
`Answer (to be attached as Exhibit C to Lilly’s Memorandum);
`
`5. Document produced by Teva on behalf of Joerg Zeller bearing Bates numbers
`Zeller_FREM_00014548-78 (to be attached as Exhibit 1 to Gabranski Declaration);
`
`6. Document produced by Pfizer to Lilly pursuant to a document subpoena bearing Bates
`numbers on behalf of Joerg Zeller bearing Bates numbers LLY-GALCA-0071882-83
`and introduced as Exhibit 51 in the August 20, 2021 deposition of Jaume Pons (to be
`attached as Exhibit 2 to Gabranski Declaration);
`
`7. Document produced by Teva on behalf of Joerg Zeller bearing Bates numbers
`Zeller_FREM_00002542-71 and introduced as Exhibit 60 in the August 20, 2021
`deposition of Jaume Pons (to be attached as Exhibit 3 to Gabranski Declaration);
`
`8. Teva’s objections and responses to Lilly’s Interrogatory Nos. 1-9 and 15-18, served
`September 11, 2020 (to be attached as Exhibit 4 to Gabranski Declaration);
`
`9. Document produced by Teva bearing Bates numbers TEVA_FREM_002234595-605 and
`introduced as Exhibit 66 in the August 20, 2021 deposition of Jaume Pons (to be attached
`as Exhibit 5 to Gabranski Declaration);
`
`10. Document produced by Teva bearing Bates numbers TEVA_FREM_002543790-852 (to
`be attached as Exhibit 6 to Gabranski Declaration);
`
`11. Teva’s objections and responses to Lilly’s Request for Production Nos. 1-56, served
`September 4, 2020 (to be attached as Exhibit 7 to Gabranski Declaration);
`
`12. Email from Lulu Wang to Eric Romeo et al., dated August 24, 2020 (to be attached as
`Exhibit 8 to Gabranski Declaration);
`
`13. Letter from Natasha Daughtrey to Emily Gabranski, dated February 11, 2021 (to be
`attached as Exhibit 9 to Gabranski Declaration);
`
`14. Letter from Natasha Daughtrey to Amana Abdulwakeel, dated December 3, 2020 (to be
`attached as Exhibit 10 to Gabranski Declaration);
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 1:18-cv-12029-ADB Document 173 Filed 10/04/21 Page 3 of 4
`
`15. Letter from Emily Gabranski to Natasha Daughtrey, dated January 20, 2021 (to be attached
`as Exhibit 11 to Gabranski Declaration);
`
`numbers
`bearing Bates
`by Teva
`produced
`document
`a
`of
`16. Excerpt
`TEVA_FREM_002238860-67 (to be attached as Exhibit 12 to Gabranski Declaration);
`
`17. Letter from Amana Abdulwakeel to Natasha Daughtrey, dated March 8, 2021 (to be
`attached as Exhibit 13 to Gabranski Declaration);
`
`18. Letter from Natasha Daughtrey to Amana Abdulwakeel, dated April 6, 2021 (to be
`attached as Exhibit 14 to Gabranski Declaration);
`
`19. Letter from Elaine Blais to Emily Gabranski, dated May 12, 2021 (to be attached as
`Exhibit 15 to Gabranski Declaration);
`
`20. Email from Shaobo Zhu to Ryan O’Quinn et al., dated June 29, 2021 (to be attached as
`Exhibit 16 to Gabranski Declaration); and
`
`21. Excerpted transcript of the deposition of Jaume Pons, taken August 20, 2021 (to be
`attached as Exhibit 17 to Gabranski Declaration).
`
`Lilly proposes that the Order sealing and the documents described above be lifted only in
`
`the instance of a further order of the Court, and that the sealed documents be kept in the clerk’s
`
`nonpublic information file during any post-impoundment period.
`
`WHEREFORE, Defendant respectfully requests that this Court allow this Motion.
`
`Dated: October 4, 2021
`
`/s/Andrea L. Martin
`Andrea L. Martin (BBO 666117)
`BURNS & LEVINSON LLP
`125 High Street
`Boston, MA 02110-1624
`(617) 345-3000
`amartin@burnslev.com
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 1:18-cv-12029-ADB Document 173 Filed 10/04/21 Page 4 of 4
`
`William B. Raich
`Danielle A. Duszczyszyn
`Denise Main
`Pier D. DeRoo
`Daniel F. Roland
`Matthew Luneack
`Yoonjin Lee
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
`GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
`901 New York Avenue, NW
`Washington, DC 20001-4413
`William.Raich@finnegan.com
`Danielle.Duszczyszyn@finnegan.com
`Denise.Main@finnegan.com
`Pier.DeRoo@finnegan.com
`Daniel.Roland@finnegan.com
`Matthew.Luneack@finnegan.com
`Yoonjin.Lee@finnegan.com
`
`Charles E. Lipsey
`Ryan O’Quinn
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
`GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
`1875 Explorer Street
`Suite 800
`Reston, VA 20190-6023
`Charles.Lipsey@finnegan.com
`Oquinnr@finnegan.com
`
`Emily R. Gabranski (BBO 694417)
`Marta Garcia Daneshvar
`Lulu Wang (BBO 704042)
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
`GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
`2 Seaport Lane
`Boston, MA 02210-2001
`Emily.Gabranski@finnegan.com
`Marta.Garcia@finnegan.com
`Lulu.Wang@finnegan.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendant Eli Lilly & Company
`
`LR 7.1(a)(2) CERTIFICATION
`
`I, Andrea L. Martin, hereby certify that Lilly’s counsel met and conferred with Plaintiffs’
`counsel regarding this motion on September 30, 2021; Plaintiffs’ counsel stated on September
`30, 2021 that Plaintiffs do not object/assent to this motion.
`
`/s/Andrea L. Martin
`Andrea L. Martin, Esq.
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I, Andrea L. Martin, hereby certify that this document filed through the ECF system will
`be sent electronically to the registered participants as identified on the Notice of Electronic Filing
`(NEF) and paper copies will be sent to those indicated as non-registered participants on October
`4, 2021.
`
`/s/Andrea L. Martin
`Andrea L. Martin, Esq.
`
`4813-0135-6285.1
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket