throbber
Case 1:18-cv-12029-ADB Document 164 Filed 09/16/21 Page 1 of 7
`
` ÿÿ  ÿ
` 
`ÿ 
`
 ÿ 
ÿ
`
ÿÿ 
`
 ÿÿ
`
` 
`
`ÿ
`ÿÿ
`ÿ !ÿ"#$ÿ
`ÿÿ
`%ÿ&%ÿ'"(#)(**+%ÿ
`(,('ÿ0)(1#ÿ1&ÿ
`2340,456574.!ÿ
`,&ÿ
`ÿ-ÿ.ÿ-%ÿ
`./*/#$"#)&ÿ
`
`89  ÿ ÿ:8
8
` ;ÿ

ÿÿ
`ÿ 
`
`
` 9ÿÿ 
  ÿ 9 
`ÿ ÿ 
`
`ÿ
`'"(#)(**+ÿ/,"ÿ<"=>"0/?)(0"'+ÿ#)/=#")(1#"'ÿ >@ÿ"#$ÿ/,"ÿ<"=>"0/?)(0"'+ÿ%ÿ#0&ÿ
`A01''/0)(,/'B%ÿC/,"DEÿ"#$ÿ./*/#$"#)ÿ'(ÿ(''Bÿ"#$ÿ1>F"#BÿAC(''BDGÿ)1H/)</=ÿI()<ÿ/,"%ÿC)</ÿ
`"=)(/+DE%ÿ)<=1?H<ÿ)</(=ÿ01?#+/'%ÿ</=/@Bÿ+)(F?'")/ÿ"#$ÿ"H=//ÿ"+ÿ*1''1I+&ÿ
`J%ÿ(#ÿ()+ÿ/F)/>@/=ÿ5K%ÿ563ÿ01>F'"(#)ÿ(#ÿ)<(+ÿ>"))/=%ÿ/,"ÿ"++/=)/$ÿ)<")ÿ(''BL+ÿ
`>H"'()BMÿAH"'0"#/N?>"@4H#'>Eÿ(#O/0)(1#ÿF=1$?0)%ÿ1=ÿ?+/+ÿ)</=/1*%ÿ(#*=(#H/+ÿ)</ÿ*1''1I(#Hÿ#(#/ÿ
`F")/#)+2ÿÿ&&ÿ")/#)ÿ1+&ÿ3%P3Q%6RPGÿ3%P7K%QR7Gÿ7%5QQ%7PGÿ7%SR6%QRGÿ7%SRQ%33Gÿ7%33R%76KGÿ
`7%33R%763Gÿ7%376%56Gÿ"#$ÿ7%376%5ÿA01''/0)(,/'B%ÿC)</ÿ")/#)+4(#4?()DE&ÿÿA.T)&ÿ1&ÿ&Eÿ
`J%ÿ(#ÿ()+ÿ1,/>@/=ÿ5%ÿ563ÿ"#+I/=ÿ)1ÿ/,"L+ÿ01>F'"(#)ÿ(#ÿ)<(+ÿ>"))/=%ÿ(''Bÿ
`"++/=)/$%ÿUVWXYÿ[\U[%ÿ"**(=>")(,/ÿ$/*/#+/+ÿ)<")ÿ/"0<ÿ1*ÿ)</ÿ")/#)4(#4?()ÿ"=/ÿ#1)ÿ(#*=(#H/$ÿ"#$ÿ"=/ÿ
`(#,"'($%ÿ"+ÿI/''ÿ"+ÿ01?#)/=0'"(>+ÿ+//T(#Hÿ$/0'"=")1=BÿO?$H>/#)ÿ1*ÿ)</ÿ+">/&ÿÿA.T)&ÿ1&ÿK&Eÿÿÿ
`J%ÿ@Bÿ"=0<ÿS%ÿ5656%ÿ)</ÿ#()/$ÿ)")/+ÿ")/#)ÿ"#$ÿ="$/>"=Tÿ**(0/L+ÿ")/#)ÿ
`=("'ÿ"#$ÿFF/"'ÿ!1"=$ÿAC!DEÿ<"$ÿ(++?/$ÿ*(#"'ÿI=())/#ÿ$/0(+(1#+ÿ(#ÿ"''ÿ]VWXYÿ^[YWX_ÿ/,(/Iÿ
`ÿ
`
`

`

`Case 1:18-cv-12029-ADB Document 164 Filed 09/16/21 Page 2 of 7
`Case 1:18-cv-12029-ADB Document 164 Filed 09/16/21 Page 2 of 7
`
`(“IPR”) proceedingsfiled by Lilly as to certain challenged claimsin each ofthe nine Patents-in-Suit.
`
`(See Dkt. No. 44.)
`
` ÿ
`
ÿ ÿÿÿÿ ÿ

`ÿ
  ÿ
ÿÿ 
ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿÿ
` !!ÿ#$ÿ% ÿ&&ÿ
`'())*+ÿ ÿ*ÿ,-+ÿ.,+ÿ ÿ/ÿ0 
`ÿ ÿ* ÿ
`ÿ ÿ1 
`ÿ0
`
ÿ ÿ
`
` ÿ
 ÿ ÿ ÿ
` ÿ ÿ2*34ÿÿ5
` ÿ
 ÿÿ ÿ ÿÿ
`
ÿ
`6 6ÿ ÿ +ÿ
`ÿ ÿ2*34ÿÿÿ,ÿ ÿ
  ÿ
ÿ ÿ7,
` ÿ ÿ ÿ
` ÿ   ÿÿ 6 ÿÿÿ ÿ
  ÿ
ÿ ÿ ÿ
` ÿ
`
` ÿ ÿ
` ÿ ÿ   ÿÿ 6 ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ 6  ÿ
` ÿ

` ÿÿ
` !!ÿ#$ÿ% ÿ,&.+ÿ,&,ÿ
`'())*ÿ ÿ 
` ÿ6 ÿ ÿÿ

`
` ÿÿ6 ÿ
` 
 ÿÿ
`  ÿ ÿ
`
` 5ÿ ÿ
` ÿ ÿÿÿ
`ÿÿ6 5ÿ ÿ ÿ
`
ÿ1 
`ÿ0
`
ÿ
 ÿ
`'())*ÿ2 6ÿÿ
` ÿ ÿ5
`5ÿÿ
`  ÿ  ÿÿÿ ÿ ÿ
` ÿ7ÿ ÿÿ
ÿ
ÿÿ5
` ÿ
` ÿÿ   ÿÿ 6 ÿÿ ÿ
`1 
`ÿ0
`
8ÿ
`'())*ÿ ÿ
`  ÿ  ÿ2 6ÿ
` ÿÿÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ
` ÿ
` ÿ5ÿ
ÿÿ5
` ÿ
` ÿÿ ÿ1 
`ÿ0
`
ÿÿ ÿ   ÿ
` ÿ
` 
` ÿÿ0 
`8ÿ
`'())*ÿÿÿ
` ÿ ÿ5
`5ÿÿ  +ÿ ÿ
`ÿÿÿ
` 
`ÿ  
`
`  ÿ
 
` ÿ 
`ÿ ÿ
ÿ ÿ,--+ÿÿ ÿ
` ÿ
ÿÿ ÿ
` ÿ
` ÿ
` ÿ
` ÿ6ÿÿ
  ÿ
`ÿ9:ÿ/0ÿ;ÿ,.ÿÿ2+ÿ* 
 ÿ ÿ< 
 ÿ
`*  ÿ ÿ ÿ6  ÿ ÿ ÿ  ÿ ÿ0
 ÿ=    ÿ  ÿÿÿ> 
`ÿ
`% 
` 
`
`+ÿ#
` ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ/6
`ÿ ÿ0
` ÿ,??&ÿ  ÿ2ÿ2 ÿ
`,ÿ2 ÿ
  ÿ
ÿ
` @ÿÿ
ÿ,Aÿÿ,:.ÿ ÿ/ÿ ÿ% ÿ?+9&.+-,&8ÿ
ÿ,-ÿÿ,&,?ÿ ÿ/ÿ ÿ
`% ÿ?+--+?:,8ÿ
ÿ,,:ÿ ÿ/ÿ ÿ% ÿ?+B?.+,.8ÿ
ÿ,-ÿÿ,&,?ÿ ÿ/ÿ ÿ% ÿ?+9&-+BB,8ÿ
ÿ,
`,:ÿ ÿ/ÿ ÿ% ÿ?+B?.+,,8ÿÿ
ÿ,?ÿ ÿ/ÿ ÿ% ÿB+:?A+-&?ÿ
`ÿ2 ÿ
  ÿ
ÿ
` @ÿÿ
ÿ,+ÿ9+ÿ&+ÿB,A+ÿ,?+ÿ.+ÿÿ&9,ÿ ÿ/ÿ ÿ% ÿB+:B-+.&:8ÿ
ÿ,,Bÿ ÿ/ÿ
` ÿ% ÿ?+BB&+?.A8ÿÿ
ÿ,,Bÿ ÿ/ÿ ÿ% ÿ?+BB&+?.Bÿ
`ÿ
`
`! The challenged claims are: claims 1-7 and 15-20 of U.S. Patent No. 9,340,614; claims 1-6 and 14-19 of U.S. Patent
`No. 9,266,951; claims 1-15 of U.S. Patent No. 9,890,210; claims 1-6 and 14-19 of U.S. Patent No. 9,346,881; claims 1-
`15 of U.S. Patent No. 9,890,211; and claims 1-9 of U.S. Patent No. 8,597,649.
`? The challenged claimsare: claims 1, 3, 4, 8-17, 19, 20, and 24-31 of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,586,045; claims 1-18 of U.S.
`Patent No. 9,884,907; and claims 1-18 of U.S. Patent No. 9,884,908.
`
`WHEREAS,on August 16, 2021, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued
`
`three decisions on appeal from the PTAB’s final written decisions in the nine IPR proceedings
`
`involving the Patents-in-Suit, affirming the PTAB’s findings that (1) the challenged claimsofsix!
`
`of the Patents-in-Suit are unpatentable as obvious and (2) the challenged claims of the remaining
`
`three” Patents-in-Suit are not unpatentable as obvious on the single obviousness ground considered.
`
`(See Dkt. Nos. 140, 141.)
`
`WHEREAStheparties have met and conferred and have reached an agreementto narrow the
`
`issues pending in this matter in view of the recent Federal Circuit decisions.
`
`WHEREASTevahasagreed to withdraw its infringement allegations against Lilly based on
`
`the six Patents-in-Suit that contain claims that were affirmed as unpatentable as obvious by the
`
`Federal Circuit;
`
`WHEREASthe infringement allegations Teva brought against Lilly based on the three
`
`Patents-in-Suit with claims that were affirmed by the Federal Circuit as not unpatentable remain
`
`before this Court;
`
`WHEREASLilly has agreed to withdraw its allegations, set forth in its preliminary patent-
`
`related disclosures pursuant to Local Rule 16.6(d), that the asserted claims in the remaining three
`
`Patents-in-Suit are invalid as anticipated under 35 U.S.C. § 102 by Tan, Application of Monoclonal
`
`Antibodies to the Investigation of the Role of Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide as a Vasodilatory
`
`Neurotransmitter, Dissertation Submitted to the University of Cambridge (1994) (“the Tan Thesis’)
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 1:18-cv-12029-ADB Document 164 Filed 09/16/21 Page 3 of 7
`Case 1:18-cv-12029-ADB Document 164 Filed 09/16/21 Page 3 of 7
`
`and/or rendered obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103 by the Tan Thesis alone or in combination with one
`
`or more of the following references:
`
`Lassenet al., CGRP May Play a Causative Role in Migraine, Cephalalgia (2002) 22:
`54-61 (“Lassen’’);
`
`Doods et al., Pharmacological Profile of BIBN4096BS, the First Selective Small
`Molecule CGRP Antagonist, Br. J. Pharmacol. (2000) 129: 420-423 (“Doods”);
`
`Olesen et al., Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Receptor Antagonist BIBN 4096 BS
`for the Acute Treatment of Migraine, N. Engl. J. Med. (2004) 350: 1104-1110
`(“Olesen”);
`
`Petersen et al., BIBN4096BS Antagonizes Human a-Calcitonin Gene Related
`Peptide-Induced Headache and Extracerebral Artery Dilation, Clinical Pharmacology
`& Therapeutics: (2005) 77(3): 202-213 (“Petersen 2005”);
`
` ÿ ÿ
` 
ÿ
ÿÿÿÿÿ ÿÿ ÿ ÿ ÿÿ ÿ   ÿ ÿ ÿ
`ÿÿÿÿ ÿ  ÿ
`!"  ÿÿ#ÿ$%&ÿ'ÿ&ÿÿ

`ÿ%ÿ ÿ'  #ÿ( ÿ)**+ÿ** ÿ
`,-.ÿ)/"  0+1ÿ
`!2 ÿÿ#ÿ& ÿ& ÿÿ3435,6.3#ÿÿ7  ÿ
`ÿÿ
`'
ÿ$%&ÿ8  #ÿ3ÿ9ÿ&ÿ)*+ÿ*6 ÿ,*-,*ÿ)/2 0+1ÿ
`!:  ÿÿ#ÿ  ÿ$ -%ÿ&( ÿ%(ÿ8  ÿ3435ÿ,6.ÿ3ÿ
`ÿÿ8
ÿ ÿÿ'  #ÿ5ÿ; ÿ9ÿ'ÿ)*,+ÿ ÿ,-ÿ
`)/:  0+1ÿ
`!<=>=?@=Aÿ=>ÿCDEFÿGHGIJKLMGNÿOA>CPQARS=@ÿTUVCAÿWXYCDZR>QARAÿ[=A=ÿ\=DC>=]ÿ
`&( -4 
ÿ^ÿ ÿ;_ ÿ8ÿ2   #ÿ ÿ&ÿ
``ÿ(
  ÿ)*+ÿaa)+ ÿ**-*ÿ)/&  ÿ*0+1ÿ
`!'  ÿÿ#ÿ4    ÿÿ5
 ÿ3ÿ7ÿ4   ÿ ÿÿ%ÿ ÿ
`2
ÿ'ÿ ÿÿ$%&-3  ÿ( #ÿ( ÿ)*+ÿ* ÿ6*ÿ)7**+ÿ
`)/'  0+1ÿ
`!
`ÿÿ#ÿ&b   ÿÿ'  ÿ4

 ÿ$#ÿ7) c+*#ÿ ÿ
`7 cÿ ÿ' #ÿ ÿ% ÿ)6d.+ÿ,. ÿ6.6-6adÿ)/
`0+1ÿ
`!e  #ÿ  ÿ$ -%ÿ&( ÿ ÿ  ÿ%( ÿ'
ÿ
`$   #ÿ& #ÿ&( #ÿ ÿ(
 ÿ&   #ÿaÿ;  ÿ
`%
`  ÿ#ÿfdÿ)66.+ÿ)/e  0+1ÿ ÿ
`!g
 ÿÿ#ÿÿ& ÿ5ÿ.#d#aÿ3#ÿ
ÿ9 ÿ#ÿ*ÿ)/g
 0+1ÿ
`e^;%;8ÿÿ&  cÿ   ÿ ÿ  ÿÿ ÿ(  ÿ  ÿÿ
`
`
ÿh
 #ÿ ÿ
`#ÿÿ" ÿ ÿ/ 
 ÿ ((ÿÿ  ÿ( ÿÿ  ÿ
`
`  ÿ  0ÿ ÿÿÿ ÿ  ÿÿÿÿ&  - -
ÿ
(ÿ ÿÿ7ÿ
` 
ÿÿ)2bÿ5ÿ,+ÿ
`5:e#ÿ^;%;7:%;#ÿ45ÿ%;:$544:5ÿ:7ÿ^;ÿ7;2;%8"ÿ4%4cÿ2;44:5ÿ
`:5ÿ8&&;8"ÿ7%:'ÿ^;ÿ4&%ÿ&%:;;245$#ÿ4ÿ4ÿ^;%;3iÿ4&"8;2ÿ852ÿ8$%;;2#ÿ
` ÿ ÿ  ÿÿ&  ÿ#ÿ ÿ
hÿÿÿ((
`ÿÿÿ
#ÿ ÿ ÿÿ
`8ÿ  #ÿ
  #ÿ ÿ  ÿ ÿÿÿ& ÿ5 ÿd#6a#.,61ÿ
`8
`6#*..#61ÿ6#,#.,1ÿ6#,.#dd1ÿ6#d6#*1ÿÿ6#d6#*ÿ ÿ
`c ÿ( ÿ)2bÿ5ÿ+#ÿ" c ÿ
`ÿ
`
`Messlingeret al., Inhibition of Neurogenic Blood Flow Increases in the Rat Cranial
`Dura Mater by a CGRP-Binding Spiegelmer, Cephalalgia (2005) 25: 923 (F022)
`(“Messlinger’’);
`
`Covell et al., Pharmacokinetics of Monoclonal Immunoglobulin G1, F(ab’)2, and
`Fab’ in Mice, Cancer Res. (1986) 46: 3969-3978 (“Covell”);
`
`Wimalawansa, Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide and its Receptors: Molecular
`Genetics, Physiology, Pathophysiology, and Therapeutic Potentials, 17 Endocrine
`Reviews 5, 533-85 (1996) (“Wimalawansa”); and
`
`Queenet al., U.S. Patent No. 6,180,370 B1, issued Jan. 30, 2001 (“Queen”);
`
`WHEREAStheParties’ aforementioned agreement renders moot any potential motion for
`
`summary judgment, by Teva, that Lilly is “statutorily estopped from asserting prior art based
`
`invalidity defenses” as to the asserted claims of the three Patents-in-Suit upheld by the Federal
`
`Circuit. (Dkt. No. 141.)
`
`NOW, THEREFORE, IN RECOGNITION OF THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT’S DECISIONS
`
`ON APPEAL FROM THE IPR PROCEEDINGS,IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED,
`
`by and between the Parties hereto, and subject to the approval of the Court, as follows:
`
`A.
`
`All claims, counterclaims, and defenses relating to U.S. Patent Nos. 8,597,649;
`
`9,266,951; 9,340,614; 9,346,881; 9,890,210; or 9,890,211 in Teva’s Complaint (Dkt. No. 1), Lilly’s
`
`

`

`Case 1:18-cv-12029-ADB Document 164 Filed 09/16/21 Page 4 of 7
`Case 1:18-cv-12029-ADB Document 164 Filed 09/16/21 Page 4 of 7
`
`Answer to Teva’s Complaint (Dkt No. 17), and Teva’s Answer to Counterclaims (Dkt. No. 25) are
`
`hereby dismissed with prejudice.’
`
`B.
`
`Lilly will not assert that U.S. Patent Nos. 8,586,045, 9,884,907, and 9,884,908 are
`
`invalid as anticipated under 35 U.S.C. § 102 by the Tan Thesis or rendered obvious under 35 U.S.C.
`
`§ 103 by the Tan Thesis alone or in combination with one or more of Lassen, Doods, Olesen,
`
`Petersen 2005, Messlinger, Covell, Wimalawansa, and Queen, and hereby withdraws the
`
`correspondingportionsofits preliminary patent-related disclosures pursuant to Local Rule 16.6(d).*
`
`C.
`
`The Parties shall bear their own costs and attorney fees in connection with the
`
`claims and defenses dismissed or withdrawn by this Stipulation and Order.
`
` ÿ ÿ
`
ÿ 
 ÿÿ ÿÿ
ÿ
`
ÿ ÿ ÿ  
ÿÿ ÿ ÿ
ÿ
`!"#ÿÿ!ÿ$%
`&
`'#ÿÿ ÿ
ÿ!
ÿ()ÿ*
 ÿ ÿ+ +,- ÿ.++.-ÿ
ÿ.++.-+ÿ
ÿ
`
ÿ
ÿ

ÿ ÿ% ÿ()ÿ/ÿ-ÿ"#ÿ!ÿ
`
ÿ
`!ÿ ÿ ÿ "  ÿ ÿ% ÿ()ÿ
`/ÿ-%ÿ"#ÿ!ÿ
`
ÿ
`!ÿ
 ÿ ÿ ÿ "
 ÿ!ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ 0ÿ'
 ÿ ÿ1 ÿ
`* ÿ-- ÿ2 3ÿ ÿ4



ÿ
ÿ5 ÿ
ÿ!"#ÿ!
ÿ!ÿ
`   3ÿ  ÿ 0ÿÿ
#ÿ
 6
ÿ ÿ
ÿ ÿ' 
ÿ7ÿ,,
`
`
`
`!ÿ*
ÿ!
ÿ"
ÿ!ÿ  ÿ ÿ
ÿ
  #ÿ0ÿ ÿ  ÿ!ÿ!ÿ
`
ÿ
ÿ0 ÿÿ ÿ!
 ÿ"#ÿ!ÿ)
 ÿ
ÿ1ÿ
`8
`ÿ8)ÿ)1ÿ)
`8*('
`9:ÿ
`
:ÿ)"ÿ ÿ-ÿ
`;;ÿ<=>?@AÿC@?D?@EFGH=IÿJJJ
`SHSÿTID@?UÿVWÿXU@AEIÿ
` 3
ÿKÿL ÿ&&1Mÿ ,,+-ÿÿ
` 
ÿ'ÿ2
 ÿ&&1Mÿ,,,ÿ
`9
 ÿN
ÿ&
ÿ&&1Mÿ, ,ÿÿ
`&(7)ÿYÿ'9Z8)1ÿ''*ÿ
` ÿN3!ÿ)ÿ
`7 "ÿO ÿ888ÿ&&1Mÿ,-ÿ
`&  ÿ2ÿ--6,ÿ
`K !
ÿ)ÿ4 3ÿ&&1Mÿ,.-+ÿ
`,ÿ% 6%---ÿ
`P

ÿ'ÿ&&1Mÿ,.ÿ
`

 ["   ÿ
`9ÿ
`ÿ7  ÿ&&1Mÿ,. .ÿ
`L
! ÿÿ2Q ÿ&&1Mÿ,.%,-ÿ
`!
ÿ9ÿ'#ÿ
`)!
" ÿR!ÿ&&1Mÿ,.,,.ÿ
`7#
ÿ1 5 ÿ
`Q1148ÿ*71
`97ÿ''*ÿ
`O89QÿN997)1ÿO7&14ÿ
`--ÿ ! ÿ  ÿ
`&  ÿ2ÿ--ÿ
`Q779
`
`ÿYÿ(97ÿ''*ÿ
`
` ÿO ÿ)\

`
`
`:ÿ,ÿ -6---
`%ÿO ÿ!ÿ

ÿ 0ÿ "ÿ!ÿ
ÿ  
ÿ
ÿ0 ÿ ÿ  ÿ886ZÿZ88868]ÿ]86]8Zÿ
ÿ]Z886
`]Z888ÿ ÿ
`
ÿ 
 ÿÿ ÿÿ  ÿ8886]ÿ
ÿ]Z6]Z888ÿ 0ÿ'# ÿ  
ÿ
ÿÿ
ÿ'# ÿ
`!6
`
` !ÿ
ÿO0 !693! !ÿ00
 ÿ0 ÿ ÿ'# ÿ ÿ ÿ
`
ÿ 
 ÿÿ ÿÿÿO!ÿ
`
`  ÿ]8]ÿ
ÿ]]ÿ 0ÿ'# ÿ  
ÿ
ÿÿ
ÿ'# ÿ
` #6) ÿ
` #6
`!ÿ
ÿ
` #6O !ÿ
`00
 ÿ0 ÿ ÿ'# ÿ ÿ ÿ
`
ÿ 
 ÿÿ ÿÿ
ÿ!"#ÿÿ!ÿ$ÿ ÿ
ÿ
` ÿ!ÿP ÿ!#ÿ
ÿ ÿ()ÿ*
 ÿ + .,.^ÿ.,,. ^ÿ.%-,^ÿ.%,++^ÿ.+.--^ÿ ÿ.+.-ÿÿÿ
`ÿO ÿ!ÿ

ÿ 0ÿ "ÿ'#ÿ
 
 ÿÿ
 ÿÿ0 !ÿ ÿÿ
#ÿ
 6
ÿ ÿ
ÿ
` ÿ' 
ÿ7ÿ,,ÿ!
ÿ()ÿ*
 ÿ ÿ+ +,- ÿ.++.-ÿ
ÿ.++.-+ÿ
ÿ
ÿ0 ÿEIA?@ÿU_EUÿ ÿ
`   !ÿ
ÿ
 ÿ ÿ% ÿ()ÿ/ÿ-0ÿ
ÿÿ
ÿ0 ÿ
 #ÿ
ÿ "   6#ÿ "ÿ
  3ÿÿO ÿ
`!ÿ0!ÿ

ÿ 0ÿ "ÿ ! 3ÿ ÿ!ÿ)
 ÿ
ÿ1ÿÿ!ÿ
ÿ0 ÿ0  3ÿ!ÿ
ÿ
`  
ÿ
ÿ0 ÿÿ!"#ÿ!ÿ$ÿ ÿ!ÿ  ÿ 0ÿ!ÿO
ÿÿ ÿ
  3ÿ ÿ
`!ÿ
 ÿ
ÿ
 ÿ ÿ"#ÿ! ÿ
ÿ  
ÿ
ÿ0 ÿ
`ÿ
`
`3 For the avoidance ofdoubt, these claims, counterclaims, and defenses include Counts II-V, VIII-IX, XI-XIV, and XVII-
`XVIII in Teva’s Complaint (Dkt. No. 1), Counts III-X and XV-XVIII of Lilly’s Counterclaims as well as Lilly’s Third-
`Tenth and Fifteenth-Eighteenth Affirmative Defenses in Lilly’s Answer to Teva’s Complaint (Dkt No. 17). Further,
`Counts XIX and XX of Lilly’s Counterclaims as well as Lilly’s Twenty-Second, Twenty-Third, and Twenty-Fourth
`Affirmative Defenses in Lilly’s Answer to Teva’s Complaint (Dkt No. 17) are hereby dismissed with prejudice, in part,
`to the extent they relate to U.S. Patent Nos. 8,597,649; 9,266,951; 9,340,614; 9,346,881; 9,890,210; or 9,890,211.
`4 For the avoidance of doubt, Lilly maintainsits assertions, set forth in its preliminary patent-related disclosures pursuant
`to Local Rule 16.6(d), that U.S. Patent Nos. 8,586,045, 9,884,907, and 9,884,908 are invalid for, inter alia, improper
`inventorship and derivation under 35 U.S.C. § 102(f) as well as for statutory and obviousness-type double patenting. For
`the further avoidance of doubt, nothing in this Stipulation and Order precludes the parties from referencing the claims,
`counterclaims and defenses dismissed hereby with prejudice, or the content ofthe Federal Circuit decisions pertaining to
`the patents and assertions covered by those claims, counterclaims, and defenses.
`
`IT IS SO STIPULATED:
`
`Dated: September 15, 2021
`
`/s/ Robert Frederickson IT
`Douglas J. Kline (BBO# 556680)
`Elaine Herrmann Blais (BBO# 656142)
`Robert Frederickson III (BBO# 670111)
`Joshua S. Weinger (BBO# 690814)
`Alexandra Lu (BBO# 691114)
`Eric T. Romeo (BBO# 691591)
`Kathleen A. McGuinness (BBO# 693760)
`Shaobo Zhu (BBO# 697669)
`GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
`100 Northern Avenue
`Boston, MA 02210
`Tel.: (617) 570-1000
`
`/s/Andrea L. Martin
`Andrea L. Martin (BBO# 666117)
`BURNS & LEVINSON LLP
`125 High Street
`Boston, MA 02110-1624
`(617) 345-3000
`amartin@burnslev.com
`
`Charles E. Lipsey
`Ryan O’ Quinn
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
`GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
`Two Freedom Square
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 1:18-cv-12029-ADB Document 164 Filed 09/16/21 Page 5 of 7
`
` ÿ
`ÿ

ÿ
` ÿ
`  ÿ
` ÿ
` ÿ
`   ÿ
` ÿ
`  ÿ
`!"  ÿ
`#ÿ$ÿ%" &&ÿ'()ÿ+,-ÿ./-0
`ÿÿ
`12234#$ÿ562%786ÿ995ÿ
`:ÿ; " ÿ<&ÿ
`6ÿ%&=>ÿ%?ÿ@A:
ÿ
`7ÿ:
`ÿ
::ÿ
` ÿ:
`ÿB
:
Bÿ
`" && ÿ
`$ & " ÿ3 "&=ÿ'()ÿ+,-ÿ./-0
`ÿ
`12234#$ÿ562%786ÿ995ÿ
`:ÿ<ÿ  ÿ<&ÿÿ
`9ÿ?>ÿ%?ÿ@:: ÿ
`7ÿ 

`ÿA  ::ÿ
` ÿ 

`ÿ

ÿ
` "&= ÿ
`CDD)(E0FGÿH)(ÿIJ,/ED/HHGÿ
`
`@ÿÿ<K ÿ
`6&>ÿL?ÿ :@:  ÿ
`%" 9M= ÿ
`6= 2NO  ÿ
`4 ÿPÿ6 "ÿ
`3 ÿ?ÿ3 !!=!=ÿ
`3ÿ; ÿ
`5ÿ3ÿ36ÿ
`3 ÿÿ6 ÿ
`; &&"ÿQÿ9  ÿ
`Rÿ9ÿ
`#$$81?$>ÿS8$386<2$>ÿ?6?P24>ÿ
`1?66877ÿTÿ3U$$86>ÿ995ÿ
`@:ÿ$ÿRÿ?V >ÿ$4ÿ
`4 "&>ÿ3%ÿ ::: AA
ÿ
`4 6 " ÿ
`3 3 !!=!= ÿ
`3;  ÿ
`536 ÿ
`3 6  ÿ
`; &&"9   ÿ
`R9 ÿ
`8=ÿ6ÿ1  ÿPP2Wÿ@AA
`ÿ
`; & ÿ1  ÿ3 "V ÿ
`9  ÿ4 ÿPP2Wÿ :A:A
`ÿ
`#$$81?$>ÿS8$386<2$>ÿ?6?P24>ÿ
`1?66877ÿTÿ3U$$86>ÿ995ÿ
` ÿ< M&ÿ9 ÿ
`P&>ÿ;?ÿ: : ::ÿ
`8=1   ÿ
`; & 1   ÿ
`9  4  ÿ
`; ÿQÿ<& &ÿ
`<  =ÿ;ÿQV ÿ
`89#ÿ9#99Rÿ?$3ÿ%2;5?$Rÿ
`9=ÿ%M &ÿ%&ÿ5 &&ÿ3M&ÿ
`#  M>ÿ#$ÿA Bÿ
`& &X =ÿ
`V X  ==ÿ
`CDD)(E0FGÿH)(ÿY0H0EZ,ED
`
`ÿ
`
`

`

` ÿÿÿ ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ
`
`
ÿ
`
`9/16/2021
`
`ÿ
` ÿÿ ÿÿÿ
`
`
ÿ
`
ÿ  ÿ 
ÿÿ
`
`Case 1:18-cv-12029-ADB Document 164 Filed 09/16/21 Page 6 of 7
`
`ÿ
`
`

`

`Case 1:18-cv-12029-ADB Document 164 Filed 09/16/21 Page 7 of 7
`Case 1:18-cv-12029-ADB Document 164 Filed 09/16/21 Page 7 of 7
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I, Andrea L. Martin, hereby certify that this documentfiled through the ECF system will be
`
`sent electronically to the registered participants as identified on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
`
`and paper copies will be sent to those indicated as non-registered participants on September 15,
`
`  ÿ
`ÿ 
 ÿ
` ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ !"ÿ#ÿ !$ÿÿ%&'ÿ"ÿ(##ÿÿ
`ÿ# ##ÿ ÿÿ$ÿ))ÿÿÿ ÿÿ* ÿ ÿ%# ÿ'#$ÿ+*%',ÿ
`ÿ))ÿ )ÿ(##ÿÿÿ ÿ ÿÿÿ -$ÿ))ÿ ÿ.)"ÿ/0ÿ
`121/ÿ
`34356789:ÿ<=ÿ>:8?@6ÿ
`ÿÿÿ%Aÿ
`BCB-CCDC-CEF/ÿ
`
`2021.
`
`4847-8868-8379.1
`
`/s/Andrea L. Martin
`Andrea L. Martin, Esq.
`
`ÿÿ
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket