throbber
Case 6:17-cv-01217-EFM Document 246 Filed 10/10/22 Page 1 of 3
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
`
`
`
`LOGANTREE LP
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`v.
`
`GARMIN INTERNATIONAL, INC.
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. 6:17-cv-01217
`
`
`
`
`PLAINTIFF LOGANTREE LP’S MOTION IN LIMINE
`
`
`For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum of Law, LoganTree LP moves
`
`for an order in limine on the following:
`
`Argument, evidence, testimony, or suggestion that there is any difference in the
`1.
`operation of the step goal and step counting features between any of the Accused Products.
`
`Argument, evidence, testimony, or suggestion that Garmin’s products do not
`2.
`infringe because they do not record “a time stamp reflecting the time at which a user achieved
`his or her user-defined step goal.”
`
`
`Argument, evidence, or testimony of any comparison between the accused products
`3.
`to prior art.
`
`Argument, evidence, testimony, or suggestion that the asserted claims of the ’576
`4.
`patent are limited to workers compensation claims, back angles on lifting heavy objects, or the
`BackTalk device, or that Garmin does not infringe because Garmin’s Accused Products are
`different from the BackTalk device.
`
`Argument, evidence, testimony, or suggestion that LoganTree took contradictory
`5.
`positions between its statements to the patent office and its infringement contentions in this
`litigation.
`
`Argument, evidence, testimony, or reference to any alleged improprieties in
`6.
`LoganTree’s, or any of its affiliates’, dealings with the IRS or SEC.
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case 6:17-cv-01217-EFM Document 246 Filed 10/10/22 Page 2 of 3
`
`Respectfully submitted by:
`
`FOULSTON SIEFKIN LLP
`
`
`
`
`/s/Clayton J. Kaiser
`Clayton J. Kaiser, Kansas Bar #24066
`1551 N. Waterfront Pkwy, Suite 100
`Wichita, Kansas 67206
`O: 316-291-9539
`F: 866-280-2532
`ckaiser@foulston.com
`
`and
`
`MCCATHERN, PLLC
`
`
`
`/s/ Arnold Shokouhi
`Arnold Shokouhi, TX (pro hac vice)
`James E. Sherry, TX (pro hac vice)
`3710 Rawlins Street, Suite 1600
`Dallas, Texas 75219
`O: 214-443-4478
`F: 214-741-4717
`arnolds@mccathernlaw.com
`jsherry@mccathernlaw.com
`
`and
`
`Ahmad, Zavitsanos & Mensing PC
`/s/ Jason McManis
`
`
`Jason McManis, TX (pro hac vice)
`Weining Bai, TX (pro hac vice)
`Sujeeth Rajavolu (pro hac vice)
`1221 McKinney Street, Suite 2500
`Houston, Texas 77010
`T: 713-655-1101
`F: 713-655-0062
`jmcmanis@azalaw.com
`wbai@azalaw.com
`srajavolu@azalaw.com
`
`Counsel for Plaintiff LoganTree LP
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 6:17-cv-01217-EFM Document 246 Filed 10/10/22 Page 3 of 3
`
`
`/s/Clayton J. Kaiser
`Clayton J. Kaiser, #24066
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on October 10, 2022, I electronically filed a copy of the foregoing
`document with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of
`such filing to counsel of record for all parties in the case.
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket