`#: 5240
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
`MONROE DIVISION
`
`
`CASE NO. 3:24-CV-00122-DCJ-CES-
`RRS
`
`THREE-JUDGE COURT
`
`PHILLIP CALLAIS ET AL
`
`
`VERSUS
`
`NANCY LANDRY
`
`
`
`
`ORDER
`
`
`
`The present matter before the Court is The State of Louisiana’s and The
`
`Secretary of State’s Joint Motion for Stay Pending Appeal [Doc. 222]. Movants ask
`
`the Court to stay its April 30, 2024 Injunction and Reasons for Judgment [Doc. 198]
`
`which enjoins Louisiana’s enacted congressional map, SB8, pending appellate
`
`proceedings in the United States Supreme Court. Rule 62(d) of the Federal Rules of
`
`Civil Procedure provides that:
`
`While an appeal is pending from an interlocutory order or final
`judgment that grants, continues, modifies, refuses, dissolves, or refuses
`to dissolve or modify an injunction, the court may suspend, modify,
`restore, or grant an injunction on terms for bond or other terms that
`secure the opposing party's rights.
`
`The rule, however, goes on to state that:
`
`If the judgment appealed from is rendered by a statutory three-judge
`district court, the order must be made either:
`(1) by that court sitting in open session; or
`(2) by the assent of all its judges, as evidenced by their signatures.
`
`Having polled the three members of the panel, all of the members of the panel
`
`do not assent to a stay of the court's judgment pending appeal. Accordingly,
`
`
`
`Case 3:24-cv-00122-DCJ-CES-RRS Document 223 Filed 05/09/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID
`#: 5241
`
`IT IS ORDERED THAT The State of Louisiana’s and The Secretary of State’s
`
`Joint Motion for Stay Pending Appeal [Doc. 222] is DENIED.
`
`THUS, DONE AND SIGNED in chambers on this 9th day of May, 2024.
`
`_____________________________________
`DAVID C. JOSEPH
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ ChargeStill Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site